+ All documents
Home > Documents > Nutritional Evaluation of Processed Jatropha curcas Kernel Meals: Effect on Growth Performance of...

Nutritional Evaluation of Processed Jatropha curcas Kernel Meals: Effect on Growth Performance of...

Date post: 11-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: shittuaf
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
Nutritional Evaluation of Processed Jatropha curcas Kernel Meals: Effect on Growth Performance of Broiler Chicks Ojediran T. K., Adisa Y. A., Yusuf S. A. and Emiola I. A. J Anim Sci Adv 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121 DOI: 10.5455/jasa.20141115115449 Journal of Animal Science Advances Online version is available on: www.grjournals.com
Transcript

Nutritional Evaluation of Processed Jatropha curcas Kernel

Meals: Effect on Growth Performance of Broiler Chicks

Ojediran T. K., Adisa Y. A., Yusuf S. A. and Emiola I. A.

J Anim Sci Adv 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

DOI: 10.5455/jasa.20141115115449

Journal of Animal Science Advances

Online version is available on: www.grjournals.com

OJEDIRAN ET AL.

1110

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

Nutritional Evaluation of Processed Jatropha curcas

Kernel Meals: Effect on Growth Performance of

Broiler Chicks 1

Ojediran T. K., 2Adisa Y. A.,

2Yusuf S. A. and

1Emiola I. A.

1 Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P. M. B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.

2 Department of Animal Production and Health, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P. M. B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the growth performance of broiler chicks fed differently processed

(Raw Defatted Meal RDM, Toasted Defatted Meal TDM, Cooked Defatted Meal CDM, Lye Defatted Meal

LDM and Sand Roasted Defatted Meal ZRDM) Jatropha curcas kernel meals. The feeding trial lasted for 21

days. 180 day-old Marshal strain unsexed broiler chicks were used for this experiment. There were 6 dietary

treatments of 30 birds per treatment and 3 replicate of 10 birds each in a complete randomized design. Each

differently processed Jatropha curcas kernel meals were used to replace one-third of the soybean meal in the

control diet. Data on average daily feed intake (ADFI) of birds fed control (D1) was significantly (P<0.05)

higher than others. Birds fed TDM (D3), CDM (D4) and LDM (D5) had similar ADFI with those fed RDM (D2)

and ZRDM (D6). The average daily weight gain (ADWG) of birds fed the D1 diet was significantly (P<0.05)

higher than others. The feed gain ratio (FGR) of birds fed the D2 diet was significantly (P<0.05) higher than

others. The total mortality of birds fed the D1 diet was significantly (P<0.05) lower than others while those fed

the D2, D3, D4 and D5 diets did not show significant differences (p>0.05). Birds fed the D6 diet had the highest

total mortality rate (P<0.05) from others except for those fed with the D5 diet which had a similar mortality rate.

The result suggests that the processing methods improves the nutrients, however, heat treatments reduced the

antinutrients with minimal effect on the saponin and phorbol esters present in the Jatropha curcas kernel meals,

which resulted in low feed intake in the diets 2-6. ADFI, ADWG, FGR and total mortality were adversely

affected by the dietary treatments as observed by the depressed growth rate and high mortality in birds fed

Jatropha curcas meals. However, further experiment should be carried out to examine the performance of

broiler chicks on bio-treated samples of the processed Jatropha curcas kernel meals.

Keywords: Growth, Jatropha curcas kernel, performance, processing.

Corresponding author: Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P. M. B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.

Received on: 15 Nov 2014 Revised on: 20 Nov 2014

Accepted on: 26 Nov 2014

Online Published on: 30 Nov 2014

Original Article

ISSN: 2251-7219

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROCESSED JATROPHA CURCAS KERNEL MEALS …

1111

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

Introduction

Feed represents the major cost of poultry

production and the cost of feed ingredients could be

as high as 80% of the total cost of the finished feed

(Longe, 2006). Inadequate production of feeds has

been found to be one of the major factor limiting the

development and expansion of the poultry business

(Emenalom, 2004).

It is imperative therefore, to embark on

research into alternatives and cheaper sources of

feedstuffs or ingredients to the orthodox feedstuffs

in order to widen sources of raw materials for

poultry feeds (Annongu et al., 2010). There is no

doubt that the exploitation of a non-conventional

feeding stuff such as Jatropha curcas kernel meal

will help to reduce the cost of poultry feeds with

subsequent reduction in the cost of production. This

is because this Jatropha curcas kernel meal is a by-

product of bio-fuel or bio-diesel processing with

each ton of dry seed produces 200-300 liters of bio-

fuel and 700-800 kg of seed meal (Brodjonegoro et

al., 2005) and does not suffer from competition

from any quarter.

Jatropha curcas is a multi-purpose and large

drought resistant plant with several attributes,

considerable potentials, evoked interest all over

tropics as a potential biofuel crop and it originated

from Central America but can now be found

throughout the tropics including Africa and Asia

(Openshaw, 2000). It is a tall bush or small tree (up

to 6 m height). The lifespan of this perennial bush is

more than 50 years, and it can grow on marginal

soils with low nutrient content (Openshaw, 2000).

The seed has about 35-50% crude protein (Aslani et

al., 2007), 60% oil and rich in essential amino acid

and minerals (Makkar et al., 2008). The use of

Jatropha curcas meal in animal nutrition is

however faced with several problems of anti-

nutritional factors such as lectin, saponin, tannin,

phytate, trypsin inhibitors and phorbol esters

(Makkar and Becker, 1999). Due to these

phytotoxins, the seeds or cakes or its oil cannot be

used for human or animal consumption. Processing

methods, such as soaking, germination roasting and

autoclaving has been reported to improve the

nutritional properties of plant seeds (Yagoub and

Abdella, 2007). Processing techniques caused

important changes in the biochemical, nutritional

and sensory characteristics of legumes. In many

parts of the world, legumes are often consumed

after soaking and germination, during which the

nutritional value is enhanced. During germination

of food grains, it has been reported that certain

minerals and vitamins were increased (Sangronis

and Machado, 2007). The above named toxins can

be removed either by chemical or physical methods

while phorbol ester is the most difficult toxin to be

detoxified by these methods (Belewu and Sam,

2010). Meanwhile, feeding trial of defatted meals as

poultry diet is scanty.

