+ All documents
Home > Documents > Microbial studies on frozen shrimps processed in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria

Microbial studies on frozen shrimps processed in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria

Date post: 12-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
10
Scientific Research and Essay Vol. 3 (11), pp. 537-546, November, 2008 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE ISSN 1992-2248 © 2007 Academic Journals Full Length research Paper Microbial studies on frozen shrimps processed in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria I. O. Okonko 1 *, T. A. Ogunnusi 2 , A. A. Ogunjobi 2 , A. O. Adedeji 1 , O. D. Adejoye 3 , E. T. Babalola 1 and A. A. Ogun 4 1 Department of Virology (World Health Organization Collaborative Centre for Arbovirus Reference and Research, World Health Organization Regional Reference Polio Laboratory, World Health Organization National Reference Centre for Influenza), Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria. 2 Enviromental Microbiology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria. 4 Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria Accepted 17 November, 2008 This study reports the microbial investigation on shrimps, a frozen seafood, processed at ten different processing plants in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria. Samples processed and unprocessed shrimps were collected and analyzed for the presence of microorganisms. Microbial loads were enumerated using microbiological media. A total of 120 isolates characterized as Bacillus sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp., Escherichia coli, Flavobacterium sp., Staphylococcus auerus, Pseudomonas sp., Rhizopus sp., Aspergillus flavis, Aspergillus formigatus, Mucor mucido, and Sacchromyces sp. were isolated from shrimps. No Vibrio sp. was isolated from any of the shrimp sample. Rhizopus sp., A. flavis, and M. mucido were only found in unprocessed shrimp while Sacchromyces sp. and A. formigatus was found on processed shrimps only. Bacillus sp. were the most predominant species and most frequently isolated organism in this study, all the shrimps sampled haboured Bacillus sp. [20(16.7%)], followed by Salmonella sp. [18 (15.0%)], Shigella sp. [18 (15.0%)], Enterobacter sp. [13(10.8%)], Micrococcus sp. [13(10.8%)], E. coli [12(10.0%)], Flavobacterium sp. [5(4.2%)], S. auerus [5(4.2%)] and Pseudomonas sp. [1(0.8%)]. Rhizopus sp [8(6.7%)] was the most frequently implicated fungi in this study, followed by A. flavis [3(2.5%)], A. formigatus [1(0.8%)], M.r mucido [1(0.8%)], and Sacchromyces sp. [1(0.8%)]. The microbial loads at 24 and 48 h incubation showed that most of the shrimps exceed the FAO/WHO standard limit for food and water. At 24 and 48 h, processed shrimps gave total viable counts 70 - 440 and 100-1000 CFU/ml) coliform bacilli, 0 - 120 and 20 - 150 CFU/ml; Salmonella-Shigella (SS) counts, 0 - 120 and 0 - 700 CFU/ml and fungi count, 0 - 30 and 0 - 50 CFU/ml respectively, while unprocessed shrimps gave total viable counts, 390 - 1200 and 500 - 2000 CFU/ml; coliform bacilli, 120 - 350 and 380 - 1280 CFU/ml; SS counts, 80 - 1800 and 220 – 1850 CFU/ml and fungi count 70 - 260 and 120 - 600 CFU/ml respectively. The findings of this study indicates that none of the shrimps of the food processors and the water samples were within acceptable FAO/WHO/NAFDAC standards due to high colony counts, presence of indicator organisms /index of food quality - E. coli, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., and S. auerus. This study suggests that most shrimps sold in the market may be sources of microbial food poison and intoxication hence, they are counter productive by being responsible for public health hazard and loss of revenue. Therefore, there is the need to improve on hygienic and sanitary practices in seafood processing plants and retail service outlets in order to obtain relatively safe processed seafood products for human consumption. Key words: Microbial loads, index of food quality, microbiological quality, pathogens, shrimps.
Transcript

Scientific Research and Essay Vol. 3 (11), pp. 537-546, November, 2008 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE ISSN 1992-2248 © 2007 Academic Journals

Full Length research Paper

Microbial studies on frozen shrimps processed in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria

I. O. Okonko1*, T. A. Ogunnusi2, A. A. Ogunjobi2, A. O. Adedeji1, O. D. Adejoye3, E. T.

Babalola1 and A. A. Ogun4

1Department of Virology (World Health Organization Collaborative Centre for Arbovirus Reference and Research, World Health Organization Regional Reference Polio Laboratory, World Health Organization National Reference Centre for Influenza), Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, University College Hospital

(UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria. 2Enviromental Microbiology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Ibadan,

Ibadan, Nigeria. 3Department of Biological Sciences, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria.

4Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria

Accepted 17 November, 2008

This study reports the microbial investigation on shrimps, a frozen seafood, processed at ten different processing plants in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria. Samples processed and unprocessed shrimps were collected and analyzed for the presence of microorganisms. Microbial loads were enumerated using microbiological media. A total of 120 isolates characterized as Bacillus sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp., Escherichia coli, Flavobacterium sp., Staphylococcus auerus, Pseudomonas sp., Rhizopus sp., Aspergillus flavis, Aspergillus formigatus, Mucor mucido, and Sacchromyces sp. were isolated from shrimps. No Vibrio sp. was isolated from any of the shrimp sample. Rhizopus sp., A. flavis, and M. mucido were only found in unprocessed shrimp while Sacchromyces sp. and A. formigatus was found on processed shrimps only. Bacillus sp. were the most predominant species and most frequently isolated organism in this study, all the shrimps sampled haboured Bacillus sp. [20(16.7%)], followed by Salmonella sp. [18 (15.0%)], Shigella sp. [18 (15.0%)], Enterobacter sp. [13(10.8%)], Micrococcus sp. [13(10.8%)], E. coli [12(10.0%)], Flavobacterium sp. [5(4.2%)], S. auerus [5(4.2%)] and Pseudomonas sp. [1(0.8%)]. Rhizopus sp [8(6.7%)] was the most frequently implicated fungi in this study, followed by A. flavis [3(2.5%)], A. formigatus [1(0.8%)], M.r mucido [1(0.8%)], and Sacchromyces sp. [1(0.8%)]. The microbial loads at 24 and 48 h incubation showed that most of the shrimps exceed the FAO/WHO standard limit for food and water. At 24 and 48 h, processed shrimps gave total viable counts 70 - 440 and 100-1000 CFU/ml) coliform bacilli, 0 - 120 and 20 - 150 CFU/ml; Salmonella-Shigella (SS) counts, 0 - 120 and 0 - 700 CFU/ml and fungi count, 0 - 30 and 0 - 50 CFU/ml respectively, while unprocessed shrimps gave total viable counts, 390 - 1200 and 500 - 2000 CFU/ml; coliform bacilli, 120 - 350 and 380 - 1280 CFU/ml; SS counts, 80 - 1800 and 220 – 1850 CFU/ml and fungi count 70 - 260 and 120 - 600 CFU/ml respectively. The findings of this study indicates that none of the shrimps of the food processors and the water samples were within acceptable FAO/WHO/NAFDAC standards due to high colony counts, presence of indicator organisms /index of food quality - E. coli, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., and S. auerus. This study suggests that most shrimps sold in the market may be sources of microbial food poison and intoxication hence, they are counter productive by being responsible for public health hazard and loss of revenue. Therefore, there is the need to improve on hygienic and sanitary practices in seafood processing plants and retail service outlets in order to obtain relatively safe processed seafood products for human consumption. Key words: Microbial loads, index of food quality, microbiological quality, pathogens, shrimps.

538 Sci. Res. Essays INTRODUCTION In Nigeria, there is a large number of public frozen sea-food processing plants distributed along the country, where a considerable number of people buy their frozen seafood products daily. Serious consequences relating to national productivity and development can arise from lack of hygiene and sanitation in such outlets. The term “seafood products” or "fish" includes all fresh or saltwater finfish, molluscan shellfish, crustaceans, and other forms of aquatic animal life. Fish and shellfish are an important part of a healthful diet. They contain high quality protein and other essential nutrients which can be low in satu-rated fat and may contain omega-3 fatty acids. In fact, a well-balanced diet that includes a variety of fish and shell-fish can contribute to heart health and children's growth and development. But, as with any type of food, it's important to handle seafood safely in order to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. Following these basic food safety tips for buying, preparing, and storing fish and shellfish ensures that consumers enjoy fine taste and good nutrition of seafood (FSIS, 2007; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

Fish products have an essential role in the traditional European diet due to their composition and the high number of fish species (SMITC, 2005). Fish products contribute significantly to “healthy diets” due to their high content on �-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (�-3 PUFA), and other important components as high quality proteins, vitamins or minerals (Ackman, 1989). However, fish pro-ducts are very prone to degradation (Liston, 1982). Their high water content, autochthon bacteria flora able to live at low temperatures and its high enzymatic activity, mainly autolitic, are responsible of the susceptibility of fish muscle. Among these changes, lipid oxidation is one of the most important. It leads to rancid flavours and reduces the shelf–life of fish products especially during storage (Flick and Martin, 1992). Generally, seafood pro-ducts are very safe to eat. On a pound-for-pound basis, seafood is as safe as, if not safer than, other meat sources. But no food is completely safe, and problems do occur (Kurtzweil et al., 2008).

There have been several reports on the health risks associated with the consumption of processed seafood, ranging from allergic reactions, stomach and intestinal cancerous growths, a general degeneration of peripheral cellular tissues, to gradual breakdown of the digestive and excretive systems in a statistically high percentage of people examined. Few of these reports however, have looked at the likely risks from a microbiological food safety point of view (Edema et al., 2005). A tender tuna steak lightly seasoned with lemon pepper and grilled over a charcoal fire is one way to please a seafood lover's pa-late. Stuffed flounder, lobster thermidor, and shrimp *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].

