+ All documents
Home > Documents > Plio-pleistocene paleomagnetic record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Monogenetic Volcanic Field...

Plio-pleistocene paleomagnetic record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Monogenetic Volcanic Field...

Date post: 28-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011), 311328 311 © 2011 Inst. Geophys. AS CR, Prague PLIO-PLEISTOCENE PALEOMAGNETIC RECORD FROM THE MICHOACÁN-GUANAJUATO MONOGENETIC VOLCANIC FIELD (WESTERN MEXICO) RAFAEL MACIEL PEÑA 1 , AVTO GOGUITCHAICHVILI 1* , BERNARD HENRY 2 , LEDA SÁNCHEZ-BETTUCCI 3 , JUAN MORALES 1 , BERTHA AGUILAR REYES 1 , ANA MARÍA SOLER-ARECHALDE 4 AND MANUEL CALVO-RATHERT 5 1 Laboratorio Interinstitucional de Magnetismo Natural, Instituto de Geofísica - Sede Michoacán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia, 58089 Morelia, Mexico ([email protected], [email protected]) 2 Paléomagnétisme, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 94107 Saint Maur, France 3 Departamento de Geología, Area Geofísica-Geotectónica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay 4 Laboratorio de Paleomagnétismo, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México DF., México 5 Laboratorio de Paleomagnetismo, Departamento de Física, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Burgos, C/Francisco de Vitoria, s/n, 09006, Burgos, Spain * Corresponding author Received: February 22, 2010; Revised: June 22, 2010; Accepted: January 15, 2011 ABSTRACT The paleosecular variation (PSV) and polarity transitions are two major features of the Earth’s magnetic field. Both PSV and reversal studies are limited when age of studied units is poorly constrained. This is a case of Central and western Mexico volcanics. Although many studies have been devoted to these crucial problems and more than 200 paleomagnetic directions are available for the last 5 Ma, only few sites were dated directly. This paper presents new paleomagnetic results from seventeen independent cooling units in the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field (MGVF) in western Mexico. Twelve sites are directly dated by 40 Ar/ 39 Ar or K-Ar methods and span from 2.78 to 0.56 Ma. The characteristic paleodirections are successfully isolated for 15 lava flows. The mean paleodirection (inclination I and declination D) obtained in this study is I = 28.8°, D = 354.9°, and Fisherian statistical parameters are k = 28, 95 = 7.3°, N=15, which corresponds to the mean paleomagnetic pole position P lat = 83.9°, P long = 321.6°, K = 34, A 95 = 6.6°. The paleodirections obtained in present study compiled with those, previously reported from the MGVF, are practically undistinguishable from the expected Plio-Quaternary paleodirections. The paleosecular variation is estimated through the study of the scatter of the virtual geomagnetic poles giving S F = 15.9 with S U =21.0 and Continuation of LATINMAG Special Issue #4, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 54 (2010)
Transcript

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011), 311328 311 © 2011 Inst. Geophys. AS CR, Prague

PLIO-PLEISTOCENE PALEOMAGNETIC RECORD FROM THE MICHOACÁN-GUANAJUATO MONOGENETIC VOLCANIC FIELD (WESTERN MEXICO)

RAFAEL MACIEL PEÑA1, AVTO GOGUITCHAICHVILI1*, BERNARD HENRY2, LEDA SÁNCHEZ-BETTUCCI3, JUAN MORALES1, BERTHA AGUILAR REYES1, ANA MARÍA SOLER-ARECHALDE4 AND MANUEL CALVO-RATHERT5

1 Laboratorio Interinstitucional de Magnetismo Natural, Instituto de Geofísica - Sede

Michoacán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia, 58089 Morelia, Mexico ([email protected], [email protected])

2 Paléomagnétisme, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 94107 Saint Maur, France

3 Departamento de Geología, Area Geofísica-Geotectónica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay

4 Laboratorio de Paleomagnétismo, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México DF., México

5 Laboratorio de Paleomagnetismo, Departamento de Física, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Burgos, C/Francisco de Vitoria, s/n, 09006, Burgos, Spain

* Corresponding author

Received: February 22, 2010; Revised: June 22, 2010; Accepted: January 15, 2011

ABSTRACT

The paleosecular variation (PSV) and polarity transitions are two major features of the Earth’s magnetic field. Both PSV and reversal studies are limited when age of studied units is poorly constrained. This is a case of Central and western Mexico volcanics. Although many studies have been devoted to these crucial problems and more than 200 paleomagnetic directions are available for the last 5 Ma, only few sites were dated directly. This paper presents new paleomagnetic results from seventeen independent cooling units in the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field (MGVF) in western Mexico. Twelve sites are directly dated by 40Ar/39Ar or K-Ar methods and span from 2.78 to 0.56 Ma. The characteristic paleodirections are successfully isolated for 15 lava flows. The mean paleodirection (inclination I and declination D) obtained in this study is I = 28.8°, D = 354.9°, and Fisherian statistical parameters are k = 28, 95 = 7.3°, N=15, which corresponds to the mean paleomagnetic pole position Plat = 83.9°, Plong = 321.6°, K = 34, A95 = 6.6°. The paleodirections obtained in present study compiled with those, previously reported from the MGVF, are practically undistinguishable from the expected Plio-Quaternary paleodirections. The paleosecular variation is estimated through the study of the scatter of the virtual geomagnetic poles giving SF = 15.9 with SU =21.0 and

Continuation of LATINMAG Special Issue #4, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 54 (2010)

R. Maciel Peña et al.

312 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

SL = 12.7 (upper and lower limits respectively). These values agree reasonably well with the recent statistical Models. The oldest sites analyzed (the Santa Teresa and Cerro Alto) yield normal polarity magnetizations as expected for the cooling units belonging to the Gauss geomagnetic Chron. The interesting feature of the record comes from lava flows dated at about 2.35 Ma with clearly defined normal directions. This may point out the possible existence of a normal polarity magnetization in the Matuyama reversed Chron older than the Reunion and may be correlated to Halawa event interpreted as the Cryptochron C2r.2r-1. Another important feature of the geomagnetic record obtained from the MGVF is the evidence of fully reversed geomagnetic field within Bruhnes Chron, at about 0.56 Ma corresponding to the relative paleointensity minimum of global extent found in marine sediments at about 590 ka.