The decreases in the levels of anti-nutritional

factors to safe limits may be caused by thermal

degradation, soaking in distilled water, germination,

and extraction of methanol (Yasmin et al., 2008;

Magdi, 2007; Aderibigbe et al., 1997), hot water

treatment, lye treatment and fermentation (Akande

et al., 2012). This study therefore attempts to

investigate the effect of various processing methods

on nutrient, compositon of Jatropha curcas kernel

meals and their effect on growth performance of

broiler chicks.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Site

The research was conducted at the poultry unit

of the Teaching and Research Farm, Ladoke

Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso.

Test Ingredients

Dry seeds of J. curcas were purchased locally.

The seeds were screened to separate whole seeds

from the dirt and extraneous matter. The seeds were

dehulled to separate the kernel from the shell

manually. The extraction of oil follows similar

manner to that of other oil seeds such as cotten seed

cake, cashew nut meal, castor seed cake (Belewu,

2010b, Odunsi et al., 2002; Akande et al., 2012).

The kernels were divided into portions for ease of

processing. Five different processing methods were

adopted, viz:

RDM

OJEDIRAN ET AL.

1112

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

A portion of the kernel was milled and

subjected to oil extraction using hydraulic press and

was referred to as Raw Defatted Meal (RDM). This

is similar to the procedure of Akande et al., (2012).

TDM

A potion of the milled kernel from RDM was

roasted until the kernel become crispy to the touch

and turn brown in a pan, stirred from time to time to

maintain uniform heating while it lasted for 30

minutes, as this was referred to as Toasted Defatted

Meal (TDM).

CDM

A portion of the raw kernel was cooked at

1200C ±5

0C for 30 minutes (similar to the procedure

of Martinez-Herrera et al., (2006)) in a cooking pot,

sun dried for 24 hours after which they were oven

dried at 850C for an hour before being milled and

then defatted using the hydraulic press as this was

referred to as Cooked Defatted Meal (CDM).

LDM

The lye was prepared by putting woodash in a

muslin cloth and hot water (1000C ± 5

0C) was

poured on the ash and the filtrate (pH 9.5) was used

to cook the kernel at 1200C ± 5

0C and held for 30

minutes. This is a variant to the procedure of

Akande, (2010). The treated kernel was dried,

milled and defatted and referred to as Lye Defatted

Meal (LDM).

ZRDM

Raw whole seeds were roasted in sand (particle

size of ¼–½ mm ) at 115oC ±5

0Cand held at this

temperature for 30 minutes. The roasted seed was

cooled, dehulled and kernels were milled then

defatted to produce Sand Roasted-Defatted kernel

Meal (ZRDM).

All meals were at between 0.5-1.0mm mesh

size.

Experimental Diets

Six (6) experimental diets were formulated:

Diets 1 contained 0% JKM and served as the

control diet, while diets 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 contained

10.33% (one-third replacement of soybean meal)

inclusion level of RDM, TDM, CDM, LDM and

ZRDM respectively as shown in table 1. All diets

were iso-nitrogeneous and iso-caloric.

Table 1: Gross Composition of Experimental Diets for the Broiler Starters.

Ingredients %

Diet 1

(CNRL)

Diet 2

(RDM)

Diet 3

(TDM)

Diet 4

(CDM)

Diet 5

(LDM)

Diet 6

(ZRDM)

Maize 53.00 53.00 52.00 53.00 53.00 52.00

Wheat offal 6.00 6.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 7.00

Soybean meal 31.00 20.67 20.67 20.67 20.67 20.67

JKM 0.00 10.33 10.33 10.33 10.33 10.33

Fish meal 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00

Limestone 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35

DCP 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Salt 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

Vitamin Premix 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25

Lysine

Methionine

0.15

0.05

0.15

0.05

0.15

0.05

0.15

0.05

0.15

0.05

0.15

0.05

Total (%) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Calculated Analysis

Crude protein (%) 23.66 23.31 23.43 23.17 23.91 23.61

M.E. kcal/kg 2940.82 3106.31 3100.57 3106.31 3106.31 3100.57

JKM= Jatropha curcas kernel cake meal, DCP= dicalcium phosphate.

*Vitamin premix contained the following vitamins and minerals in 1kg of broiler diet: 12500 IU, Vit A: 2500 IU, Vit D3:

40mg, Vit E: 2mg, Vit K3: 30mg, Vit B1: 55mg, Vit.B2: 550mg, Niacin: 115mg, Calcium Pantothenate: 50mg, Vit B6:

0.25mg, Vit B12: 500mg, Choline chloride: 10mg, Folic acid: 0.08mg, Biotin: 120mg, Manganese: 1000mg, Fe: 80mg,

Zn: 8.5mg, Cu: 1.5mg, I: 0.3mg, Co: 0.12mg Se and 120mg Antioxidant.

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROCESSED JATROPHA CURCAS KERNEL MEALS …

1113

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

Experimental Birds and Management

One hundred and eighty (180) Marshal Strain

Broiler Chicks were used for this study. All the

birds were initially fed on commercial broiler starter

mash for the first week to stabilize the chicks after

which they were randomly distributed without

sexing into six dietary groups of thirty (30) birds

each. Each treatment group was further sub-divided

into three replicates of ten (10) birds each. The birds

were fed with their respective treatment diet and

water was served ad-libitum. The experimental

chicks were raised under intensive care

management in a deep litter system. Occasional

management practices such as vaccination,

medication, weekly weighing of birds and feed

intake, changing of litters and proper record keeping

were taken. The study lasted for 21 days for the

introduction of treatmental diets.

Data Collection

Average Daily Feed Intake (ADFI), Average

Daily Gain (ADG) and Weight gain were monitored

and recorded throughout the feeding trial period.

Feed gain ratio of the experimental birds were

estimated.

Chemical Analysis

Proximate Composition

Proximate composition (Dry matter, Crude

protein, Crude fibre, Ether extract, Ash and

Nitrogen free extract) of the dried samples were

determined using the procedures of AOAC (2000).

Energy Determination

This was calculated using Pauzenga formula

(Pauzenga, 1985).

