+ All documents
Home > Documents > Use of three bivalve species for biomonitoring a polluted estuarine environment

Use of three bivalve species for biomonitoring a polluted estuarine environment

Date post: 14-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: people-environment-udc
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300 DOI 10.1007/s10661-010-1634-x Use of three bivalve species for biomonitoring a polluted estuarine environment Juan Fernández-Tajes · Fernanda Flórez · Sandra Pereira · Tamara Rábade · Blanca Laffon · Josefina Méndez Received: 12 December 2009 / Accepted: 26 July 2010 / Published online: 6 August 2010 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Estuaries are marine areas at great contamination risk due to their hydrodynamic features. PAH are wide and ubiquitous contam- inants with a high presence in these marine en- vironments. Chemical analysis of sediments can provide information, although it does not give a direct measure of the toxicological effect of such contaminants in the biota. Samples of Venerupis pullastra, Cerastoderma edule, and Mytilus gallo- provincialis were collected from two locations in Corcubión estuary (Norhwest of Spain). The level of PAH in sediment and biota, and its possible ori- gin were assessed. A moderate level of contamina- tion was observed with a predominance of PAH of a pyrogenic origin. Genotoxic damage, measured as single-strand DNA breaks with the comet as- say, was evaluated in gill tissue and in hemolymph. The values of DNA damage obtained showed a higher sensitivity of clams and cockles to the pol- J. Fernández-Tajes (B ) · F. Flórez · S. Pereira · T. Rábade · J. Méndez Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Zapateira s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain e-mail: [email protected] B. Laffon Toxicology Unit, Department of Phsycobiology, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain lution load level. These differences among species make us suggest the use of some other species coupled with mussels as an optimal tool for bio- monitoring estuarine environments. Keywords Estuary · Comet assay · Bivalve · Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons · Marine pollution Introduction Estuaries are semi-enclosed sea areas with limited self-renewal ability and therefore particularly at risk from contaminant inputs (Vlahogianni et al. 2007). Pollution in these marine environments is considered a critical issue because of the high variation in several abiotic factors, such as salinity, pH, and temperature, that alter the bioavailability and, by consequence, the toxicity of pollutants (Monserrat et al. 2007). The Corcubión estuary covers the municipalities of Cee and Corcubión, in the far west of the Galician seashore. A remark- able feature of this area is the presence of a smelt- ing industry, a shipyard and both commercial and fishing harbors. In addition to these facts, there are two extractive areas for commercial clams and cockles located in the inner part of the estuary. Although it is possible that there are large inputs of pollutants in this area, data on the presence of
Transcript

Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300DOI 10.1007/s10661-010-1634-x

Use of three bivalve species for biomonitoring a pollutedestuarine environment

Juan Fernández-Tajes · Fernanda Flórez ·Sandra Pereira · Tamara Rábade ·Blanca Laffon · Josefina Méndez

Received: 12 December 2009 / Accepted: 26 July 2010 / Published online: 6 August 2010© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Abstract Estuaries are marine areas at greatcontamination risk due to their hydrodynamicfeatures. PAH are wide and ubiquitous contam-inants with a high presence in these marine en-vironments. Chemical analysis of sediments canprovide information, although it does not give adirect measure of the toxicological effect of suchcontaminants in the biota. Samples of Venerupispullastra, Cerastoderma edule, and Mytilus gallo-provincialis were collected from two locations inCorcubión estuary (Norhwest of Spain). The levelof PAH in sediment and biota, and its possible ori-gin were assessed. A moderate level of contamina-tion was observed with a predominance of PAH ofa pyrogenic origin. Genotoxic damage, measuredas single-strand DNA breaks with the comet as-say, was evaluated in gill tissue and in hemolymph.The values of DNA damage obtained showed ahigher sensitivity of clams and cockles to the pol-

J. Fernández-Tajes (B) · F. Flórez · S. Pereira ·T. Rábade · J. MéndezDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology,Faculty of Sciences, University of A Coruña,A Zapateira s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spaine-mail: [email protected]

B. LaffonToxicology Unit, Department of Phsycobiology,University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

lution load level. These differences among speciesmake us suggest the use of some other speciescoupled with mussels as an optimal tool for bio-monitoring estuarine environments.

Keywords Estuary · Comet assay · Bivalve ·Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ·Marine pollution

Introduction

Estuaries are semi-enclosed sea areas with limitedself-renewal ability and therefore particularly atrisk from contaminant inputs (Vlahogianni et al.2007). Pollution in these marine environments isconsidered a critical issue because of the highvariation in several abiotic factors, such as salinity,pH, and temperature, that alter the bioavailabilityand, by consequence, the toxicity of pollutants(Monserrat et al. 2007). The Corcubión estuarycovers the municipalities of Cee and Corcubión,in the far west of the Galician seashore. A remark-able feature of this area is the presence of a smelt-ing industry, a shipyard and both commercial andfishing harbors. In addition to these facts, thereare two extractive areas for commercial clams andcockles located in the inner part of the estuary.Although it is possible that there are large inputsof pollutants in this area, data on the presence of

290 Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300

such contamination agents and on their effects onmarine biota are scarce.

PAH are ubiquitous widespread contaminantsand may be generated mainly by three processes:(1) combustion of organic matter at very high tem-peratures (pyrolitic origin); (2) release of petro-leum (petrogenic origin); or (3) diagenic processes(degradation of the organic matter; Neff 1979).Once formed, PAH may enter marine coastalareas through the spillage of petroleum, indus-trial discharges, atmospheric fallout, and urbanrunoff (Neff 1979). Because of their low watersolubility and their hydrophobicity, heavy PAHrapidly become associated with organic and inor-ganic suspended particles (Gschwend and Hites1981; Chiou et al. 1998) being incorporated intomarine organisms via filtering activities. Genotox-icity of PAH is mainly linked to the ability ofmarine species to biotransform them into reactivemetabolites that can directly affect DNA or in-duce free oxygen radicals that would produce ox-idative damage in macromolecules such as DNAor proteins (Farmer 2003; Rocher et al. 2006).Estimates of the relative rate of DNA damageindicate that single strand breaks are the mostprevalent type of genetic damage caused by PAH(Bernstein and Bernstein 1991; Cheng and White2004).

