+ All documents
Home > Documents > Rheological Behavior of Concentrated Solutions EPDM of Some Viscosity Improvers in SAE 10W-40...

Rheological Behavior of Concentrated Solutions EPDM of Some Viscosity Improvers in SAE 10W-40...

Date post: 21-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: unibuc
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
____________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]; Journal of Scientific Research & Reports 3(11): 1518-1533, 2014; Article no. JSRR.2014.11.009 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Rheological Behavior of Concentrated Solutions EPDM of Some Viscosity Improvers in SAE 10W-40 Mineral Oil Ioana Stanciu 1* 1 University of Bucharest, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Physical Chemistry, Bvd. Regina Elisabeta, no. 4-12, 030018 Bucharest, Romania. Author’s contribution This whole work was carried out by the author IS. Received 30 th January 2014 Accepted 23 rd March 2014 Published 28 th April 2014 ABSTRACT Rheology of polymer concentrated solutions represents a cross-disciplinary field, using wide spectra of theoretical tools from physics and chemistry. They effectively thicken the oil at all temperatures, but the increase of viscosity is more pronounced at high temperatures. The lubricating effect is extends across a wider temperature range and the oil becomes thus a multi-grade one. Its viscosity still decreases logarithmically with temperature, but the slope representing the change is lessened. This slope is dependent on the nature and amount of additive to the base oil. The purpose of this study was to obtain automotive multi-grade oils. They have a number of advantages such as easy starting cold engine, reducing wear and decrease the formation of deposits in the engine. Multi-grade oil can be used longer than the engine base oils because they are more highly refined and contain large proportions of additives. The rheological behaviour of the solutions was determined using a Haake VT 550 Viscometers developing shear rates ranging between 3 and 1312 s -1 and measuring viscosities from 10 4 to 10 6 mPa.s when the HV 1 viscosity sensor is used. Rheological measurements of 3; 6; 10 and 12% EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil show non-Newtonian behaviour in the temperature range 313-370 K and shear rates ranging between 3 and 1312 s -1 . The lower slope is given by 3% solution, followed by 12%, and the highest one by 10% solutions. EPDM solutions present an increase of slope when passing from 3 to 6% and a decrease when the concentration exceeds the last value. The lowest slope was obtained for solution having the concentration 12%, followed by 3%, while 6% solution has the highest value. Original Research Article
Transcript

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Corresponding author E-mail istanciu75yahoocom

Journal of Scientific Research amp Reports3(11) 1518-1533 2014 Article no JSRR201411009

SCIENCEDOMAIN internationalwwwsciencedomainorg

Rheological Behavior of ConcentratedSolutions EPDM of Some Viscosity Improvers

in SAE 10W-40 Mineral Oil

Ioana Stanciu1

1University of Bucharest Faculty of Chemistry Department of Physical Chemistry BvdRegina Elisabeta no 4-12 030018 Bucharest Romania

Authorrsquos contribution

This whole work was carried out by the author IS

Received 30th January 2014Accepted 23rd March 2014Published 28th April 2014

ABSTRACT

Rheology of polymer concentrated solutions represents a cross-disciplinary field usingwide spectra of theoretical tools from physics and chemistry They effectively thicken theoil at all temperatures but the increase of viscosity is more pronounced at hightemperatures The lubricating effect is extends across a wider temperature range and theoil becomes thus a multi-grade one Its viscosity still decreases logarithmically withtemperature but the slope representing the change is lessened This slope is dependenton the nature and amount of additive to the base oil The purpose of this study was toobtain automotive multi-grade oils They have a number of advantages such as easystarting cold engine reducing wear and decrease the formation of deposits in the engineMulti-grade oil can be used longer than the engine base oils because they are more highlyrefined and contain large proportions of additives The rheological behaviour of thesolutions was determined using a Haake VT 550 Viscometers developing shear ratesranging between 3 and 1312 s-1 and measuring viscosities from 104 to 106 mPas whenthe HV1 viscosity sensor is used Rheological measurements of 3 6 10 and 12 EPDMsolutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil show non-Newtonian behaviour in the temperaturerange 313-370 K and shear rates ranging between 3 and 1312 s-1 The lower slope isgiven by 3 solution followed by 12 and the highest one by 10 solutions EPDMsolutions present an increase of slope when passing from 3 to 6 and a decrease whenthe concentration exceeds the last value The lowest slope was obtained for solutionhaving the concentration 12 followed by 3 while 6 solution has the highest value

Original Research Article

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1519

This suggests that EPDM can be a better viscosity improver for the mineral oil SAE 10W-40 both at low and high concentrations

Keywords Rheological concentrated solutions viscosity multi-grade oils

1 INTRODUCTION

Rheology of polymer concentrated solutions represents a cross-disciplinary field using widespectra of theoretical tools from physics and chemistry [1-3] For physicists understandingthe configuration and dynamics of long polymer chains has been a significant source ofproblems within statistical physics from the 1950rsquos onwards One of the reasons whyphysicists were drawn to the problem is the universality of polymer properties [4-8] Withinthe time and length scales much exceeding the atomic ones universal theories have beenbuilt well describing the main features in the polymer behavior insensitive to the details ofthe chemistry of the chains Among these theories the most popular are the Rouse andZimm models in which the polymer is represented as a chain of beads under Brownianmotion [9-12]

Additive effectively thickens the oil at all temperatures but the increase of viscosity is morepronounced at high temperatures The lubricating effect extends across a wider temperaturerange and the oil becomes thus a multi-grade one Its viscosity still decreases logarithmicallywith temperature but the slope representing the change is lessened This slope isdependent on the nature and amount of additive to the base oil [13-15]

The purpose of this study was to obtain automotive multi-grade oils They have a number ofadvantages such as easy starting cold engine reducing wear and decrease the formation ofdeposits in the engine Multi-grade oil can be used longer than the engine base oils becausethey are more highly refined and contain large proportions of additives Rheological behaviorand viscosity index properties are of great importance in terms of operation and fuelconsumption of an engine the oil viscosity increases the multi-grade oil consumption islower [16-21]

The object of this paper is to determine the rheological behaviour of some concentratedsolutions of copolymer EPDM produced by DSM Elastomers Europe BV and recommendedas viscosity improvers for multi-grade mineral oils at shear rates ranging between 3 and1312 s-1 and temperatures between 40 and 100ordmC to estimate their efficiency as lubricatingadditives for the low viscosity mineral oil SAE 10W-40