scampi are others. But blue marlin served up with a dose Seafood can be exposed to a range of hazards from the water to the table. Some of these hazards are natural of scombroid poisoning or steamed oysters with a touch of Norwalk-like virus are more likely to turn the stomach, instead of treating the palate (Kurtzweil et al., 2008).to seafood's environment; others are introduced by humans. The hazards can involve bacteria, viruses, para-sites, natural toxins, and chemical contaminants. When these processed frozen seafood products are consumed raw, there is the likelihood of endangering the health of the consumers especially when the microorganisms pre-sent include pathogenic ones (Okonko et al., 2008). Unsafe water used in processing seafood products posses a global public health threat, placing persons at risk for a host of diarrheal and other diseases (Hughes and Koplan, 2005). Unsanitary food products have particularly devastating effects on young children in the developing world. Each year, >2 million persons, mostly children <5 years of age, die of diarrheal diseases (Peterson et al., 1998; Kosek et al., 2003; Parashar et al., 2003). For children in this age group, diarrheal diseases accounted for 17% of all death from 2000 to 2003 (WHO, 2005), ranking third among causes of death, after neonatal causes and acute respiratory infections.

Nearly 90% of diarrheal-related deaths have been attri-buted to unsafe or inadequate water supplies and sani-tation (Younes and Bartram, 2001; WHO, 2004) condi-tions affecting a large part of the world’s population (Hughes and Koplan, 2005). An estimated 1.1 billion per-sons (one sixth of the world’s population) lack access to clean water and 2.6 billion to adequate sanitation (WHO, 2005; Hughes and Koplan, 2005). Cholera may also be transmitted by shellfish harvested from polluted waters since Vibrio cholerae O1 is part of the auto-chthonous microbiota of these waters (FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

Biological contaminants such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa and helminthes constitute the major cause of food-borne diseases with varying degrees of severity, ranging from mild indisposition to chronic or life-threatening illness, or both. In developing countries, such contaminants are responsible for food borne diseases such as cholera, campylobacteriosis, E. coli gastro-ente-ritis, salmonellosis, shigellosis, typhoid fever, bruce-llosis, amoebiasis and poilomyletis (Edema et al., 2005). A wide variety of foods including meats, milk, vegetables, and fish have been associated with the diarrheal type food poisoning resulting from Bacillus spp. The vomiting-type outbreaks have generally been associated with rice pro-ducts; however, other starchy foods such as potato, pasta and cheese products have also been implicated. Food mixtures such as sauces, puddings, soups, casse-roles, pastries, and salads have frequently been incrimi-nated in food poisoning outbreaks (FSRI, 2003; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

Salmonella spp., Clostridium botulinum, Staphylococcus

aureus, Campylobacter jejuni, Yersinia entero-colitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Listeria monocyt-ogenes, Vibrio cholerae O1, Vibrio cholerae non-O1, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and other vibrios, Vibrio vulni-ficus, Clos-tridium perfringens, Bacillus cereus, Aeromonas hydrophila and other spp., Plesiomonas shigelloides, Shigella spp., Miscellaneous enterics, aswell as Strepto-coccus are pathogens often encountered in seafood products (FDA, 2007a,b,c,d). There is a widespread occurrence of these pathogens in animals, especially in poultry and swine. Environmental sources of the patho-gens include water, soil, insects, factory surfaces, kitchen surfaces, animal feces, raw meats, raw poultry, and raw seafoods, to name only a few (FSRI, 2003; FSIS, 2007; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

Pathogens such as L. monocytogenes, C. botulinum, and B. cereus are naturally present in some soil, and their presence on fresh produce is not rare. Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Campylobacter jejuni, V. cho-lerae, parasites, and viruses are more likely to conta-minate fresh produce through vehicles such as raw or improperly composted manure, irrigation water containing untreated sewage, or contaminated wash water. Treat-ment of produce with chlorinated water reduces popula-tions of pathogenic and other micro-organisms on fresh produce but cannot eliminate them. Reduction of risk for human illness associated with raw produce can be better achieved through controlling points of potential contami-nation in the field; during harvesting; during processing or distribution; or in retail markets, food-service facilities, or the home (CDC, 1996, 1999; PHPP, 1997; Scates et al., 2003; FDA, 2007a,b,c,d).

Various Salmonella species have long been isolated from the outside of egg shells. The present situation with S. enteritidis is complicated by the presence of the orga-nism inside the egg, in the yolk. This and other infor-mation strongly suggest vertical transmission, that is, deposition of the organism in the yolk by an infected layer hen prior to shell deposition. Foods other than eggs have also caused outbreaks of S. enteritidis disease. Raw meats, poultry, eggs, milk and dairy products, fish, shrimp, frog legs, yeast, coconut, sauces and salad dressing, cake mixes, cream-filled desserts and toppings, dried gelatin, peanut butter, cocoa, and chocolate have been implicated in harbouring pathogenic micro-organi-sms (CDC, 1966, 1999; FDA, 2007a,b,c,d).