Marine organisms can take up contaminantsfrom bottom sediments, suspended particulatematerial, the water column, and food sources(Livingstone 1993; Laffon et al. 2006). Incorpora-tion rate will depend not only on the availabilityof the contaminants but also on several bioticand abiotic factors (filtration rate, metabolismtemperature, salinity, pH, etc.). In this context,biomonitoring constitutes a good alternative anda complement to chemical systems used for con-tamination evaluation. Bivalves may result quiteuseful for the genotoxic biomonitoring of the seaenvironment because of their suitable size, widedistribution in both hemispheres, their filtering ac-tivity that favors bioaccumulation of contaminants(Khadim 1990), and their contact with sediments(Rank et al. 2005). In fact, they are consideredas good sentinel organisms and are widely usedto monitor the presence of toxic compounds inmarine environments (Solé et al. 1994; Porte et al.2000; Serafim and Bebianno 2001). Exposure of

aquatic organisms such as bivalves to genotoxiccontaminants could be a risk to human healthvia their incorporation through the food chain(Lemiere et al. 2005) and could also constitutean ecological risk that may lead to heritable mu-tations and loss in the total genetic diversity (ei-ther intra- o inter-species) with significant impli-cations for the long-term survival of natural pop-ulations (Bikham et al. 2000). Therefore, there isan increasing need to develop an early, fast, easy,and effective methodology to detect the geno-toxic consequences of exposure and metabolismof chemicals. In this sense, DNA strand breakshave been recognized as suitable biomarkers ofcontaminant DNA damage (Speit and Hartmann1995; Mitchelmore and Chipman 1998; Frenzilliet al. 2009) and have been widely measured bydifferent methods such as alkaline elution (Bihariet al. 1992) or alkaline unwinding (Nacci et al.1992; Liepelt et al. 1995). Among them, the sin-gle cell gel electrophoresis (Singh et al. 1988),or comet assay, has been recognized in severalstudies as a convenient method for biomonitor-ing DNA damage in the marine environment(Shugart 1988; Accomando et al. 1991; Frenzilliet al. 2001; Taban et al. 2004; Rank 2009).

The aims of this study were (a) to make apreliminary analysis of the PAH pollution levelin the Corcubión estuary, (b) to evaluate the po-tential of the comet assay to be used as a methodfor detecting genetic damage in gill cells andhemocytes of the clam Venerupis pullastra andthe cockle Cerastoderma edule; (c) to evaluate thesensitivity of both cell types to DNA damage, andto compare their relative sensitivity with Mytilusgalloprovincialis as one of the most bivalve widelyused as a sentinel species in biomonitoring studies.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Clams (V. pullastra), mussels (M. galloprovin-cialis), and cockles (C. edule) were collected fromtwo locations in the inner part of the Corcubiónestuary (Corcubión, 42◦56′42.89′′ N 9◦11′35.05′′ O;A Concha, 42◦57′08.52′′ N 9◦11′23.23′′ O) close tothe smelting industry and the fishing port (Fig. 1).

Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300 291

Fig. 1 Map showing the location of the sampling sites.A Corcubión sampling site, B A Concha sampling site; 1fishing harbor, 2 shipyard, 3 smelting industry

Together with organisms, sediment samples weretaken in opaque plastic bags. The collected bi-valves from both polluted sites and from hatcherywere characterized by a similar maximum lengthand size (4.21 ± 0.5 cm for clams, 6.57 ± 0.5 cmfor mussels, and 3.15 ± 0.5 cm for cockles). It was75–80% of the maximum size reached within eachpopulation. This approach guaranteed that com-pared individuals from same species had similarmetabolic conditions and the influence of physi-ological differences between the two populationswas less pronounced (Regoli 2000; Namiesniket al. 2008).

Samples were transported immediately to thelaboratory, and the bivalves were placed in aquar-iums with filtered seawater (total PAH content<5 ng L−1) inside of a photoperiod chamber at18◦C in cycles of 12 h light–darkness for 1 day,to clear gut contents prior to the experiments.Reference bivalves were obtained from a hatch-

ery belonging to the CIMA (Centre of MarineInvestigations, Ribadeo, Spain) and acclimated inthe same abovementioned conditions. For eachlocation, four to eight individuals (depending onthe species) were used for PAH content deter-mination, and nine individuals were randomly se-lected for DNA damage evaluation by means ofthe comet assay.

Analysis of PAH in sediment and biota

Determination of total PAH content (TPAH) insediment and biota was performed by means ofa gas chromatography coupled to tandem massspectrometry using a Trace GC 2000 gas chro-matograph (Thermo Finnigan, Walthman, MA,USA) equipped with a GC PAL Autosampler(CTC-Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland), PTV andsplit/splitless injectors, and coupled to a ThermoFinnigan Polaris Q ion trap mass spectrometer.

Reagents and standards

PAH native stock solution (PAH-STK-A,4,000 ± 200 ng mL−1 in isooctane) contain-ing naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene,phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene,benz(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(b)fluorene,benzo(k)fluoreanthene, benzo(j)fluoranthene,benzo(a)pyrene, indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, was purchased from WellingtonLaboratories (Guelph, ON, Canada) and usedfor preparing calibrations solutions. Calibrationsolutions were prepared by dilution of PAH-STK-A standard with isooctane. Solid standardsfor other PAH were purchased by Supelco(Bellefonte, PA, USA).

PAH-labeled compound solution (PAH-LCS, 2,000 ± 100 ng mL−1 in isooctane)containing naphthalene–d8, acenaphthene-d10,fluorene-d10, phenanthrene-d10, anthracene-d10,fluoranthene-d10, pyrene-d10, benz(a)anthra-cene-d12, chrysene-d12, benzo (b)fluorene-d12,benzo(k)fluoreanthene-d12, benzo(a)pyrene-d12,indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene-d12, and dibenzo(a,h)-anthracene-d14 was purchased from WellingtonLaboratories (Guelph, ON, Canada) and used assurrogate standard.

292 Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300

Reference material SRM 2977 ‘Mussel Tissue.Organic contaminants and trace elements’ wereprovided by NIST (Gaithersburg, MD; USA).