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The following copolymer was used as viscosity improvers ethylene-propylene-(ter) polymer(EPDM) product on DSM Thermoplastic Elastomers Europe BV The low viscosity oil SAE10W-40 (INCERP Romania) was used as mineral oil

Copolymer EPDM is recommended for plastics modification and oil modification forapplication in automotive construction wire and cable and general rubber good Thechemical and physical properties of Copolymer EPDM are physical state - solid form - balesor granulate colour ndash natural opaque brown in case of oil extended grades odour ndash weakparaffinic relative density 860-900 Kgm-3 bulk density depending on bale or granulate

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1520

structure insoluble in water soluble in hydrocarbons such as (alkanes hexane heptanesoctane decane dodecane iso-octane isododecane cycloalkanes cyclo-octane decalinecyclododecane aromatic substances butyl benzene octylbenyene and oil paraffinicnaphthenic aromatic Typical of ethylene-propylene number-average molecular weight (4-20) 10000 molecular weight (20-40) 10000 visco-average molecular weight of the wind 10-40 million Their ratio which can be taken as a measure of copolymer polydispersity is 237The composition copolymer of a EPDM is 45 propylene 525 ethylene and 25 dienemonomer

The properties physico-chemicals oil SAE10W-40 are density 0872103 kgm-3 kinematicviscosity at 40ordmC ndash 1085 cSt kinematic viscosity at 1000C ndash 154cSt viscosity index ndash 149viscosity-temperature coefficient (VTC) ndash 08580 CCS viscosity at -25ordmC ndash 6270 cP flashpoint ndash 220ordmC pour point - -37ordmC sulfated ash ndash 086 neutralization No (TBN-E) ndash 71and color 2

The dissolution of the copolymer was performed at room temperature with continuousshaking for several weeks

Solutions has the concentrations 3 6 10 and 12 gdL were prepared EPDM requires muchmore time for complete dissolution Concentration range indicated by the importing firm thatis between 1 and 12 and temperature range have chosen to follow the behaviour of thepolymer in the engine The range of 1-3 concentrations or could not make determinationswith Viscometer used

The rheological behaviour of solutions was determined using a Haake VT 550 Viscotesterdeveloping shear rates ranging between 3 and 1312 s-1 and measuring viscosities from 104

to 106 mPas when the HV1 viscosity sensor is used The solutions concentrated ofthe copolymers were investigated in the temperature range of 40 -100ordmC The accuracy ofthe temperature was plusmn01ordmC

To calculate the value of the shear stress the following equation is used

σ = Z α (1)

where represents the constant of the rotating cylinder The z value depends on the sizes ofthe cylinders and on the constant of action for the spring chosen from the apparatusconstant sheet α ndash factor that is read after each determination The accuracy of measuringshear stress was +- 1

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Fig 1 shows dependence dynamic viscosity on absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40 without additives The dynamic viscosity of oil decreases exponentially with increasingabsolute temperature by an equation of the form (2)

η = 1625522 + 250576E11 exp (- T1451402) (2)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1521

310 320 330 340 350 360 370 3800

20

40

60

80

100

120

140Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 178532R^2 = 09992

y0 1625522 plusmn108297A1 25057630324290915 plusmn20351579043681323t1 1451402 plusmn054858

Dyna

mic

visco

sity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 1 The dependence dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40

The correlation coefficient is R2 = 09992

The rheograms obtained for the 3 6 10 and 12 EPDM solutions for shear rates rangingbetween 3 and 1312 s-1 were analysed according to the models that describe the deviationsfrom the Newtonian behaviour [913]

Bingham

= o + (dγdt) (3)

Casson

12 = o12 + 12(dγdt) 12 (4)

Ostwald-de Waele = k (dγdt)n (5)

and Herschel-Bulkley

= o + k(dγdt)n (6)

where is the shear stress o ndash yield stress - viscosity (dγdt) - shear rate n ndash flow indexand k ndash index of consistency

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1522

The rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at the specified temperatures and shear rates areshown in Fig 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hea r ra te s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 2 Rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K C ndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and H ndash 370 K

The viscosities of EPDM solutions the studied temperatures and shear rates behave aspseudoplastic fluids following the Herschel-Bulkley model Thus the rheograms of 3copolymer solution shown in Fig 1 indicate a pseudoplastic behaviour regardless thetemperature The higher the temperature the less pronounced the pseudoplastic behaviouras expected reflected in the value of the flow The flow rate of the solution at thetemperatures of 313 and 323 K which indicates the amount of 093 - in addition - a morepronounced pseudoplastic behaviour

The value of shear rate for thinning of EPDM solution 3 for the temperatures are 81 s-1for 343 K 1458 s-1 for 353 K The concentrate solution 3 EPDM are z is 114 and then αis between 155 and 95

Viscosity index oil SAE 10W-40 is 149 (ASTM 2270-93) and VTC for 08580 The kinematicviscosity of the concentrate solution was 1313 cSt at 100ordmC and 900 cSt at 40ordmC

Put the focus viscosity index of 3 solution is 106 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTC ofthe solution is 08541 down 00039 times

Table 1 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 3 gdL

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1523

The model proposed to describe the dependence of shear stress vs shear rate for theconcentration of solutions of 3 6 10 and 12 is described by equation (7)

= A + B(dγdt)+C(dγdt)2 (7)

The parameters A B and C were obtained by fitting a polynomial solution concentrationrheogram 3 absolute temperature of 313 K A = 639202 B = 063535 and C = -180371E-4

Table 1 shows the data values of the correlation coefficients determined for each partialmodel theological obtained by linear regression obtained from all seven rheogramstemperatures at which the tests were performed Although the values of correlationcoefficients have values close enough for all four theological models the highest values areobtained Herschel-Bulkley model yet

Table 1 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 3 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

313 09870 09869 09919 09922 09997323 09929 09955 09928 09979 09997333 09958 09964 09958 09974 09992343 09981 09985 09980 09992 09996353 09994 09966 09996 09998 09963363 09979 09987 09994 09998 09997370 09978 09982 09976 09987 09995