Anti-nutritional Factors

Trypsin inhibitors was determined using the

method of Kakade et al., (1969); Lectin content was

determined by hemaglutination assay as described

by Makkar et al., (1997); Tannins was determined

using the method of Swain (1979); The

determinations of total saponins were applied using

a spectrophotometric method described by Hiai et

al., (1989); Phytate was determined using the

method of Maga, (1983) while Phorbol esters was

determined after the procedure of Haas and

Mittelbach, (2000).

Statistical Analysis

All data generated and estimated were

subjected to Analysis of Variance in a Complete

Randomised Design of SAS (2000) software

package. Significant means were seperated using

Duncan multiple range test of the same package.

Results and Discussion

Effect of Various Processing Methods on

Proximate and Energy Composition of Jatropha

curcas Kernel Meals is shown in table 2. The Dry

Matter ranges from 94.26 – 97.71%. Raw whole

kernel (RWK) dry matter increased from 94.26% to

95.62% in the RDM; this could be attributed to the

defattening process.

Table 2: Effect of various processing methods on proximate composition of Jatropha curcas kernel and meals.

Parameters (%)

RWK RDM TDM CDM LDM ZRDM

Dry matter

94.26 95.26 97.60 95.62 91.39 97.71

Crude protein

23.57 38.59 33.82 37.24 44.49 35.50

Ether extract

52.04 37.21 47.08 43.31 24.56 43.62

Crude fibre

2.42 4.15 9.11 8.50 6.66 8.60

Ash

4.80 6.14 5.97 5.80 10.20 5.75

NFE

11.43 9.17 1.62 0.77 5.48 4.24

ME (Kcal/Kg)

5198.03 4706.94 4889.27 4837.99 4398.05 4870.78

OJEDIRAN ET AL.

1114

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

Note, RWK= Raw Kernel, RDM = Raw Defatted Meal, TDM= Toasted Defatted Meal, CDM= Cooked Defatted Meal,

LDM= Lye treated Defatted Meal, ZRDM= Sand Roasted Defatted Meal, NFE= Nitrogen Free Extract, ME= Metabolizable

Energy. %: percent.

This is in agreement with the report of Abou-

arab and Abu-Salem (2010). However, this is lower

when compared with the findings of Oladele and

Oshodi (2007) who reported 97.47%. The dry

matter of TDM and ZRDM were 97.6% and 97.71%

respectively; this shows that TDM and ZRDM

treatments had the moisture content reduced by the

virtue of heat applied. CDM and LDM had a dry

matter content of 95.26% and 91.39% respectively.

The CDM (95.62% dry matter) is similar to that

RDM of (94.26%); this could mean that cooking

had little effect on dry matter at the drying level

applied. LDM had the least dry matter, probably

because re-drying the lye treated kernel increased

the moisture content and was not as dried as other

treatments. RWK and other treatments were found

to be higher when compared to an earlier report on

certain common legumes/grains such Mucuna

pruriens var. pruriens (24.90% DM) (Udedibie and

Carlini, 1998); Entada scadens (26.82% DM)

(Vadivel et al., 2008). A low moisture content of

5.74%, 4.74%, 2.40%, 4.38%, 8.61% and 2.29% for

RWK, RDM, TDM, CDM, LDM and ZRDM

respectively was observed. This value is obviously

lower than 10% moisture content limit

recommended for storage stability of flours.

(http://wantonfeed.com/grain/life.html).

The Crude protein value of 23.57% was

observed for RWK and due to oil extraction; it

increases in the RDM to 38.59%. The crude protein

(CP) value of RWK is comparable with the findings

of Akintayo (2004) who reported a value of 24.60%

in the unfermented kernel of Jatropha curcas. On

the other hand, Ogbobe and Akano (1993) reported

that the seed of Jatropha gossypifolia contains

13.40% CP which is lower than 24.60% CP that

was reported by Akintayo (2004). However, Abou-

arab and Abu-Salem (2010) reported higher CP

value of 32.88%. The CP content increases to

35.46% in RDM; this means defattening increase

the protein content of the seed and this is due to oil

extraction from the kernel. The crude protein of

TDM and ZRDM (33.82% and 35.5%) respectively

when compared to the RDM (38.59%) were lower,

this could be due to denaturing of protein by heat

while CDM (37.24%) had little effect when

compared to RDM (38.59%). Emiola et al., (2003,

2007) shows that aqueous heating tended to reduce

the CP content possibly due to leaching and

vaporization of some nitrogenous compound during

processing of Mucuna. The LDM had 44.49%

(crude protein) and this is the highest CP observed;

this could be due to residual protein inherent in the

wood ash. This result agrees with the findings of

Akande et al., (2011). RWK contains 23.57% crude

protein which makes it a good source of protein.

This result agrees with the findings of Belewu and

Sam, (2010). In contrast, Oladele and Oshodi,

(2008) reported 38.5% crude protein for Jatropha

cathartica. The crude protein of RWK, RDM,

TDM, CDM, LDM and ZRDM is lower than that of

the meal of the Jatropha curcas from cape verde

(56.4% crude protein) and Nicaragua (61.2% crude

protein) that was observed by Makkar et al., (1998).

Ether extract (52.04%) was observed for J.

curcas kernel and due to oil extraction; it decreases

in the RDM to 37.21% but increased to 47.08% in

the TDM while LDM had (24.59% EE). High

extraction in RDM and LDM reflected in their CP

content. ZRDM (43.62%) increases when compared

to RDM (37.21%), which could be due to browning

of the kernels and can probably reduce defattening

which is similar to TDM (47.08%). This means that

the method of defattening is less efficient and could

probably be responsible for reduced defattening.

This is similar to the findings of Akande et al.,

(2012) because of similar extraction method. The

high ether extract value of 52.04% in the kernel

signifies high lipid content. The oil content is much

higher than the value recorded for Bauhinia

reticulata which belongs to the pea family (Amoo,

2003). The higher oil content of Jatropha curcas

makes it one of the most appropriate renewable

alternative sources of biodiesel in terms of

availability and cost (Umer et al., 2010). The oil

content is higher than Canola seed (43%) and Soya

bean (18%) (www.biodieselmagazine.com).