Operation conditions

PAH separation was achieved with a DB-XLBcolumn (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 um filmthickness) and the GC oven temperature pro-gramme consisted of 50◦C (3 min) and increasedat 4◦C min−1 up to 325◦C (held for 20 min).The injection was carried out in PTV-splitless, theinjected volume was 9 μL, and the injector pro-gramme started at 55◦C and increased at 3◦Cs−1

up to 300◦C (held for 20 min).Mass spectrometer worked in MS/MS mode,

particular conditions (precursor ion, product ion,and collision energy and isolation time) were op-timised for each compound and the ionizationvoltage was 70 eV. Transfer line and ionisationsources were 300◦C and 250◦C, respectively.

Extraction procedure

Different sample preparation methods were ap-plied depending on the type of matrix analyzed:

1. Sediment samples: before extraction eachsample of frozen dried sediment (2 g) wasspiked with 5 μL of PAH-LCS standard.The extraction was carried out by MAE with15 mL of acetone–hexane (1:1, v/v). Sulfurwas removed treating the extracts with Cuactivated with HCl. The extracts were cleanedwith a 5 g silica (3% deactivated) columnand eluted with 15 mL of dichloromethane–hexane (20:80, v/v). Then they were concen-trated in a rotary evaporator, dried undernitrogen stream, and redissolved in 100 μL ofhexane.

2. Biota samples: before extraction each sampleof freeze-dried biota (5 g) was spiked with5 μL of PAH-LCS standard. The extractionwas carried out by MAE with 15 mL ofacetone–hexane (1:1, v/v). The extracts werecleaned with a 22 g aluminum oxide (10%deactivated) column and eluted with 90 mL ofhexane. Then they were concentrated in a ro-

tary evaporator, dried under nitrogen stream,and redissolved in 100 μL of hexane.

Comet assay

Cell viability assayed by the Trypan-blue exclu-sion method was observed in the range of 90–100% for all samples.

The gills of the three species were excised andsliced, using dissection scissors and tweezers, andplaced in a tube containing 3 ml of CMFS solution(20 mM HEPES, 500 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM KCl, and5 mM EDTA) and left for an hour shaking slowlyhorizontally. They were then placed in a verticalposition for 5 min in order to allow the piecesof tissue to settle. The supernatant containingthe dissociated cells was collected with a pipette,transferred to another tube, and centrifuged at1,500 rpm for 5 min at 4◦C. Having removed thesupernatant, the pellet was resuspended in 1.5 mLof Kenny’s Salt Solution (0.4 M NaCl, 9 mM KCl,0.7 mM K2HPO4, and 2 mM NaHCO3).

Hemolymph was withdrawn from the posterioracductor muscle into a hypodermic syringe con-taining Alsever (glucose 20.80 g/L, sodium citrate8.00 g/L, EDTA 3.36 g/L, NaCl 22.50 g/L, andpH 7.5) and kept in ice until centrifugation.

The alkaline comet assay was performed inisolated gill cells and hemocytes following themethod described by Pérez-Cadahía et al. (2004).

One hundred randomly selected cells from eachindividual were examined, using the image cap-ture and analysis QWIN Comet (Leica ImagingSystems, Cambridge, UK). Percentage of DNAin tail comet (DNAt) was used to evaluate DNAdamage.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using theSPSS for Windows statistical package, version 12.0(Illinois, USA). Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit was applied to compare the distributionof the variables obtained in the study with thenormal distribution. As the distribution of all vari-ables departed significantly from normality, non-parametric tests were deemed adequate for thestatistical analysis of the data. The existence of sig-nificant differences among groups was determined

Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300 293

by means of the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed bya Mann–Whitney U test, to evaluate the effect ofthe origin and tissue of the three species. Level ofsignificance was set at 0.05. Associations betweentwo variables were analyzed by Spearman’s corre-lation. Level of significance was set at 0.01.

Results and discussion

PAH and their origin in sediments

One of the aims of this study was to makea preliminary evaluation of the pollution lev-els in the estuary of Corcubión. The total PAH(16 USEPA priority PAH) content in sedimentswere 449.63 for Corcubión and 108.46 for AConcha. According to these values and to theclassification proposed by Bihari et al. (2006),Corcubión could be classified as fairly contam-inated (250 μg/kg < TPAH < 500 μg/kg), andA Concha as slightly contaminated (TPAH <

250 μg/kg). The 16 USEPA priority pollutants inthe sediments were present in the two samplingsites, excepting for the three rings acenaphthyleneand acenaphthene that were below the detectionlimit in both locations, and for the two rings PAH

Table 1 PAH concentrations (μg/kg d.w.) in sedimentfrom Corcubión and A Concha

PAH Corcubión A Concha

Naphthalene 18.48 <LOQAcenaphthylene <LOQ <LOQAcenaphthene <LOQ <LOQFluorene 3.12 2.65Phenanthrene 30.16 12.07Anthracene 0.56 1.02Fluoranthene 93.36 14.72Pyrene 95.26 17.17Benz(a)antrhacene 10.75 4.10Crysene 45.24 5.81Benzo(b)fluoranthene+ 69.05 17.26

benzo(j)fluorantheneBenzo(k)fluoranthene 22.24 5.63Benzo(a)pyrene 0.91 6.38Benzo(ghi)perylene 5.97 1.96Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 19.67 8.76Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 34.84 10.93Total 449.63 108.46

LOQ below limit quantification level

naphthalene, which was only present in Corcubión(Table 1).