Ke y wo rd s : paleosecular variation, reversals, Western Mexico, time-averaged field,

geocentric axial dipole, Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt

1. INTRODUCTION

Revealing the variability of the geomagnetic field with time is essential for understanding the conditions in the Earth’s liquid core and at the core-mantle boundary. Detailed paleomagnetic records allow remote sensing of the activity in the Earth’s deep interior at very different time scales. Apart from the Paleosecular Variation (PSV) studies, the Time Averaged Field (TAF) is being considered as the decisive factor to precisely describe the fluctuations of the Earth magnetic field. The TAF may indicate long-term departures from the Geocentric Axial Dipole (GAD), the most basic field model used throughout paleomagnetism (Lawrence et al., 2006, 2009). The TAF initiative has begun to update the database of geomagnetic observations over the last five million years (Tauxe et al., 2004; Lawrence et al., 2006, 2009; Johnson et al., 2008). The analysis of these new generation paleomagnetic results shows that the data at low latitudes seems to be more scattered than those at high latitude. This point depends critically on a set of data or latitude about 20°N. Many paleomagnetic records from the Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) (see compilation in Ruiz-Martinez et al., 2000 and Mejia et al., 2005) show a relatively high scatter and evidence of tectonic rotations (mostly anticlockwise, of 10° to 20°) which makes it difficult to make any firm conclusions about the variability of the Earth’s magnetic field. Steele (1985) and Herrero-Bervera et al. (1986) investigated the paleosecular variation in a recent section of Brunhes Chron and concluded than the angular standard deviation was in agreement with the value predicted from the PSV models. Bohnel et al. (1990) revised this conclusion and found the PSV for central Mexico was lower than the PSV models, similar to the value for Hawaii and that the difference with the study of Herrero-Bervera et al. (1986) was due to the selection criteria applied to the data set (Urrutia-Fucugauchi, 1997; Conte-Fasano et al., 2006).

This investigation is aimed to contribute to the time averaged field global database and to the paleosecular investigations at low latitudes, based on a detailed rock-magnetic and paleomagnetic study of seventeen lava flows (about 140 standard paleomagnetic cores) associated with the Michoacan Guanajuato Volcanic Field (MGVF). The available ages range from 2.78 Ma to 0.56 Ma. The MGVF with about 2000 volcanic build-ups seems to

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 313

be most adequate unit for paleomagnetic targets. There is probably no other Plio-Quaternary volcanic field in the world displaying such a large number of monogenetic volcanoes and it can be said that in this respect it is a unique feature.

2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND AGES

The Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) is an E-W trending zone located between 19° and 20°N latitude, extending ca. 1000 km from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico (Fig. 1). Its origin is related to the subduction of the Cocos Plate beneath the North American Plate. Popocatépetl and Colima volcanoes represent the two major features of this volcanic arc. Less known is the fact that most volcanoes comprising the TMVB are monogenetic scoria cones. Their total amount is difficult to estimate, but their number has been estimated to be well above 3000. Two areas that show the highest concentrations of monogenetic volcanoes are: the Sierra Chichinautzin area, south of

Fig. 1. a) Schematic tectonic setting of Central and Western Mexico indicating the area covered by Michoacan Guanajuato Volcanic Field. b) Digital elevation model for MGVF area showing the location of studied sites.

R. Maciel Peña et al.

314 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

Mexico-City and the Michoacán-Guanajuato volcanic field. The only registered historic scoria cone eruptions on Mexican grounds are at Jorullo in 1759 and at Paricutín in 1943, which occurred within the Michoacan-Guanajuato volcanic field.

The geographic boundaries of the MGVF are delineated by the 1845N and 2015N parallels and the 100°25W and 10245W meridians. The MGVF, with an area of 40000 km2, contains over 2000 small-sized monogenetic volcanoes including: cinder cones (90%), maars, tuff rings, lava domes and lava flows with hidden vents; all their centers have a calc-alkaline predominant character but alkaline and transitional rocks are also found (Hasenaka et al., 1994). In addition to the small-sized centers, there are about 300 medium-sized volcanos that have mainly erupted calc-alkaline andesites in which the majority of lavas fall in the SiO2 range between of the 55% to 61% (Hasenaka and Carmichael, 1985). These medium-sized volcanoes represent principally Icelandic-type shields, with slopes between 5° and 15°, a basal diameter between 3 and 8 km, heights between 300 and 700 m, and volumes between 1 and 10 km3 (Ban et al., 1992; Conte-Fasano et al., 2006). These volcano shields, were built from an essentially continuous discharge from a central vent, and thus are monogenetic volcanoes. Therefore, these volcanoes represent an important part of the total magma erupted into the volcanic field. Geomorphologically the lava flows associated with these medium-sized volcanoes are older than those from cinder cones, and thus they are possible precursors to the smaller-sized volcanoes (Hasenaka, 1994). Moreover, there are two stratovolcanos, the Volcán Grande and the Cerro Tancítaro. The MGVF is different with respect to the other parts of the TMVB, which are characterized mainly by composite volcanoes (e.g. Popocatépetl, Nevado de Colima, Pico de Orizaba etc.), which typically have more acidic lavas.