An outbreak of severe dysentery caused by S. dysen-teriae type 2 recently occurred at the U.S. Naval Hospital, Bethesda, Maryland. Epidemiologic investi-gation implicated the salad bar in the active-duty staff cafeteria as the source of infection. Outbreak of Shiegella flexneri at a central commissary in Michigan was linked to salad preparation. Although all Shigella spp. have been impli-cated in foodborne outbreaks at some time, Shigella sonnei is clearly the leading cause of shigellosis from food. The other species are more closely associated with contaminated water. One in particular, S. flexneri, is now thought to be in large part sexually transmitted (Dunn et

Okonko et al. 539

al., 1995; CDC, 1996, 1999; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d). V. parahaemolyticus bacterium is frequently isolated

from the estuarine and marine environment of the United States. Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic forms of the organism can be isolated from marine and estuarine en-environments and from fish and shellfish dwelling in these environments. Infections with this organism have been associated with the consumption of raw, improperly cooked, or cooked, recontaminated fish and shellfish. A correlation exists between the probability of infection and warmer months of the year. Improper refrigeration of seafoods contaminated with this organism will allow its proliferation, which increases the possibility of infection. During July-August 1997, the largest reported outbreak in North America of culture-confirmed V. parahaemolyticus infections occurred. Illness in 209 persons was asso-ciated with eating raw oysters harvested from California, Oregon, and Washington in the United States and from British Columbia (BC) in Canada; one person died (CDC, 1998). During July-September 1998, an outbreak of V. parahaemolyticus infections associated with consumption of oysters and clams harvested from Long Island Sound occurred among residents of Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York. This is the first reported outbreak of V. parahaemolyticus linked to consumption of shellfish har-vested from New York waters (CDC, 1999).

Groups A and D Streptococcus spp. can be transmitted to humans via food. Food sources include milk, ice cream, eggs, steamed lobster, ground ham, potato salad, egg salad, custard, rice pudding, and shrimp salad. In almost all cases, the foodstuffs were allowed to stand at room temperature for several hours between preparation and consumption. Entrance into the food is the result of poor hygiene, ill food handlers, or the use of un-pas-teurized milk. Entrance into the food chain is due to underprocessing and/or poor and unsanitary food prepa-ration (CDC, 1996, 1999; FDA, 2007a,b,c,d).

Miscellaneous enterics, Gram-negative genera include-ing: Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus, Citrobacter, Aero-bacter, Providencia, Serratia and E. coli are organisms which may be recovered from natural environ-ments such as forests and freshwater as well as from farm produce (vegetables) where they reside as normal microflora. These bacteria have been recovered from dairy products, raw shellfish, and fresh raw vegetables. The organisms occur in soils used for crop production and shellfish har-vesting waters and, therefore, may pose a health hazard (Frampton and Restaino, 1993; CDC, 1996, 1999; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

In 1995, the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 34 incidences of food poisoning in people who had eaten oysters harvested from certain southern U.S. waters. Health experts blamed the flu-like illness on a virus similar to the Norwalk virus, which is usually introduced into fishing areas by human sewage. In 1997, 26 employees of the World Bank headquarters in Washington, D.C., developed headaches, dizziness, nau-sea, and rashes several hours after eating blue marlin

540 Sci. Res. Essays served in their workplace cafeteria. An emergency room doctor who treated some of the victims attributed the illness to scombroid poisoning, which is caused by a toxin produced when certain fish product spoil (Kurtzweil et al., 2008).

FDA (2007a, b, c, d) recommends a continuous priori-tization of all manufacturers of high risk fishery products, particularly processors of scombroid species and cooked ready-to-eat products, for annual inspection as well as processors and importers of aquaculture products to undergo increased inspection and training. The potential of seafood and water to harbour microbial pathogens and causing subsequent illness is well documented for both developed and developing countries (Younes and Bartram, 2001; Wright et al., 2004). Water-related diseases continue to be one of the major health problems globally. It is estimated that 80% of all illnesses are linked to use of food and water of poor micro-biological quality (WHO, 2005). Treatment of farm produce such as sea-food with chlorinated water reduces populations of patho-genic and other microorganisms on fresh produce but cannot eliminate them. Reduction of risk for human illness associated with raw produce can be better achi-eved through controlling points of potential contamination in the field, during harvesting, during processing or distri-bution, or in retail markets, food-service facilities, or the home (USDA, 2007; FDA, 2007a,b,c,d; FAO/WHO, 2007).

The microbiological safety of food is achieved by as far as possible ensuring the absence of pathogenic micro-organisms and by all means preventing their multipli-cation (Edema and Omemu, 2004). A good knowledge of the microbial qualities of raw frozen seafood is necessary so as to guide its suitability for consumption. Thus, regu-lar microbiological analysis of seafood products at source or processing plants must be carried out to determine or check the effectiveness of processing and packaging. This study sought to evaluate the microbial quality on frozen shrimps processed in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria seafood products. Therefore this current study reports microbial studies on shrimps, a frozen seafood, pro-cessed in Ibadan and Lagos, Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 20 samples of processed and unprocessed shrimps were collected at 10 different processing plants in Ibadan and Lagos. These samples were taken to the laboratory for microbiological studies within 6 h. Samples that could not be analyzed were stored at -40C in a freezer till the following day. Shrimps samples were analyzed for bacteriological quality as described by the methods of FAO (1997) and Fawole and Oso (2001). The media used for the bacteriological analysis of water and the swab samples include plate count agar (PCA), Salmonella-Shigella agar (SSA), Eosin Methylene blue (EMB) agar, Thiosulphate Citrate Bile Salt (TCBS) agar and Potato Dextrose agar (PDA). The media used were weighed out and prepared according to the manufacturer’s specifi-cation, with respect to the given instructions and directions. A serial dilution method was used for total microbial counts. The processed and unprocessed shrimps samples were then inoculated separately

on different agar plates and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 - 48 h for evidence of growth. Pure isolates of resulting growth were identified using morphological and biochemical methods as described by Lennette et al. (1985), Frampton and Restaino (1993) and Jolt et al. (1994). The sterility of each batch of test medium was confirmed by incubating one or two uninoculated tubes or plates along with the inoculated tests. The uninoculated tubes or plates were always examined to show no evidence of bacterial growth.