Table 2 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 3 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Doubling of copolymer concentration reduce very much the shear rate range on which themeasurements can be done excepting the last two temperatures as can be seen in Fig 3In the temperature range 363-370 K is not observed significant differences in rheologicalbehaviour of concentrated solutions of copolymer Melt index is much higher at 363Kcompared to that obtained at 370 K Solution viscosity decrease with increasing shear ratecan be explained by the alignment of the polymer molecules in the direction of shear force toshear velocities mentioned which has the effect of thickening when they are randomlydistributed The higher the temperature the greater the force required to align molecules fortemperature Decreasing thinning with increasing shear rate viscosity returns to the previousvalue and rheograms obtained with increasing shear rate overlap The value of shear rate forthinning of solution EPDM 6 gdL for the temperatures are 486 s-1 for 333 and 343 K 1458s-1 for 363 K The concentrate solution 6 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 24and 975

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1519

This suggests that EPDM can be a better viscosity improver for the mineral oil SAE 10W-40 both at low and high concentrations

Keywords Rheological concentrated solutions viscosity multi-grade oils

1 INTRODUCTION

Rheology of polymer concentrated solutions represents a cross-disciplinary field using widespectra of theoretical tools from physics and chemistry [1-3] For physicists understandingthe configuration and dynamics of long polymer chains has been a significant source ofproblems within statistical physics from the 1950rsquos onwards One of the reasons whyphysicists were drawn to the problem is the universality of polymer properties [4-8] Withinthe time and length scales much exceeding the atomic ones universal theories have beenbuilt well describing the main features in the polymer behavior insensitive to the details ofthe chemistry of the chains Among these theories the most popular are the Rouse andZimm models in which the polymer is represented as a chain of beads under Brownianmotion [9-12]

Additive effectively thickens the oil at all temperatures but the increase of viscosity is morepronounced at high temperatures The lubricating effect extends across a wider temperaturerange and the oil becomes thus a multi-grade one Its viscosity still decreases logarithmicallywith temperature but the slope representing the change is lessened This slope isdependent on the nature and amount of additive to the base oil [13-15]

The purpose of this study was to obtain automotive multi-grade oils They have a number ofadvantages such as easy starting cold engine reducing wear and decrease the formation ofdeposits in the engine Multi-grade oil can be used longer than the engine base oils becausethey are more highly refined and contain large proportions of additives Rheological behaviorand viscosity index properties are of great importance in terms of operation and fuelconsumption of an engine the oil viscosity increases the multi-grade oil consumption islower [16-21]

The object of this paper is to determine the rheological behaviour of some concentratedsolutions of copolymer EPDM produced by DSM Elastomers Europe BV and recommendedas viscosity improvers for multi-grade mineral oils at shear rates ranging between 3 and1312 s-1 and temperatures between 40 and 100ordmC to estimate their efficiency as lubricatingadditives for the low viscosity mineral oil SAE 10W-40

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The following copolymer was used as viscosity improvers ethylene-propylene-(ter) polymer(EPDM) product on DSM Thermoplastic Elastomers Europe BV The low viscosity oil SAE10W-40 (INCERP Romania) was used as mineral oil

Copolymer EPDM is recommended for plastics modification and oil modification forapplication in automotive construction wire and cable and general rubber good Thechemical and physical properties of Copolymer EPDM are physical state - solid form - balesor granulate colour ndash natural opaque brown in case of oil extended grades odour ndash weakparaffinic relative density 860-900 Kgm-3 bulk density depending on bale or granulate

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1520

structure insoluble in water soluble in hydrocarbons such as (alkanes hexane heptanesoctane decane dodecane iso-octane isododecane cycloalkanes cyclo-octane decalinecyclododecane aromatic substances butyl benzene octylbenyene and oil paraffinicnaphthenic aromatic Typical of ethylene-propylene number-average molecular weight (4-20) 10000 molecular weight (20-40) 10000 visco-average molecular weight of the wind 10-40 million Their ratio which can be taken as a measure of copolymer polydispersity is 237The composition copolymer of a EPDM is 45 propylene 525 ethylene and 25 dienemonomer

The properties physico-chemicals oil SAE10W-40 are density 0872103 kgm-3 kinematicviscosity at 40ordmC ndash 1085 cSt kinematic viscosity at 1000C ndash 154cSt viscosity index ndash 149viscosity-temperature coefficient (VTC) ndash 08580 CCS viscosity at -25ordmC ndash 6270 cP flashpoint ndash 220ordmC pour point - -37ordmC sulfated ash ndash 086 neutralization No (TBN-E) ndash 71and color 2

The dissolution of the copolymer was performed at room temperature with continuousshaking for several weeks

Solutions has the concentrations 3 6 10 and 12 gdL were prepared EPDM requires muchmore time for complete dissolution Concentration range indicated by the importing firm thatis between 1 and 12 and temperature range have chosen to follow the behaviour of thepolymer in the engine The range of 1-3 concentrations or could not make determinationswith Viscometer used

The rheological behaviour of solutions was determined using a Haake VT 550 Viscotesterdeveloping shear rates ranging between 3 and 1312 s-1 and measuring viscosities from 104

to 106 mPas when the HV1 viscosity sensor is used The solutions concentrated ofthe copolymers were investigated in the temperature range of 40 -100ordmC The accuracy ofthe temperature was plusmn01ordmC

To calculate the value of the shear stress the following equation is used

σ = Z α (1)

where represents the constant of the rotating cylinder The z value depends on the sizes ofthe cylinders and on the constant of action for the spring chosen from the apparatusconstant sheet α ndash factor that is read after each determination The accuracy of measuringshear stress was +- 1

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Fig 1 shows dependence dynamic viscosity on absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40 without additives The dynamic viscosity of oil decreases exponentially with increasingabsolute temperature by an equation of the form (2)

η = 1625522 + 250576E11 exp (- T1451402) (2)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1521

310 320 330 340 350 360 370 3800

20

40

60

80

100

120

140Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 178532R^2 = 09992

y0 1625522 plusmn108297A1 25057630324290915 plusmn20351579043681323t1 1451402 plusmn054858

Dyna

mic

visco

sity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 1 The dependence dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40

The correlation coefficient is R2 = 09992

The rheograms obtained for the 3 6 10 and 12 EPDM solutions for shear rates rangingbetween 3 and 1312 s-1 were analysed according to the models that describe the deviationsfrom the Newtonian behaviour [913]