Our sampling strategy was largely conditioned by radiometric data availability (Murphy and Carmichael, unpublished results; Hasenaka and Carmichael, 1985; Nixon et al., 1987; Ban et al., 1992; Ferrari et al., 1990). We sampled preferentially sites with available isotopic data (Fig. 1 and Table 1), easy access and, apparently unaltered outcrops. In total, 136 oriented samples belonging to 17 individual lava flows were collected. Twelve out of 17 cooling units were age-dated by Ar-Ar and K-Ar methods. These lavas were erupted between 2.78 Ma and 0.56 Ma (Table 1). Sites Val2 and Val3 (Santa Teresa) as well as Sites Val15 and Val16 (Jaripeo) represent consecutive lava flows with the reddish (scoria) contact between them. The same is true for Sites Val4, 5 and 6 (Cerro Grande) which are composed of three consecutive lava flows. The samples were distributed throughout each flow both horizontally and vertically. All of the sampled lavas are horizontal (or almost horizontal with dip less than 3°). In general, the samples were obtained at the bottom of the flows with the hope of collecting samples with the finest grained material. Cores were sampled with a gasoline-powered portable drill, and oriented in most cases, with both the magnetic and sun compasses.

3. MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS

Detailed rock-magnetic investigations were conducted on one representative sample from each lava flow to identify the magnetic carriers and grain size characteristics. All rock-magnetic measurements were carried out at the palaeomagnetic laboratory of Burgos University (Spain).

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 315

Tab

le 1

. Fl

ow-m

ean

pale

odire

ctio

ns o

f cha

ract

eris

tic re

man

ence

, loc

atio

n an

d av

aila

ble

isot

opic

age

det

erm

inat

ions

for M

GV

F vo

lcan

ics.

n -

num

ber

of s

peci

men

s us

ed f

or c

alcu

latio

n, N

- n

umbe

r of

tre

ated

sam

ples

, I

- in

clin

atio

n, D

- d

eclin

atio

n,

95 a

nd k

- r

adiu

s of

95%

conf

iden

ce c

one

and

prec

isio

n pa

ram

eter

of

Fish

er s

tatis

tics,

resp

ectiv

ely,

Lat

., Lo

ng. -

geo

grap

hic

latit

ude

and

long

itude

of

stud

ied

site

s;VG

P lat

, VG

P lon

g - v

irtua

l geo

mag

netic

pol

e po

sitio

ns fo

r eac

h la

va fl

ow.

Ref

.

Ban

et a

l. (1

992)

H

asen

aka

and

Car

mic

hael

(198

5)

Has

enak

a an

d C

arm

icha

el (1

985)

Ba

n et

al.

(199

2)

Ban

et a

l. (1

992)

Ba

n et

al.

(199

2)

Mur

phy

and

Car

mic

hael

(u

npub

l. re

sults

) Ba

n et

al.

(199

2)

Nix

on e

t al.

(198

7)

Ban

et a

l. (1

992)

Fe

rrar

i et a

l. (1

990)

Fe

rrar

i et a

l. (1

990)

VGP l

ong

[°]

228.

0068

294.

4861

301.

2733

345.

0987

36

6.45

26

342.

6257

22

5.84

85

308.

0294

17.6

851

21

3.68

81

334.

4765

33

2.11

30

91

.298

6 36

1.87

70

307.

7276

VGP l

at [°

]

82.5

495

65.9

269

65.2

045

82.1

308

74.3

213

76.8

594

86.7

639

79.9

482

82.0

161

67

.099

4 80

.840

7 87

.131

0

65.5

789

79.0

194

87.2

164

Age

[Ma]

0.56

0

.07

2.78

0

.07

2.78

0

.08

2.35

0

.25

2.35

0

.25

2.35

0

.25

n.a.

1.2

n.a.

n.

a.

n.a.

0.58

0

.09

2.60

0

.10

1.97

0

.23

0.75

0

.15

0.75

0

.15

n.a.

Long

. W

1013

9.9

1005

2.2

1005

2.2

1004

5.2

10

04

5.2

10

03

1.9

10

04

5.4

1012

6.8

1015

6.7

10

15

4.1

10

15

3.6

10

25

4.9

10

20

4.7

10

10

1.5

10

05

0.4

10

05

0.4

10

11

2.0

Lat.

N

193

547

.6

10.7

20

10.7

20

20.7

20

20.7

20

20.7

20

40.1

20

36.3

20

33.1

20

32.6

19

55.6

19

31.0

19

23.5

19

46.5

19

41.9

19

41.9

19

11.3

k

190

382

137

582

112

275

191 28

62

824 66

236

34

47

15.7

9

95

[]

4.8

3.4

5.7

2.8

8.6

5.5

4.1

11.7

9.9 2.3

8.3

4.4

12.6

9.

8 7.

8

D [

]

173.

8

354.

5

351.

6

352.

6 34

3.5

348.

1 17

7.2

355.

4

351.

5 21

.4

352.

6 35

7.7

354.

6 34

8.6

358.

7

I []

28.

3

5.9

5.7

31.2

33

.7

26.2

33.

9

21.9

37.5

19.3

25

.4

33.2

62.5

32

.7

31.8

n/N

8/8

8/8

7/8

8/8

6/8

5/8

8/8

6/8

5/7

0/8

8/8

7/8

8/8

0/8

3/8

5/8

8/8

R. Maciel Peña et al.

316 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

3 . 1 . T h e r m o m a g n e t i c C u r v e s

Thermomagnetic curves measured in a high field of 800 mT using a Variable Field Translation Balance (VFTB). A continuous thermomagnetic curve indicates that most of samples contain titanium-poor titanomagnetites, with a Curie temperature between 510°C and 575°C. The significant irreversibility of the heating and cooling in curves (Fig. 2, Samples 98V366A and 98V344A) suggests that the titanomagnetite may have been transformed during heating into hematite or even maghemite during heating in those samples, whose cooling curves are much lower than the heating curves. A few samples have yield apparently two different thermomagnetic phases during heating. The lower Curie point ranges between 180230°C, while the higher one is about 520°C. Both Ti-rich and Ti-poor titanomagnetites seem to co-exist in few lava flows (e.g. Sample 98V396A).

