COMPRAM Methodology of Societal Complexity Approaching and Analytical Enhancing the Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities by ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’ is a research study/paper dedicated to the: * Roman philosopher and mathematician Boetius (ca. 480–524/5AD) - the author of the <<Consolation of Philosophy>>; ** Chair and the tens -:- hundreds of participants (researchers – professors – practitioners) related to the International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity , Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe – and to the founder of the research direction on Societal Complexity: COMPRAM. This dedicated research study/paper is firstly, so, aggregated is presented by Professor Dr. Nicolae Bulz - Professor Dr. Dorien DeTombe and Eliza-Cristina Bulz within the in session EURO 2016 Poznan - WC-21: Methodology of Societal Complexity and Sustainable Development , stream Methodology of Societal Complexity. Area: OR in Health, Life Sciences and Sports July 6, 2016, Wednesday, 12:30-14:00 / Room: Building CW, ground floor, Room 025 Chair: Prof. Dr. Dorien DeTombe International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe / Euro Working Group on Methodology of Societal Complexity [email protected]www.complexitycourse.org/doriendetombe.html
Transcript
COMPRAM Methodology of Societal Complexity Approaching and Analytical Enhancing the Human &
Social Peace and Security Capabilities by ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’
is a research study/paper dedicated to the:
* Roman philosopher and mathematician Boetius (ca. 480–524/5AD) - the author of the <<Consolation of Philosophy>>;
** Chair and the tens -:- hundreds of participants (researchers – professors – practitioners) related to the
International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, Europe – and to the founder of the research direction on Societal Complexity: COMPRAM.
This dedicated research study/paper is firstly, so, aggregated is presented by
Professor Dr. Nicolae Bulz - Professor Dr. Dorien DeTombe and Eliza-Cristina Bulz
within the in session EURO 2016 Poznan - WC-21: Methodology of Societal Complexity and Sustainable Development , stream Methodology of Societal Complexity. Area: OR in Health, Life Sciences and Sports July 6, 2016, Wednesday, 12:30-14:00 / Room: Building CW, ground floor, Room 025 Chair:
Prof. Dr. Dorien DeTombe International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe / Euro Working Group on Methodology of Societal Complexity [email protected] www.complexitycourse.org/doriendetombe.html
MA: Institute of Chartered Accountants ICAS), Scotland, UK - memberKnowledge-based Development Foundation (KBDF), Bucharest, Romania – member and Journal of Economics and Technologies Knowledge (JETK) Techno-Executive
COMPRAM Methodology of Societal Complexity Approaching and Analytical Enhancing the Human & Social Peace and Security Capabilities by ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’
is a research study/paper firstly dedicated to the Roman philosopher and mathematician Boetius (ca. 480–524/5AD) - the author of the <<Consolation of Philosophy>> treaty on [his] PROBLEM / written within the death sentence vs. his non-Arianism.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The posibilities_domain regarding this presentation: Two variances – related to different focusing within ‘Science-Religion Dialogue’:
THE CORE: Cosmological Model_1 (axiomatic) - Last stage bio-anthropologic research
- Neuro and Cognitive perspectives
‘Positive’ samples - DARWIN – LAMARK’s absent dialogue - ADN, mind and consciousness as a set of (universal) tools [“I Dream a Dream” – case study] - SOCIAL NETWORKS – Science-Religion Dialogue’s Econometric elicitation(s) [A case study]
‘Negative’ samples - Thomas KEMP’s and Adam MORTON’s reflections on EVIL - DANTE’s and BOTICELLI’s reflections on Earthly and beyond Earthly World(s)
THE CORE: Cosmological Model_2 (interactive and subtle_axiomatic) - Last stage Micro and Macro-Cosmos researches- Neuro, Bio, and Quantum Computing perspectives
‘Positive’ samples
- From Stephan ODOBLEJA’s non-edited manuscripts (Drobeta - Tr. Severin State Archive) - From Mihai DRAGANESCU’S Consciousness Society; Basarab NICOLESCU’s Transdisciplinary construct; Constantin V. NEGOITA’s Fuzziness and Post-modernity construct; Mircea MALITZA’s Geo-(post)modernity construct
Medieval manuscript front-page for Boetius’ work
Initial Constrains – Necessity AND Sufficiency
* Modelling and Simulation/Emulation of the Complex Societal Problems /// starting within three stages at the University level(s): (1) Temporal series; (2) Analytical models; (3) COMPRAM Methodology
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*** Probabilistic, fuzzy, and subtle representation / resolution stance on human being: SUFFERING FORGIVINGEVIL GOODSIN LOVEPUNISHMENT SALVATION
1: A surprising equivalence between Consolation of Philosophy and Methodology for Societal Complexity (COMPRAM)
There is the possibility to affirm on a very surprising [methodological] equivalence, beyond a historian space-time, between two important attempts toward the forever difficult "problem solving":
I: Consolation of Philosophy, by Roman philosopher and mathematician Boetius (ca. 480–524 or 525), and
II: Methodology for Societal Complexity, by professor Dorien J. DeTombe [Defining complex interdisciplinary societal problems. A theoretical study for constructing a co-operative problem analyzing methodology: the methodology COMPRAM. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers Amsterdam (thesis), 1994, 439 pp.]
It is here to point, only, on some occurrence of the concepts problem (4) and solve / solution (3) across the text of Consolation of Philosophy: * Book III. True Happiness and False.‘I understand the problem, but I desire to hear how thou wouldst solve it.’** Book V. Free Will and God’s Foreknowledge.Then said I: ‘But now I am once more perplexed by a problem yet more difficult.’
If we could know, as He knows, all that is most perplexing in this problem would be made plain. For knowledge depends not on the nature of the thing known, but on the faculty of the knower. Then said she: ‘This debate about providence is an old one, and is vigorously discussed by Cicero in his “Divination”; thou also hast long and earnestly pondered the problem, yet no one has had diligence and perseverance enough to find a solution. And the reason of this obscurity is that the movement of human reasoning cannot cope with the simplicity of the Divine foreknowledge; for if a conception of its nature could in any wise be framed, no shadow of uncertainty would remain. With a view of making this at last clear and plain, I will begin by considering the arguments by which thou art swayed. First, I inquire into the reasons why thou art dissatisfied with the solution proposed, which is to the effect that, seeing the fact of foreknowledge is not thought the cause of the necessity of future events, foreknowledge is not to be deemed any hindrance to the freedom of the will.
Now, surely the sole ground on which thou arguest the necessity of the future is that things which are foreknown cannot fail to come to pass. But if, as thou wert ready to acknowledge just now, the fact of foreknowledge imposes no necessity on things future, what reason is there for supposing the results of voluntary action constrained to a fixed issue? Suppose, for the sake of argument, and to see what follows, we assume that there is no foreknowledge. Are willed actions, then, tied down to any necessity in this case?’‘Certainly not.’It is obvious that Boetius' texts, here depicted, are comprised into a theological treaty (on the realm of the VI century; onto a dramatic context genesis). But any reader could comprehend that the superior cognitive level of the usage of "foreknowledge", co-referring the simplicity of the Divinity and the happiness of the humans, is a subtle methodological acquisition of a VI century meditation - but not only - it is an in ovo attempt to a multi-level representation of the real and reality. It is a similar, at least, contemporary attempt toward the interdisciplinary representation and solving of the societal problems within our complexity.A detailed inquiry within the entire content of Boetius' texts would possible depict significant equivalence between his and our attempts toward the "problem solving", then enhancing us to an extended attempt, awareness, insight and praxis.
Preface.
Proem.
Book I. The Sorrows of Boethius.Boethius’ Complaint. His Despondency. The Mists Dispelled. Nothing Can Subdue Virtue. Boethius’ Prayer. All Things have Their Needful Order The Perturbations of Passion.
Book II. The Vanity of Fortune’s GiftsFortune’s Malice. Man’s Covetousness. All Passes. The Golden Mean. The Former Age. Nero’s Infamy. Glory May Not Last. Love is Lord of All.
The Thorns of Error. The Bent of Nature. The Insatiableness of Avarice. Disgrace of Honours Conferred by a Tyrant. Self-Mastery. True Nobility. Pleasure’s Sting. Human Folly. Invocation. The True Light. Reminiscence. Orpheus and Eurydice.
Book IV. Good and ILL Fortune.
The Soul’s Flight. The Bondage of Passion. Circe’s Cup.
The Unreasonableness of Hatred. Wonder and Ignorance. The Universal Aim. The Hero’s Path
Book V. Free Will and God’s Foreknowledge.
Chance. The True Sun. Truth’s Paradoxes. A Psychological Fallacy. The Upward Look.
Epilogue.
Song III.The Mists Dispelled.
Then the gloom of night was scattered, Sight returned unto mine eyes.So, when haply rainy Caurus Rolls the storm-clouds through the skies,Hidden is the sun; all heaven Is obscured in starless night.But if, in wild onset sweeping, Boreas frees day’s prisoned light,All suddenly the radiant god outstreams,And strikes our dazzled eyesight with his beams..
3 7 Memory
2 6
1 5
Su St 4 Bu Ba
- + Action - +
Symbols into the above graphics: / Spatial (not yet ‘subtle’ representation towards ‘subtle’ resolution:bureaucracy: Bu, and surveillance: Su; bases of data, knowledge and moral items: Ba, and stimulation: St Planar representation (a section into the space / within “zero” level Politics – oz axis ): 1 (Poverty level / Demographic pulse ); 2 (Popular scenarios / informational chaos: probabilities, fuzziness and subtleness ); 3 (Stochastic appearance of life / beyond the probabilistic fate ), and 4 (Prospective track / beyond, between and within foresight and forecasting); 5 (Financial pulse / beyond the fuzziness of our track of life); 6 (Happiness pulse / beyond the heuristics of our track of life - but within the “smile of the human on the street” ); 7 (Attractive education / as a condensed “awareness-insight-action” track ) figures accordingly to a consonant (analytical ,or algebraic, or …) measure. Axiom: The embedded accountable aspect of the tension Memory Action: It shapes the curve function inward a domain of ‘free will’ (linear, non-linear: quasi-cosinus hyperbolic – quasi-circular)
2: Towards the attaining of a subtle (desired) representation-support, here and now, it is worth to simulate, through a personalist-ognitive track the environment of social qualitative data. The result is presented into the coupled graphics, as below:
The qualitative graphics refer an accountable estimation of the aposteriori outlook from the holistic entity – as survival, persistence and/or progress. The space: (ox): Action; (oy): Memory; (oz): Politics; …
2.5: WHY THERE IS NOT HUMANKIND’S COMPLETENESS AND CONSISTENCY WITHIN TRUE, GOODNESS, BEAUTY, MORALITY, VALUE, BEST PRAXIS, …?
::
2.6: WHY …? e.g.:
200 years Aberdeen harbor growth
Murchinchinson oil platform (decommissioning began in the fourth quarter of 2013 and is expected to continue for approximately five years.
Plugging and abandoning of the 33 platform wells that have subsea tie-backs to three remote wells began in late 2013.) – versus Piper Alpha catastrophe (6 July 1988, killing 167)
:: ::
An energetic systems is controllable versus ONE inner variable : frequency
3: A type of reflection onto, into and by society. A paradigm of societal modeling: Interactive Modeling
The following seven tables try to synthesize a conceptual modeling stage (defining implicitly the proposed Interactive Modeling approach toward societal modeling). The single tools are: the conceptual items regarding nature, society and thinking, and the same are the purposes to be attained [II.].
Table 1 A model of the contemporary space-time for our cybernetic becoming:Hyper-bottle
Klein /
The unity ofour world(s)
INTRO(“accent of existence and
reflection” onto theprofoundness of our
contemporary space-time)
EXTRO(“accent of existence and
reflection” onto the externalprofoundness of contemporary space-
time)OPENNESS“white box”
a: Real world / pull-back c: Trans-real world / pull-before
CLOSE“black box”
b: Meta-real world / pull- tech d: Pre-real world / pull-back_back
Table 2 Possible varieties of thinking:THINKING(t.)