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROCESSED JATROPHA CURCAS KERNEL MEALS …

1115

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

The RWK had the lowest Crude fibre (CF)

content (2.42%) when compared with other

treatments. This may be due to the presence of oil in

the kernel. This is lower when compared with

3.81% reported for raw seed of J. Curcas by Abou-

arab and Abu-Salem (2010) which is similar to the

report of Makkar et al., (1998). On the other hand,

Ogbobe and Akano (1993) reported that the

untreated seed of Jatropha gossypifolia contains

(9.25%). TDM and ZRDM have the highest CF

content (9.11% and 8.6% respectively) which

means the effect of heat is greatly felt in the

treatment, i.e. heat browning does not affect the

fibre but since protein is likely denatured, it resulted

in increased fibre contents. CDM (8.50%) is

comparable in CF percentage of TDM (9.11%) and

ZRDM (8.60). LDM (6.66%) also increases when

compared with raw kernel. All this increment in CF

may be due to defattening process. The crude fibre

is the sum total of all those organic compounds of

the plant cell membranes and supporting structures

which in chemical analysis of plants food stuff

remain after removal of the crude protein, fat and

Nitrogen-free extract. Thus, the crude fibre in diet

consists mostly of plant polysaccharides that cannot

be digested by human and monogastric dietary

enzymes such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and some

materials that encrust the cell walls (Melon, 1980).

Among the treatment, LDM (6.66%) could be

due to the alkaline effect of lye in breaking the fibre

bonds. Lye being a solution of alkali which

probably reacted with the fibre to break the bonds

thus causing a reduced crude fibre content

meanwhile other heat involving treatments could

not reduce the fibre probably because they had no

alkali or acid solution in them. Crude fibre value of

4.15% recorded for RDM is much lower than that

reported for raw African locust bean (11.7%) and

raw melon seeds (15.8%) (Omafuvbe Bridget et al.,

2004), but are higher than that reported for cowpea

(3.6%) and soybean (0.2%) (Saurez et al., 1999).

The ash content (4.80%) was observed for RWK

and it increased in RDM to 6.14% while LDM had

10.2% ash; the significant increase in ash content

could be due to the minerals content added by the

wood ash solution used in the LDM treatment.

The RWK, RDM and ZRDM had 4.8%, 5.97%

and 5.75% respectively, this could be due to the

high ether extract; as ether extract increased there

was reduction in ash content. It could be observed

in the treatments that ether extract and ash had a

negative correlation. Findings reveals that the ash

content is higher than 2.40% in Jatropha curcas

seed and 3.20% in Mucuna solan Seed (Sutton et

al., 1998). However, it is lowered than 5.68% of

raw seed of Jatropha curcas reported by Abou-

Arab and Abu-Salem (2010). Its increase in RDM

to 6.14% signifies that defattening increases the

concentration of minerals, while LDM had 6.64%

ash; the significant increase in ash content could be

due to the minerals content added by the wood ash

solution used in the LDM treatment. This is similar

to the findings of Akande et al., (2011) The RDM

and ZRDM had 6.14% and 5.75% respectively,

CDM had the ash content of 5.26%, it increases

when compared with the raw kernel. The RWK had

11.43% nitrogen free extract (NFE) which reduced

among the various treatments applied. It reduces in

RDM but futher reduced among heat involving

treatments with CDM being the lowest. It signifies

that dafattening reduces the NFE content of the

variously treated JKM. Cooking could probably

affects the NFE because of leaching into the water.

However these values are lower compare with the

findings of Belewu et al., (2010).

The RWK has the highest metabolizable energy

(ME) of 5198.03 (Kcal/kg) when compared with

other treatments. This could be as a result of high

Ether extract in the kernel. RDM, TDM, CDM,

LDM and ZRDM had a lower ME when compared

with RWK and it may be due to the defattening

process. It is observable that the ME of TDM, CDM

and ZRDM were higher than RDM and LDM

meanwhile the crude fibre of TDM, CDM and

ZRDM were also higher than RDM and LDM

which probably connotes that the CF bonds with the

undefatted oil to increase the energy content of the

affected meals since oil has been noted to improve

energy content of any feed materials as observed in

RWK.

The ME of the RWK and all other treatments

were higher when compared with Centrosema

pubescence (3389.00Kcal/Kg) and Calopogonium

OJEDIRAN ET AL.

1116

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

mucunoides (3424.00Kcal/Kg) reported by Ugwu,

et al., (2001). Table 3 shows the Effect of Various

Processing Methods on Antinutrient Compositon of

Jatropha curcas Kernel Meals.

Table 3: Effect of various processing methods on anti-nutritional composition of Jatropha curcas kernel

and meals.

Anti-nutrients RWK RDM TDM CDM LDM ZRDM

Trypsin inhibitor (TIU/mg) 22.69 13.52 0.00 0.65 0.47 0.53

Lectin (HU/mg) 48.29 31.31 0.00 4.23 2.55 3.18

Tannin (%) 0.070 0.053 0.007 0.019 0.014 0.016

Saponin (%) 2.18 2.09 1.24 1.74 1.53 1.61

Phytate (%) 8.63 8.26 1.84 2.46 2.05 2.39

Phorbolester(mg/100g) 2.700 2.490 1.040 1.287 1.140 1.207 %- percentage, RWK-Raw Whole kernel, RDM-Raw Defatted Meal, TDM-Toasted Defatted Meal, CDM-Cooked

Defatted Meal, LDM-Lye solution treated Defatted Meal, ZRDM-Sand Roasted Defatted Meal.

Trypsin Inhibitor

RWK had 22.67 IU/mg while the defatted

meals except RDM (13.52IU/mg) had lower values

less than 1.00IU/mg and this reduction could be due

to the leaching out of trypsin inhibitor activity

(TIA) during processing and as a result of trypsin

inhibitor heat labile nature (Siddhuraju et al., 1996).

However, the fact that not all TIA was removed

shows that at least some of the trypsin inhibitors are

heat resistant at the temperature applied. These

findings agree with that reported by Magdi (2007).

Also, no amount of TIA was observed in the TDM

and could be due to the temperature during toasting.

Meanwhile, Jyothi and Sumathi (1995) reported that

the extraction at both low and high temperatures

with sodium bicarbonate was most effective in the

case of trypsin inhibitors of common bean seeds.