3 . 2 . H y s t e r e s i s P r o p e r t i e s

Magnetic hysteresis loop determinations were also conducted using the VFTB instrument. The saturation remanent magnetization (Jrs), the saturation magnetization (Js)

Fig. 2. Susceptibility versus temperature (in air) curves of representative samples. Arrows indicate the heating and cooling cycles.

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 317

and coercive force (Hc) were calculated after correction for the paramagnetic contribution. The coercivity of remanence (Hcr) was determined by applying a progressively increasing backfield after saturation. Representative hysteresis plots are reported in Fig. 3 (Samples 98V366A and 98V396A). Judging from the ratios of hysteresis parameters (Fig. 4), it seems that all samples fall into the pseudo-single domain (PSD) grain size region (Day et al., 1977; Dunlop, 2002). This may indicate a mixture of multidomain (MD) and a significant amount of single domain (SD) grains (see the SD-MD trend reported by Dunlop, 2002). Corresponding isothermal remanence (IRM) acquisition curves were found to be very similar for all samples. Saturation is reached in moderate fields in the order of 150200 mT, which points to some spinels (titanomagnetites) as remanence carriers. A well defined wasp-waisted behavior, which reflects the presence of magnetic

Fig. 3. Typical examples of hysteresis loops (uncorrected, left column) and associated isothermal remanence acquisition curves (right column).

R. Maciel Peña et al.

318 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

phases with different coercivities (Tauxe et al., 1996) was obtained for one case (Fig. 3, Sample 98V344A). Both hysteresis and thermomagnetic curves indicate a very important contribution of Ti-hematite in this sample. At low applied fields, the hysteresis curve is thin and the IRM curve is steep, pointing to the presence of magnetite or Ti-poor titanomagnetite (Cervantes Solano et al., 2010). In contrast, at high applied fields the hysteresis curve is clearly open and IRM acquisition shows no full saturation. This indicates that both (titano)magnetite and (titano)hematite co-exist in studied samples.

3 . 3 . R e m a n e n c e P r o p e r t i e s

The remanent magnetization of the studied samples were measured with a JR6 (AGICO) spinner magnetometer (nominal sensitivity ~ 109 Am2). Both alternating field (AF) demagnetizations using a Molspin AF-demagnetizer and stepwise thermal demagnetizations using an ASC-TD48 furnace were carried out.

Two-component magnetizations were recognized for most of the studied units (e.g. Fig. 5a, Samples 98V320 and 98V372). The secondary components are sometimes much stronger than primary ones (this is the case of Sample 98V320). The characteristic magnetization components are isolated after applying 30 mT peak alternating field. The omnipresence of lightning-produced secondary components is well illustrated in the equal area projection of natural; remanent magnetization (NRM, Fig. 5b), which show extremely scattered directions. It should be noted that the AF treatments proved to be more efficient. Other samples displayed stable, uni-component magnetizations.

Fig. 4. Dunlop plot (modified after Dunlop, 2002) showing the relationship between the hysteresis parameters.

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 319

Fig. 5a. Orthogonal vector plots of stepwise thermal or alternating field demagnetization of representative samples. The numbers refer either to the temperatures in °C or to peak alternating fields in mT. - projections into the horizontal plane, - projections into the vertical plane.

Fig. 5b. The equal area projection of the NRM directions before magnetic treatments. - positive inclination, - negative inclination.

R. Maciel Peña et al.

320 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

4. MAIN RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The characteristic magnetization direction was determined by the least squares method (Kirschvink, 1980), using 4 to 9 data points being taken in the principal component analysis for this determination. The obtained directions were averaged by unit and the statistical parameters were calculated assuming a Fisherian distribution. The average unit directions are rather precisely determined for the 13 sites (Table 1, Fig. 6) yielding an 95 of less than 10°. Sites Val8 (San Nicolas) and Val15 (Jaripeo) gave slightly higher values

Fig. 6. a) Equal area projections of the flow-mean characteristic paleodirections for the MGVF volcanics, and b) corresponding virtual geomagnetic pole positions. Thick ellipses represent the mean values.

Fig. 7. The same as in Fig. 6 for all available results.

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 321

of 11.7° and 12.6° respectively. We note however, that the paleodirections retrieved from Val15 are based on three samples. Due to a strong magnetic overprints, no paleodirections were obtained from the Sites Val10 (Yuridia) and Val14 (Brinco del Diablo).

Sites VAL2 and VAL3 (Santa Teresa) are consecutive lavas with a clearly defined contact zone between them. Thus, they represent two distinct geomagnetic field features. The same is true for the Sites VAL4 through VAL6 (C. Grande) and VAL15 and VAL16 (Jaripeo). In case, of C. Grande and Jaripeo these consecutive lavas yielded statistically distinguishable paleodirections while the Santa. Teresa lavas provided almost identical results. Thus, it is quite possible that these lavas were formed during a relatively short time.

Table 2. Flow-mean paleodirections of characteristic remanence, location and available isotopic age determinations (1 - Gonzalez et al., 1997, 2 - Bohnel and Molina, 2002, 3 - Panfil, 1999, 4 - Michalk et al., 2010, 5 - Maciel Peña et al., 2009) for TMVB volcanics. For the meaning of the symbols, see Table 1.