Bingham

= o + (dγdt) (3)

Casson

12 = o12 + 12(dγdt) 12 (4)

Ostwald-de Waele = k (dγdt)n (5)

and Herschel-Bulkley

= o + k(dγdt)n (6)

where is the shear stress o ndash yield stress - viscosity (dγdt) - shear rate n ndash flow indexand k ndash index of consistency

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1522

The rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at the specified temperatures and shear rates areshown in Fig 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hea r ra te s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 2 Rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K C ndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and H ndash 370 K

The viscosities of EPDM solutions the studied temperatures and shear rates behave aspseudoplastic fluids following the Herschel-Bulkley model Thus the rheograms of 3copolymer solution shown in Fig 1 indicate a pseudoplastic behaviour regardless thetemperature The higher the temperature the less pronounced the pseudoplastic behaviouras expected reflected in the value of the flow The flow rate of the solution at thetemperatures of 313 and 323 K which indicates the amount of 093 - in addition - a morepronounced pseudoplastic behaviour

The value of shear rate for thinning of EPDM solution 3 for the temperatures are 81 s-1for 343 K 1458 s-1 for 353 K The concentrate solution 3 EPDM are z is 114 and then αis between 155 and 95

Viscosity index oil SAE 10W-40 is 149 (ASTM 2270-93) and VTC for 08580 The kinematicviscosity of the concentrate solution was 1313 cSt at 100ordmC and 900 cSt at 40ordmC

Put the focus viscosity index of 3 solution is 106 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTC ofthe solution is 08541 down 00039 times

Table 1 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 3 gdL

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1523

The model proposed to describe the dependence of shear stress vs shear rate for theconcentration of solutions of 3 6 10 and 12 is described by equation (7)

= A + B(dγdt)+C(dγdt)2 (7)

The parameters A B and C were obtained by fitting a polynomial solution concentrationrheogram 3 absolute temperature of 313 K A = 639202 B = 063535 and C = -180371E-4

Table 1 shows the data values of the correlation coefficients determined for each partialmodel theological obtained by linear regression obtained from all seven rheogramstemperatures at which the tests were performed Although the values of correlationcoefficients have values close enough for all four theological models the highest values areobtained Herschel-Bulkley model yet

Table 1 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 3 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

313 09870 09869 09919 09922 09997323 09929 09955 09928 09979 09997333 09958 09964 09958 09974 09992343 09981 09985 09980 09992 09996353 09994 09966 09996 09998 09963363 09979 09987 09994 09998 09997370 09978 09982 09976 09987 09995

Table 2 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 3 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Doubling of copolymer concentration reduce very much the shear rate range on which themeasurements can be done excepting the last two temperatures as can be seen in Fig 3In the temperature range 363-370 K is not observed significant differences in rheologicalbehaviour of concentrated solutions of copolymer Melt index is much higher at 363Kcompared to that obtained at 370 K Solution viscosity decrease with increasing shear ratecan be explained by the alignment of the polymer molecules in the direction of shear force toshear velocities mentioned which has the effect of thickening when they are randomlydistributed The higher the temperature the greater the force required to align molecules fortemperature Decreasing thinning with increasing shear rate viscosity returns to the previousvalue and rheograms obtained with increasing shear rate overlap The value of shear rate forthinning of solution EPDM 6 gdL for the temperatures are 486 s-1 for 333 and 343 K 1458s-1 for 363 K The concentrate solution 6 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 24and 975

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1520

structure insoluble in water soluble in hydrocarbons such as (alkanes hexane heptanesoctane decane dodecane iso-octane isododecane cycloalkanes cyclo-octane decalinecyclododecane aromatic substances butyl benzene octylbenyene and oil paraffinicnaphthenic aromatic Typical of ethylene-propylene number-average molecular weight (4-20) 10000 molecular weight (20-40) 10000 visco-average molecular weight of the wind 10-40 million Their ratio which can be taken as a measure of copolymer polydispersity is 237The composition copolymer of a EPDM is 45 propylene 525 ethylene and 25 dienemonomer

The properties physico-chemicals oil SAE10W-40 are density 0872103 kgm-3 kinematicviscosity at 40ordmC ndash 1085 cSt kinematic viscosity at 1000C ndash 154cSt viscosity index ndash 149viscosity-temperature coefficient (VTC) ndash 08580 CCS viscosity at -25ordmC ndash 6270 cP flashpoint ndash 220ordmC pour point - -37ordmC sulfated ash ndash 086 neutralization No (TBN-E) ndash 71and color 2

The dissolution of the copolymer was performed at room temperature with continuousshaking for several weeks

Solutions has the concentrations 3 6 10 and 12 gdL were prepared EPDM requires muchmore time for complete dissolution Concentration range indicated by the importing firm thatis between 1 and 12 and temperature range have chosen to follow the behaviour of thepolymer in the engine The range of 1-3 concentrations or could not make determinationswith Viscometer used

The rheological behaviour of solutions was determined using a Haake VT 550 Viscotesterdeveloping shear rates ranging between 3 and 1312 s-1 and measuring viscosities from 104

to 106 mPas when the HV1 viscosity sensor is used The solutions concentrated ofthe copolymers were investigated in the temperature range of 40 -100ordmC The accuracy ofthe temperature was plusmn01ordmC

To calculate the value of the shear stress the following equation is used

σ = Z α (1)

where represents the constant of the rotating cylinder The z value depends on the sizes ofthe cylinders and on the constant of action for the spring chosen from the apparatusconstant sheet α ndash factor that is read after each determination The accuracy of measuringshear stress was +- 1

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Fig 1 shows dependence dynamic viscosity on absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40 without additives The dynamic viscosity of oil decreases exponentially with increasingabsolute temperature by an equation of the form (2)

η = 1625522 + 250576E11 exp (- T1451402) (2)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1521

310 320 330 340 350 360 370 3800

20

40

60

80

100

120

140Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 178532R^2 = 09992

y0 1625522 plusmn108297A1 25057630324290915 plusmn20351579043681323t1 1451402 plusmn054858

Dyna

mic

visco

sity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 1 The dependence dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40