In this study, we also investigated the sourcesof PAH. The distribution of light and heavy PAHreflects the common practice in the literature toassess the source of PAH, since the presence oflighter PAH is usually linked to a petrogenic ori-gin (Soclo et al. 2000; Colombo et al. 2006), andthe sources of the heavier fraction are more likelyto be identified as the pyrolitic ones. Accordingto this classification, sediments for both locationswould have a pyrolitic origin since the proportionof the lighter PAH (two and three rings) wasbelow 13% of the total concentration (Fig. 2).Another method recently used to estimate theorigin of PAH compounds, is to apply molecularindices based on the thermodynamic stability ofvarious isomeric compounds. PAH of molecularmass 178 (anthracene and phenantrene) and 202(fluoranthene and pyrene) are commonly used todistinguish between combustion and petroleumsources (Sicre et al. 1987; Budzinski et al. 1997;Soclo et al. 2000; Yunker et al. 2002). Accordingto index for mass 178, anthracene to anthraceneplus phenanthrene (An/178) ratio <0.10 usually istaken as an indication of petroleum while >0.10indicates a dominance of combustion. Values of0.02 for Corcubión site and 0.08 for A Conchasite reflect a petroleum source. Although this in-dex indicates a petrogenic origin, emissions forlignite have reported values below 0.10 (Yunker

Fig. 2 PAH distribution pattern (accumulated percentage)in sediments from Corcubión and A Concha

294 Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300

et al. 2002). The presence of a smelting indus-try located in an area close to sampling site ofCorcubión, which indeed uses lignite as raw ma-terial, could indicate a pyrolitic origin instead ofa petrogenic one. For mass 202 fluoranthene tofluoranthene plus pyrene (Fl/Fl+Py) values ob-tained for Corcubión (0.49) and A Concha (0.46)are characteristic of combustion of liquid fossilfuel (vehicle and crude oil; Yunker et al. 2002).The benz(a)anhracene to benz(a)anthracene pluschrysene (BaA/228) ratio was above 0.50 in bothlocations (0.84 for Corcubión and 0.68 for A Con-cha) implying combustion source of sediments.For the indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene to indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene plus benzo(ghi)perylene (IP/IP+Bghi)ratio, values above 0.50 are indicative of grass,wood, and coal combustion (Yunker et al. 2002).According to the different indexes (An7178,BaA/228, Fl/Fl+Py, and IP/IP+Bghi), there is apredominance of combustion origin although withan additional contribution from petrogenic hy-drocarbons present in the marine environment.These petroleum inputs assessed by the An/178ratio could be a result of oil spills due to therelease of petroleum by ships. However, as it hasbeen mentioned above, combustion of lignite hasreported values below 0.10. The results suggestthat the sources of PAH are mainly related to ve-hicle and ship traffic, fuel and wood combustion.Atmospheric deposition may be one of the major

PAH transport pathways into the estuary for PAHderived from combustion processes. Combustion-derived PAH emitted to the atmosphere can en-ter the water column by gas exchange across theair–water interface, dry deposition of airborneparticulate matter, or wet deposition by rainfall(Gustafson and Dickut 1997; Karacık et al. 2009).The wood fires in 2005 together with the floodsin early 2006 close to the Corcubión estuary areprobably the source of PAH with combustion ori-gin found in the sediments.

PAH in mussels, clams, and cockles

Table 2 shows the individual and TPAH con-centrations in the mussels, clams, and cocklescollected from Corcubión and from A Concha.Total concentrations for the 16 priority PAH were1,280.12 and 583.40 in clams, 1,052.62 and 909.24in mussels, and 843.26 and 309.75 in cockles forCorcubión and A Concha, respectively. The mostimportant contributors to PAH burden were ace-naphtene and fluoranthene in mussels; acenaph-thene and phenantrene in clams; and acenaph-thene, fluoranthene, and phenanthrene in cockles.

Although the accumulation pattern of PAH insediments and in the three species is not corre-lated, a positive relationship exists between conta-mination level and content of PAH in the studiedbivalves. Thus, Corcubión exhibited the highest

Table 2 PAHconcentration (μg/kgd.w.) in tissues fromVenerupis pullastra (Vp),Mytillus galoprovincialis(Mg), and Cerastodermaedule (Ce) in Corcubión(C) and A Concha (AC)

LOQ below limitquantification level

Vp C Vp AC Mg C Mg AC Ce C Ce AC

Naphthalene 206.77 61.52 27.07 136.19 72.34 8.00Acenaphthylene <LOQ 1.36 <LOQ <LOQ 0.40 <LOQAcenaphthene 753.74 224.26 98.68 496.46 263.70 29.18Fluorene 18.51 2.31 2.98 2.83 0.57 0.52Penanthrene 118.18 115.22 158.78 74.32 188.16 110.69Anthracene 6.31 6.04 12.21 18.00 7.24 2.00Fluoranthene 43.57 50.53 403.32 84.53 103.87 71.92Pyrene 75.38 59.82 5.58 3.92 1.91 1.50Benz(a)anthracene 14.39 10.68 31.73 16.69 22.60 0.01Crysene 12.00 9.76 51.55 20.29 28.83 18.06Benzo(b)fluoranthene+ 8.56 11.32 93.96 27.91 73.58 41.39

benzo(j)fluorantheneBenzo(k)fluoranthene 1.90 22.45 47.12 16.72 7.01 1.02Benzo(a)pyrene 3.53 3.62 26.78 9.89 45.55 21.94Benzo(ghi)perylene <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQDibenz(a,h)anthracene 4.14 <LOQ 3.56 1.16 24.55 1.93Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 13.14 6.51 89.30 0.33 2.95 1.59Total 1,280.12 585.40 1,052.62.1 909.24 843.26 309.75

Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300 295

levels of total PAH in sediment, and all bivalvescollected from this site showed the highest contentof PAH.

Figure 3 shows the PAH distribution patternin the three species for both locations. Surpris-ingly, light PAH were not dominant in the threebivalves and either location. The four, five, andsix rings PAH accounted for more than the 70%of TPAH in mussels from Corcubión, and above50% of TPAH in cockles from A Concha. Thesedifferences between species and locations couldbe due to different ways of PAH intake. Thelighter PAH possess a higher water solubility,allowing the direct absorption by water and inter-stitial water, while the heavy ones would be ab-sorbed on particulate matter and should be assimi-lated by the digestive system of marine organisms.The presence of higher levels of much less solublePAH, such as benzo(a)pyrene, in bivalves thanin sediment, reinforce the idea that heavy PAHshould be assimilated by ingestion of particles. Itshould be noted that some of those PAH, such asdibenzo(a,h)anthracene, are more accumulated inbivalves compared to sediments.