CONSCIOUSNESS ? COGNITIVE PROCESSES INTO ? SUB_CONSCIOUSNESSSISTEMIC t. Openness
Table 4 The source of contemporary thinking defragmentationMental Focalization /proper research domain
AssumedResponsibility
Assumed Meta_Responsibility
Analytic Mind GEOMODERNITYvs.Interdisciplinarity
TRANSDICIPLINARITYvs. Transhumanist Manifesto
Algebraic Mind FUZZIFICAREvs. Co-disciplinarity
STRUCTURAL–FENOMENOLOGYvs. Integrative Science
Table 5 Tabular form of the World of Individualhood:An aggregation of the
Plato’s and Aristotle’s
approaches
INTRO_entity with
frontiers
EXTRO_entity with
frontiers
OPEN frontiers for entity 1: EXISTENCE 3: POZITIVITY
CLOSED frontiers for entity 2: NEGATIVITY 4: REFLECTATION
What is necessary and sufficient onto a (virtual) processor from an Anticipatory / Incursion (computing) system? The following three conjectures are constructed so:
Conjecture 1: A sufficient frame is the aggregation of the elements of the set { BELIEF; UNDERSTANDING; EXPLANATION; PRAXIS }, onto the ansamblage of the represented / solved problems.
Into the Internet context, to propose to constitute a new structure: to denominate it “Internetron”. Any “process_products, within our world(s): (Hypothetical Reality, Models, Ideals), would contains, at least, a link between the entities to gather into an Internetron. The sufficient threshold for an Internetron is to achieve the cognitive resources and to perform the anticipation, within its context [IV.].
Conjecture 2: A necessary frame is the aggregation of the elements of the set { BELIEF-DESIRE-EMOTION (B-D-E); PRAXIS }, onto the ansamblage as a whole, and to each represented / solved problem.
It is seeming the context of the e-EUROPE program, equivalent with the Table 1 frame, the identification of a virtual corpus with a single face, within the circularity : a, b, c, d, a, … :
a: Real world / pull-back c: Trans-real world / pull-before b: Meta-real world / pull- tech d: Pre-real world / pull-back_back
Into the Internet context, to propose to constitute a new structure: to denominate it “Internetron into the contemporary space-time for our cybernetic becoming”, or shorter “Planetron”.The necessary threshold for a Planetron is to achieve the cognitive resources and to perform the incursion, within its context [IV.].
Into this context to appreciate the equivalence of the B-D-E constructs with the human complexity of the reflection upon the reflection (that is to touch consciousness) – through the triad of triads T1 (faith; hope; will), T2 (prejudice; surprise; evidence), T3 (e-Concepts; expectations; admissible time).
The Christian two millennial topos, for T1 would be: T1(faith-as capability; hope-as necessity; love-as sufficiency).
Conjecture 3: A necessary and sufficient frame is the aggregation of the elements of the set { human awareness; human insight; social action (human-machine) (A-I-A)}.
Toward the implementation of this necessary and sufficient frame it is to put in evidence the construct of Qualia [III.], [VI.]. So, an Anticipatory / Incursive Neural Network: as a Dual Comprehension Flow would anticipatory “to implode” by our perceptibility (awareness), anterior to our emergence – but supposing it, and “to explode” within an uniformization of our states, across our innovative status, beside our emergence – and firmly constructing it – it would be our Qualia (an natural gift within, by, and inward our Cosmos, here and now – at least for us).
Definition 9: Our individual Qualia is our cultural trace, but the social Qualia (may be only societal Qualia) is the aggregation of the entire set{ BELIEF; UNDERSTANDING; EXPLANATION; PRAXIS } through the linear flow {humankind awareness; human insight; social action}.
This linear flow “make pieces” (through the fragmentation and co-planarization within Table 1) human circular ring: {information1-decision-action-information2}. The construct of Qualia introduces / represents the locus (“without states”) of implosion of the entries and explosion of the outputs of the initial conceptual network. So, Definition 9 overlap the usual perspective on Qualia
To associate for the structure proper to Definition 9 a denomination: “liniarizated Internetron” (or shorter, “Sociotron”)
The sufficient and necessary threshold for a Sociotron is to achieve the cognitive resources and to perform the anticipation and incursion, within its context [IV.].
Remark 4: To associate all the above six tables with the cognitive patterns, elaborated step by step through axioms, definitions, propositions, remarks and consequences, and constituted as: the “Memory Action” . Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity cognitive societal model.These six tables, and mainly the last in its climax, through the proposed association, attain lower proper levels of resource-consumption till an attained social memory and /or action mark.So, Project: the t“Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension gains new perspectives by the procedural utility of the Table 6 – just devoted to assure a quasi-completeness and quasi-consistency to the previously denominated mental construct: the ascendant Action by ascendant levels of the Memory – just involving and expanding, here, the concept of social Qualia.
Table 6 “Existence” / “Belonging” filter over the (e-)WorldDimension of “belonging” to the(e-)Worlds; connections to:
(e-)WORLD as a(hypothetical) real / model /ideal systemcomprehension after / beyond /in accordance to PLATO
humanawareness
humaninsight
socialaction(human-machine)
HumanAwareness
REACTION(ex.judiciary)
Tounderstand
TO HAVE
Human Insight to „pass”again
QUALIA to explain
Dimension of“existence”within the (e-)Worlds;
Connectionsto:
Social Action(human-machine)
TO BE To „live”again
ACTION(ex.industrial-financial)
Central pattern: Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity
<=> (space) <=> Humankind / singularities
<=> Humankind diversity/ spatial <=>
GENEROSITY
Partnership Solidarity
Our INTENTIONALITY Axis
Solidarity PartnershipCREATIVITY
<=> Humankind diversity/ temporal <=>
Humankind / communities <=> (time) <=>
Central pattern: Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity
pattern <=> (space) <=> Humankind / singularities
<=> Humankind diversity/ spatial <=>
GENEROSITY
Partnership Solidarity
pattern Our RESPONSIBILITY_Labyrinth
Our INTENTIONALITY Axis pattern
Solidarity PartnershipCREATIVITY
<=> Humankind diversity/ temporal <=> pattern
Humankind / communities <=> (time) <=>
Central pattern: Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity
A pattern <=> (space) <=> Humankind / singularities
Revolutionary iteration of progress Spatial evolution/decay >>>
Partnership Solidarity D pattern B pattern GENEROSITY
LIBERTY / Our INTENTIONALITY Axis PROSECUTION / CREATIVITY
CONSTRUCTION Our RESPONSIBILITY_Labyrinth COERCIONbeyond space Solidarity Partnership beyond time Dual Cause Primal Cause <=> Input <=> C pattern <=> Output <=> interaction interaction Evolutionary iteration of solidarity “ ADMINISTRATION “Creative” Societal / partnership < Temporal evolution/decay (des)illusion <<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>> <Historical/temp. Awareness> Rhythm (Uniface/Möbius property)
4: A paradigm of complex recurrence. The resolutive solution of a model to comprise: ego, world, nature, society, thinking
The following cognitive and interactive model would be devoted to sustain the existence of a complex recurrence between the ascendant Action and the ascendant levels of the Memory.
4.1. The infra and hyper-incursion is due to connectedness.The anticipation is due to communication.
4.2 . The world of Paradoxes is a crystal or a broken one as are the harmonization regarding
connectedness and communication.
A
D
CLight
I-becoming
B
G
Modelbecoming
ProfoundZone
Light
O-becoming
4.3. Conceptual expand inward the each face of the pyramid (A; B; C; D; G):
* inward A face: algebraic thinking Existence edge: to BE edge: THINKING Reflection analytic thinking edge: to COMBINE Objectivity Subjectivity the name of the A face equilibrium: EGO-REFERENTIALITY
** inward B face: algebraic thinking high frequent nouns Fuzzyfication Structural-Phenomenology edge: THINKING edge: NOUNS Geomodernism Transdisciplinarityanalytic thinking low frequent edge: to CONDUCT proto-Responsibility next-Responsibility the name of the B face equilibrium: RESPONSIBILITY
*** inward C face:
high frequent nouns a WORLD meta WORLD closed edge: NOUNS edge: STRUCTURE low frequent trans WORLD real WORLD open edge: to CONCORD Extro-vity Intro-vity the name of the C face equilibrium: SYSTEM-REFERENTIALITY
IV * inward D face: the name of the D face equilibrium: RISK-UNCERTAINITY-HEURISTIC REFERENTIALITY closed Negativeness edge: STRUCTURE edge: to HAVE open Positiveness
edge: to ACT (to COMBINE; to CONCORD; to CONDUCT)
Negative Feed-back Positive Feed-back
V * inward G face: D face Objectivity to BE ; to HAVE STRUCTURE Intro-vity
EGO-REFERENTIALITY A face C face SYSTEM- -REFERENTIALITY G face
Subjectivity THINKING B face NOUNS Extro-vity
edge: to COMBINE edge: to CONDUCT edge: to CONCORD proto-responsibility meta-responsibility RESPONSIBILITY
the name of the G face equilibrium: A-INTENTIONALITY & NON-INTENTIONALITY vs. “upper” INTENTIONALITY and META-INTENTIONALITY
VI * The arrow :: to BE the name of the arrow of the pyramid equilibrium: INTENTIONALITY & META-INTENTIONALITY to HAVE vs. “lower” A-INTENTIONALITY and NON-INTENTIONALITY
4.4. Conceptual expand beyond the faces of the pyramid (A; B; C; D; G):
VII * The arrow expandation of the pyramid onto A face: God’s pointer (as Trinity’s pointers) onto B face: Redeemer’s primal pointer onto C face: Redeemer’s dual pointer onto D face: Holy Ghost’s pointer
VIII * The expandation of the G face to A face: from God’s pointer (to BE; THINKING; to COMBINE) (as Human Being’s pointers) to B face: from Redeemer’s primal pointer (THINKING; NOUNS; to CONDUCT) to C face: from Redeemer’s dual pointer (NOUNS; STRUCTURE; to CONCORD) to D face: from Holy Ghost’s pointer (STRUCTURE; to HAVE; to ACT)
IX * The correspondence between VII and VIII expandation would reveal Qualia (the property to have properties; see again Definition 9 and Table 6, for more). Qualia’s relevation is higher or lower as the INTENTIONALITY and META-INTENTIONALITY, and A-INTENTIONALITY and NON-INTENTIONALITY are aggregated.The Trinity may express INTENTIONALITY and META-INTENTIONALITY, the Human Being may express A-INTENTIONALITY and NON-INTENTIONALITY.All these may express the Profound Zone as a World of INTENTIONALITY.
The turning points into the Profound Zone, as a World of INTENTIONALITY, to be expressed by the attaining of the Magellanity property (within its neuro-geometrical equivalence with the mental acceptance of the spherically Earth).
The following mental string would support the presupposed neuro-geometrical equivalence as to exist within the above presented Human Being’s pointers: to BE; the pointer (to BE; THINKING; to COMBINE); the primal pointer (THINKING; NOUNS; to CONDUCT); the dual pointer (NOUNS; STRUCTURE; to CONCORD); the pointer (STRUCTURE; to HAVE; to ACT); to HAVE.
X * The connectedness and the communication are due to Qualia, and present high or lower status as –
inward connectedness: as the equilibria of the faces (A; B; C; D; G) of the pyramid are attained a harmonization or not even: EGO-REFERENTIALITY with the RESPONSIBILITY, RESPONSIBILITY with the SYSTEM-REFERENTIALITY, SYSTEM-REFERENTIALITY with the RISK-UNCERTAINITY-HEURISTIC REFERENTIALITY, RISK-UNCERTAINITY-HEURISTIC REFERENTIALITY with the EGO-REFERENTIALITY.
inward communication: as the tensions onto the edges of the pyramid are attained a harmonization or not even: Objectivity / Subjectivity with the proto-Responsibility / next-Responsibility, proto-Responsibility / next-Responsibility with Extro-vity / Intro-vity, Extro-vity / Intro-vity with the Negative Feedback / Positive Feedback, Negative Feedback / Positive Feedback with the Objectivity / Subjectivity.
The functionalism of the world of Paradoxes is supported by the infra and hyper-incursion, and anticipation.
The turning points into the world of Paradoxes, to be expressed by the attaining of the Möbius-ity property (within its neuro-geometrical equivalence with the band of one face).
The neuro-geometrical ascension on a neuro-shape with Möbius-ity property would consist into:XI.1: To cut the circular mental shape: EGO-REFERENTIALITY RESPONSIBILITY SYSTEM-REFERENTIALITYRISK-UNCERTAINITY-HEURISTIC REFERENTIALITYEGO-REFERENTIALITY
XI.2: To cut the circular mental shape: Objectivity / Subjectivityproto-Responsibility / next-ResponsibilityExtro-vity / Intro-vityNegative Feed-back / Positive Feed-backObjectivity / Subjectivity
XI.3: To put “opposite” the sticker between the XI.1 and XI.2, “now” linear mental shapes.