The correlation coefficient is R2 = 09992

The rheograms obtained for the 3 6 10 and 12 EPDM solutions for shear rates rangingbetween 3 and 1312 s-1 were analysed according to the models that describe the deviationsfrom the Newtonian behaviour [913]

Bingham

= o + (dγdt) (3)

Casson

12 = o12 + 12(dγdt) 12 (4)

Ostwald-de Waele = k (dγdt)n (5)

and Herschel-Bulkley

= o + k(dγdt)n (6)

where is the shear stress o ndash yield stress - viscosity (dγdt) - shear rate n ndash flow indexand k ndash index of consistency

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1522

The rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at the specified temperatures and shear rates areshown in Fig 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hea r ra te s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 2 Rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K C ndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and H ndash 370 K

The viscosities of EPDM solutions the studied temperatures and shear rates behave aspseudoplastic fluids following the Herschel-Bulkley model Thus the rheograms of 3copolymer solution shown in Fig 1 indicate a pseudoplastic behaviour regardless thetemperature The higher the temperature the less pronounced the pseudoplastic behaviouras expected reflected in the value of the flow The flow rate of the solution at thetemperatures of 313 and 323 K which indicates the amount of 093 - in addition - a morepronounced pseudoplastic behaviour

The value of shear rate for thinning of EPDM solution 3 for the temperatures are 81 s-1for 343 K 1458 s-1 for 353 K The concentrate solution 3 EPDM are z is 114 and then αis between 155 and 95

Viscosity index oil SAE 10W-40 is 149 (ASTM 2270-93) and VTC for 08580 The kinematicviscosity of the concentrate solution was 1313 cSt at 100ordmC and 900 cSt at 40ordmC

Put the focus viscosity index of 3 solution is 106 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTC ofthe solution is 08541 down 00039 times

Table 1 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 3 gdL

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1523

The model proposed to describe the dependence of shear stress vs shear rate for theconcentration of solutions of 3 6 10 and 12 is described by equation (7)

= A + B(dγdt)+C(dγdt)2 (7)

The parameters A B and C were obtained by fitting a polynomial solution concentrationrheogram 3 absolute temperature of 313 K A = 639202 B = 063535 and C = -180371E-4

Table 1 shows the data values of the correlation coefficients determined for each partialmodel theological obtained by linear regression obtained from all seven rheogramstemperatures at which the tests were performed Although the values of correlationcoefficients have values close enough for all four theological models the highest values areobtained Herschel-Bulkley model yet

Table 1 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 3 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

313 09870 09869 09919 09922 09997323 09929 09955 09928 09979 09997333 09958 09964 09958 09974 09992343 09981 09985 09980 09992 09996353 09994 09966 09996 09998 09963363 09979 09987 09994 09998 09997370 09978 09982 09976 09987 09995

Table 2 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 3 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Doubling of copolymer concentration reduce very much the shear rate range on which themeasurements can be done excepting the last two temperatures as can be seen in Fig 3In the temperature range 363-370 K is not observed significant differences in rheologicalbehaviour of concentrated solutions of copolymer Melt index is much higher at 363Kcompared to that obtained at 370 K Solution viscosity decrease with increasing shear ratecan be explained by the alignment of the polymer molecules in the direction of shear force toshear velocities mentioned which has the effect of thickening when they are randomlydistributed The higher the temperature the greater the force required to align molecules fortemperature Decreasing thinning with increasing shear rate viscosity returns to the previousvalue and rheograms obtained with increasing shear rate overlap The value of shear rate forthinning of solution EPDM 6 gdL for the temperatures are 486 s-1 for 333 and 343 K 1458s-1 for 363 K The concentrate solution 6 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 24and 975

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1521

310 320 330 340 350 360 370 3800

20

40

60

80

100

120

140Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 178532R^2 = 09992

y0 1625522 plusmn108297A1 25057630324290915 plusmn20351579043681323t1 1451402 plusmn054858

Dyna

mic

visco

sity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 1 The dependence dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for oil SAE 10W-40

The correlation coefficient is R2 = 09992

The rheograms obtained for the 3 6 10 and 12 EPDM solutions for shear rates rangingbetween 3 and 1312 s-1 were analysed according to the models that describe the deviationsfrom the Newtonian behaviour [913]

Bingham

= o + (dγdt) (3)

Casson

12 = o12 + 12(dγdt) 12 (4)

Ostwald-de Waele = k (dγdt)n (5)

and Herschel-Bulkley

= o + k(dγdt)n (6)

where is the shear stress o ndash yield stress - viscosity (dγdt) - shear rate n ndash flow indexand k ndash index of consistency

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1522

The rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at the specified temperatures and shear rates areshown in Fig 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hea r ra te s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 2 Rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K C ndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and H ndash 370 K

The viscosities of EPDM solutions the studied temperatures and shear rates behave aspseudoplastic fluids following the Herschel-Bulkley model Thus the rheograms of 3copolymer solution shown in Fig 1 indicate a pseudoplastic behaviour regardless thetemperature The higher the temperature the less pronounced the pseudoplastic behaviouras expected reflected in the value of the flow The flow rate of the solution at thetemperatures of 313 and 323 K which indicates the amount of 093 - in addition - a morepronounced pseudoplastic behaviour

The value of shear rate for thinning of EPDM solution 3 for the temperatures are 81 s-1for 343 K 1458 s-1 for 353 K The concentrate solution 3 EPDM are z is 114 and then αis between 155 and 95

Viscosity index oil SAE 10W-40 is 149 (ASTM 2270-93) and VTC for 08580 The kinematicviscosity of the concentrate solution was 1313 cSt at 100ordmC and 900 cSt at 40ordmC

Put the focus viscosity index of 3 solution is 106 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTC ofthe solution is 08541 down 00039 times

Table 1 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 3 gdL

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1523

The model proposed to describe the dependence of shear stress vs shear rate for theconcentration of solutions of 3 6 10 and 12 is described by equation (7)

= A + B(dγdt)+C(dγdt)2 (7)

The parameters A B and C were obtained by fitting a polynomial solution concentrationrheogram 3 absolute temperature of 313 K A = 639202 B = 063535 and C = -180371E-4

Table 1 shows the data values of the correlation coefficients determined for each partialmodel theological obtained by linear regression obtained from all seven rheogramstemperatures at which the tests were performed Although the values of correlationcoefficients have values close enough for all four theological models the highest values areobtained Herschel-Bulkley model yet