Regardless of the species, PAH compositionpattern was dominated by the presence of three-ring PAH, followed by those with four rings, ex-cept for the mussels from Corcubión, for whichthe most abundant were the four-ring PAH. Asimilar trend, with high predominance of three-and four-ring PAH, was also reported by Binelliand Provini (2003), and by Perugini et al. (2007)in some species of bivalves. The total PAH con-centrations in mussels, clams, and cockles werecomparable with those reported for moderately

contaminated areas (200–1,000 ng/g) of differentbays worldwide (Baumard et al. 1999; Chase et al.2001; Liu and Kueh 2005), and at least one orderof magnitude lower than in highly anthropogeni-cally impacted sites (Telli-Karakoç et al. 2002;Liu and Kueh 2005). Although these levels couldbe considered as moderate levels, mussels fromCorcubion exhibited higher values to those ob-tained by Nieto et al. (2006) in mussels collected3 days after the Prestige shipwreck.

The different values of molecular indices(An/178, Ba/228, Fl/FL+Pyr, IP/IP+Bghi) calcu-lated in mussels, clams, and cockles (Table 3)reflect a similar trend than that obtained for sed-iments. The combustion seems to be the mainsource for PAH, but with a certain petrogenicinput.

The three species of bivalves analyzed in theexposed location are commercially harvested.If we attend to the threshold level proposedby the Food Safety Administration (USA) forcommercial exploitation of these organisms(200 μg/kg d.w. of the sum of the six HAP:benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b) and benzo(k)-fluorantene, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)-anthracene, and indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene),mussels exceed this limit. Thus, mussels harvestedfrom Corcubión estuary should be analyzed priorto human consumption to avoid possible adversehealth effects.

Comet assay

Table 4 shows the results obtained in the cometassay carried out with gills and hemocytes in the

Fig. 3 PAH distributionpattern (accumulatedpercentage) in tissuesfrom Venerupis pullastra(Vp), Mytilusgalloprovincialis (Mg),and Cerastoderma edule(Ce) from Corcubión andA Concha

296 Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300

Table 3 Values of molecular indices calculated in the three bivalve species to assess the origin of PAH accumulated in theirtissues

Sampling Species Index Source Index Source Index Source Index Source

site An178 Fl/Fl+ BaA/228 IP/IP+Pyr Bghi

Corcubión V. pullastra 0.051 Petrogenic 0.366 Petrogenic 0.545 Combustion 1.000 CombustionM. galloprovincialis 0.071 Petrogenic 0.986 Combustion 0.919 Combustion 1.000 CombustionC. edule 0.037 Petrogenic 0.982 Combustion 0.839 Combustion 1.000 Combustion

A Concha V. pullastra 0.050 Petrogenic 0.458 Combustion/ 0.522 Combustion 1.000 CombustionPetrogenic

M. galloprovincialis 0.195 Combustion 0.956 Combustion/ 0.852 Combustion 0.997 Combustionpetrogenic

C. edule 0.018 Petrogenic 0.980 Combustion/ 0.001 Petrogenic 0.999 CombustionPetrogenic

An178 Anthracene to Anthracene plus Phenanthrene index, Fl/+Fl+Py Fluoranthene to Fluoranthene plus Pyrene index,BaA/228 Benzoanthracene to Benzoanthracene plus Crysene index, IP/IP+Bghi indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene to indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene plus benzo(ghi)perylene (IP/IP+Bghi) ratio

three species from both locations and those fromthe aquaculture farm (reference).

DNA damage in mussels from Corcubión andA Concha was significantly higher than in musselsfrom the reference site. The values of DNAt ob-tained were practically equal for both locations, AConcha being slightly higher. For clams and cock-les, DNA damage was also significantly greaterin the two polluted sites than in the reference(Fig. 4). Although the three species showed in-creased genetic damage for both exposed sites,the levels of this damage differed, M. galloprovin-cialis being the most affected species, followedby C. edule and V. pullastra. The backgroundlevel of DNA damage, determined as the DNAtvalue obtained in the reference site, was higherin M. galloprovincialis (Table 4). The differenceamong species probably reflects differences in ex-posure (clams and cockles are buried), but mayalso reflect differences in physiology (metabolism,filtration rate, retention capabilities of PAH, etc).

Downs et al. (2002) reported species-specific re-sponses in mussel and clams collected from oil-impacted sites. They found differences betweenoiled and unoiled sites and between the re-sponse of the two bivalves in metabolic activa-tion and clearance of benzene, benzo(a)pyrene,and benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide adducted pro-tein. They suggested that the differences in thehabitat might have contributed, the clams beingexposed to a higher concentration of pollutantsbecause of their location in the inner sediments.Other authors, such as Thomas et al. (2007) havealso found species-specific differences betweenmussels and clams, attributing the obtained re-sults to the habitat and the different physiologi-cal capacities of each species. In 2003, Woottonet al. undertook a study to evaluate the PAH-induced immunomodulation in three species, andthey concluded that the immunomodulation in thesentinel specie Mytilus edulis was no typical ofthe other two species studied, Ensis siliqua and

Table 4 Results of the comet assay carried out with gills and hemocytes of three species

Gills Hemolymph

Control Corcubión A Concha Control Corcubión A Concha

V. pullastra 0.1000 ± 0.0072 0.8773 ± 0.1261a 0.9437 ± 0.1315a 0.0919 ± 0.0070 0.5144 ± 0.0468a 0.4855 ± 0.1132a

C. edule 0.2164 ± 0.0200 1.0495 ± 0.073a 0.9130 ± 0.0777a 0.1858 ± 0.0259 1.5291 ± 0.1396a 1.2606 ± 0.1313a

M. galloprovincialis 0.8260 ± 0.045 1.8794 ± 0.1510a 1.8975 ± 0.099a 0.4804 ± 0.042 1.0382 ± 0.049a 1.8078 ± 0.1410a

aSignificant differences between the sampling site and the control group (p value <0.05)

Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300 297

Fig. 4 DNAt values in Venerupis pullastra (V. pullastra), Cerastoderma edule (C. edule), and Mytilus galloprovincialis (M.galloprovincialis) in gill cells and hemolymph. *p < 0.05, significant differences between the exposed and control groups

C. edule, suggesting that these would be moresensitive, and therefore, could reflect the gen-eral immune response to PAH more accurately.Cheung et al. (2006) also observed a high level ofDNA damage in hemocytes of C. edule comparedto those of M. edulis. These authors explain theresults as a consequence of differences in the an-tioxidant defense mechanism among species.