Remark 5: So, Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension gains new perspectives by the procedural utility of the scheme from the sub-paragraph 3.2 (The world of Paradoxes presenting the status of the harmonization regarding connectedness and communication). So, Table 6 – is a proper approach on the ascendant Action by ascendant levels of the Memory (through the concept of social Qualia), and the scheme from the sub-paragraph 3.2. is a proper approach on the complex recurrence between the ascendant Action and the ascendant levels of the Memory.
5: The paradigm on moral society in conjunction with Project: the “Memory Action” tension / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity5.1. The presentation of the Project as a contemporary replay to Reinhold Niebuhr’s paradigm: Moral Man and Immoral Society
The presentation of the author’ replay as a four folded insightI: The first fold
There is into the American mass-media pool a new trend: to (re)present into an unexpected way the climax of the financial competition and the locus of the high stress human activity, the stock exchange - the place where people (merchants, stockbrokers, dealers, etc.) publicly buy and sell stock and shares in companies, the turning point of investing money. Starting from the fact that there are human beings involved, then there is the possibility to replace the abstract and invisible competition with a commonplace co-operation, during a so short individual work-life into a stock exchange.
II: The second fold of the author’ replay as a (surprising) insight
There is into the American intellectual pool a very complex reflection of the corpus of works from Reinhold Niebuhr (1892-1971), but SEPARATING the two books: “The Nature and Destiny of Man : A Christian Interpretation”, and “Moral Man and Immoral Society”
Regarding “The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation”, into e-book sites:
“Niebuhr has developed the most balanced statement of our character, identity, and core behavior motivations. He references all major worldviews from Eastern Naturalism to Western Rationalism to Biblical Revelation. The Biblical Worldview provides the most balanced perspective of our human nature, which is offensive to the contrasting perspectives. In Volume 1, he identifies our form and our vitality as essential components of our nature. He also identifies that our desire for freedom, our ability to transcend our natural state and our self-interest leads to "Mans Problem." Volume 2 focuses on worldviews that have messianic expectations and resolutions of history through corporate identities. One can understand Niebuhrs perspective on the eve of WWIIs Fascist nations. In summary, this is absolutely one of the best works I have read to help clarify our human nature. His perspective is pragmatic, but is still very focused on core Christian doctrines. Buy it, read it, wait a year, read it again, and ponder the depth and breath of his insights!” (e-book site, 2004).
“This work is known to be a classic, and in my opinion, it is the best written last century. I even enjoyed R. Niebuhr better than Tillich and Barth. His erudition and conclusions are powerful and engaging. I recommend reading this for those familiar with political thought and philosophy of the modern era. By no means is this work parochial, it scope makes it a enthralling read even for those who find themselves outside to spectrum of Christian belief “(“Best 20th Century Theological Work” e-book site, 2004). “In the Nature and Destiny of Man, Reinhold Niebuhr, the influential "Christian realist" theologian, deals with big issues: the nature of man, history, and the end of the history. He offers deep - I would say profound - support for his views, but not proof. He offers one interpretation of the meaning of lives mysteries but not the only possible interpretation.
IV: The fourth fold of the author’ replay as an (synthetic proposed) insight
Adam Smith (1723-1790), is the European civilization all over remembered author of An Inquiry into the nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London, 1776. Into the context of this paper, and more over, it is to express that the European civilization would better benefit, preserving actively into its intellectual and collective memory the fact that he is, also, the author of The Theory of Moral Sentiments, London, 1759. These two books (and the other three of his creativeness) are co-
expressing the construct of “invisible hand” as metaphor for the self-regulation of an (equilibrated) market, if his other construct: fellow-feeling is acting into a moral context, co-depicted into XVIIIth century Scotland, within Shaftesbury, Hutchenson, and his friend David Hume, by the so called “School of good feeling and real sentiments”. Later on, W. Stanley Jevons, into his more than 14 edition reprinted, Political Economy, 1878, is worth to point after a century on Adam Smith’s five principal circumstances which make for small wages in some occupations, and balance great wages in other ones, as follows:“The agreeableness or disagreeableness of the employment themselves.The easiness and cheapness, or the difficulty and expense of learning the occupation.The constancy or inconstancy of employment.The small or great trust which must be reposed in those who exercise the employment.And lastly, the probability or improbability of success in employment greatly affects the wages of those who succeed.” Then, arguing on the “leaving everybody at perfect liberty to enter any trade”, Jevons states on “What is a fair day’s wages”. Happy times, of good memory within all Adam Smith’s heritage: wealth + morality. This heritage is not integral preserved into contemporary period, but may be, still, restored – evidently into a more complex scientific context, and into a tremendous more complex reality.
In 1935 Harcourt, Brace and Company had published the translation of the book The Mind and Society by Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923). Written in Italian, translated in French, it was made available in English, and reviewed by Aldous Huxley: ‘Hunger and thirst after rationality are at least as characteristic of the human mind as hunger and thirst after righteousness. As keenly as they desire to behave well or at least to be thought to behave well –men desire to understand. To live in a world that makes no sense is intolerable to them. They feel an overwhelming need to explain the universe and themselves within it. But whereas the hunger and the thirst after righteousness find their satisfaction (so far, at least, as theory goes) in such things as the Ten Commandments, the Nine Beatitudes, the Eightfold way, the hunger and the thirst after rationality can never be fully assuaged except by the one. Man’s ambition is to explain everything in terms of a single principle, to reduce the bewildering diversity of phenomena to intellectual Unity. Ultimately, it may be science will actually achieve the complete unification of the diversity. It is possible, it is perhaps even moderately probable, that all phenomena will suffer themselves to be interpreted in terms of one explanatory principle. ... It is the great merit of Vilfredo Pareto that he resisted the two opposite temptations which confront the sociologist: the temptation, on the one hand, merely to describe without attempting to explain; and on the other, the temptation to explain everything in terms of only a single principle. The residues of the fifth class are those having to do with “the integrity of the individual.” Every individual in a society has a certain notion of his relations with other individuals and with the community in general. When these “right” relations are disturbed, he feels more or less acute distress and tries either really or symbolically to restore the equilibrium. ... cardinal important book” (Huxley, Aldous. Pareto’s Museum of Human Stupidity / With the Face of Confucius and the Fierce Irony of Voltaire. The New York Herald Tribune. Section VII, June 9. 1935, 1-2)
5.2. An individual attempt proposed to be continued through Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension. The research on the BODY AND THE CONSCIOUSNESS; PARADIGMS OF MIND AND SOCIETY, constituted as a sub-project: Sub-Project: (In)visible (Hu)man*5.2.1. AbstractA theoretical approach upon the Consciousness versus the Body aims at re-defining Mind-Body problem according with an ideal stratum of the nature (as matter and reflection). Information-rational subject, brain-mind-body, nature-consciousness-society would be the main pieces of this stratum, involving both Cognitive Science and Interdisciplinary Sociology.
Our real (hypothetical systemic) body comprises both paradoxes and limitations regarding (hypothetical non-systemic) consciousness:
* I: Ancestors-successors images and mental insight upon consciousness (non-personal body);
* II: Face / hands / nude / clothes / sensors acquired shapes (static and dynamic balanced items - as aggregated substance&energy and "revealed" information toward body);
* III: Individual&collective body (an "unrevealed" gap related to consciousness);
* IV: From dolls toward photos album (a chronological humankind passage);
* V: Equilibrium between: energetic needs, sexual behavior, knowledge eliciting (the convergence of the body mental concept as pattern). In this context two complementary paradigms of mind and society would prove a normality according with a fuzzy topos :
#1 The divergence of the body mental concept is a meta-equilibrium pattern between: "will - must - can" humankind triad;
#2 There is a fuzzy centered topos through the open domain: * I - * V
Focusing upon the sustainable balance: nature and paradigms #1 - #2 , there is a circular flow: "the intelligence/I stage/ of the body" - "mind-body problem" - "paradigms of mind and society" - "consciousness inputs and emergence" - "the intelligence/II stage/ of the body".
*5.2.2. Initial argumentative imagery [Why?]
1. Is there an eco-consciousness?A. The individual reflection (between mechanic and creation – parts of the reflection, as an entire complex
relation: nature, human being, society, Universe, seen and unseen parts of micro, inner and macro-Cosmos) upon other individual; the individual reflection upon its ego;
B. The individual reflection upon the collectivity (from mechanic agglomeration of people, to superior aggregation, to extreme aggregations, till the (non-)consonance of the thinkers);
C. The paradoxes of the repetitive individual1-collective-individual2 backtracking of the eco-consciousness: killing, war, lying, escaping from the essence, hiding in mud; 2. Does his eco-consciousness exist?3. Does her eco-consciousness exist?4. The basic problem of the eco-consciousness : do not kill! The background of contemporaneous religions: the infinitesimal magnitude –but very precious- of each individual inside the Universe.
[Note: the pages depicting this above shortly presented imagery are jpg files; the author shall send the CD at the request]
Initial argumentative key-patterns:* A <<his>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus –as sociocybernetical topos inside/for a community - has a particular complexity (nearly different from both clear sides: he and she);** The identity, the process of surveillance, and the progress of the respective community are the most correlated items from the huge emergent items of a (possible) <<his>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus ;*** "Positive", "negative" and "gray" <<his>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus (according to the "values-knock" of their set of items);*4* <<His>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus from different points of "view": each individual's (man's, woman's, older person's, child's), group's, village's/city's, region's, country's, group of country's, [geographic] zone's, cultural zone's, continental area's, planet's [all of these as humankind entities amalgamated with their technical resources, with their artifacts, with their soul/spirit (individual – collective)].
Second-stepped argumentative key-patterns:* Universal, and particular complexity of the human aggregation | general, planetary, and particular complexity of a community;
** Implicit and explicit balance of the "identity-surveillance-progress" of a human aggregation | of a community;*** The interval of the balanced values for a human aggregation | for a community (estimation, measurement);*4* <<His>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus versus the balance of the "identity-surveillance-progress"; versus: from different points of "view" (as the above *4* shows);*5* The "values-knock" of a <<his>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus :=: the estimations and/or the measurements for all the depicted items of the description (representation) of a city, of its initial actions (planned and/or "self-organized"), of its constituted problems (real, imaginary, false). Like Alexander the Great – in front of the legendary knock from Gordium ( 334 BC) the mayor, his counselors, the communities dedicated scientists, the citizens "have the innovative" Alexander's solution: to cut the knock with the sword, or the classical solution: to solve the problem (related to a complex knock: to find its beginning, to pass till the end of the thread). As each problem (city problem) is a thread with its metaphoric knock, then <<to ignore>> or <<to solve>> the problem are the alternatives; each of them with its deep profoundness. Logically, the solving of a problem follows (may) after its representation; meta-logically may be amalgamated (as the heuristics capacities of the human beings much involve, albeit the huge amount of methods and algorithms for modeling/simulation of a problem). [It is one of the principles from Sociocybernetics.]
The presupposed innovative capacities of :## the insight upon the owner of a (hypothetical) eco-consciousness: to his/her heart [yet unrevealed profoundness], brain [mental profoundness], social security threat,## body correlation to eco-consciousness,## body mental concept, construct and eco-consciousness,## ... the finding of an innovative solution; any famous general would be granted with fame not for classical solutions, but for operative, surprising (and successful) attempts, ## ... the future insight upon communication, knowledge, culture "features" would project the complex knock of the <<his>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness balanced locus inside a cognitive space "where" to find the beginning, and to pass till the end of the thread/balanced locus – the way is to be "seen", and then follow,## the insight upon a complex knock of the <<his>>/<<her>> eco-consciousness UNbalanced locus. It would denominate the situation for the finding of one or even some cognitive space(s), "where to see", but the observable thread ... is broken. (Metaphorical) is comminuted towards "threats". Then, it is to change the typical thinking at all. To find a broader inter/trans-disciplinary renewed approach.