RESULTS The microbial loads of processed and unprocessed shrimps samples collected from 10 different seafood processing plants is shown in Table 1 and 2. Samples AP to JP are processed shrimp samples while samples UA to UJ are unprocessed shrimp samples collected from 10 different processing plants. The microbial load at 24 h incubation differs from one processing plants to the other (Table 1). The total viable count (TVC) ranges from 70 to 440 CFU/ml for the processed shrimp samples and 390 to 1200 CFU/ml for unprocessed shrimps samples. These exceed the FAO/WHO standard limit 1.0 x 102 CFU/ml for food products and water (Table 1). Table 1 also indicates that of all the processed shrimp samples, sample FP had the highest total viable count of 440 CFU/ml, followed by sample GP (260 CFU/ml), HP (150 CFU/ml), EP (130 CFU/ml), IP (120 CFU/ml) and 80 CFU/ml for sample AP and BP respectively and sample JP had the least count (70 CFU/ml) while of all the unprocessed shrimps; sample UE had the highest total viable count of 1200 CFU/ml, followed by UH (1160 CFU/ml), UA (640 CFU/ml), UI (580 CFU/ml) and UC and UF with 560 CFU/ml each (Table 1).

The probable numbers of total coliform bacilli ranges from zero to 120 MPN/ml for of 1 ml processed shrimps samples and 120 to 350 MPN/ml for unprocessed shrimp samples, this also exceeds the FAO/WHO standard limit of zero MPN/ml for food products and water (Table 1). Of all processed samples, sample HP had the highest coli-form count (120 MPN/ml), followed by samples DP and FP having 40 MPN/ml each and sample BP had zero MPN/ml while among the unprocessed shrimps; sample UA had the highest coliform count 350 MPN/ml, followed by UB and UH having 330 MPN/ml each. All the unpro-cessed samples had a very high MPN values, highly exceeding the FAO/WHO standard limit for food products (Table 1).

The Salmonella-Shigella count (SSC) ranges from zero CFU/ml to 120 CFU/ml for processed shrimp samples and 80 to 1800 CFU/ml for unprocessed shrimp samples (Table 1). After 24 h incubation, samples of processed shrimps AP and BP had no growth of Salmonella and Shigella sp. Samples JP had the highest Salmonella and Shigella count with 400 CFU/ml, followed by samples EP and DP having 240 and 230 CFU/ml respectively (Table 1), while unprocessed shrimps sample had heavy loads of Salmonella and Shigella ranging from 80 to 1800 CFU/ml.

Sample UH had the highest Salmonella and Shigella

Okonko et al. 541 Table 1. Microbial loads of processed and unprocessed shrimp samples after 24 h incubation.

Sample

TVC (CFU/ml)

TCC (MPN/ml)

SSC (CFU/ml)

FC (CFU/ml)

Identified organisms

Processed shrimps AP 80 10 0 0 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp. BP 80 0 0 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli CP 110 20 10 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Favobacterium sp.,

Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. DP 100 40 230 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. EP 130 10 240 0 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp. Micrococcus sp,

Pseudomonas sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., FP 440 40 80 30 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Favobacterium sp.,

Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Sacchromyces sp. GP 260 20 100 0 Bacillus sp., Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp.,

Staphylococcus sp. HP 150 120 180 20 A. formigatus, Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp.,

Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. IP 120 20 10 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Shigella sp.,

Favobacterium sp., Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp. JP 70 10 400 0 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Staphylococcus sp Unprocessed shrimps UA 640 350 100 70 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. Rhizopus sp. UB 390 330 80 100 Bacillus sp., Micrococcus sp, M. mucido, Salmonella sp.,

Shigella sp. UC 560 190 200 80 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Flavobacterium sp., Shigella sp. Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UD 460 250 480 120 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp.,

Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UE 1200 210 360 90 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp.,

Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UF 560 150 165 150 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp., Shigella sp.,

Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UG 390 250 100 130 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Shigella sp. Salmonella sp.,

Staphylococcus sp., Rhizopus sp. UH 1160 330 1800 70 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Flavobacterium sp., Shigella

sp. Salmonella sp., Staphylococcus sp., A. flavis UI 580 120 100 200 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Shigella sp., Salmonella sp.,

Staphylococcus sp, Rhizopus sp. UJ 460 240 620 260 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp., A. flavis

TVC = Total Viable Count; TCC = Total Coliform Count; SSC = Salmonella-Shigella Count; FC = Fungi Count; CFU = Colony forming unit; Ml = Millilitre; AP-JP = Processed shrimp samples; UA-UJ = Unprocessed shrimp samples. count with 1800 CFU/ml, followed by UJ, UG, and UE having 620, 480 and 360 CFU/ml respectively (Table 1).