Lectin

RWK had 48.29HU/mg which was reduced to

31.31HU/mg in RDM when it was defatted and was

reduced to 4.23 in CDM, 3.18 in ZRDM, 2.55 in

LDM and 0.00HU/mg in TDM which could be due

to elimination of lectin by toasting as a result of its

heat labile nature which is contrary to an earlier

study by Aderibigbe et al., (1997) who found an

increase in lectin activity following heat treatment

which was attributed to some artifacts.

Tannin

RWK, RDM, TDM, CDM, LDM, ZRDM had

0.070%, 0.053%, 0.007%, 0.019%, 0.014%, 0.016%

respectively. RDM had 0.053% which was the

highest and could be as a result that defatting has

little effect on tannins and TDM (0.007%), the

lowest which could be due to the heat produced

during toasting.

Saponin

2.18%, 2.09%, 1.24%, 1.74%, 1.53%, 1.61%

saponin was observed for the RWK, RDM, TDM,

CDM, LDM and ZRDM respectively. RDM had

2.09% in relation to the raw kernel (2.18%) which

could be that defattening had little effect on saponin

while the value for others shows that heating has

little effect on saponin. Reddy and Pierson (1994)

have reported that saponins are not destroyed by

cooking Also, Abou Arab and Abu-Salem (2010)

observed no significant difference in saponin

contents of defatted whole seed and kernel after

roasting.

Phytate

RWK, RDM, TDM, CDM, LDM and ZRDM

had 8.63%, 8.26%, 1.84%, 2.46%, 2.05%, 2.39%

phytate respectively. TDM (1.84%) had the lowest

value of phytate which shows that toasting had a

significant effect on the phytate content while

defattening had slight effect on the RDM (8.26%)

which had the highest phytate level. The phytate

content of Cape Verde (jatropha kernel) meal was

9.4% and those of Nicaragua meal and Soyabean

meal were 10.0 and 1.5% respectively. The phytate

content of Jatropha meals was much higher than

that of peanut presscake (1.36%; Fardiaz and

Markakis, 1981). These values suggest presence of

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROCESSED JATROPHA CURCAS KERNEL MEALS …

1117

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

high levels of phytate in Jatropha curcas samples.

These high levels of phytate might decrease

bioavailability of minerals. Phytates have also been

implicated in decreasing protein digestibility by

forming complexes and also by interacting with

enzymes such as trypsin and pepsin (Reddy and

Pierson, 1994). Aderibigbe et al., (1997) observed

that none of the heat treatments studied decreased

phytate level.

Phorbolesters

RWK, RDM, TDM, CDM, LDM and ZRDM

had 2.70%, 2.49%, 1.04%, 1.29%, 1.14%, 1.21%

phorbolester respectively. RDM had the highest

phorbolester value in comparism to other treatments

and could be due to defattening process. Belewu

and Sam (2010) observed 0.013 phorbol ester for

RDM, meanwhile, it is noteworthy that, the content

of phorbolester in most of the samples was still

high. Phorbolester content of 0.09 mg/g in seed

meal is safe for livestock because the content is

lower than that found in untoxic jatropha cultivar of

0.11 mg/g (Makkar et al., 1998). These findings are

in conformity with the work of Belewu (2008) who

reported the death of albino rats fed fungus treated

Jatropha seed meal. Physical treatment by heating

in autoclave followed with extraction using ethanol

and potassium bicarbonate decreased lectin activity

in jatropha seed meal from Mexico from 34 to 0.57

mg/g, saponin from 2.85% to 1.72%, and

phorbolester from 3.85 to 0.08 mg/g (Martinez

Herrera et al., 2006).

Table 4 shows the Growth Performance

Characteristics of Broiler Chicks Fed Differently

Treated Jatropha curcas Kernel Cake Meal.

Table 4: Growth Performance Characteristics of Broiler Chicks Fed Differently Treated Jatropha Curcas

Kernel Cake Meal.

Parameters (g/bird) Diet 1

CNRL

Diet 2

RDM

Diet 3

TDM

Diet 4

CDM

Diet 5

LDM

Diet 6

ZRDM

SEM

Initial BW (g) 109.10 113.87 110.6 118.27 115.97 115.10 1.72

Final BW (g) 650.52a

151.08b

221.49b

235.22b

188.75b

229.00b

45.02

ADFI (g/b/d) 74.08a

15.34b

12.00bc

12.10bc

12.41bc

6.83c

5.71

ADWG (g/b/d) 25.78a

1.77b

5.40b

5.57b

3.35b

5.42b

2.17

Feed gain ratio 2.87b

8.67a

2.22b

2.17b

3.71b

1.27b

0.30

Total Mortality (%) 0.00c

43.33b

56.67b

60.00b

63.33ab

83.33a

±5.66 S.E.M: Standard error of mean. a, b, c

: Means with different superscripts on the same row differ significantly (P<0.05).

BW= Body weight, ADFI= Average daily feed intake, ADWG= Average daily weight gain, g/b/d= gram per bird per day.

There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in

the initial body weight for the six dietary

treatments, but there was significant difference

(P<0.05) in the final body weight for the six dietary

treatments. This finding is in agreement with the

work of Bamgbose et al., (1996), who reported that

increasing the level of cotton seed cake in the

finisher diets resulted in significant depression in

the performances of broiler in-terms of daily feed

intake, daily weight gain and final body weights.

However, birds fed diet 1 (control) has the highest

final body weight at 3-weeks followed by those fed

diet 4 (CDM), diet 6 (ZRDM), diet 3 (TDM), diet 5

(LDM) respectively while diet 2 (RDM) have the

least final body weight. From the result it could be

deducted that, the processing method applied on the

meals affected the final weight gain in the birds and

these could be traceable to feed intake and residual

antinutrients in the corresponding test ingredients.

The average daily feed intake was influenced

by the diets and processing methods. Birds fed

100% JKC free diet (control, D1) had the highest

ADFI (74.08). The ADFI of D1 was significantly

different (P<0.05) from others. The ADFI of birds

fed RDM (D2) was significantly different (P<0.05)

from that of D1 and ZRDM (D6) but similar to those

fed TDM (D3), CDM (D4) and LDM (D5). ADFI of

diet 6 was significantly different (P<0.05) from that

OJEDIRAN ET AL.

1118

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

of diet 1and 2, but similar to that of diet 3, 4 and 5.