*5.2.3. The content of the Sub-Project: (In)visible (Hu)manAim: The seeking of "our inner words" - insight as an interdisciplinary experiment, a transdisciplinary experience, and an intercultural approach versus the balance : Body <=> Consciousness (both as mental constructs / concepts)
Content:Humankind problems require different types of specialists. It seems that one type (at least) is missing: specialists that could study the general and particular mistakes and errors of the scientists and/or praxis oriented people, trying to reduce the propagation of the mistakes and errors from one generation of specialists to an other. As a possible insight into this search of a new type of specialists, and also as an emulation, this paper presents a "thinking - language" driblet. The existence-reflection connection may reveal some deep features of our worlds, as mental concept <=> mental construct is. Then, the focus upon security <=> evolution is facing the responsibility mental construct versus different types of systemic thinking. This context promotes an analytical effort into the representation and solving problems. An internalizing of existence and belonging -on one side- and of genesis, acting, doing, and making -on the other side- would promote an outlook on open / closed entities within, inside, by and around a rational subject. So, he/she will engage an insight in and around its ego and world image, through the verbal usage of to be and to have. The projected emergence would be an understanding/explanation of the verbal sequence to combine_to concord_to conduct. According to this paper it would be elicited within, inside, by and around some of the contemporary problems, some of the imminent problems, and would promote an inter / trans-disciplinary research as experiment / experience, and an intercultural approach.An adequate main frame for this type of research / approach would be imbedded in the Universal Consciousness and Eco-consciousness mental constructs / concepts. All these means -according within a long-term understanding / explanation / reconstruction- an other type of scientific behavior.
An adage belonging to Romanian scientists from the post-second war period read as follows: <<Give more to science, expect less from science, and thoroughly prepare the progress of the future science>>. Today, though, none of us [Romanian, at least] seems to act accordingly. We are somewhat open (to this adage) but quasi-non-engaged.Each of us is seeking grants, contracts, and higher remunerated vacancies rather than searching for ideas and [self-constructed] projects. That is why the metaphor (In)visible (Hu)man, here, is proposed as title of this paper - as a desired application, a distributed project. We are not quite scared, but we are far from an inner-harmonic [and self-constructed] reaction in front of the quasi-constant emergent palette of the observed individual and humankind. This palette being quasi-constant (from extrovert behavior to introvert despair), it is of the same type as in the Ancient, Medieval, Modern Worlds. But it was and is [only] systemically minded.
There are no totally new or [self-]changed attitudes. Contemporary World(s) are still non-innovative and quite conservative about their inner patterns, despite the huge innovative man-machine interface and broader artifact world(s). [These stationary attitudes may be based upon a huge power of the natural archetype(s) of humankind - this power is not yet fully observed/explained/understood. Today, it seems that there is no room for a "humankind (holistic) psychoanalyst".]
Final remarksThe seeking of "our inner words" - insight as an interdisciplinary experiment, a transdisciplinary experience, and an intercultural approach Let be a rational subject, our world and a problem. Considering a desired representation and solution for the problem, an "initial" step is proposed. The rational subject, according with his/her comprehension of the problem will try to carry the entire problem across the cognitive effort to balance the verbs meaning of the existence, belonging and concordance_combination_conduct with nouns or groups of nouns which are the most proper versus the problem. Then he/she will represent and solve the problem. Then, he/she will search the nouns representing the open and closed entities, which are describing the context of the just solved problem. This maybe a circular Archimedes-type point, a confidence. The ideal emergence of any case study, practically applying within the theoretical frame supposed to be elicit, would be concretely both "inner" verbs and nouns to reveal: the Universal Consciousness and Eco-consciousness mental constructs / concepts of ourselves - individuals and humankind.
Project: (In)visible (Hu)man The rational subject, the constituted problems, the solved and yet unsolved problems are constituting our world. If our desire is to change the contemporary world, the "the seeking of our inner words" may be merged -across different moments- within the real problem representation and solving. The critical feedback upon the efficiency of this attempt is strictly necessary. This is an adaptive "loop" facing the variety of our problems, searching the Eden trees of "consciousness" and "life".
A representation of a problem is attached (Append). It is an invitation to an other type of solving the problem. So, the project: (In)visible (Hu)man maybe an open link. The Visible Human may be acted by each of us, into his/her "consciousness" and "life", his/her community as a complex (hypothetical) real + model + ideal (hyper_perenitity).
[The circular Archimedes-type point, magellanity property, the hard and soft contradictions, the responsibility, the variety of systemic thinking, the Universal Consciousness and Eco-consciousness, the enlargement of the structural science are proposed topics for other theoretical approaches / praxis.]
This or another inter/trans-disciplinary/intercultural attempt may contribute to an equitable, sustainable and societal world of tomorrow (one of the possible worlds / see Table 1, 2). One of the possible wolds being a continuos one flow from the Informational Society to Knowledge Society toward Consciousness Society, and for ever returning, into an open and larger humankind spiral. To travel through the light beam of (consistence; completeness).
APPEND to 5.2.: The BODY / CONSCIOUSNESS into the Social Context - a proposed sub-project: (In)visible (Hu)man -
************************************************************************{Verbal stimulus} | Words – as profound proofs "open / closed" Entities************************************************************************to be | (new) nature human person / human persons
| body(_soul_spirit)
to have | name culture / civilization | human nature
to combine | nature logic item / responsible item | human nature | human artifacts
[BODY ; soul ; spirit]'s paradigm : the hidden body into non-figurative topos
to conduct | consciousness good item / sustainable item | body (ies) | society & steps toward a science of body and consciousness [body ; soul ; SPIRIT]'s emergence : education & work || science & religion
(inter / trans-disciplinary approaches)
Conceptual markers: as [ x ; xx ; xxx ] ; x* as BODY { o ; oo ; ooo } as { o individual ; oo planetary ; ooo universal entities }
The tabular defragmentation of the reactions at {verbal stimulus}
N-1/N Entity open closed
intro x* xx o oo extro x xxx o ; oo ooo
Remark 6: So, Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension gains a new sub-project, across the previous perspectives mentioned by the procedural utility of the scheme from the sub-paragraph 3.2 (regarding connectedness and communication), and Table 6 (through the concept of social Qualia).
Now and here, the complex recurrence between the ascendant Action and the ascendant levels of the Memory has a analytic support through the author’s replay to Reinhold Niebuhr’s paradigm: Moral Man and Immoral Society.
Also, on the ascendant Action by ascendant levels of the Memory (as a cognitive interactive concept) it is worth to engage the results from the expanding (according to each interested context) Sub-Project: (In)visible (Hu)man.
6: The minimal starting nucleus for Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension
6.1. Challenges toward a Moral Market: Creative Market, Creative Economy, and Knowledge Society / as a two parts of innovative sociological research within interdisciplinary approach
Justification of the sociological research as finding the modeling context (the first part), and then, there, to construct a solution (the second part). Meantime the forecasted aggregation of the two parts means an answer to the really global and theoretically basic question:WHY DOES NOT THE RATIO POVERTY / WELFARE WORK as a dynamically pro-market reform indicator, into the contemporary MARKET and ECONOMY?
The representational stage of the context (obvious facts and preliminary questions):
* ECO-CONSCIOUSNESS (our individual and collective consciousness; it would be promoted only inward a SUBTLE WORLD –or may be into an other kind of world- so, there will be possibly to strengthen the CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP, as a suitable trace of the human being(s), a suitable reflection of the reflection. The ECO-CONSCIOUSNESS would be: to fulfill [the predictive knowledge, the long-term moral edificium, the intelligence (e-)market momentum, the humankind action as efficient production and service, the continuous adaptation of the functions till the structures]; to self-replace [the local progress through irrational race on rational profits]; to acquire [the new human being torn mentally by the risen computational power]; to focus [on the collective and then individual happiness - through giving more than receiving]; to harmonize [the individual and collectives objectives as the insight, the care, and the responsibility for: the “local” with the “global”; the “narrow” with the “major”; the “short term” with the “long term” and “very long term”]; to co-ordinate [the local intelligence –within distributed problem solving- toward “a society of minds”]; to end [within serenity, compassion, humility instead of non-confidence, aggressiveness, boasting] but to remain [not forcing within our spiritually quasi-perennial insight, kindly gifted inward, from, by an Universal Consciousness, but within our constructed steps inward an ever open Eco-Consciousness, a not rejected “included tertium”] .
Original methodology to construct the solution:
6.2. The proposed CHARTA OF THE CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP[between all the human beings, the NGOs, the world states and the planetary specialized entities - connected into a first stage by their interest in pro-market reform and the poor]A. Global and local ethical education-work helixB. Global and local research-action helix on equitable, sustainable and societal topics, and the consequent knowledge transfer and technologies transfer C. Human relations (as basic state of the: embedded ECO-CONSCIOUSNESS, self-constituted and sustained INTERNATIONALLY CIVIL SOCIETY, resulting SUBTLE WORLD - within its CREATIVE (E-)MARKET, and initially desired and designed CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP, and possible attained through all these)D. Amenities, health care, tourism, generalized access to the products_processes of science, technology, sport, literature and arts
D. Amenities, health care, tourism, generalized access to the products_processes of science, technology, sport, literature and arts1. The connection of all these with the common major projects between developed and transition / developing countries (mainly with : (re)forestification and aquaculture).2. The enquiry on the prevalence of the common investments on the common amenities, health care, tourism. 3. The subtle health care underlining on the life saving of the poorest people & promoting their creative finding on their habitat; the identification of the old efficient medical acquisition –as clear collective mental resonance- in order to strengthen the emergency world wide action on the old and new sanitary threats & to promote an increment of the habitat through CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP. 4. The developing of a scientific trend and new cultural attitude regarding the amenities (underlining on the amenities into the great urban communities -rich and poor- , till an inter_cities knowledge transfer and technologies transfer). This may be the “starting point” of the CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP. The identification of the intercultural and inter/trans-disciplinary patterns of the sport, including new varieties according CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP – and the consequent applying, within initial and on-line help. The deep insights on the real effect from new sport varieties into a SUBTLE WORLD, transparently controlling the level and the content of the worldwide assistance. One new pattern may be: probabilistic formatting of the two international sportive teams just at the start of their contest, within an “a”% interchange of the national members of the teams, into a free and fair acceptance (“a” stated above –at B.6.).5. The re-definition of the human being as individual and societal entity. The identification of the subtle (and healthy) forms of energizing, acquiring knowledge, perpetuation and (non)sexual satisfaction – for the individual. The identification of the harmonic small community and world wide community aggregation by acting collectively energizing, acquiring knowledge, perpetuation and (non)sexual satisfaction. The deep insight on the real effect from the subtle (and healthy) forms of all above, into a SUBTLE WORLD, transparently controlling the level and the content of the worldwide assistance.6. A SUBTLE WORLD must prove its prevalence through a new SUBTLE HAPPINESS. It would be cased only and only not ignoring / low controlling the on-line poverty, and subtle controlling the PRO-CREATIVE (E-)MARKET REFORM through CREATIVE PARTNERSHIP. The recipient of all these is the contemporary KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY.The proposed project and its possible consequences are shaping a face of the [understanding / explaining] reform. [Regarding the “other faces” of the reform, and minding to an entire face of the reform, there is a possible transit from a post-modern stanza of the world to a trans-modern stanza of the world. This trans-modern stanza will possible attain the scientific topoi to denominate itself and to demonstrate evidently that it is a possible (near future) SUBTLE WORLD, or ... no.]
7: A proposed “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity Charta
It is the place for a conclusive rehearsal, generating a seven step common project:
7.1. To identify the levels of resource-consumption according to: humankind progress versus its societal price.
Remark 1: The quasi-negative and the quasi-positive level of resource-consumption till a social action is accountable estimated according to the aposteriori outlook from the holistic entity: humankind progress versus its societal price.
7.2. To promote the assistance for operative actions within low memory level.Remark 2: The quasi-co-generation of an entity and its primal level of the Action, according to operative constrains (low levels of societal resources and knowledge) may happen according to an apriori expected: humankind progress versus its societal value for the holistic entity.It may be a zero level of the primal level of the Memory, just only to start an operative primal Action.
7.3. To check and meditate to the string, and to its Quattro-basis: 1: Poverty level / Demographic pulse; 5: Financial pulse; 2: Popular scenarios; 6: Happiness pulse; 3: Stochastic appearance of life. 7: Attractive education 4: Prospective track surveillance stimulation
bureaucracy bases of data, knowledge and moral items
Remark 3: The ascendant Action (by ascendant levels of the Memory) ascends, step by step, through its quasi-negative nuclei, into the order: 1; 2; 3, and through its quasi-centered positive nuclei, into the order: 4; 5; 6; 7.