Table 1 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 3 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

313 09870 09869 09919 09922 09997323 09929 09955 09928 09979 09997333 09958 09964 09958 09974 09992343 09981 09985 09980 09992 09996353 09994 09966 09996 09998 09963363 09979 09987 09994 09998 09997370 09978 09982 09976 09987 09995

Table 2 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 3 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Doubling of copolymer concentration reduce very much the shear rate range on which themeasurements can be done excepting the last two temperatures as can be seen in Fig 3In the temperature range 363-370 K is not observed significant differences in rheologicalbehaviour of concentrated solutions of copolymer Melt index is much higher at 363Kcompared to that obtained at 370 K Solution viscosity decrease with increasing shear ratecan be explained by the alignment of the polymer molecules in the direction of shear force toshear velocities mentioned which has the effect of thickening when they are randomlydistributed The higher the temperature the greater the force required to align molecules fortemperature Decreasing thinning with increasing shear rate viscosity returns to the previousvalue and rheograms obtained with increasing shear rate overlap The value of shear rate forthinning of solution EPDM 6 gdL for the temperatures are 486 s-1 for 333 and 343 K 1458s-1 for 363 K The concentrate solution 6 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 24and 975

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1522

The rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at the specified temperatures and shear rates areshown in Fig 2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hea r ra te s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 2 Rheograms of 3 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K C ndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and H ndash 370 K

The viscosities of EPDM solutions the studied temperatures and shear rates behave aspseudoplastic fluids following the Herschel-Bulkley model Thus the rheograms of 3copolymer solution shown in Fig 1 indicate a pseudoplastic behaviour regardless thetemperature The higher the temperature the less pronounced the pseudoplastic behaviouras expected reflected in the value of the flow The flow rate of the solution at thetemperatures of 313 and 323 K which indicates the amount of 093 - in addition - a morepronounced pseudoplastic behaviour

The value of shear rate for thinning of EPDM solution 3 for the temperatures are 81 s-1for 343 K 1458 s-1 for 353 K The concentrate solution 3 EPDM are z is 114 and then αis between 155 and 95

Viscosity index oil SAE 10W-40 is 149 (ASTM 2270-93) and VTC for 08580 The kinematicviscosity of the concentrate solution was 1313 cSt at 100ordmC and 900 cSt at 40ordmC

Put the focus viscosity index of 3 solution is 106 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTC ofthe solution is 08541 down 00039 times

Table 1 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 3 gdL

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1523

The model proposed to describe the dependence of shear stress vs shear rate for theconcentration of solutions of 3 6 10 and 12 is described by equation (7)

= A + B(dγdt)+C(dγdt)2 (7)

The parameters A B and C were obtained by fitting a polynomial solution concentrationrheogram 3 absolute temperature of 313 K A = 639202 B = 063535 and C = -180371E-4

Table 1 shows the data values of the correlation coefficients determined for each partialmodel theological obtained by linear regression obtained from all seven rheogramstemperatures at which the tests were performed Although the values of correlationcoefficients have values close enough for all four theological models the highest values areobtained Herschel-Bulkley model yet

Table 1 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 3 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

313 09870 09869 09919 09922 09997323 09929 09955 09928 09979 09997333 09958 09964 09958 09974 09992343 09981 09985 09980 09992 09996353 09994 09966 09996 09998 09963363 09979 09987 09994 09998 09997370 09978 09982 09976 09987 09995

Table 2 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 3 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Doubling of copolymer concentration reduce very much the shear rate range on which themeasurements can be done excepting the last two temperatures as can be seen in Fig 3In the temperature range 363-370 K is not observed significant differences in rheologicalbehaviour of concentrated solutions of copolymer Melt index is much higher at 363Kcompared to that obtained at 370 K Solution viscosity decrease with increasing shear ratecan be explained by the alignment of the polymer molecules in the direction of shear force toshear velocities mentioned which has the effect of thickening when they are randomlydistributed The higher the temperature the greater the force required to align molecules fortemperature Decreasing thinning with increasing shear rate viscosity returns to the previousvalue and rheograms obtained with increasing shear rate overlap The value of shear rate forthinning of solution EPDM 6 gdL for the temperatures are 486 s-1 for 333 and 343 K 1458s-1 for 363 K The concentrate solution 6 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 24and 975

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1523

The model proposed to describe the dependence of shear stress vs shear rate for theconcentration of solutions of 3 6 10 and 12 is described by equation (7)

= A + B(dγdt)+C(dγdt)2 (7)

The parameters A B and C were obtained by fitting a polynomial solution concentrationrheogram 3 absolute temperature of 313 K A = 639202 B = 063535 and C = -180371E-4

Table 1 shows the data values of the correlation coefficients determined for each partialmodel theological obtained by linear regression obtained from all seven rheogramstemperatures at which the tests were performed Although the values of correlationcoefficients have values close enough for all four theological models the highest values areobtained Herschel-Bulkley model yet

Table 1 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 3 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

313 09870 09869 09919 09922 09997323 09929 09955 09928 09979 09997333 09958 09964 09958 09974 09992343 09981 09985 09980 09992 09996353 09994 09966 09996 09998 09963363 09979 09987 09994 09998 09997370 09978 09982 09976 09987 09995

Table 2 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 3 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Doubling of copolymer concentration reduce very much the shear rate range on which themeasurements can be done excepting the last two temperatures as can be seen in Fig 3In the temperature range 363-370 K is not observed significant differences in rheologicalbehaviour of concentrated solutions of copolymer Melt index is much higher at 363Kcompared to that obtained at 370 K Solution viscosity decrease with increasing shear ratecan be explained by the alignment of the polymer molecules in the direction of shear force toshear velocities mentioned which has the effect of thickening when they are randomlydistributed The higher the temperature the greater the force required to align molecules fortemperature Decreasing thinning with increasing shear rate viscosity returns to the previousvalue and rheograms obtained with increasing shear rate overlap The value of shear rate forthinning of solution EPDM 6 gdL for the temperatures are 486 s-1 for 333 and 343 K 1458s-1 for 363 K The concentrate solution 6 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 24and 975