Diet 6 had the lowest ADFI (6.83). The feed intake

decreased with respect to the treatment method

employed in the processing of the experimental test

ingredients. It appears that the diet 3 (TDM), diet 4

(CDM), diet 5 (LDM) and diet 6 (ZRDM) with

10.33% inclusion in the diets of broiler chicks did

not favour feed consumption. Therefore, Birds in

diet 1 (control) had the highest feed consumption

rate, followed by birds in diet 2, diet 5, diet 4 and

diet 3 respectively while birds in diet 6 consumed

least. This result corroborates the findings of

Sumiati et al., (2007) who fed Jatropha curcas meal

at the level of 5% in the diet to broilers and

observed reduced feed consumption. Tiurma et al.,

(2010), reported that at the second week of feeding

trial (with jatropha seed meal), feed intake on

control was higher that those of other treatments.

This shows that jatropha seed meal has a negative

effect on feed palatability, although its inclusion in

the diet was only 5%.

This agreed with the work of Chivandi et al.,

(2006) and Belewu (2008) who observed similar

trend in pigs and rats respectively. During the

experiment, poor feed intake, dehydration, loss of

weight and death were recorded for the birds on

diets 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. This observation confirmed

the results of Aregheore et al., (2005) on sheep and

goats. Inclusion of untreated jatropha seed meal in

the diet caused accumulation of lectin, anti-trypsin,

and phorbolester in the digestive tract

(Brodjonegoro et al., 2005). Lectin will disturb

protein synthesis, while anti-trypsin inhibits trypsin

than chymotrypsin enzyme activities. All these

antinutritional factors have negative effect on

palatability (Tiurma et al., 2010). This indicated

that combination of the negative effect of anti-

nutritive and toxic compounds in the diet decreased

feed consumption (Makkar and Becker, 1999).

Birds on diet 1 had the highest ADWG (25.78)

while treatment 2 had the least ADWG (1.77). This

complies with the findings of Tiurma et al., (2010);

Longer feeding period resulting in lower body

weight gained was observed in broiler chickens.

The Jatropha curcas kernel cake diets were

comparable but significantly different from the diet

1 (control). But, diet 4 was next to diet 1, followed

by diet 6 and next is diet 3. This means that

treatment had effect in weight gain probably

because of residual antinutrients still present in the

dietary treatments which affect the feed intake. This

finding corroborates with the reports of Anandan et

al., (2005) who used processing methods such as

soaking in water, boiling, heating, lye treatments

and NaOH treatments were more potent in

detoxifying castor seed meal. There was significant

difference in (P<0.05) in both the feed intake and

weight gain.

The feed gain ratio (FGR) obtained for birds in

the six diets were 2.87, 8.67, 2.22, 2.17, 3.71 and

1.27 respectively and there was significant

difference (P<0.05) in the values observed with

birds fed diet 2 having the highest FGR while birds

fed diet 6 has the least value while other diets were

comparable. This corresponds to the result obtained

by Tiurma et al., (2010). It was observed that the

lowest feed conversion was found on chickens fed

untreated jatropha seed meal. Makkar and Becker

(1997) reported that combination of the negative

effect of anti-nutritive and toxic compounds in the

diet decreased feed consumption which then

inhibited chicken growth.

Birds fed diet 2 having the highest FGR,

followed by birds fed diet 3, diet 5, diet 1, diet 4,

while the birds fed diet 6 has the least value. This

implies that birds fed diet 6 consume the least feed

to yield 1g of their body weight followed by birds

fed diet 4, diet 3, diet 1, and diet 5 respectively

while birds in diet 2 consume more feed in gram to

gain 1g of body weight. Thus the birds consumed

more so as to meet their energy requirements to

sustain growth and development which is in line

with the report of Esonu et al., (2005).

Birds fed diet 6 had the best feed gain ratio.

This corresponds to the result obtained by Tiurma et

al., (2010). It was observed that the lowest feed

conversion was found on chickens fed untreated

jatropha seed meal. Makkar and Becker (1997)

reported that combination of the negative effect of

anti-nutritive and toxic compounds in the diet

decreased feed consumption which then inhibited

chicken growth. The total mortality of D1 was

significantly different (P>0.05) from others. Total

mortality of D6 was significantly different (P<0.05)

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROCESSED JATROPHA CURCAS KERNEL MEALS …

1119

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

from D1, D2, D3, and D4 but similar toD5. D6 had the

highest mortality while D1 had the lowest. This is

better off what was observed by (Sumiati et al.,

2007), where by feeding Jatropha curcas meal at

the level of 5% in the diet to broilers reduced feed

consumption, caused 100% mortality at the age of

22 days and it damaged the liver as well as kidney.

Conclusion

The result suggests that the processing methods

increased crude protein, crude fibre and ash

especially in LDM. Heat treatments reduced the

antinutrients with minimal effect on the saponin and

phorbol esters present in the Jatropha curcas kernel

meal, which resulted in low feed intake in diets 2-6

containing the test ingredients and probably the

treatments made the known antinutrients to form

complexes not yet known which resulted in low

feed intake and higher mortality. The feed intake,

final weight, weight gain, feed gain ratio and total

mortality were adversely affected by the dietary

treatments observed by the depressed growth rate

and high mortality in birds fed Jatropha curcas

meals. However, further experiment should be

carried out to examine the performance of broiler

chicks on bio-treated samples of the processed

Jatropha curcas kernel meals.

Aknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of

Animal Production and Health, Ladoke Akintola

University of Technology, P. M. B. 4000,

Ogbomoso, Nigeria.

References

Abou-Arab AA and Abu-Salem MF (2010). Nutritional

quality of Jatropha curcas seeds and effect of some

physical and chemical treatments on their anti-nutritional

factors. Afr. J. Food Sci., 4(3): 93-103.

Aderibigbe AO, Johnson OLE, Makkar HPS, Becker K and

Foidi N (1997). Chemical composition and effect of heat

on organic matter and nitrogen-degradability and some

anti-nutritional components of Jatropha meal. Anim.

Feed Sci. Tech., 67: 223-243.

Akande TO, Odunsi AA, Akinwumi AO, Okunlola DO, Shittu

MD and Afolabi OC (2012). Carcass yield and

histopathological changes in meat type chickens fed raw

and processed castor bean (Ricinus communis Linn.)

cake. Int. J. Agr. Sci., 2(4): 136-142.