The fungi count (FC) for the samples range from zero CFU/ml to 30 CFU/ml for processed shrimp samples and 70 to 260 CFU/ml for unprocessed shrimp samples (Table 1). Only two of processed shrimps had no fungi growth after 24 h incubation, samples HP and FP having 20 and 30 CFU/ml respectively while all the unprocessed shrimps had fungi growth with sample UJ having the

highest fungi count 260 CFU/ml, followed by samples UI, UF, UG and UD having 200, 150, 130 and 120 CFU/ml respectively (Table 1).

Table 2 shows the microbial loads of processed and unprocessed shrimp samples collected from different frozen seafood processing plants incubated for 48 h. Total viable count at 48 h of incubation were very different from one shrimp sample to the other and this ranged from 100 to 1000 CFU/ml for processed shrimps

542 Sci. Res. Essays

Table 2. Microbial loads of processed and unprocessed shrimp samples after 48 h incubation. Sample

TVC (CFU/ml)

TCC (MPN/ml)

SSC (CFU/ml)

FC (CFU/ml)

Identified organisms

Processed shrimps AP 140 40 0 0 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp. BP 100 20 0 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli CP 350 40 50 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Favobacterium sp., Micrococcus sp,

Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. DP 160 70 420 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. EP 500 20 420 0 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp. Micrococcus sp, Pseudomonas

sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., FP 1000 50 110 50 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Favobacterium sp.,

Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Sacchromyces sp.

GP 600 30 140 0 Bacillus sp., Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., S. auerus

HP 800 150 300 50 A. formigatus, Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp.

IP 500 40 50 0 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Shigella sp., Favobacterium sp., Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp.

JP 140 60 700 0 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., S. auerus

Unprocessed shrimps UA 1000 800 500 120 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Salmonella sp., Shigella sp. Rhizopus sp. UB 500 600 300 180 Bacillus sp., Micrococcus sp, Mucor mucido, Salmonella sp.,

Shigella sp. UC 600 900 350 120 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Flavobacterium sp., Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UD 800 1200 530 180 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp.,

Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UE 1600 980 470 125 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp.,

Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UF 1000 800 250 220 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp., Shigella sp.,

Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp. UG 690 380 220 300 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Shigella sp. Salmonella sp., S.

auerus., Rhizopus sp. UH 2000 440 1850 130 Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Flavobacterium sp., Shigella

sp. Salmonella sp., S. auerus., A. flavis UI 900 740 240 450 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., S. auerus ,

Rhizopus sp. UJ 600 1280 860 600 Bacillus sp., E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp,

Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., Rhizopus sp., A. flavis

TVC = Total Viable Count; TCC = Total Coliform Count; SSC = Salmonella-Shigella Count; FC = Fungi Count; CFU = Colony forming unit; Ml = Millilitre; AP-JP = Processed shrimp samples; UA-UJ = Unprocessed shrimp samples.

and 500 to 2000 CFU/ml for unprocessed shrimps. Sample FP also had the highest total viable count of all the processed shrimps (1000 CFU/ml), followed by sam-ples HP, GP, EP and IP having 800, 600, 500 and 500 CFU/ml, respectively, while of all the unprocessed shrimps; UH had the highest total viable count having 2000 CFU/ml, followed by samples UE, UA and UG having 1600, 1000 and 1000 CFU/ml respectively (Table 2). At 48 h incubation microbial load of all the samples

exceed the FAO/WHO standard limit 100 CFU/ml (Table 2).

Also, the probable numbers of coliform bacilli ranged from 20 to 150 CFU/ml and 380 to 1280 CFU/ml for processed and unprocessed shrimp respectively (Table 2), indicating that unprocessed shrimps UJ had the high-est coliform count with 1280 MPN/ml, followed by UD, UE, UC, UA, and UF having 1200, 980, 900, 800 and 800 MPN/ml respectively. This indicates that all unprocessed

Okonko et al. 543

Table 3. Frequency of occurrence of microorganisms isolated from processed and unprocessed shrimp samples. Organisms No. (%) Processed shrimps (%) Unprocessed shrimps (%) AP BP CP DP EP FP GP HP IP JP UA UB UC UD UE UF UG UH UI UJ Bacillus sp. 20(16.7) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E. coli 12(10.0) - + + + - + - + + - + + + + - - + + + + Enterobacter sp. 13(10.8) + - - - + - - + + + + - + + + + + + - + Favobacterium sp. 5(4.2) - - + - - + - - + - - - + - - - - + - - Micrococcus sp. 13(10.8) - - + - + + + + + + + + - + + + - - - + Pseudomonas sp. 2(1.7) - - - - + - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - Salmonella sp. 18(15.0) - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Shigella sp. 18(15.0) - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + S. auerus. 5(4.2) - - - - - - + - - + - - - - - - + + + - A. formigatus, 1(0.8) - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - A. flavis 3(2.5) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + Rhizopus sp. 8(6.7) - - - - - - - - - - + - + + + + + - + + M. mucido 1(0.8) - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - Sacchromyces sp. 1(0.8) - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total 120 2 2 6 4 6 7 5 7 7 6 7 5 7 7 8 6 6 7 7 8 Overall Total 120 (100) 52 (43.3) 68 (56.7)

Key: AP-JP = Processed shrimp samples; UA-UJ = Unprocessed shrimp samples.

shrimps exceeds FAO/WHO standard limit of 0 MPN/ml (Table 2).