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1524

Table 2 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

3 gdL

Temperature K Yield stresso

Flow index n Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 13841 08442 22361 09922323 25455 05190 25435 09979333 23701 05459 23721 09974343 24870 02837 24868 09992353 24985 01830 24335 09998363 26329 01045 26331 09998370 24183 01366 24247 09987

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 1110 cSt at 100ordmC and 74987 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 6 is 236 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oil VTCof the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 3 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 6 gdL

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s -1

B C D E F G H

Fig 3 Rheograms of 6 EPDM solution at B ndash 313K Cndash 323K D ndash 333K E ndash 343K Fndash 353K G ndash 363K and Hndash 370 K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1525

In the case of 10 EPDM solution the temperature range on which the measurements werepossible narrowed to 323-363 K and the shear rate one to 3-486 s-1 as Fig 3 showsbecause of the great increase of solution viscosity Its pseudoplastic behaviour is moreaccented compared with a 6 solution (the flow index is decreased from 093 to 087) Theconcentrated solution 10 EPDM are z is 114 and then α is between 32 and 983

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrated solution was 2414 cSt at 100ordmC and 16321 cStat 40ordmC

The viscosity index of concentred solution 10 is 285 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08520 down 0006 times

Table 5 presented absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model describedby equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 10 gdL

Table 3 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 6 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

313 09902 09937 09902 09972 09995323 09930 09958 09930 09987 09998333 09943 09952 09942 09954 09996343 09962 09974 09962 09986 09999353 09950 09965 09948 09984 09999363 09775 09774 09979 09988 09995370 09809 09876 09926 09949 09992

Table 4 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 6 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Increasing of concentration at 12 reduces more the temperature range of measurementsto 333-363 K as can be seen in Fig 5 and increases the pseudoplastic behaviour the flowindex decreasing at 084 Table 7 presented absolute temperature value coefficientcorrelation of the model described by equations (3-7) for the solution of concentration 12gdL

The kinematic viscosity of the concentrate solution was 3065 cSt at 100ordmC and 20798 cSt at40ordmC

The concentrated solution EPDM 12 are z is 114 and then α is between 15 and 102

The viscosity index of concentred solution 12 is 299 times higher than SAE 10W-40 oilVTC of the solution is 08518 down 00062 times

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1526

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600Sh

ear s

tress

Pa

S hear ra te s -1

B C D E F

Fig 4 Rheograms of 10 EPDM solution at Bndash 323K Cndash 333K D ndash 343K Endash 353Kand F - 363K

Table 4 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

6 gdL

TemperatureK

Yield stresso

Flow indexn

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

313 26692 08240 00693 09972323 21027 08458 01221 09987333 16876 08459 01849 09954343 12334 08626 02913 09986353 07559 08777 04695 09984363 12067 06193 01405 09988370 10425 06436 03525 09949

Table 6 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 10 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

The dynamic viscosity of most materials including polymer solutions and polymer melts wellabove their glass transition temperatures decreases with temperature in accordance toAndrade equation [13]

= Amiddot10BT (8)

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1527

where A and B are constants characteristic of the polymer and T is the absolutetemperature

Table 5 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 10 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBinghamcalculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

Model Herschel-Bulkleycalculated witheq (6)

Modelproposedcalculated witheq (7)

323 09991 09969 09969 09992 10000333 09887 09927 09886 09963 09998343 09953 09969 09953 09986 09993353 09950 09965 09951 09982 09999363 09974 09973 09989 09998 09991

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

500

600

Shea

r stre

ss P

a

Shear rate s-1

B C D E

Fig 5 Rheograms of 12 EPDM solution at B ndash 333K Cndash 343K D ndash 353K andEndash 363K

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1528

Table 6 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

10 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

323 45780 07598 07853 09992333 38508 08477 08457 09963343 36673 08039 09135 09986353 30002 08694 08464 09982363 27012 08700 08845 09998

Table 7 Absolute temperature value coefficient correlation of the model described byequations (3-7) for the solution 12 gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

TemperatureK

ModelBingham

calculatedwith eq(3)

ModelCassoncalculatedwith eq (4)

ModelOstwald-deWaelecalculatedwith eq (5)

ModelHerschel-

Bulkleycalculatedwith eq (6)

Modelproposedcalculatedwith eq (7)

333 09969 09982 09970 09993 09997343 09967 09971 09973 09998 09999353 09963 09980 09965 09994 09996363 09963 09985 09963 09998 09999

Table 8 shows the yield stress flow index index of consistency and correlation coefficientsfor the solution of 12 in the temperature range 313-370 K determined by equation (6)

Table 8 Absolute temperature yield stress flow index index of consistency andvalue coefficient correlation of the model described by equations (6) for the solution

12 gdL

TemperatureK

Yieldstress o

Flowindex n

Index ofconsistency k

Correlationcoefficient R2

333 35206 08449 04296 09993343 31034 08877 05423 09998353 29751 08565 04378 09994363 28932 08564 04289 09998

The statistical correlation coefficients calculated at each temperature experimental dataobtained for solutions of concentration 3 6 10 and 12 are given in Table 9

The dynamic viscosity solutions EPDM copolymer similarly decreases with increasingtemperature and in Fig 6 is the decrease of viscosity with temperature for a solution with aconcentration of 3 g dL

From the figure it can be seen that the first order exponential decrease is observed for thesolution on the entire temperature range

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1529

Table 9 Absolute temperature value statistical coefficient correlation for the solution3 gdL 6gdL 10gdLand 12gdL

Value coefficient correlation R2

Temperature K Solutionconcentration3

SolutionConcentration6

SolutionConcentration10

Solutionconcentration12

313 09744 09809 - -323 09859 09888 - -333 09950 09902 - 09938343 09964 - 09890 09900353 09524 09924 09902 09904363 09956 09683 09968 09948370 - 09575 - -

The same can be seen in the correlation coefficient of 09872 For solutions with otherconcentrations are lower correlation coefficients ranging between 09769 solutionconcentration of 10 g dL and 09930 for the given concentration of 12 g dL

Log dependence on the value of the dynamic viscosities of the solutions of the inverse of thetemperature of EPDM is shown in Fig 7