Site N I [°]

D [°]

95[]

k Lat. [°N]

Long. [°W]

Age[ka]

VGPlat [°]

VGPlong[°]

Ref.

Paricutin 6 37.8 10.7 4.4 238 19.47 102.25 0.06 79.82 180.64 1 Tetimpa 8 38.6 352.6 3.9 201 19.05 98.45 2.29 82.56 31.05 2, 3 El Jabali 6 34.3 12.5 2.7 597 19.45 102.11 3.89 78.18 193.03 1, 2 El Metate 5 41.5 82 4.4 301 19.54 101.99 4.72 14.79 171.49 1 Tres Cruces 15 53 338.5 2.6 216 19.1 99.5 8.48 66.00 50.85 1 El Huanillo 3 10.7 42.2 5.3 540 19.67 101.98 9.2 46.56 205.41 1 La Mina 6 58.2 339.7 4.6 213 19.71 101.42 17.19 64.03 63.34 1 El Pueblito 5 39.9 3.6 5.1 227 19.82 101.92 29.02 85.59 150.75 1 AG2 5 17.7 2.4 4.4 302 19.177 100.25 5 79.9 66.5 4 EG 15 51 330.7 5.3 52 21.196 104.47 63 61.9 193.5 4 DG 19.384 100.34 78 4 AL2 9 33.2 6.6 4.9 109 19.166 100.237 118 83.7 358.2 4 CD 12 24.3 1.9 3.7 142 19.39 102.11 269 83.1 62 4 AH 6 29.2 4.9 9 59 19.148 100.147 282 84.1 26 4 CF 8 34.3 7.3 6.5 74 19.36 102.66 339 83.1 350.8 4 BJ 15 33 6.7 3.2 147 19.28 102.86 360 83.5 358 4 AZ 10 45.3 9.8 10.9 21 19.43 102.21 730 78.4 306.9 4 Cima 13 51.9 15.3 10.6 16 19.37 102.98 957 71 300.6 4 BL 16 1 334.8 2.8 178 19.27 102.73 3528 59 133.6 4 Tan1 (TV) 3 23.8 7.8 16.5 56 19.4162 102.3049 209 79.76 234.11 5 Tan2 (TV) 8 43.5 353.5 3.9 199 19.4162 102.3049 209 81.53 58.30 5 Tan3 (UR-4) 8 60.9 339.9 3.6 242 19.3744 102.0843 429 61.73 69.41 5 Tan4 (San Fco) 0 19.3691 102.3651 339 5 Tan5 (Tan 28) 2 41.2 348.5 19.3945 102.4122 269 78.50 36.10 5 Tan6 (Tan 26) 7 58.6 17.9 9.6 41 19.4257 102.4355 256 64.82 136.42 5 Tan7 (Tan 10) 6 28.1 348.6 6.3 115 19.3089 102.5396 373 78.27 352.48 5 Tan8 (Tan 43') 8 27.7 2.5 2.9 359 19.2619 102.5641 612 84.86 254.48 5 Tan9 (Tan 43) 8 31.3 352.7 9.2 39 19.2682 102.569 612 82.67 354.96 5 Tan10 (NI 19) 7 32.8 1.2 7.3 69 19.8733 102.2158 82 87.69 252.59 5 Tan11 (NI 18) 7 43.6 349.3 4.3 198 19.0103 102.0676 163 78.19 47.09 5

R. Maciel Peña et al.

322 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

The mean paleodirection obtained in this study is inclination I = 28.8°, declination D = 354.9°, Fisherian parameters k = 28, 95 = 7.3°, N = 15, which corresponds (Fig. 6) to the mean paleomagnetic pole position Plat = 83.9°, Plong = 321.6°, K = 34, A95 = 6.6°. These directions, are practically indistinguishable from the expected Plio-Quaternary paleodirections, as derived from the reference poles for the North American polar wander curve (Besse and Courtillot, 2002) and is in agreement with previous studies and compiled data from the MGVF (Tables 2 and 3, Fig. 7) considering all previously reported studies (Gonzalez at al., 1997; Bohnel and Molina, 2002; Panfil, 1999; Michalk et al., 2010; Maciel Peña et al., 2009). This suggests that no major tectonic deformation occurred in the studied area since the Late Pliocene to the present. Thus, these data may be used for the paleosecular variation (PSV) estimation.

The formula 2 2 2F T WS S S n was used for estimating paleosecular variation in this

study, where SF is the angular dispersion, SW dispersion within the site (following McEllhinny and McFadden, 1997), n the average number of samples per site, and

1 2211 1 N

T iiS N is the total angular dispersion (Cox, 1969). Here, N is the

number of sites used in the calculation, i the angular distance of the i-th virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) from the axial dipole. All VGPs obtained in this study yield lesser colatitudes than generally adopted 45 cut-off angles (Johnson et al., 2008). We obtained SF = 15.9 with SU = 21.0 and SL = 12.7 (upper and lower limits respectively) which reasonably agrees with the Model G of the McFadden et al. (1988, 1991) fit to the Johnson et al. (2008) databases for the last 5 Ma (Fig. 8). Considering all previously reported paleodirections from the MGVF (Table 3 and Fig. 9) we have obtained values (SF = 13.9 with SU = 16.9 and SL = 11.9) which are almost identical to those reported by Herrero-Bervera et al. (1986).

Table 3. Summary of paleomagnetic data and angular dispersion of the VGPs from volcanic rocks of Central Mexico and MGVF.