The Salmonella-Shigella count after 48 h incu-bation showed a high count for all the shrimp samples ranging from zero to 700 CFU/ml for processed shrimps and 220 to 1850 CFU/ml for unprocessed shrimps (Table 2).

After 48 h incubation, fungi count of the unpro-cessed shrimp samples ranges from 120 to 600 CFU/ml. UJ had the highest fungi count 600 CFU/ml, followed by samples UI, UG and UF hav-ing 450, 300, and 220 CFU/ml respectively (Table 2).

A total of 120 isolates were obtained and identi-fied as Bacteria, fungi and yeast. The bacteria iso-lates include Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp.,

Escherichia coli, Flavobacterium sp., Micrococcus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., S. auerus. No Vibrio sp. was isolated on TCBS agar. The fungi isolates were identified as A. formigatus, A. flavis, M. mucido, Rhizopus sp. and Sacchromyces sp.

Table 3 shows the frequency of the organisms isolated from the processed and unprocessed shrimp samples. The highest number of the isolates was obtained from unprocessed shrimps samples which constituted 68 and 52% of the isolates were obtained from of processed shrimp samples (Table 3).

Bacillus sp. [20 (16.7%)] were the most frequently isolated organism from all the shrimps samples, followed by Salmonella sp. [18 (15.0%)], Shigella

sp. [18 (15.0%)], Enterobacter sp. [13 (10.8%)], Micrococcus sp. [13 (10.8%)], Escherichia coli [12 (10.0%)], Flavobacterium sp. [5 (4.2%)], S. auerus [5(4.2%)] and Pseudomonas sp. [1 (0.8%)] (Table 3). Rhizopus sp [8 (6.7%)] was the most fre-quently fungi isolates implicated in this study, followed by A. flavis [3 (2.5%)], A. formigatus [1 (0.8%)], M. mucido [1 (0.8%)], and Sacchromyces sp. [1 (0.8%)] (Table 3).

These pathogens were present in the processed and unprocessed shrimps collected from frozen seafood processing plants. Bacillus sp. was isolated from all the shrimp samples while Entero- bacter sp. was isolated from 5 processed shrimps and 8 unprocessed shrimp samples and Esche-richia coli were isolated from both processed and

544 Sci. Res. Essays unprocessed shrimp samples in equal magnitude, 6 samples each (Table 3).Staphylococcus sp. was only isolated from 2 processed and 3 unprocessed shrimp samples. Sacchromyces sp. and A. formigatus was isolated from processed shrimp samples only and all other fungi isolates- Rhizopus sp., A. flavis, and M. mucido were only found in unprocessed shrimp samples (Table 3). No Vibrio sp. was isolated from any of the shrimp sample. DISCUSSION In this present study, all shrimp samples haboured Baci-llus sp. while prominent microorganisms variously ha-boured include Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Entero-bacter sp., Micrococcus sp., E. coli, Rhizopus sp., Flavo-bacterium sp., Staphylococcus sp., A. flavis, Pseudo-monas sp., A. formigatus, M. mucido, and Sacchro-myces sp. No Vibrio sp. was isolated from any of the shrimp sample. Shrimps may be sources of microbial food poison and food intoxication hence, shrimps may be counter productive by being responsible for public health hazard and loss of revenue. All these pathogen isolated in this study are of food processing and public health implication and hence, hazardous and injurious to human health if consumed.

Most of the organisms found on these shrimps are those commonly found in soil and water. But an organism like E. coli isolated from some of the shrimps is an indica-tion of faecal contamination of the shrimps and might affect the health of the consumer. S. aureus, another organism found on the shrimps is also a pathogenic orga-nism of public health significance. This organism might have contaminated the shrimps as a result of handling. This is also in accordance to the assertion of Dunn et al. (1995) and Omemu and Bankole (2005) that improper handling and improper hygiene might lead to the contamination of ready-to-eat food such as vegetable salad and this might eventually affects the health of the consumers.