The figure shows that this copolymer are linear dependencies in the range of concentrationsfor all temperatures studied but that the slopes are not similar in particular theconcentration of 12 g dL which value is very small compared to the other At the same timeviscosity values are very close to concentrations to 10 and 12 g dL but the moreconcentrated solution viscosity less dependent on temperature The dependence logdynamic viscosities on temperature for concentrated solutions were obtained the equation(8)

In order dependencies temperature viscosities of the four solutions were obtained thefollowing equation (9-12)

log = - 34660 + 194697T (9)

log = - 30122 + 217159T (10)

log = - 18091 + 209944T (11)

log = - 02991 + 156091T (12)

The values of the correlation coefficients of between 09996 and 09998

The values of the constants A and B are given in table 10 to facilitate discussion of theirvariation

Comparing the decrease of viscosity of solutions of the copolymer with increasingtemperature it can be seen that EPDM is able to generate multi-grade oils with widertemperature ranges that is it is a better viscosity improver at all the studied concentrations

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1530

310 320 330 340 350 360 3700

100

200

300

400

500

600Data Data1_BModel ExpDec1

Chi^2 = 5939979R^2 = 09872

y0 665584 plusmn2424526A1 2685061468205418 plusmn7715088432779567t1 1740986 plusmn282872

Dyna

mic

visc

osity

Pas

Temperature K

Fig 6 Dependence of dynamic viscosity ndash absolute temperature for solution ofconcentation 3 gdL

Table 10 Constans A and B in the Andrade equation for EPDM solutions

Concentration EPDMlog A B

361012

-34660-30122-18091-02991

194697217159209994156091

As can be seen from the table the values for EPDM solutions vary with the concentration ofhigh values

In respect of the slope the smaller value is obtained for a concentration of 12 g dLfollowed by the concentration of 3 g dL and the higher the concentration of 6 g dL

Lower values obtained from the change in the slopes of the lines representing the viscosityof the solution of the copolymer with EPDM at all concentrations temperatures means thatthe viscosity of solutions of the copolymer is less dependent on temperature

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1531

00027 00028 00029 00030 00031 00032

18202224262830323436384042444648

log

dyna

mic

vis

cosi

ty

1T K-1

C D E F

Fig 7 Dependence log = f(1T) for solutions of EPDM C ndash 3 D ndash 6 E ndash 10F ndash 12

4 CONCLUSION

EPDM solutions in SAE 10W-40 mineral oil are more viscous In the case of EPDM solutionsthe slope increases when passing from the copolymer concentration 3 to 6 but decreaseswhen concentration exceeds this value The lowest slope was obtained for solution havingthe concentration 12 followed by that of 3 solution while 6 solution has the highestvalue This suggests that EPDM is a better viscosity improver at all the concentrations forthe mineral oil SAE 10W-40

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

There was no funding for this study the parcel data analysis and interpretation in writing themanuscript

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1532

COMPETING INTERESTS

Author has declared that no competing interests exist

REFERENCES

1 Gericke M Schlufter K Liebert T Heinze T Budtova T Rheological properties ofcelluloseionic liquid solutions From dilute to concentrated states Biomacromolecules200910(5)1188-1194

2 Uppuluri S Keinath SE Tomalia DA Dvornic PR Rheology of dendrimers INewtonian flow behavior of medium and highly concentrated solutions ofpolyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers in ethylenediamine (EDA)solvent Macromolecules 199831(14)4498-4510

3 Quemada D Rheology of concentrated disperse systems II A model for non-newtonian shear viscosity in steady flows Rheologica Acta 197817(6)632-642

4 Chauveteau G Rodlike polymer solution flow through fine pores Influence of poresize on rheological behavior Journal of Rheology 198226111

5 Flomenbom O Silbey RJ Utilizing the information content in two-statetrajectories Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006103(29)10907-10910

6 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

7 Osa M Ueda H Yoshizaki T Yamakawa H First cumulant of the dynamic structurefactor for polymers in Θ solvents Effects of chain stiffness and local chainconformation Polymer Journal 200638(2)153-158

8 Toacutethovaacute J Lisyacute V Relaxation times of flexible polymer chains in solution from non-conventional viscosity measurements Open Macromolecules Journal 20104(1)26-31

9 Larson RG The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers Progress andproblems J Rheol 2005491

10 Kremer K Sukumaran SK Everaers R Grest GS Entangled polymersystems Computer physics communications 2005169(1)75-81

11 Lisy V Tothova J Zatovsky AV Long-time dynamics of RousendashZimm polymers indilute solutions with hydrodynamic memory The Journal of Chemical Physics2004121106-99

12 Tchesskaya T A generalized Zimm model Hydrodynamic screening in polymersolutions Journal of Molecular Liquids 2009150(1)77-80

13 Bender Jonathan W Norman JW Optical measurement of the contributions ofcolloidal forces to the rheology of concentrated suspensions Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 19951721171-184

14 Strivens TA The rheological properties of concentrated cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide-salicylic acid solutions in water Colloid and Polymer Science 1989267(3)269-280

15 Tothova J Brutovsky B Lisy V Monomer dynamics in single-and double-strandedDNA coils The European Physical Journal E 200724(1)61-67

16 Barrow MS Brown SWJ Cordy S Williams PR Williams RL Rheology of multigradeengine oils in high deformation rate extensional flows International Journal of EngineResearch 20045(4)349-364

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398

Stanciu JSRR Article no JSRR201411009

1533

17 Bala V Rollin AJ Brandt G Rheological properties affecting the fuel economy ofmultigrade automotive gear lubricants Training 2014200003-24

18 Palacios JM Bajon ML Effective viscosity of oils containing VI improver and itsrelation to wear Tribology International 198316(1)27-31

19 Eckert RJA Covey DF Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymersas viscosity index improvers Lubrication Science 19881(1)65-80

20 Bair S Reference liquids for quantitative elastohydrodynamics Selection andrheological characterization Tribology Letters 200622(2)197-206

21 Mufti RA Jefferies A Novel method of measuring tappet rotation and the effect oflubricant rheology Tribology International 200841(11)1039-1048

_________________________________________________________________________copy 2014 Stanciu This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (httpcreativecommonsorglicensesby30) which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproductionin any medium provided the original work is properly cited

Peer-review historyThe peer review history for this paper can be accessed here

httpwwwsciencedomainorgreview-historyphpiid=493ampid=22ampaid=4398


Recommended