Data Set Age [years] N Plat [°]

Plong[°]

A95[°]

K SF SU SL

Steel (1986) 76000580000 24 86.9 333.2 5.5 29.6 14.2 17.6 11.9 Herrero-Bervera et al. (1986) 0580000 45 86.4 133.0 3.5 35.7 13.9 16.1 12.1 Bohnel et al. (1990) (compilation + new data)

Brunhes 70% < 40000 74 88.3 72.4 3.3 26.6 15.4 17.4 13.8

Urrutia-Fucugauchi (1997) (compilation + new data) Brunhes 84 88.4 111.5 2.6 36 12.9 14.4 11.7

This Study (MGVF) Brunhes/Matuy. 15 84.0 321.6 7.3 28 15.9 21.0 12.7 All MGVF Selected Brunhes/Matuy. 45 88.7 99.1 5.3 17 13.9 16.9 11.9

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 323

In order to obtain a relatively detailed paleomagnetic record for the last 3 Ma, we have combined our data with that of the nearby, Ar-Ar dated lava flows associated with the Tancitaro Volcano (Maciel Peña et al., 2009). The paleomagnetic declination, inclination and paleolatitude of the VGP (virtual geomagnetic poles) are shown in Fig. 10 against their stratigraphic position. The oldest sites analyzed are the Santa Teresa locality Site

Fig. 8. Paleosecular variation of lavas (PSVL) for the last 5 Ma (data from this study). (Adopted from McFadden et al., 1988 and 1991 - black line, and Johnson et al., 2008 - grey line.)

Fig. 9. The same as in Fig. 8 using all available MGVF data.

R. Maciel Peña et al.

324 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

Val2 and Val3 and the Cerro Alto locality Site Val13. All yielded normal polarity magnetizations as expected for the units belonging the Gauss geomagnetic Chron. An interesting feature of the record comes from the lava flows Val4 through Val16 (Cerro Grande) dated at about 2.35 Ma these yielded clearly defined normal directions. The possible existence of a normal polarity magnetization in the Matuyama reversed (Fig. 10) epoch older than the Reunion events, identified as anomaly X in the magnetic anomaly profiles by Heirtzler et al. (1968) and Emilia and Heinrichs (1969), has not been confirmed by subaerial volcanic rocks with the exception of a 2.37 Ma normal polarity lava from Argentina (Valencio et al., 1970). More recently however, Herrero-Bervera et al. (2007) reported transitional paleodirecions at Halawa Valley, Koolau Volcano, Oahu, Hawaii (Fig. 10). The corresponding virtual geomagnetic pole positions are located close to Madagascar and 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating experiments yielded isochrons between 2.64 ± 0.23 to 2.37 ± 0.17 Ma with a weighted mean age of 2.514 ± 0.039 Ma, which, combined with the overall reversed polarity of whole section and the absence of polarity reversals, strongly suggests that the excursion corresponds to Cryptochron C2r.2r-1 (Cande and Kent, 1995). The normal polarity was also detected for the Site Val8 (San Nicolas) dated at about 1.2 Ma. It may be speculated that this lava flow was erupted during the worldwide observed Reunion geomagnetic event.

Another important feature of the geomagnetic record obtained from the MGVF field is that lava flow VAL-1 dated radiometrically at about 0.56 Ma yield fully reversed paleodirections. Quidelleur and Valet (1996), on the basis of transitionally magnetized

Fig. 10. Flow-mean magnetic inclination, declination and paleolatitude of virtual geomagnetic poles against age based on data from Central and Western Mexico (see text for more details).

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 325

lavas (Canary Islands) that gave an unspiked K-Ar age of 602 ± 24 ka, interpreted the event as a new excursion and proposed the name ‘La Palma’. In addition, a relative paleointensity minimum of global extent was found in marine sediments at about 590 ka (Guyodo and Valet, 1999) supporting the findings of Quidelleur and Valet (1996). However, Singer et al., (2002) based on new high quality Ar-Ar data, proposed that the lavas at Barranco de los Tilos recorded the Big Lost event (incremental heating 40Ar/39Ar age of 580.2 ± 7.8 ka) (Figs. 7 and 8), rather than ‘La Palma’ excursion. The Big Lost event was first described by Champion et al. (1981, 1988) in lava flows in Idaho. There are some marine evidences of the Big Lost event as well: Lund et al. (1998) identified in ODP leg 172 three cases of anomalous directions at 610 ka; Langereis et al. (1997) found additional evidences for the Big Lost between 560570 ka recorded in a piston core from the Ionian Sea. More recently, Carcaillet et al. (2004) found three VDM (virtual dipole moment) minima between 750 and 500 ka, the oldest (about 700 ka) being identified as the Delta excursion. The only evidence of a fully reversed short event at 630640 ka comes from the studies of Liu et al. (1985, 1988) who investigated in detail the Lishi Loess Series in Xifeng area in China. Additional evidence that support these anomalous paleodirections comes from the Ceburuco lavas studied by Pétronille et al. (2005).