7.4. To try to elaborate varieties of cognitive societal model “Memory Action”, minding to connectedness communication.
Remark 4: To associate all the first six tables with the cognitive patterns, elaborated step by step through axioms, definitions, propositions, remarks and consequences, and constituted as: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity cognitive societal model.Those six tables, and mainly the last in its climax, through the proposed association, attain lower proper levels of resource-consumption till an attained social memory and /or action mark.So, Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension gains new perspectives by the procedural utility of the Table 6 – just devoted to assure a quasi-completeness and quasi-consistency to the previously denominated mental construct: the ascendant Action by ascendant levels of the Memory – just involving and expanding, here, the concept of social Qualia.
7.5. To try to comprehend “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension by social Qualia.
Remark 5: So, Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension gains new perspectives by the procedural utility of the scheme from the sub-paragraph 3.2 (The world of Paradoxes presenting the status of the harmonization regarding connectedness and communication). So, Table 6 – is a proper approach on the ascendant Action by ascendant levels of the Memory (through the concept of social Qualia), and the scheme from the sub-paragraph 3.2. is a proper approach on the complex recurrence between the ascendant Action and the ascendant levels of the Memory.
7.6. To critically comprehend on the paradigm: “Moral Man and Immoral Society” and/or to .” (In)visible (Hu)man”
Remark 6: So, Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension gains a new sub-project, across the previous perspectives mentioned by the procedural utility of the scheme from the sub-paragraph 3.2 (regarding connectedness and communication), and Table 6 (through the concept of social Qualia).
Now and here, the complex recurrence between the ascendant Action and the ascendant levels of the Memory has a analytic support through the author’s replay to Reinhold Niebuhr’s paradigm: Moral Man and Immoral Society.
Also, on the ascendant Action by ascendant levels of the Memory (as a cognitive interactive concept) it is worth to engage the results from the expanding (according to each interested context) Sub-Project: (In)visible (Hu)man.
7.7. According to the above six steps, to initiate, complete, and (re)adapt varieties for the Project: the t“Memory Action” Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension.
8: Bibliography [as a constrained proposal: only ten systemic items and parallel readings (/ ) to comprehend " WITHIN A SYSTEMIC AND CYBERNETIC OUTLOOK " regarding Project: the “Memory Action” / Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tension] …………………………………………………….V. Geyer F. (1977). General systems theory and the growth of the individual's inner complexity as a function of time. Modern Trends in Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. II (ed. J. Rose, C. Bilciu), 59-78. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; (1998). The increasing convergence of social science and cybernetics. Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of World Organization of System and Cybernetics, Vol. 2nd Sociocybernetics, 211-216, Bucharest: Bren. [These are the bridgeheads of long-term research related to the historical cradle and a peak of Sociocybernetics; professor Geyer is not only an interdisciplinary scientist but also a prominent leader of more then 200 researchers dedicated to contemporary social complexity].
/ Malitza M. (2000, 1998, 1978). Ten Thousand Cultures, One Single Civilisation [: Toward Geomodernity of the XXI Century], International Political Science Review, Vol 21, N.1, Jan. 2000; Zidul si iedera [The Wall and the Ivy], Cartea Romaneasca, 1978./ Pirani M.B. (2002). The Body in the Social Sciences, TG03 session at the XIVth World Congress of Sociology, Brisbane. Cipriani R., Longo Di Cristofaro G., Greenfield S., Kalekin Fishman D., Pirani M.B (2005). Memories in action - The role of memories in social change, Mid Term Conference, University of Roma ‘La Sapienza', Department of Social Science and International Sociological Association / WG03 The Body in the Social Sciences Rome/Cassino, July 12-14, 2005
X. Vallée R. (1995). Cognition et Système / Essai d'Epistémo-Praxéologye, 136 pp. Limonest: L'Interdisciplinaire / Système (s). [This work provides extensive concepts upon knowledge, action, perception, memorization, and decision; the turning point is the "epistemo-praxiological loop" associated with mathematical described operators; there is an intimate objectivity-subjectivity link developed from a "radical constructivism" toward a "well temperate constructivism"].
/ The initial references for the Charta of Creative Partnership:Bourguignon, F. 2001. Research directions for “Understanding Reforms”: the need for systematic (extended) distributional incidence analysis, “Understanding Reforms” GDN Congress, Rio.
Williamson, J. 2000. What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus? The World Bank Research Observer. vol. 15, no. 2, August: 251-64.
9:
9.1.The project <<What is Truth?>>- Booklet covers
9.2: INVITATION:
Partnership within the new project applications:
HORIZON 2020, and Creative e-Europe
9.3.: St Andrew’s Cathedral Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
team of the project “What is Truth?” as part of the program <<Scientists in Congregations Scotland>> led by the Divinity School, St Andrews University, St Andrews, Scotland, UK – within a grant from John Templeton Foundation, US Interdisciplinary-Intercultural-and-Ecumenical-Workshop-ARMOURS-OF-LIGHT-----WHAT-IS-TRUTHDecember 18, 2015 – January 31, 2016 A Contribution to the Peace, Culture and worldwide Security within a proposed project:<<'What is Truth?' versus the LIGHT alongside the cycle 'Societal Management_1 --- Science/Technology --- Religion/Philosophy ---Art/Literature --- Societal Management_2'>>
Abstract: There are the complex and long term activities, the scientific and theologic documentation and pro-active research, the active Science-Religion Dialogue, the 20 months original results (July 2014 – February 2016) related to the weekly debates and other major activities (Autumn School Nov. 2014, pilgrimages and visits, Festival of Light Jan. 2016) of the project <<What is Truth? / Science-Religion Dialogue>>, project in Aberdeen, Scotland, UK – based on St. Andrew Cathedral, within the ‘Scientists in Congregations Scotland’ led by the Divinity School, St Andrews University, St Andrews, Scotland, UK – within a grant from John Templeton Foundation, US.Into the same context to note, here and now, that an inner work/sub-project as the proposed <<Armours of Light ––– What is truth ––– Science-Religion Dialogue>> was yet included on the UNESCO site www,unesco.com – Year of Light YoL 2015 [a thematic year which will be “extendeds” over 2016 – so, at least within these pieces of information there is a base for the afirmation “to hope that anyway a new frame would be possible” alongside the desired continuity of the project <<What is Truth? / Science-Religion Dialogue>>.The sub-site included on the UNESCO site www,unesco.com – Year of Light YoL 2015 – is:http://www.light2015.org/Home/Event-Programme/2015/Workshop/UK-Interdisciplinary--Intercultural-and-Ecumenical-Workshop-ARMOURS-OF-LIGHT-----WHAT-IS-TRUTH----.html ].
Into this international (e-)context it was presented and start up the activities related to a new project<<'What is Truth?' versus the LIGHT / alongside the cycle 'Societal Management_1 --- Science/Technology --- Religion/Philosophy --- Art/Literature --- Societal Management_2'>>.
It is intended that the outcome of this project, and the potential activities related to constitute a contribution to the contemporary desired Peace, Culture and worldwide Security.
The followings paragraphs were presented within the Workshop <<Armours of Light ––– What is truth ––– Science-Religion Dialogue>>, December 18, 2015 – January 31, 2016. The consecutive debates were the sources of up-grading the text, as it is now presented, and there are the 17 + 11 sub-titles contributions from the research long term colleagues.
This abstract, the text-paragraphs are intended as an OPEN INVITATION to the SSRN e-readers to analyse and decide to participate to the synergic expected efforts to start by proposing one – three (individual dealt) sub-titles, and/or collective co-authored sub-titles, and then to follow the prospected (ideal) seven steps, as it is stated within the following set of paragraphs – and within their entireness related to objectives and potential outcomes.
The sequence of the following paragraphs I – IV reflect an original act, and the coherent and cohesive implementation of the principle related to INTERACTIVE MODELLINNG – construct presented by the proponet author of this study/file. Keywords: Armours of Light, Culture, Binomial Elicitation, Contemporary Change (E-)Stance, Creative Partnership, from ‘conflict to consensus’, from the ‘abstract to reality’, generosity-creativity-solidarity triad, global (post) crisis versus humankind wisdom, Interactive Modellinng, LIGHT, Multi-Nomial Elicitation, Peace, reflection for transformation from ‘indifference to engagement’, Qvo Vadis Homine_2050_?, ‘right relationship’ between science and faith, Science-Religion Dialogue, Societal Innovation, SSRN e-readers, spirituality/biodiversity’ in ‘Science-Religion’ Dialogue, stimulate discussion-analysis, ‘What is truth?’, worldwide Security, UNESCO Year of Light YoL 2015 I: Address about seven ideal steps toward a contribution to the contemporary desired Peace, Culture and worldwide Security Please to analyse the above keywords, their beyond alphabetic ordered sequence – as a desired and to be found sequence of objectives / outcomes. And, then, please to receive the expression of the ideal seven steps of this new project – alongside with the invitation(s) sent, and the receiving of consonant sub-titles from the invitees:
1: So, please to consider that we (together) will constitute an INITIAL SET OF SUB- TITLES. 2: This set of sub- titles can be, and we (the partners) will and must to take care on the COHERENT, COHESIVE AND CONCORDANT FEATURES OF THE AGGREGATED SUB-TITLES SET – so, to elicit the SYNERGY of our new project / corresponding to the embedded parts („sub-titles”, and the consequent follow up from you - the partners). 3: Within this SYNERGIC SET OF THESE SUB-TITLES, also together, we shall start the synergic and non-entropic attempt to create, to advance, and to propose [toward some 2016 Grants Contests / UE and worldwide] a NETWORK of ideas/texts/video/site/REPRESENTATION, PROCEDURAL and CONTEMPORARY CHANGE (e-)STANCE of SOCIETAL INNOVATION, here and now, as a first step aggregated frame within the upward proposed new project. 4: This possible NETWORK could be/include your reflections and proposed new societal steps toward a better new millennial world comparing to the too complex and too war-dedicated XXth century world. 5: This possible NETWORK can be, and we (the partners) will and must to take care to (re)generate an e-FORUM that can be extended over the academic and University contexts – to some larger economic, social and political entities – thus addressing the will and capacity to contribute and act as to attain – step by step – a suitable representation, a global model/simulation/emulation related to the actual and to a better world – a better problem solving world, within at least a „ minimal peace assurance”, a maximal intellectual oppeness, and to study/act/re-study to gain a supra-unitary ratio of happiness/alienation, and welfare/poverty. 6: This possible NETWORK can be, and we (the partners) will and must to take care that if there will be complementary – or even contradictory solutions/texts/ideas to find the consensus that the main ideas to be co-represented and to re-gain a common route to go forward – as to be an example of synergy even when and where non-equivalent points of view and acts were, are, and will be met.
E.g.: Why do atheists, deists, pantheists, theists, … not take a direct dialogue line within a total respect to each other, to the other? Sure that each party would benefit from a direct sense of communication, and an on-line adjust of the development of each theoretical and praxis approach in front of the same problem – problems of deep knowledge – problems of day by day knowledge – problems of representation and solving general and current problems … 7: So, our praxis could be an example for other ... / sure with modesty, just humility and prudence, out of any form of violence, to just refer the sensible points and problems of our contemporary too complex humankind – after a too keen problemness XXth century. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Nicolae Bulz IInd Co-Director of the project <<What is Truth?>>, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK Founder and Co-ordinator of the International Consortium GENEROSITY-CEATIVITYS-SOLIDARITY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II: An ideal and operative response to the proposed seven ideal steps toward a contribution to the contemporary desired Peace, Culture and worldwide Security: TWO LISTS of sub-titles Consonant to the above ideal seven steps, downward, there are the “resulted” TWO LISTS, containing the proposed sub-titles (17 + 11), that are the aggregated results of the individual research and insight from some of the members of the International Consortium Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity (founded as a research entity in 2009 – more information are below), and from the team of the actual project <<What is Truth? / Science-Religion Dialogue>>, project in Aberdeen, Scotland, UK (project that was started in July 2014 – also, more information are below). So, there is the opportunity to analize on the possibility, at least, to co-operate “UK – an other country” in order to start BINOMIAL ELICITATION – toward a MULTI-NOMIAL ELICITATION [corresponding to more than two contries with an institutional presence] of the best way to attain the status of an international recognized WORKSHOP / SYMPOSIUM / CONFERENCE – for the near or next temporal stance resulting within the synergy between the actual and the near future proponents of sub-titles. There are, also, other opportunities to operate according to the rules for the submission of applications for European Union Grants – US Research Grants – Private Foundations, and/or other opportunities related to the status of an international recognized stance for the proposed project.