Akintayo ET (2004). Characteristics and composition of

Parkia biglobbossa and Jatropha curcas oils and cakes.

Bioresource Tech., 92: 307-310.

Amoo IA (2003). Effect of Fermentation on the Nutrient and

Mineral Content of Bauhinia reticulata. J. Res. Sci.

Manag., FUTA, Akure 1, 13-16.

Anandan S, Anil Kumar GK, Ghosh J and Ramachandra KS

(2005). Effect of different physical and chemical

treatments on detoxification of ricin in castor cake.

Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 120(1-2): 159-168.

Annongu AA, Belewu MA and Joseph JK (2010). Potentials

of Jatropha Seeds as Substitute Protein in Nutrition of

Poultry. Res. J. Anim. Sci., 4(1): 1-4.

Aslani MR, Maleki M, Mohri M, Sharifi K, Najjar-Nezhad V

and Afshari E (2007). Castor bean (Ricinus communis)

toxicosis in a sheep flock. Toxiconcology., 49(3): 400-

406.

AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis of the

Association of Official Analytical Chemist International.

17th Ed. Published by the Association of Official Anal.

Chem. Int., Virginia. USA.

Aregheore EM, Becker K and Makkar HPS (2005).

Detoxification of a toxic variety of Jatropha curcas and

Biochemical and Nutritional evaluation. Mysore J. Food

Agr. Sci., 88: 911-919.

Bamgbose AM, Bogoro S and Nwokoro SO (1996).

Processing and utilization of soyabean in ration of

poultry in Nigeria: A Rev. Agr. Revolution., 17: 93-102.

Belewu MA (2008). Replacement of fungus treated Jatropha

curcas kernel meal in the diet of rat. Green Farming J.,

2(3): 154-157.

Belewu MA, Belewu KY and Ogunsola FO (2010). Nutritive

value of dietary fungi treated Jatropha curcas kernel

cake: Voluntary intake, growth and digestibility

coefficient. Agr. Biol. J. North Am., 1(2): 135-138.

Belewu MA and Sam R (2010). Solid state fermentation of

Jatropha curcas kernel cake: proximate composition and

anti-nutritional components. J. Yeast Fungal Res., 1: 44-

46.

Brodjonegoro TP, Reksowardjojo IK, Tatang D and

Soerawidjaj H (2005). Jarak Pagar Sang Primadona.

Departemen Teknik Kimia, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

http://www.pikiran-

rakyat.com/cetak/2005/1005/13/cakrawala/utama02.htm.

Bryan S (2012). Biodiesel magazine web.

http//www.biodieselmagazine.com Accessed on January

18, (2012).

Chivandi E, Erlwanger KH, Makuza SM, Read JS and

Mtimuni JP (2006). Effects of diet Jatropha curcas meal

on percent packed cell volume, serum glucose,

cholesterol and triglyceride concentration and alpha-

amylase activity of weaned fattening pigs. Res. J. Anim.

Vet. Sci., 1: 18-24.

OJEDIRAN ET AL.

1120

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

Devappa RK, Makkar HP and Becker K (2010). Jatropha

toxicity-a review. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health., 13: 476-

507.

Emenalom OO (2004). Comparative performance of broiler

chicks fed diets containing differently processed Mucuna

pruriens seed meal. Nigeria J. Anim. Prod., 31: 12-16.

Emiola IA, Ologhobo AD, Adedeji TA and Akanji MA

(2003). Performance characteristic of broiler chicks fed

diff. Processed kidney bean as replacement for two

conventional legumes. Moor J. Agr., 4(2): 236-241.

Emiola IA, Ologhobo AD and Gous RM (2007). Performance

and histological responses of internal organs of broiler

chickens fed raw, dehulled, and aqueous and dry-heated

kidney bean meals. Poult. Sci., 86: 1234-1240.

Esonu BO, Emenalom OO, Udedibie ABI, Anyanwu A, Madu

U and Inyang AO (2005). Evaluation of Neem

(Azadirachta indica) leaf meal on performance, carcass

charactertistics and egg quality of laying hens. Int. J.

Agr. Rural Dev., 6: 208-212.

Fardiaz D and Markakis P (1981). Degradation of Phytic Acid

in Oncom (Fermented Peanut Press Cake). J. Food Sci.,

46(2): 523-525.

Haas W and Mittelbach M (2000). Detoxification experiments

with the seed oil from Jatropha curcas L. Indust. Crop

Prod., 12: 111-118.

Hiai S, Oura H, Nakajima T (1989). Color reaction of some

sapogenins and saponins with vanillin sulphoric acid.

Planta Med., 29: 116-122.

Jyothi V and Sumathi S (1995). Effect of alkali treatments on

the nutritive value of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).

Plant Foods Human Nutr., 48: 193-200.

Kakade ML, Simons N and Liener IE (1969). An evaluation of

natural versus synthetic substrates for measuring the

antitryptic activity of soybean samples. Cereal Chem.,

46: 518-526.

Longe OG (2006). Poultry: Treasure in a chest. Inaugural

Lecture, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 1-42.

Maga JA (1983). Phytate: It’s Chemistry: Occurrence, Food

Interactions, Nutritional Significance and Method of

Analysis.

Magdi AO (2007). Effect of different processing methods on

nutrient composition, antinutrtional factors, and in vitro

protein digestibility of Dolichos labalb bean [Labalb

purpuresus (L) sweet]. Pakistan J. Nutr., 6: 299-303.

Makkar HPS and Becker K (1997). Potential of Jatropha

curcas seed meal as a protein supplement to livestock

feed, constraints to its utilization and possible strategies

to overcome constraints. Proceeding Jatropha 97.

Managua, Nicaragua. 37-40.

Makkar HPS, Becker K, Sporer F and Wink M (1997). Studies

on nutritive potential and toxic constituents of different

provenances of Jatropha curcas, J. Agr. Food Chem., 45:

3152-3157.

Makkar HPS, Aderibigbe AO and Becker K (1998).

Comparative evaluation of non-toxic and toxic varieties

of Jatropha curcas for chemical composition,

digestibility, protein degradability and toxic factors.

Food Chem., 62: 207-215.