5. CONCLUSIONS

We have carried out a rock-magnetic and paleomagnetic survey on seventeen independent cooling units from the Michoacan Guanajuato Volcanic Field. A continuous thermomagnetic curve indicates that most of the samples contain titanium-poor titanomagnetites occasionally associated with titanohematites. Judging from the ratios of hysteresis parameters, it seems that all samples fall into the pseudo-single domain grain size region indicating a mixture of multidomain (MD) and a significant amount of single domain (SD) grains. The characteristic paleodirections are successfully isolated for 15 lava flows. The mean paleodirection obtained in this study is I = 28.8°, D = 354.9°, k = 28, 95 = 7.3°, N = 15, which corresponds to the mean paleomagnetic pole position Plat = 83.9°, Plong = 321.6°, K = 34, A95 = 6.6°. The compilation of previously reported paleomagnetic data yielded similar results which are practically indistinguishable from the expected Plio-Quaternary paleodirections, as derived from the reference poles for the North American polar wander curve. The calculation of angular standard deviation of the virtual geomagnetic poles using all currently available data belonging to the MGVF yielded SF = 13.9 with SU = 16.9 and SL = 11.9 (upper and lower limits, respectively) which reasonably agrees with available statistical models for the last 5 Ma. The interesting feature of the record comes from the lava flows dated at about 2.35 Ma with clearly defined normal directions. This may point out the possible existence of a normal polarity magnetization in the Matuyama reversed Chron older than the Reunion events and may be correlated to Halawa event interpreted as the Cryptochron C2r.2r-1. Another important feature of the geomagnetic record obtained from the MGVF is the evidence of a fully reversed geomagnetic field within Bruhnes Chron, at about 0.56 Ma corresponding to the relative paleointensity minimum of global extent found in marine sediments at about 590 ka.

R. Maciel Peña et al.

326 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful for the financial support given by CONACYT Project No.54957. MCR acknowledges partial support of Junta de Castilla y Leon Project No.BU004A0S.

References

Ban M., Hasenaka T., Delgado-Granados H. and Takaoka N., 1992. K-Ar ages of lavas from shield volcanoes in the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field, Mexico. Geofis. Int., 31, 467473.

Besse J. and Courtillot V., 2002.Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Ma. J. Geophys. Res., 107, DOI: 1029/2000JB000050.

Bohnel H and Molina-Garza R., 2002. Secular variation in Mexico during the last 40,000 years, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 133, 99109.

Bohnel H., Urrutia-Fucugauchi J. and Herrero-Bervera E., 1990. Paleomagnetic data from central Mexico and their use for paleosecular variation studies. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 64, 224236.

Cande S.C. and Kent D.V., 1995. Revised Calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 60936095.

Carcaillet J.T., Bourles D.L. and Thouveny N., 2004. Geomagnetic dipole moment and 10Be production rate intercalibration from authigenic 10Be/9Be for the last 1.3 Ma. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 5, Q05006, DOI: 10.1029/2003GC000641.

Cervantes Solano M., Goguitchaichvili A., Sánchez Bettucci L., Cejudo Ruiz R., Calvo-Rathert M., Carlos Ruiz-Martinez V., Soto R. and Alva-Valdivia L.M., 2010. Paleomagnetism of Early Cretaceous Arapey formation (northern Uruguay). Stud. Geophys. Geod., 54, 533546.

Champion D.E., Dalrymple G.B. and Kunz M.A., 1981. Radiometric and paleomagnetic evidence for the Emperor reversed polarity event at 0.46 m.y. in basalt lava flows from the eastern Snake River Olain, Idaho. Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 10551058.

Champion D.E., Lanphere M.A. and Kunz M.A., 1988. Evidence for a new geomagnetic polarity reversal from lava flows in Idaho: Discussion of short polarity reversals in the Brunhes and late Matuyama polarity chrons. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 1166711680.

Conte-Fasano G., Urrutia-Fucugauchi J., Goguitchaichvili A. and Morales-Contreras J., 2006. Low-latitude paleosecular variation and the time-averaged field during the late Pliocene and Quaternary - Paleomagnetic study of the Michoacan-Guanajuato volcanic field, Central Mexico. Earth Planets Space, 58, 13591371.

Cox A., 1969. Confidence limits for the precision parameter k. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 18, 545549.

Day R., Fuller M. and Schmidt V.A., 1977. Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: grain size and compositional dependence. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13, 260267.

Dunlop D., 2002. Theory and application of the Day plot (Mrs/Ms versus Hcr/Hc) 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data. J. Geophys. Res., 107, DOI: 10.1029 /2001JB000486.

Emilia D.A. and Heinrichs D.F., 1969. Ocean floor spreading: Olduvai and Gilsa events in the Matuyama epoch. Science, 166, 12671270.

Ferrari L., Pasquarè G. and Tibaldi A., 1990. Plio-Quaternary tectonics of central Mexican Volcanic Belt and some constraints on its rifting mode. Geofis. Int., 28, 518.

Plio-Pleistocene Paleomagnetic Record from the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field

Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011) 327

Goguitchaichvili A. and Prévot M., 2000. Magnetism of oriented single crystals of hemo-ilmenite showing self-reversal of thermoremanent magnetization. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 27612781.

Gonzalez S., Sherwood G., Bohnel H. and Schnepp E., 1997. Paleosecular variation in central Mexico over the last 30 000 years: The record from lavas. Geophys. J. Int., 130, 201219.

Guyodo Y. and Valet J.P. 1999. Global changes in intensity of the Earth’s magnetic field during the past 800 kyr. Nature, 399, 249252.

Hasenaka T. and Carmichael I.S.E., 1985, A compilation of location, size and geomorphological parameters of volcanoes of the Michoacan-Guanajuato volcanic field, central Mexico. Geofìs. Int., 24, 577607.

Hasenaka T., 1994. Size, distribution, and magma output rate for shield volcanoes of the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field, Central Mexico. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 63, 1331.

Heitzler J.R., Dickson G., Herron E., Pitman W.C. and Lepichon X., 1968. Marine magnetic anomalies, geomagnetic field reversals and motions of the ocean floor and continents. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 21192143.

Herrero-Bervera E., Browne J.E., Valet J.P., Singer B.S. and Jicha B.R., 2007. Cryptochron C2r.2r-1 recorder 2.51 Ma in the Koolau Volcano at Halawa, Oahu, Hawaii, USA: Paleomagnetic and 40Ar/39Ar evidence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 254, 256271.