Now, we, the proponents of the jointed content of the two downward lists of sub-thems – which stand on a multi-thematic stance – and all the colleagues/partners that have come and will come better within each personal experience. But, it will come a moment [after that each of us will read/revise the entire set of sub-titles sent/received – then to experience the possible inter/ trans/ co-disciplinary co-approaches to be elicited just between us – as our e-World citizens – but sure that it is a bit more toward this current state-of-art level. We, the proponents of these two above lists of sub-themes, were positively reacted to the following message: Dear Professor and/or Expected Colleague at the New Project, and NETWORK, I ask for your partnership – according to this message-INVITATION - on the (near/next) project: <<'What is Truth?' versus the LIGHT alongside the cycle 'Societal Management_1 --- Science/Technology --- Religion/Philosophy ---Art/Literature --- Societal Management_2'>>. At this stage, an essential Input stage, your agreement to go forward is high valuable + to send your response as a sub-title, now only as: * your explicit sub-title …………………………………. * your name ……….…………………………………….. * your institution/association/previous institution (you want to represent) ………………………….. e.g. of an explicit sub-title [just received from a venerable Professor from Brasilia - Founder of a new science <<Conviviology>>]: What is War? - What is Peace? - What is Well-being? - What is Leadership? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The initial nucleus of the content related to the above entitled project consists by TWO LISTS, as follow:
THE IST LIST WITH THE 17 PROPOSED SUB-TITLES (the sub-titles are listed according to the chronological order of the proposals): - WHAT IS WAR.....WHAT IS PEACE.....WHAT IS WELL-BEING.....WHAT IS LEARESHIP - WHAT IS TRUTH? THE TRUTH IS A DEFINITIVE ASSERTION, TILL THE CONTRARY IS PROVEN Professor Ph.D. Ilie GILBERT Sao Paolo, Brazil Honorary Citizen, Texas and Nebraska states, USA Member of “Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din România” (AOSR) Founder of a new science <<Conviviology>> ATTEMPTING MORAL PERFECTION: BENJAMIN FRANKLIN’S SCHEME OF ORDER AND LIST OF VIRTUES VERSUS THE CHALLENGE OF PRESENT-DAY HABITS AND TEMPTATIONS [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] Lecturer Dr. Adriana-Carolina BULZ Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania PARAPHYSICAL JURISPRUDENT MASSACRE MEDIATION [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] Richard L. AMOROSO Director - Noetic Advanced Studies Institute Los Angeles, California USA www.noeticadvancedstudies.us
HOMO SAPIENS UNIVERSAL UPBRINGING, EDUCATION AND WHOLE LIFE LEARNING FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURE OF HUMANKIND DURING 21ST CENTURY Professor Dr. Dr. h. c. Timi ECIMOVIC Director - Institut-Climatechange Republic of Slovenia Home page: www.institut-climatechange.si HOW DIFFICULT IS TO TELL THE TRUTH? Lecturer Dr. Cristian TSAKIRIS Ecological University of Bucharest Romania A N T A R C T I C A THE EMPIRE OF WHITENESS [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] Professor Ph.D. Florentin SMARANDACHE Mathematics & Science Department University of New Mexico Gallup, New Mexico, USA http://fs.gallup.unm.edu/FlorentinSmarandache.htm APPLIED RESEARCH IN BANKING ACTIVITY [TECHNIQUES OF SCORING CALCULUS / THE EUROPEAN BANKING METHOD BASEL I] [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] Associated Professor Stelian PANTAZESCU Economic and Social Cybernetic Commission / Romanian Academy structures FIBES 200 Foundation, Romania Phd. Ec. / Eng. Viorel LUPU FIBES 200 Foundation, Romania
ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE AS A MEDIUM OF CULTURAL EXCHANGE [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] Ph.D. Student Dan Costa BACIU Architecture Department, University of Chicago USA POPPER AND THE CAUSAL ROOTS OF PROBABILITY [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] [acc. vol.“Gödel 100 + 1” / Romanian Academy, CRIFST, DLMFS, GCI, 2008] Professor Ph.D. Marianne BELIS Directrice Académique Supinfo Paris Ecole Supérieure d'Informatique (ESI) Paris (Academy of Computer Science) Paris, France BIOSECURITY AS MAIN STEP IN EPIDEMIOLOGY AND EPIZOOTOLOGY COUNTRY STABILITY [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] Professor Dr. Zinaida KLESTOVA Deputy Director State Scientific-Control Institute of Biotechnology and Strains of Microrganisms Kyiv Ukraine - THE PRINCIPLES, MODELS AND APPLICATIONS IN SOCIETY EVOLUTION - TOWARD MULTIVALUEDNESS ASPECTS IN SELF-ORGANIZATION, COMPLEXITY AND COMPUTATIONS INVESTIGATIONS - TOWARDS SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professor Dr. Alexander (Oleksandr) Sergeevich MAKARENKO National Technical University of Ukraine (KPI), Department of Applied Nonlinear Analysis, Head of Department Department Mathematical Methods of System Analysis, Professor Head of International office at Institute for Applied System Analysis Head of non-governmental organization SEIS (Socio-economical innovations in society) Kyiv Ukraine TECHNOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT TOWARDS ECOLOGICAL LIGHT Professor Dr. Eng. Cristin BIGAN Ecological University of Bucharest Romania - FRACTAL INTELLIGENCES, A NEW PARADIGM IN PERFORMANCE EDUCATION [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT] - ROMANIAN NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM AND THE EUROPEAN SECURITY Priest Dumitru GRIGORE, Eng., Ph.D. Student Military Technical Academy, Bucharest Romania
Within, also, the participation of the following personalities (according to near reserved/proposed sub-titles): Professor Dorien DeTOMBE (MSc. Ph.D.) Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China Chair International Research Society on Methodology of Societal Complexity Amsterdam, The Netherlands http://www.complexitycourse.org/doriendetombe.html 多莉恩 · 德通教授 中华人民共和国四川省成都市 一环南路一段 24 ， 四川大学http://www.scu.edu.cn Book: HandlingSocietalComplexity http://www.complexitycourse.org/HandlingSocietalComplexityDeTombe4.pdf E-Course Complexity www.complexitycourse.org/complexitycourse.html Professor Ph.D. Marion HERSH Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow Scotland, UK Drd. Physics, (e-)painter Mihaela Andana CALINESCU Bucharest Romania -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE IIND LIST WITH THE 11 PROPOSED SUB-TITLES (the sub-titles are listed according to the order of the proposals within the ‘WHAT IS TRUTH?’ project July 2014 – February 2016 ): - RESOLUTIONS - 01/01/2016 VIDEO [co-authorship with Imam Dr. Emad JODEH] http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06tl0gm/resolutions-01012016
- LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR - ‘WHAT IS TRUTH?’ - GOD AS LIGHT IN JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM. ‘WHAT IS TRUTH?’ IN MULTI-FAITH CONTEXT Very Reverend Dr. Isaac M POOBALAN Rector & Provost, St Andrew's Cathedral, Aberdeen Chaplain, RGU, Garthdee, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK THE CONTEXT FOR THE EXPERIENCE OF CONFLICT AND FOR THE RESOLUTION OF CONFLICT [A Sermon at St. Andrew’s Cathedral, Aberdeen / 7th September 2014 / On the Gospel –Matthew 18. 15-20] Very Reverend Richard KILGOUR General Secretary of the International Christian Maritime Association London, UK “LOVE TO GOD / LOVE TO SCIENCE” VIDEO, it is on-line on http://vimeo.com/109827885 and http://aberdeen.anglican.org/resources/video/video-sermon-for-sunday-26-october-2014/20141026 Very Reverend Richard KILGOUR and Professor Dr. Nicolae BULZ London - Aberdeen, UK WHY ARE WE HERE & WHAT PURPOSE IS OUR EXISTENCE? Ret. Accountant Sylvia SIMPSON Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
SOMETHING THAT COMES BOTH FROM WITHIN AND ALSO THROUGH INTERACTION WITH OUR FELLOW MAN [ON THE QUESTION “WHAT IS TRUTH?”] Ph.D., Ret.Prof. Biochemistry Ken PAGE and Ingrid PAGE Aberdeen, Scotland, UK THEOLOGICAL SCIENCE: A DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE DISCIPLINES PAVING THE WAY TO “AGAPE” IN THE PRESERVATION AND ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN CIVILISATION [ON THE ”THEOLOGICAL SCIENCE” / “TO BE OR TO HAVE”] Retired Career Court Justice David JOHNSTONE-BUCHER, B Iuris LLB, UNISA Noetic Researcher into Human Condition from a Pragmatic Judicial Perspective [Authorised by Appointed Representatives of the Templeton Foundation] Aberdeen, Scotland, UK DOES COMMENT MATTER? [COMMENTS ADDRESSING THE STUDY << ON THE ”THEOLOGICAL SCIENCE” / “TO BE OR TO HAVE”>>] Mrs. Catriona MANBY Aberdeen, Scotland, UK - A PARADIGM: “FIGHT WITH THE INDIFFERENCE”, WITHIN A COMPLEMENTARY PARADOX: “FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF” - IS IT POSSIBLE TO ELICIT A “REFRACTED LIGHT” [TRUTH VERSUS LIGHT]? Prof.dr. Nicolae BULZ IInd Co-Director of the project <<What is Truth?>> Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
A Cosmological Model – within Science-Religion Dialogueas (re-)focused during the 20 months activities from the team of the project “What is Truth?” - St Andrew’s Cathedral Aberdeen, Scotland, UK Nicolae Bulz
Founder of the Interdisciplinary Laboratory <<M. Eminescu - S. Haret - V. Ghika>>, 2000Associate Professor – National Defence College, RomaniaHonorary Researcher – Institute of World Economy / NERI / Romanian AcademyResearch Associate External 2005-2015 - Victoria Institute for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne, AustraliaVice-president of the Economic and Social Cybernetic Commission / Romanian Academy structuresMember of International Sociological Association (ISA), International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) affiliate member, UK Systems Society (UKSS) recent past active memberwithin the logical co-authorship of the creative authors cited into Reference section Abstract: There are the complex and long term activities, the scientific and theologic documentation and pro-active research, the active Science-Religion Dialogue, the 20 months original results (July 2014 – February 2016) related to the weekly debates and other major activities (Autumn School Nov. 2014, pilgrimages and visits, Festival of Light Jan. 2016) of the project <<What is Truth? / Science-Religion Dialogue>>, project in Aberdeen, Scotland, UK – based on St. Andrew Cathedral, within the ‘Scientists in Congregations Scotland’ led by the Divinity School, St Andrews University, St Andrews, Scotland, UK – within a grant from John Templeton Foundation, US.Into the same context to note, here and now, that an inner work/sub-project as the proposed <<Armours of Light ––– What is truth ––– Science-Religion Dialogue>> was yet included on the UNESCO site www,unesco.com – Year of Light YoL 2015 [a thematic year which will be “extendeds” over 2016 – so, at least within these pieces of information there is a base for the afirmation “to hope that anyway a new frame would be possible” alongside the desired continuity of the project <<What is Truth? / Science-Religion Dialogue>>.The sub-site included on the UNESCO site www,unesco.com – Year of Light YoL 2015 – is:http://www.light2015.org/Home/Event-Programme/2015/Workshop/UK-Interdisciplinary--Intercultural-and-Ecumenical-Workshop-ARMOURS-OF-LIGHT-----WHAT-IS-TRUTH----.html ].
Into this international (e-)context it was presented and start up the activities related to a new project<<'What is Truth?' versus the LIGHT / alongside the cycle 'Societal Management_1 --- Science/Technology --- Religion/Philosophy --- Art/Literature --- Societal Management_2'>>.
It is intended that the outcome of this project, and the potential activities related to constitute a contribution to the contemporary desired Peace, Culture and worldwide Security.