Makkar HPS and Becker K (1999). Plant Toxins and

detoxification methods to improve feed quality of

tropical seeds. Asian-Austrian J. Anim., 12: 467-480.

Makkar HPS, Francis G and Becker K (2008). Protein

concentrate from Jatropha curcas screw-pressed seed

cake and toxic and antinutritional factors in protein

concentrate. J. Sci. Food Agr., 88: 1542-1548.

Makkar HPS and Becker K (2009). Jatropha curcas, a

promising crop for the generation of biodiesel and value-

added co-products. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Tech., 111: 773-

787.

Makkar HPS and Becker K (2010). Are Jatropha curcas

phorbolesters degraded by rumen microbes? J. Sci. Food

Agr., 90: 1562-1565.

Martínez-Herrera J, Siddhuraju P, Francis G, Dávila-Ortíz G

and Becker K (2006). Chemical composition,

toxic/antimetabolic constituents and effects of different

treatments on their levels in four provenances of Jatropha

curcas L. from Mexico. Food Chem., 96: 80-89.

Melon CE (1980). Food Analysis: Theory and Practise. 2nd

Ed. Avi Publishing Company Incorporated. New York,

pp. 551-557.

Odunsi AA, Akande TO, Yusuph AS and Salami RI (2002).

Comparative utilizationof high inclusion rates of four

Agro-industrial by-products in the diets of egg type

chickens. Archivos de zootecnia., 51(196): 456-468.

Oladele EOP and Oshodi AA (2007). Nutritional Potential of

Berlandier Nettle Spurge (Jatropha cathartica Seeds).

Pakistan J. Nutr., 6: 345-348.

Oladele EOP and Oshodi AA (2008). Effect of fermentation

on some chemical and nutritive properties of berlandier

nettle spurge (Jatropha cathartica) and physic nut

(Jatropha curcas) seeds. Pakistan J. Nutr., 7: 292-296.

Ogbobe O and Akano V (1993). The physico-chemical

properties of the seed and seed oil of Jatropha

gossipifolia. Plant Food Human Nutr., 43: 197-200.

Omafuvbe Bridget O, Falade OS, Osuntogun BA and Adewusi

SRA (2004). Chemical and Biochemical Changes in

African Locust Bean (Parkia biglobosa) and Melon

(Citrillus) Seeds during Fermentation to Condiments.

Pakistan J. Nutr., 3: 140-145.

Openshaw K (2000). A review of Jatropha curcas: an Oil Plant

of Unfulfilled Promise. Biomass and Bioenergy. 19: 1-

15.

Pauzenga U (1985). Feeding Parent stock. Zootenica Int., 22-

24.

Reddy NR and Pierson MD (1994). Reduction in

antinutritional and toxic components in plant foods by

fermentation. Food Res. Int., 27: 281-290.

Sangronis E and Machado CJ (2007). Influence of germination

on the nutritional quality of Phaseolus vulgaris and

Cajanus Cajan. LWT, 40: 116-120.

Saurez FL, Springfield J, Fume JK, Lohrmann TT, Kerr PS

and Levitt MD (1999). Gas Production in Humans

ingesting Soybean Flour Derived from Beans Naturally

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF PROCESSED JATROPHA CURCAS KERNEL MEALS …

1121

J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2014, 4(11): 1110-1121

Low in Oligosaccliarides. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 69: 135-

140.

Siddhuraju P, Vijayakumari K and Janardhanan K (1996).

Chemical composition and protein quality of the little–

known legume, velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens (L) DC.).

J. Agr. Food Chem., 44: 2636-2641.

Sumiati A, Sudarman IN, Hidayah I and Santoso WB (2007).

Toksisitas racun bungkil biji Jarak pagar (Jatropha curcas

L.) pada ayam broiler (Toxicity of Jatropha curcas L.

mealtoxins in the broilers). Proceeding Seminar Nasional

AINI VI. Bagian Nutrisid Makanan Ternak, Fakultas

Peter nakan, Universities Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarka,

Indonesia, 144-150.

Sutton AL, Patterson JA, Kelly DT, Nielsen J, Jones DD,

Heber AJ, Kephart KB and Bogus E (1998). Addition of

Carbohydrates to Low Crude Protein Pig Diets to Reduce

Manure Nitrogen Excretion and Odors. Purdue

University; Departments Anim. Dairy Sci. Entomol.,

Pennsylvania State University.

Swain T (1979). Tannins and Lignins. In: Herbivores: their

interaction with plant metabolites. Rosenthal GA and

Janzen DH (Eds) Academic press. New York.

Tiurma P, Wina E, Tangendjaja B and Iskander S (2010).

Performance of Broiler Chicken Fed Physically and

Chemically Treated Jatropha curcas Seed Meal.

Indonesian. J. Agr., 3(2): 121-126.

Udedibie ABI and Carlini CR (1998). Questions and answers

to edibility problem of the Canavalia ensiformis seed, a

review. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 74: 95-106.

Ugwu SOC and Chukwuka CO (2001). The effect of inclusion

of Dried Centrocema pubescence leave as source of

protein in the diet of growing pigs. Proceeding of 6th

Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of

Nigeria held at the University of Maiduguri. 102-107.

Umer R, Farooq A, Amer J and Haq Nawaz B (2010).

Jatropha curcas seed oil as a viable source for biodiesel.

Pakistan J. Bot., 42(1): 575-582.

Vadivel V, Pugalenthi M and Megha M (2008). Biological

evaluation of protein quality of raw and processed seeds

of gila bean (Entadas cendens, Benth.) Tropical and

Subtropical Agro ecosystem. 8: 125-133.

Waltonfeed (2013). Waltonfeed web page. http//www.

wantonfeed.com/grain/life.html. Accessed on May 3,

2013.

Yagoub AA and Abdella AA (2007). Effect of domestic

processing methods on chemical, in vitro digestibility of

protein and starch and functional properties of Bambara

groundnut (Voandzeia subterranean) seeds. Res. J. Agr.

Biol. Sci., 3: 24-34.

Yasmin AY, Aurang Abdul WK, Gholam MDP and Amal BK

(2008). Effect of processing on anti-nutritional factors of

red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) grains. Food

Bioprocess Tech., 1: 415-419.


Recommended