Herrero-Bervera E., Urrutia-Fucugauchi J., Martin del Pozzo A., Bohnel H. and Guerrero J., 1986. Normal amplitude Brunhes paleosecular variation at low latitudes: A paleomagnetic record from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 14421445.

Johnson C.L., Constable C.G., Tauxe L., Barendregt R.W., Brown L.L., Coe R.S., Layer P., Mejia V., Opdyke N.D., Singer B.S., Staudigel H. and Stone D., 2008. Recent investigations of the 0-5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded in lava flows. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q04032, DOI: 10.1029/2007GC001696.

Kirschvink J.L., 1980., The least-square line and plane and analysis of palaeomagnetic data. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 62, 699718.

Langereis C.G., Dekkers M.J., de Lange G.J., Paterne M. and van Santvoort P.J.M., (1997). Magnetostratigraphy and astronomical calibration of the last 1.1 Ma from an eastern Mediterranean piston core and dating of short events in the Brunhes. Geophys. J. Int., 129, 7594.

Lawrence K.P., Constable C.G. and Johnson C.L., 2006. Paleosecular variation and the average geomagnetic field at ±20 latitude. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 7, DOI: 10.1029 /2004GC000871.

Lawrence K.P., Tauxe L., Staudigel H., Constable C.G., Koppers A., McIntosh W. and Johnson C.L., 2009. Paleomagnetic field properties near the southern hemisphere tangent cylinder. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10, Q01005, DOI: 10.1029/2008GC002072.

Liu T., Yuan B. and Han J., 1985. The loess-paleosol sequence in China and climatic history. Episodes, 8, 2128.

Liu T., Liu X., Xu T., Liu C. and Chen M., 1988. The Chinese loess in Xifeng: The primary study on magnetostratigraphic of a loess profile in Xifeng area, Gansu Province. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 92, 345348.

Lund S.P., Acton G., Clement B., Hastedt M., Okada M. and Williams T. 1998. Geomagnetic field excursions occured often during the last million years. EOS Trans. AGU, 78(14), Spring Meet. Suppl., S178S179.

R. Maciel Peña et al.

328 Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55 (2011)

Maciel Peña R., Goguitchaichvili A., Garduño Monrroy V.H., Ruiz Martinez V.C., Aguilar Reyes B., Morales J., Alva-Valdivia L., Caballero Miranda C. and Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, 2009. Paleomagnetic and rock-magnetic survey of Brunhes lava flows from Tancitaro volcano, Mexico. Geofis. Int., 48, 375384.

McElhinny M.W. and McFadden P.L., 1997. Palaeosecular variation over the past 5 Ma based on a new generalized database. Geophys. J. Int., 131, 240252.

McFadden P.L., Merrill R.T. and McElhinny M.W., 1988. Dipole/quadrupole family modeling of paleosecular variation. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 1158311588.

McFadden P.L., Merrill R.T., McEllhinny M.W. and Lee S.H., 1991. Reversals of the Earth’s magnetic field and temporal variations of the dynamo families. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 39233933.

Mejia V., Bohnel H., Ortega-Rivera M.A., Lee J. and Aranda-Gomez J., 2005. Paleosecular variation and time-averaged field recorded in Late Pliocene-Holocene lava flows from Mexico. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 6, DOI: 10.1029/2004GC000871.

Michalk D.M., Biggin A.J., Knudsen M.F., Bohnel H.N., Nowaczyk N.R., Ownby S. and Lopez-Martinez M., 2010. Application of the multiespecimen paleointensity method to Pleistocene lava flows from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 179, 139156.

Nixon G.T., Demant A., Amstrong R.L. and Harakal J.E., 1987. K-Ar and geologic data bearing on the age and evolution of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Geofis. Int., 26, 109158.

Pétronille M., Goguitchaichvili A., Henry B., Alva-Valdivia L., Rosas-Elguera J., Rodríguez Ceja M. and Calvo-Rathert M., 2005. Paleomagnetism of Ar-Ar dated lava flows from the Ceboruco-San Pedro volcanic field (western Mexico): Evidence for the Matuyama-Brunhes transition precursor and a fully reversed geomagnetic event in the Brunhes chron. J. Geophys. Res., 110, DOI: 10.1029/2004jb003321.

Quidelleur X. and Vallet J.P., 1996. Geomagnetic changes across the last reversal record in lava flows from La Palma, Spain, Canary Island. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 1375513773.

Ruiz-Martinez V.C., Osete M.L., Vegas R., Nunez-Aguilar J.I., Urrutia-Fucugauchi J. and Tarling D.H., 2000. Palaeomagnetism of Late Miocene to Quaternary volcanics from the eastern segment of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Tectonophysics, 318, 217233.

Singer B.S., Relle M.K., Hoffman K.A., Battle A., Laj C., Guillou H. and Carracedo J., 2002. Ar/Ar ages from transitionally magnetized lavas on La Palma, Canary Island, and the geomagnetic instability timescale. J. Geophys. Res., 107, DOI: 10.1029/2001JB001613.

Steele K.W., 1985. Paleomagnetic constraint on the volcanic history of Iztaccihuatl. Geofis. Int., 24, 159167.

Tauxe L., Luskin C., Selkin P., Gans P. and Calvert A., 2004., Paleomagnetic results from the Snake River Plain: Contribution to the time-averaged field global database. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 5, Q08H13, DOI: 10.1029/2003GC000661.

Tauxe L., Mullender T.A.T. and Pick T., 1996. Pot-bellies, wasp-waists and superparamagnetism in magnetic hysteresis. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 1233712350.

Urrutia-Fucugauchi J., 1997. Comments on A new method to determine paleosecular variation, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 102, 295300.

Valencio D.A., Linares E. and Vilas J.F., 1970. on the age of the Matuyama-Gauss transition. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 4, 341350.


Recommended