The followings paragraphs were presented within the Workshop <<Armours of Light ––– What is truth ––– Science-Religion Dialogue>>, December 18, 2015 – January 31, 2016. The consecutive debates were the sources of up-grading the text, as it is now presented, and there are the IIIrd elicitation of this Cosmological Model – within Science-Religion Dialogue / as (re-)focused during the 20 months activities from the team of the project “What is Truth?” - St Andrew’s Cathedral Aberdeen, Scotland, UK - according to the reactions, critiques, ammendments, proposals – as interactive contributions from the research long term colleagues. The majority of these the reactions, critiques, ammendments, proposals are real parts of the actual text. So, an interactive contribution lives within its initial cognitive object-subject.
This abstract, the text-paragraphs are intended as an OPEN INVITATION to the SSRN e-readers to analyse and decide to participate with their own reactions, critiques, ammendments, proposals – as interactive contributions – and so, also, to live within just to e-read “initial” cognitive object-subject.
So, the sequence of the following paragraphs I – IV reflect a happened act related to INTERACTIVE MODELLINNG – construct / within memebers of the project 'What is Truth?' reactions, critiques, ammendments, proposals to what I, the author, was presented during the evoked Workshop dedicated to Light and Truth, and, then, a possible on-line original act, and the coherent and cohesive implementation of the principle related to INTERACTIVE MODELLINNG – construct presented by the proponet author of this study/file. Keywords: Armours of Light, AXIOMs, Culture, Cosmological Model, FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY, from ‘conflict to consensus’, from the ‘abstract to reality’, humankind wisdom, Interactive Modellinng, LIGHT, Network of Religions, Networks of Sciences, QUOTES, RATIONALITY, reflection for transformation from ‘indifference to engagement’, ‘right relationship’ between science and faith, Science-Religion Dialogue, SSRN e-readers, spirituality/biodiversity’ in ‘Science-Religion’ Dialogue, stimulate discussion-analysis, ‘What is truth?’, UNESCO Year of Light YoL 2015, UNIVERSAL AND COSMIC PARTICULES-WAVES PARAGRAPHS from this contribution of our project <<Whay is Truth?>>Page I:SACRED TEXTS – reference and introductive stage toward a IIIrd stage of a Cosmological Model asserted 2
II:The IIIrd stage of a Cosmological Model10III:About the IMAGISTIC (only) IInd stage (2008/2010) of a Cosmological Model15; 16IV:Details about the TEXT (only) Ist stage (2005) of a Cosmological Model. According to the published study:Aspects of a Theory of Systemic Construction, “Kybernetes: International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics”, Emerald, Vol. 34 No. 9/10 2005, ISBN 1-84544-745-X ISSN 0368-492X, pp. 1598-1632; www.emeraldinsight.com / also, e-seen as http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=174316517V:Some quotes – in order to affirm a positive stance of the Science-Religion Dialogue. It is an open background to the critiques, addnotations, proposals support or quite cognitive rejection from the colleagues and e-readers – towards the the Ist stage (2005), IInd stage (2008/2010), and the IIIrd stage (now, 2016) of a Cosmological Model.28
A Cosmological Model – within Science-Religion Dialogue
Nicolae Bulz
I: SACRED TEXTS – reference and introductive stage toward a IIIrd stage of a Cosmological Model From Ecclesiastes 9 – quote:7 Go thy way, eat thy bread with joy, and drink thy wine with a merry heart; for God now accepteth thy works.8 Let thy garments be always white; and let thy head lack no ointment.
9 Live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity, which he hath given thee under the sun, all the days of thy vanity: for that is thy portion in this life, and in thy labour which thou takest under the sun.10 Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.11 I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.12 For man also knoweth not his time: as the fishes that are taken in an evil net, and as the birds that are caught in the snare; so are the sons of men snared in an evil time, when it falleth suddenly upon them.13 This wisdom have I seen also under the sun, and it seemed great unto me:14 There was a little city, and few men within it; and there came a great king against it, and besieged it, and built great bulwarks against it:15 Now there was found in it a poor wise man, and he by his wisdom delivered the city; yet no man remembered that same poor man.16 Then said I, Wisdom is better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom is despised, and his words are not heard.17 The words of wise men are heard in quiet more than the cry of him that ruleth among fools.18 Wisdom is better than weapons of war: but one sinner destroyeth much good.King James Version (KJV) Ἐκκλησιαστής, Ekklesiastes, Hebrew: ֹקֶהֶלת, Qoheleth, Koheleth From KATA IWANNHN - The Gospel According to Saint John – quote: according to the analysis presented into the http://www.greeknewtestament.com/B43C001.htmChapter 11Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusen arch hn o logoV kai o logoV hn proV ton qeon kai qeoV hn o logoV Latin Vulgate1:1 in principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat VerbumKing James Version1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.Young's Literal Translation1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;2Stephens 1550 Textus ReceptusoutoV hn en arch proV ton qeon Latin Vulgate
1:2 hoc erat in principio apud DeumKing James Version1:2 The same was in the beginning with God.Young's Literal Translation1:2 this one was in the beginning with God; 3Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuspanta di autou egeneto kai cwriV autou egeneto oude en o gegonen Latin Vulgate1:3 omnia per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil quod factum estKing James Version1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.Young's Literal Translation1:3 all things through him did happen, and without him happened not even one thing that hath happened.4Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusen autw zwh hn kai h zwh hn to fwV twn anqrwpwn Latin Vulgate1:4 in ipso vita erat et vita erat lux hominumKing James Version1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.Young's Literal Translation1:4 In him was life, and the life was the light of men,5Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai to fwV en th skotia fainei kai h skotia auto ou katelaben Latin Vulgate1:5 et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non conprehenderuntKing James Version1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.Young's Literal Translation1:5 and the light in the darkness did shine, and the darkness did not perceive it.6Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusegeneto anqrwpoV apestalmenoV para qeou onoma autw iwannhV Latin Vulgate
1:6 fuit homo missus a Deo cui nomen erat IohannesKing James Version1:6 There was a man sent from God, whose name [was] John.Young's Literal Translation1:6 There came a man -- having been sent from God -- whose name is John,7Stephens 1550 Textus ReceptusoutoV hlqen eiV marturian ina marturhsh peri tou fwtoV ina panteV pisteuswsin di autou Latin Vulgate1:7 hic venit in testimonium ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine ut omnes crederent per illumKing James Version1:7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all [men] through him might believe.Young's Literal Translation1:7 this one came for testimony, that he might testify about the Light, that all might believe through him;8Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusouk hn ekeinoV to fwV all ina marturhsh peri tou fwtoV Latin Vulgate1:8 non erat ille lux sed ut testimonium perhiberet de lumineKing James Version1:8 He was not that Light, but [was sent] to bear witness of that Light.Young's Literal Translation1:8 that one was not the Light, but -- that he might testify about the Light.9Stephens 1550 Textus Receptushn to fwV to alhqinon o fwtizei panta anqrwpon ercomenon eiV ton kosmon Latin Vulgate1:9 erat lux vera quae inluminat omnem hominem venientem in mundumKing James Version1:9 [That] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.Young's Literal Translation1:9 He was the true Light, which doth enlighten every man, coming to the world;10Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusen tw kosmw hn kai o kosmoV di autou egeneto kai o kosmoV auton ouk egnw Latin Vulgate
1:10 in mundo erat et mundus per ipsum factus est et mundus eum non cognovitKing James Version1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.Young's Literal Translation1:10 in the world he was, and the world through him was made, and the world did not know him:11Stephens 1550 Textus ReceptuseiV ta idia hlqen kai oi idioi auton ou parelabon Latin Vulgate1:11 in propria venit et sui eum non receperuntKing James Version1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.Young's Literal Translation1:11 to his own things he came, and his own people did not receive him;12Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusosoi de elabon auton edwken autoiV exousian tekna qeou genesqai toiV pisteuousin eiV to onoma autou Latin Vulgate1:12 quotquot autem receperunt eum dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri his qui credunt in nomine eiusKing James Version1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name:Young's Literal Translation1:12 but as many as did receive him to them he gave authority to become sons of God -- to those believing in his name,13Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusoi ouk ex aimatwn oude ek qelhmatoV sarkoV oude ek qelhmatoV androV all ek qeou egennhqhsan Latin Vulgate1:13 qui non ex sanguinibus neque ex voluntate carnis neque ex voluntate viri sed ex Deo nati suntKing James Version1:13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.Young's Literal Translation1:13 who -- not of blood nor of a will of flesh, nor of a will of man but -- of God were begotten.14Stephens 1550 Textus Receptus
kai o logoV sarx egeneto kai eskhnwsen en hmin kai eqeasameqa thn doxan autou doxan wV monogenouV para patroV plhrhV caritoV kai alhqeiaV Latin Vulgate1:14 et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis et vidimus gloriam eius gloriam quasi unigeniti a Patre plenum gratiae et veritatisKing James Version1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.Young's Literal Translation1:14 And the Word became flesh, and did tabernacle among us, and we beheld his glory, glory as of an only begotten of a father, full of grace and truth.15Stephens 1550 Textus ReceptusiwannhV marturei peri autou kai kekragen legwn outoV hn on eipon o opisw mou ercomenoV emprosqen mou gegonen oti prwtoV mou hn Latin Vulgate1:15 Iohannes testimonium perhibet de ipso et clamat dicens hic erat quem dixi vobis qui post me venturus est ante me factus est quia prior me eratKing James Version1:15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.Young's Literal Translation1:15 John doth testify concerning him, and hath cried, saying, 'This was he of whom I said, He who after me is coming, hath come before me, for he was before me;'16Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai ek tou plhrwmatoV autou hmeiV panteV elabomen kai carin anti caritoV Latin Vulgate1:16 et de plenitudine eius nos omnes accepimus et gratiam pro gratiaKing James Version1:16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.Young's Literal Translation1:16 and out of his fulness did we all receive, and grace over-against grace;17Stephens 1550 Textus Receptus oti o nomoV dia mwsews edoqh h cariV kai h alhqeia dia ihsou cristou egeneto Latin Vulgate1:17 quia lex per Mosen data est gratia et veritas per Iesum Christum facta est King James Version 1:17 For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.Young's Literal Translation 1:17 for the law through Moses was given, the grace and the truth through Jesus Christ did come;
18Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusqeon oudeiV ewraken pwpote o monogenhV uios o wn eiV ton kolpon tou patroV ekeinoV exhghsato Latin Vulgate1:18 Deum nemo vidit umquam unigenitus Filius qui est in sinu Patris ipse enarravitKing James Version1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].Young's Literal Translation1:18 God no one hath ever seen; the only begotten Son, who is on the bosom of the Father -- he did declare.19Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai auth estin h marturia tou iwannou ote apesteilan oi ioudaioi ex ierosolumwn iereiV kai leuitaV ina erwthswsin auton su tiV ei Latin Vulgate1:19 et hoc est testimonium Iohannis quando miserunt Iudaei ab Hierosolymis sacerdotes et Levitas ad eum ut interrogarent eum tu quis esKing James Version1:19 And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?Young's Literal Translation1:19 And this is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent out of Jerusalem priests and Levites, that they might question him, 'Who art thou?'20Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai wmologhsen kai ouk hrnhsato kai wmologhsen oti ouk eimi egw o cristoV Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptuskai wmologhsen kai ouk hrnhsato kai wmologhsen oti ouk eimi egw o cristoVLatin Vulgate1:20 et confessus est et non negavit et confessus est quia non sum ego ChristusKing James Version1:20 And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.Young's Literal Translation1:20 and he confessed and did not deny, and confessed -- 'I am not the Christ.'21Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai hrwthsan auton ti oun hliaV ei su kai legei ouk eimi o profhthV ei su kai apekriqh ou Latin Vulgate1:21 et interrogaverunt eum quid ergo Helias es tu et dicit non sum propheta es tu et respondit nonKing James Version