Hemolymph cells always exhibited lower levelsof DNA damage than gill cells except for C. edule,in which the highest levels of damage were indeedfound in this tissue. The observed difference be-tween tissues has been reported in other studies,in which the circulating cells were described asless sensitive than gill cells (Steinert et al. 1998;Coughlan et al. 2002; Rank et al. 2005). This fea-ture is likely to be due to either: (a) gills are in di-rect contact with the dissolved and particle-boundcontaminants, representing the most importanttissue in the uptake of contaminants (Frenzilliet al. 2009), or (b) the difference is related tothe different capacities in the detoxification ofpollutants, DNA-repair capacity/ability, and cellturnover (Akcha et al. 2004). Nevertheless, Rank

and Jensen (2003) found similar levels of DNAdamage in both cell types. They proposed the useof hemocytes for biomonitoring since they aremore easily manipulated and do not require celldissociation prior to the comet procedure. Thisdissociation procedure could have the potential ofintroducing damage through mechanical manipu-lation to obtain isolated cells (Frenzilli et al. 2009).In our case the differences obtained betweenboth tissues were not statistically significant.Thus, we recommend the use of hemocytes be-cause they are easier to obtain through relativelynon-invasive techniques that do not introducesupplemental DNA damage and, due to theirphysiological role in the transport of endoge-nous and exogenous substances and in immunedefense, are directly exposed to contaminants(Mersch et al. 1996) making them very convenientfor biomonitoring studies.

Only clams and cockles showed higher DNAtvalues in the location with a higher TPAH contentin sediment. Likewise, a high PAH body burdendid not directly imply a higher genetic damagefor any of the three species analyzed. This fact

298 Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300

was indeed surprising, since accumulated PAHshould be, at least in part, responsible for thegenotoxic effects detected. Some authors havereported similar results (Large et al. 2002; Akchaet al. 2004). Laffon et al. (2006) did not find cor-relation between tissue levels of PAH and DNAdamage and suggested that DNA damage inducedby PAH could not be produced immediately, andthat a certain extension of it could already havebeen repaired in the moment of undertaking thecomet assay. Thomas et al. (2007) reported thatanalyses of PAH loads in tissues do not measureany form of PAH metabolites, especially from achronic exposure; hence, values of PAH body bur-den would be probably underestimates of the to-tal active damaging compounds. Likewise, Wesselet al. (2010) stated that the determination of thePAH tissue concentration is not suitable for theevaluation of individual exposure to PAH sincetheir genotoxicity is produced for the reactivemetabolites and not for the parental compound.It should also be taken into consideration thatmany chemicals that interact with DNA in manydifferent ways and that were not analyzed mightbe present in both water and sediments, constitut-ing a very complex scenario.

Conclusion

In summary, the levels of the 16 priority USEPAPAH observed in the estuarine environment ofCorcubión reflected a moderate level and a lowlevel of pollution for sampling sites from Cor-cubión and A Concha, respectively. Despite thefact that levels of carcinogenic PAH were lowin sediments, high levels of those same PAHwere detected in body burden of mussels, clams,and cockles, and mussels exceeded the thresholdlevel recommended for the human consumptionproposed by the US Food Safety Administrationfor commercial exploitation of these organisms.The DNA damage, evaluated by the comet assay,showed a good relationship with the pollutionload level at both sampling sites, except for M.galloprovincialis. The two cell types evaluated,hemocytes and gill cells, showed similar results.Consequently, we recommend the use of hemo-cytes, since they require less handling. The higher

sensitivity of clams and cockles, as compared tomussels, makes us propose the use of other speciescoupled with M. galloprovincialis for the optimalbiomonitoring polluted marine environments.

Acknowledgements This work was funded by a07MMA013103PR grant from the “Conselleria deInnovacion e Industria (Xunta de Galicia)”. We aregrateful to “Cofradía de Pescadores y mariscadores deCorcubión” for providing samples in this study and to Mrs.Ceres Fernandez for her kindly revision of the Englishgrammar style.

References

Accomando, R., Viarengo, A., Bordone, R., Taningher, M.,Canesi, L., & Orunesu, M. (1991). A rapid method fordetecting DNA strand breaks in Mytilus galloprovin-cialis Lam. induced by genotoxic xenobiotic chemicals.International Journal of Biochemestry, 23, 227–229.

Akcha, F., Tanguy, A., Ledaym, G., Pelluhet, L.,Budzinski, H., & Chiffoleau, J. F. (2004). Mea-surement of DNA single-strand breaks in gill andhemolymph cells of mussels, Mytilus sp., collected onthe French Atlantic Coast. Marine Environmental Re-search, 58, 735–756.

Baumard, P., Budzinski, H., Garrigues, P., Narbone,J. F., Burgeot, T., Michel, X., et al. (1999). Poly-cylic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) burden of mus-sels (Mytilus sp.) in different marine environmentsin relation with sediment PAH contamination, andbioavailability. Marine Environmental Research, 47,415–439.

Bernstein, C., & Bernstein, H. (1991). Ageing, sex andDNA repair. New York: Academic Press.

Bihari, N., Batel, R., & Zahn, R. K. (1992). Fraction-ing of DNA from marine invertebrate (Maja crispate,Mytilus galloprovincialis) haemolymph by alkalineelution. Comparative Biochemestry and Physiologypart B, 102, 419–424.

Bihari, N., Fafandel, M., Hamer, B., & Kralj-Bilen,B. (2006). PAH content, toxicity and genotoxicityof coastal marine sediments from the Rovinj area,Northern Adriatic, Croatia. Science of the Total En-vironment, 366, 602–611.

Bikham, J. W., Sandhu, S., Hebert, P. D. N., Chikhi, L., &Athwal, R. (2000). Effects of chemical contaminantson genetic diversity in natural populations: Implica-tions for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. MutationResearch, 463, 33–51.

Binelli, A., & Provini, A. (2003). POPs in edible clams fromdifferent italian and european markets and possiblehuman health risk. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46, 879–886.

Budzinski, H., Jones, I., Bellocq, J., Piérardm, C., &Garrigues, P. (1997). Evaluation of sediment conta-

Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300 299

mination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in theGironde estuary. Marine Chemistry, 58, 85–97.