1:21 And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.Young's Literal Translation1:21 And they questioned him, 'What then? Elijah art thou?' and he saith, 'I am not.' -- 'The prophet art thou?' and he answered, 'No.'22Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuseipon oun autw tiV ei ina apokrisin dwmen toiV pemyasin hmaV ti legeiV peri seautou Latin Vulgate1:22 dixerunt ergo ei quis es ut responsum demus his qui miserunt nos quid dicis de te ipsoKing James Version1:22 Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?Young's Literal Translation1:22 They said then to him, 'Who art thou, that we may give an answer to those sending us? what dost thou say concerning thyself?'23Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusefh egw fwnh bowntoV en th erhmw euqunate thn odon kuriou kaqwV eipen hsaiaV o profhthV Latin Vulgate1:23 ait ego vox clamantis in deserto dirigite viam Domini sicut dixit Esaias prophetaKing James Version1:23 He said, I [am] the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.Young's Literal Translation1:23 He said, 'I am a voice of one crying in the wilderness: Make straight the way of the Lord, as said Isaiah the prophet.'24Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai oi apestalmenoi hsan ek twn farisaiwn Latin Vulgate1:24 et qui missi fuerant erant ex PharisaeisKing James Version1:24 And they which were sent were of the Pharisees.Young's Literal Translation1:24 And those sent were of the Pharisees,25Stephens 1550 Textus Receptuskai hrwthsan auton kai eipon autw ti oun baptizeiV ei su ouk ei o cristoV oute hliaV oute o profhthV Latin Vulgate1:25 et interrogaverunt eum et dixerunt ei quid ergo baptizas si tu non es Christus neque Helias neque propheta
King James Version1:25 And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet?Young's Literal Translation1:25 and they questioned him and said to him, 'Why, then, dost thou baptize, if thou art not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the prophet?'26Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusapekriqh autoiV o iwannhV legwn egw baptizw en udati mesoV de umwn esthken on umeiV ouk oidate Latin Vulgate1:26 respondit eis Iohannes dicens ego baptizo in aqua medius autem vestrum stetit quem vos non scitisKing James Version1:26 John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;Young's Literal Translation1:26 John answered them, saying, 'I baptize with water, but in midst of you he hath stood whom ye have not known, this one it is who is coming after me, who hath been before me,27Stephens 1550 Textus Receptusautos estin o opisw mou ercomenoV os emprosqen mou gegonen ou egw ouk eimi axioV ina lusw autou ton imanta tou upodhmatoV Latin Vulgate1:27 ipse est qui post me venturus est qui ante me factus est cuius ego non sum dignus ut solvam eius corrigiam calciamentiKing James Version1:27 He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.Young's Literal Translation1:27 of whom I am not worthy that I may loose the cord of his sandal.'28Stephens 1550 Textus Receptustauta en bhqabara egeneto peran tou iordanou opou hn iwannhV baptizwn Latin Vulgate1:28 haec in Bethania facta sunt trans Iordanen ubi erat Iohannes baptizansKing James Version1:28 These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.Young's Literal Translation1:28 These things came to pass in Bethabara, beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing,
From Colossians – quote: from Colossians 2: You Are Built Up in Christ2 For I want you to know how great a struggle I have on your behalf and for those who are at Laodicea, and for all those who have not]personally seen my face, 2 that their hearts may be encouraged, having been knit together in love, and attaining to all the wealth that comes from the full assurance of understanding, resulting in a true knowledge of God’s mystery, that is, Christ Himself, 3 in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. 4 I say this so that no one will delude you with persuasive argument. 5 For even though I am absent in body, nevertheless I am with you in spirit, rejoicing to see your good discipline and the stability of your faith in Christ.6 Therefore as you have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him, 7 having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith, just as you were instructed, and overflowing with gratitude.8 See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ. 9 For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form, 10 and in Him you have been made complete, and He is the head [j]over all rule and authority; 11 and in Him you were also circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, in the removal of the body of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ; 12 having been buried with Him in baptism, in which you were also raised up with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead. 13 When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, 14 having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. 15 When He had disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public display of them, having triumphed over them through Him.16 Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day— 17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. 18 Let no one keep defrauding you of your prize by delighting in self-abasement and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, 19 and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and [v]ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God.20 If you have died with Christ to the elementary principles of the world, why, as if you were living in the world, do you submit yourself to decrees, such as, 21 “Do not handle, do not taste, do not touch!” 22 (which all refer to things destined to perish with use)—in accordance with the commandments and teachings of men? 23 These are matters which have, to be sure, the appearance of wisdom in self-made religion and self-abasement and severe treatment of the body, but are of no value against fleshly indulgence.Colossians 2 / New American Standard Bible (NASB) II:Toward a IIIrd stage of a Cosmological Model - TEXTS only of some AXIOMs – as an introductive pre-stage toward a (possible refined) IIIrd stage of a Cosmological Model --- asserted by Prof. Dr. Nicolae Bulz with humility, and PROPENSION TOWARD (E-)INTERACTIVE CORRECTIONS/REVISION-COMPLETION/EXTENSIONS TO BE SUGGESTED by the colleagues and (e-)readers
AXIOM 1: [UNIVERSAL AND COSMIC PARTICULES-WAVES AXIOM] There are only the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES. AXIOM 2: [UNIVERSAL OR COSMIC RATIONALITY AXIOM] There are only the α-α, β-β, and γ-γ RATIONALITY (EQUIVALENTS TOWARDS SOME PARTICULES-WAVES).To (re)mark, here and now, α-α: ▲, β-β: ● / ♥, and γ-γ: ■
AXIOM 3: [UNIVERSAL AND/OR COSMIC TRINITY WAVES AXIOM] There are only the CORESPONDENT TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY } towards/from[/inside-outside/subtle closed/probabilistic open/ fuzzy revealed toward rational entities/inneit self-obtained] the TRIAD { α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES }. AXIOM 4: [COSMIC DYNAMICS OF THE TIME, SPACE, CAUSALITY; MIND/CONSCIENCE/CONSCIOUSNESS; EVIL] There are only the COSMIC { TIME, SPACE, CAUSALITY } set as apriori entity and the { quasi-COSMIC MIND/CONSCIENCE/CONSCIOUSNESS; quasi-COSMIC EVIL } set as aposteriori entity one by one entity, or both entities elicited - sustained – anihilated by/through/from the subtle non-concordant, fuzzy non-coherent, probabilistic no-cohesive relation between the CORESPONDENT TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY } to/from the TRIAD { α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES } . Quasi-NOTE without an AXIOMATIC expression, here and now:Not as into the entireness of this AXIOMATIC 4 context, the “isolated” respective <<the subtle non-concordant, fuzzy non-coherent, probabilistic no-cohesive relation>> is refered (represented) ONLY AND ONLY by the representation of the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES.
AXIOM 5: [TERRESTRIAL AXIOM of the complex NETWORK of RELIGIONs] There are the following MULTI-OPEN SETs of RELIGIONs { ...; HINDUISM; ...; JUDAISM; ...; BUDHISM; ...; CHRISTIANITY; ...; ISLAM; ... } CORESPONDENT OR SUBTLE/FUZZY/PROBABILISTIC NON-CORESPONDENT to the TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY as refered only by the COSMIC { TIME, SPACE, CAUSALITY } set as apriori entity and the { quasi-COSMIC MIND/CONSCIENCE/CONSCIOUSNESS; quasi-COSMIC EVIL } set as aposteriori entity andsubtle non-concordant, fuzzy non-coherent, probabilistic no-cohesive refered by the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES. Within all this axiomatic context there is the involvment of the DEGRADATION/REGENERATION dynamics of the AXIOMATIC 2 α-α: ▲, β-β: ● / ♥, and γ-γ: ■ . AXIOM 6: [TERRESTRIAL AXIOM of the complex NETWORKs of SCIENCEs] There are the the MULTI-CLOSED SETs of complex NETWORKs of SCIENCEs subtle non-concordant, fuzzy non-coherent, probabilistic no-cohesive refered by the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES,
AND ALSO refered by the COSMIC { TIME, SPACE, CAUSALITY } set as apriori entity and the { quasi-COSMIC MIND/CONSCIENCE/CONSCIOUSNESS; quasi-COSMIC EVIL } set as aposteriori entity AND ALSO SUBTLE/FUZZY/PROBABILISTIC NON-CORESPONDENT to the TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY } as AND ALSO CIRCULAR closed refered by the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES. Within all this axiomatic context there is the involvment of the DEGRADATION/REGENERATION dynamics of the AXIOMATIC 2 α-α: ▲, β-β: ● / ♥, and γ-γ: ■ . NOTE 1 without an AXIOMATIC expression, here and now: The (above) subtle non-concordant, fuzzy non-coherent, probabilistic no-cohesive reference by the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES,
AND ALSO reference by the COSMIC { TIME, SPACE, CAUSALITY } set as apriori entity and the { quasi-COSMIC MIND/CONSCIENCE/CONSCIOUSNESS; quasi-COSMIC EVIL } set as aposteriori entity AND ALSO SUBTLE/FUZZY/PROBABILISTIC NON-CORESPONDENCE to the TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY } as A CIRCULAR closed reference by the α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES addresses to the AXIOMATIC 6 MULTI-CLOSED SETs of complex NETWORKS of SCIENCEs. SO, THESE ABOVE RELATIONS-ENTITIES CAN REVEAL a(n) INDIFFERENCE,or ACTIVE OR PASSIVE DENIGRATIONS,or
POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE TENSIONED DIALOGUE addessed to the AXIOMATIC 5 MULTI-OPEN SETs of RELIGIONs { ...; HINDUISM; ...; JUDAISM; ...; BUDHISM; ...; CHRISTIANITY; ...; ISLAM; ... } . Regarding to the above expression, there are NOT AT ALL ANY “EQUIVALENCE” to the relations between the AXIOMATIC 3 CORESPONDENT TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY } towards/from[/inside-outside/subtle closed/probabilistic open/ fuzzy revealed toward rational entities/inneit self-obtained] the AXIOMATIC 1 TRIAD { α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES }. Within all this non-axiomatic context there is the involvment of the DEGRADATION/REGENERATION dynamics of the AXIOMATIC 2 α-α: ▲, β-β: ● / ♥, and γ-γ: ■ . AXIOM 7: [UNIVERSAL AND COSMIC REVELATION AXIOM] There is an INFINITE TENSIONED DYNAMICS between/inside/outside all the stages and status of each AXIOM 1 – 6 . AXIOM 7_a: [UNIVERSAL AND COSMIC FINITE-REVELATION AXIOM] It can take a FINITE TENSIONED DYNAMICS between/inside/outside all the stages and status of each AXIOM 1 – 6 . Within this axiomatic context there is no an involvment of the DEGRADATION/REGENERATION dynamics of the AXIOMATIC 2 α-α: ▲, β-β: ● / ♥, and γ-γ: ■ .
NOTE 2 with an AXIOMATIC expression, here and now: The context of both AXIOM 7 and AXIOM 7_a can/may sustain a CIRCULAR CLOSED of the AXIOM 1 – 6 and/or a MULTI-NETWORK(S) RELATION between the AXIOMs 1 – 6 . NOTE 3 without an AXIOMATIC expression, here and now: Beyond the AXIOMATIC 4 COSMIC { TIME, SPACE, CAUSALITY } set as apriori entity and the { quasi-COSMIC MIND/CONSCIENCE/CONSCIOUSNESS; quasi-COSMIC EVIL } set as aposteriori entity the above AXIOMATIC NOTE 2 can/may be “caused” only by the DEGRADATION/REGENERATION dynamics of the AXIOMATIC 1 α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES, and STRICTLY OR only by the DEGRADATION/REGENERATION dynamics of the AXIOMATIC 2 α-α: ▲, β-β: ● / ♥, and γ-γ: ■ .
NOTE 4 with an AXIOMATIC expression, here and now: The AXIOMATIC 3 CORESPONDENT TRIAD { FATHER; SON; HOLY SPIRIT / within TRINITY } towards/from[/inside-outside/subtle closed/probabilistic open/ fuzzy revealed toward rational entities/inneit self-obtained] the TRIAD { α, β, and γ PARTICULES-WAVES } has an INFINITE STATIONARITY.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(Con-)Textual NOTE on the content of this IInd paragraph: The members of project team’s dynamic suggestions/critics –during the Friday, February 5, 2016, presentation at the weekly project-debates are a cause of improvings and inspirational locus for near/next future extensions; THANKS.
A part of the ABDN <<What is Truth?>> team of the project 2014-6 PROVOST Isaac Poobalan
A part of the ABERDEEN, Scotland, UK <<What is Truth?>> team of the project 2014-2016
Prayer of Saint Ephrem the Syrian who lived in the 4th century A.D. / used extensively in Lenten services in he Eastern church
O Lord and Master of my life! Give me not (Take from me) the spirit of sloth, faint-heartedness, lust of power, and idle talk. But give rather the spirit of chastity, humility, patience, and love to Thy servant. Yea, O Lord and King! Grant me to see my own errors and not to judge my brother; for Thou art blessed unto ages of ages. Amen
Input<=>Output stance of the circular, rhythmic and labyrinthic string