Chase, M. E., Jones, S. H., Hennigar, P., Sowles, J.,Harding, G. C. H., Freeman, K., et al. (2001).Gulfwatch: Monitoring spatial and temporal patternsof trace metal and organic contaminants in the gulfof Maine (1991–1997) with the blue mussel, Mytilusedulis L. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 490–504.

Cheng, G., White, P. A. (2004). The mutagenic hazards ofaquatic sediments: a review. Mutation Research, 567,151–225.

Cheung, V. V., Depledge, M. H., & Jha, A. N. (2006).An evaluation of the relative sensitivity of two marinebivalve mollusc species using the comet assay. MarineEnvironmental Research, 62, S301–S305.

Chiou, C., McGroddy, S., & Kile, D. (1998). Partitioncharacteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons onsoils and sediments. Environmental Science and Tech-nology, 32, 264–269.

Colombo, J., Cappelletti, N., Lasci, J., Migoya, M.,Speranza, E., & Skorupka, C. (2006). Sources, verticalfluxes, and equivalent toxicity of aromatic hydrocar-bons in coastal sediments of the río de la Plata estuary,Argentina. Environental and Science Technology, 40,734–740.

Coughlan, B. M., Hartl, M. G. J., O’Reilly, S. J., Sheehan,D., Morthersill, C., van Pelt, F., et al. (2002). Detectinggenotoxicity using the comet assay following chronicexposure of manila clam Tapes semidecussatus to pol-luted estuarine sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin,44, 1359–1365.

Downs, C. A., Shigenaka, G., Fauth, J. E., Robinson, C. E.,& Huang, A. (2002). Cellular physiological assessmentof bivalves after chronic exposure to spilled ExxonValdez crude oil using a novel molecular diagnosticbiotechnology. Environmental Science and Technol-ogy, 36, 2987–2993.

Farmer, P. B. (2003). Molecular epidemiology studiesof carcinogenic environmental pollutants. Effects ofPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in en-vironmental pollution on exogenous and oxidativeDNA damages. Mutation Research-Reviews in Muta-tion Research, 544, 397–402.

Frenzilli, G., Nigro, M., Scarcelli, V., Gorbi, S., & Regoli, F.(2001). DNA integrity and total oxyradical scavengingcapacity in the mediterranean mussel, Mytilus gallo-provincialis: A field study in a highly eutrophicatedcoastal lagoon. Aquatic Toxicology, 53, 19–32.

Frenzilli, G., Nigro, M., & Lyons, B. P. (2009). The cometassay for the evaluation of genotoxic impact in aquaticenvironments. Mutation Research/Reviews in MutationResearch, 681, 80–92.

Gschwend, P. M., & Hites, R. A. (1981). Fluxes of poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to marine and lacus-trine sediments in the northeastern United States.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 45, 2359–2367.

Gustafson, K. E., & Dickut, R. M. (1997). Particle/gasconcentrations and distributions of PAHs in the at-mosphere of Southerns Chesapeake Bay-Response.Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 3738–3739.

Karacık, B., Okay, O. S., Henkelmann, B., Bernhöft, S.,& Schramm, K. (2009). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocar-bons and effects on marine organisms in the Istanbulstrait. Environmental International, 35, 599–606.

Khadim, M. (1990). Methodologies for monitoring thegenetic effects of mutagens and carcinogens accu-mulated in the body of marine mussels. Reviews inAquatic Science, 2, 83–107.

Laffon, B., Rábade, T., Pásaro, E., & Méndez, J. (2006).Monitoring of the impact of Prestige oil spill onMytilus galloprovincialis from galician coast. Environ-ment International, 32, 342–348.

Large, A. T., Shaw, J. P., Peters, L. D., McIntosh, A. D.,Webster, L., Mally, A., et al. (2002). Different levels ofmussel (Mytilus edulis) DNA strand breaks followingchronic field and acute laboratory exposure to poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Marine EnvironmentalResearch, 54, 493–497.

Lemiere, S., Cossu-Leguille, C., Bispo, A., Jourdain,M.-J., Lanhers, M.-C., Burnel, D., et al. (2005). DNAdamage measured by the single-cell electrophoresis(Comet) assay in mammals fed with mussels contami-nated by the “Erika” oil-spill. Mutation Research, 581,11–21.

Liepelt, A., Karbe, L., & Westendorf, J. (1995). In-duction of DNA strand breaks in rainbow troutOncorhynchus mykiss under hypoxic and hyperoxicconditions. Aquatic Toxicology, 33, 177–181.

Liu, J. H., & Kueh, C. S. W. (2005). Biomonitoring of heavymetals and trace organics using the intertidal musselPerna viridis in Hong Kong coastal waters. MarinePollution Bulletin, 51, 857–875.

Livingstone, D. R. (1993). Biotechnology and pollu-tion monitoring: use of molecular biomarkers in theaquatic environment. Journal of Chemical Technologyand Biotechnology, 57, 195–211.

Mersch, J., Beauvais, M., & Nagel, P. (1996). Inductionof micronuclei in hemocytes and gill cells of ze-bra mussels, Dreissena polymorpha, exposed to clas-togens. Mutation Research-Genetic Toxicology, 371,47–55.

Mitchelmore, C. L., & Chipman, J. K. (1998). Detectionof DNA strand breaks in brown trout (Salmo trutta)hepatocytes and blood cells using the single cell gelelectrophoresis (comet) assay. Aquatic toxicology, 41,161–182.

Monserrat, J. M., Martínez, P. E., Geracitano, L. A., LundAmado, L., Martinez Gaspar Martins, C., Lopes LeãesPinho, G., et al. (2007). Pollution biomarkers in estu-arine animals: Critical review and new perspectives.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C:Toxicology and Pharmacology, 146, 221–34.

Nacci, D., Nelson, S., Nelson, W., & Jackim, E. (1992).Application of the DNA alkaline unwiding assay todetect DNA strand breaks in marine bivalves. MarineEnvironmental Research, 33, 83–100.

Namiesnik, J., Moncheva, S., Park, Y.-S., Ham, K.-S., Heo,B.-G., Tashma, Z., et al. (2008). Concentration ofbioactive compounds in mussels Mytilus galloprovin-cialis as an indicator of pollution. Chemosphere, 73,938–944.

300 Environ Monit Assess (2011) 177:289–300

Neff, J. (1979). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in theaquatic environment: Sources, fates and biologicaleffects. Essex: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.

Nieto, O., Aboigor, J., Bujan, R., N’Diaye, M., Grana,J., Saco-Alvarez, L., et al. (2006). Temporal varia-tion in the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) off the Galician Coast after the ‘Prestige’ oilspill. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 328, 41–49.

Pérez-Cadahía, B., Laffon, B., Pásaro, E., & Méndez,J. (2004). Evaluation of PAH bioaccumulation andDNA damage in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis)exposed to spilled prestige crude oil. ComparativeBiochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology andPharmacology, 138, 453–460.

Perugini, M., Visciano, P., Manera, M., Turno, G.,Lucisano, A., & Amorena, M. (2007). polycyclic aro-matic hydrocarbons in marine organisms from the gulfof Naples, Tyrrhenian sea. Journal of Agricultural andFood Chemistry, 55, 2049–2054.

Porte, C., Biosca, X., Pastor, D., Sole, M., & Albalges,J. (2000). The Aegean Sea oil spill. 2. Temporalstudy of the hydrocarbons accumulation in bivalves.Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 5067–5075.

Rank, J. (2009). Intersex in Littorina littorea and DNAdamage in Mytilus edulis as indicators of harbour pol-lution. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72,1271–1277.

Rank, J., & Jensen, K. (2003). Comet assay on gill cellsand hemocytes from the blue mussel Mytilus edulis.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 54, 323–329.

Rank, J., Jensen, K., & Jespersen, P. H. (2005). Monitor-ing DNA damage in indigenous blue mussels (Mytilusedulis) sampled from coastal sites in Denmark. Muta-tion Research-Genetic Toxicology and EnvironmentalMutageneis, 585, 33–42.

Regoli, F. (2000). Total Oxyradical Scavenging Capacity(TOSC) in polluted and translocated mussels: A pre-dictive biomarker of oxidative stress. Aquatic Toxicol-ogy, 50, 351–361.

Rocher, B., Le Goff, J., Peluhet, L., Briand, M.,Manduzio, H., Gallois, J., et al. (2006). Genotoxi-cant accumulation and cellular defence activation inbivalves chronically exposed to waterbone contami-nats from the Seine River. Aquatic Toxicology, 79,65–77.

Serafim, M. A., & Bebianno, M. J. (2001). Variation ofmetallothionein and metal concentrations in the di-gestive gland of the clam Ruditapes decussatus: Sexand seasonal effects. Environmental Toxicology andChemistry, 20, 544–552.

Shugart, L. (1988). An alkaline unwinding assay for the de-tection of DNA damage in aquatic organisms. MarineEnvironmental Research, 24, 321–325.

Sicre, M. A., Marty, J. C., Saliot, A., Aparicio, X.,Grimalt, J., & Albaiges, J. (1987). Aliphatic and aro-matic hydrocarbons in different sized aerosols overthe Mediterranean sea: Occurrence and origin. At-mospheric Environment, 21, 2247–2259.

Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R., Schneider, E.L.(1988). A simple technique for quantification of lowlevels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimen-tal and Cell Research, 175, 184–191.

Soclo, H. H., Garrigues, P., & Ewald, M. (2000). Origin ofPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coastalmarine sediments: Case studies in Cotonou (Benin)and Aquitaine (France) areas. Marine Pollution Bul-letin, 40, 387–396.

Solé, M., Porte, C., Pastor, D., & Albaigés, J. (1994).Long-term trends of polychlorinated biphenyls andorganochlorinated pesticides in mussels from the west-ern Mediterranean coast. Chemosphere, 28, 897–903.

Speit, G., & Hartmann, A. (1995). The contribution ofexcision repair to the DNA effects seen in the alkalinesingle cell gel test (comet assay). Mutagenesis, 10, 555–560.

Steinert, S. A., Streib-Montee, R., Leather, J. M., &Chadwick, D. B. (1998). DNA damage in mussels atsites in San Diego Bay. Mutation Research: Fundamen-tal and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 399,65–85.

Taban, I. C., Bechmann, R. K., Torgrimsen, S., Baussant,T., & Sanni, S. (2004). Detection of DNA damage inmussels and sea urchins exposed to crude oil usingcomet assay. Marine Environmental Research, 58, 701–705.

Telli-Karakoç, F., Tolun, L., Henkelmann, B., Klimm, C.,Okay, O., & Schramm, K. (2002). Polycyclic AromaticHydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs) distributions in the bay of Marmara sea: Izmitbay. Environmental Pollution, 119, 383–397.

Thomas, R. E., Lindeberg, M., Harris, P. M., & Rice, S.D. (2007). Induction of DNA strand breaks in themussel (Mytilus trossulus) and clam (Protothaca sta-minea) following chronic field exposure to polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons from the Exxon Valdez spill.Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54, 726–732.

Vlahogianni, T., Dassenakis, M., Scoullos, M. J., &Valavanidis, A. (2007). Integrated use of biomarkers(superoxide dismutase, catalase and lipid peroxida-tion) in mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis for assess-ing heavy metals’ pollution in coastal areas from theSaronikos gulf of Greece. Marine Pollution Bulletin,54, 1361–1371.

Wessel, N., Santos, R., Menard, D., Le Menach, K.,Buchet, V., Lebayon, N., et al. (2010). Relationshipbetween PAH biotransformation as measured by bil-iary metabolites and EROD activity, and genotoxicityin juveniles of sole (Solea solea). Marine Environmen-tal Research. doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2010.03.004.

Wootton, E. C., Dyrynda, E. A., Pipe, R. K., &Ratcliffe, N. A. (2003). Comparisons of PAH-inducedimmunomodulation in three bivalve molluscs. AquaticToxicology, 65, 13–25.

Yunker, M. B., Macdonald, R. W., Vingarzan, R., Mitchell,R. H., Goyette, D., & Sylvestre, S. (2002). PAHs in theFraser River basin: A critical appraisal of PAH ratiosas indicators of PAH source and composition. OrganicGeochemistry, 33, 489–515


Recommended