The pathogens isolated in this present study are similar to the microorganisms reported by Olawale et al. (2005), nine bacterial genera and two fungi in a similar study which include S. auerus, E. aerogenes, Streptococcus faecalis, E. coli, among other organisms. The presence of Bacillus sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Enterobacter sp., Micrococcus sp., E. coli, Rhizopus sp., Flavobacte-rium sp., Staphylococcus sp., A. flavis, Pseudomonas sp., A. formigatus, M. mucido, and Sacchromyces sp. reported in this study is also in agreement with the findings of Adesokan et al. (2005) who reported the presence of Bacillus sp. and E. coli among other orga-nisms and Bankole et al. (2004, 2005) who reported the presence of S. auerus, S. epidermidis, Bacillus sp. E. coli, Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas sp., Shigella sp., Sacchromyces sp., Rhizopus sp., and Aspergillus sp. The presence of A. flavus, Sacchromyces sp., Bacillus

sp. and Micrococcus sp. in this shrimps is also compa-rable with the findings of Fagade et al. (2005) in a study on the microbiological qualities of some non-carbonated orange drinks who reported the same orga-nisms as being present in contamination of the drinks.

The most frequently isolated index of water/food quality and indicators of faecal contamination such as E. coli were isolated in this present study and the presence of some indicator and other organisms in this study is of special concern and perhaps the greatest danger asso-ciated with shrimps is contamination by human excre-ment (Apantaku et al., 1998; Edema et al., 2001; Okonko et al., 2008).

Most of the organisms found in this study are those commonly found in soil and water. But the presence of other indicator organisms like E. coli, S. faecalis, Salmo-nella sp., Shigella sp., and E. aerogenes in those wa-ter samples might be the result of possible contami-nation during sales or unhygienic handling of seafood right from the processing plants. The presence of the most frequently isolated index of water quality and indi-cators of faecal contamination such as E. coli and S. faecalis, reported in this study is an indication of faecal contami-nation of the water used for processing frozen seafood products as a result of possible burst along pipe lines or unhygienic handling of the water right from the treatment plant for tap water and borehole water (Edema et al., 2001; Okonko et al., 2008a,b) or contamination of the seafood products itself during processing or directly from source and this might have adverse effect on the health of the consumers (Adebolu and Ifesan, 2001; Okonko et al., 2008a,b).

The presence of S. aureus, Salmonella sp. and Shigella sp.- pathogenic organisms of public health concern and significance in these frozen seafood pro-ducts and these might have contaminated the processed frozen seafood products from source as a result of handling by process-sors. Improper handling and improper hygiene might lead to the contamination of ready-to-eat foods and this might eventually affects the health of the consumers (Dunn et al., 1995; Adebolu and Ifesan, 2001; Bankole et al., 2004; Afolabi, 2005; Omemu and Bankole, 2005; Okonko et al., 2008c). It is therefore suggested that frozen seafood pro-cesssors should be educated on the adverse effect of using untreated or polluted water for processing as these could serve as sources of faecal contamination. How-ever, the processors/handlers/sellers should observe strict hygienic measures so that they will not serve as source of chance inoculation of microorganisms and con-tamination of these processed frozen seafood products.

The isolation of Samonella sp. and Shigella sp. in almost all the shrimps samples also confirmed the much acclaimed information that various Salmonella species have long been isolated from the outside of egg shells and raw meats, poultry, eggs, milk and dairy products, fish, shrimp, frog legs, yeast, coconut, sauces and salad dressing, cake mixes, cream-filled desserts and toppings,

dried gelatin, peanut butter, cocoa, and chocolate have been implicated in harbouring pathogenic micro-orga-nisms The finding of this study and other information strongly suggest foods other than eggs have also caused outbreaks of S. enteritidis disease (CDC, 1966, 1999; FDA, 2007a,b,c,d). Also, Shigella sp. is frequently found in salads (potato, tuna, shrimp, macaroni, and chicken), raw vegetables, milk and dairy products, and poultry. Contamination of these foods is usually through the fecal-oral route. Faecally contaminated water and unsanitary handling by food handlers are the most common causes of contamination (Dunn et al., 1995; CDC, 1996, 1999; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

The findings of this present study confirms that a wide variety of foods including meats, milk, vegetables, and fish have been associated with the diarrheal type food poisoning resulting from Bacillus spp. The vomiting-type outbreaks have generally been associated with rice pro-ducts; however, other starchy foods such as potato, pasta and cheese products have also been implicated. Food mixtures such as sauces, puddings, soups, casse-roles, pastries, and salads have frequently been incri-minated in food poisoning outbreaks (FSRI, 2003; FDA, 2007a, b, c, d).

The microbial studies on shrimps suggests that there is need to improve on hygienic and sanitary practices in public frozen seafood processing outlets in order to obtain relatively safe products for consumption. The pre-sence of S. aureus and Salmonella sp. was also reported in sausages sold in Abeokuta and Benin-city, Nigeria in a similar study by Oluwafemi and Simisaye (2005). Accord-ing to Oluwafemi and Simisaye (2005) most of the sau-sage being sold as ready-to-food pose health risk to consumers, making it imperative to institute not only sanitary measures during its production and sales bit for retailers selling raw of pre-processed foods to have a steady source of power supply.

The presence of indicator and other organisms exa-mined in this study is of special concern and perhaps the greatest danger associated with shrimps used for food preparation, eating purposes and for other human con-sumption is contamination by human excrement (Edema et al., 2001; Okonko et al., 2008a, b). The need for micro-bial assessment of shrimps and other seafood products processed and repackaged for human consumption to reduce possible contamination (Afolabi et al., 2004; Fagade et al., 2005). From the findings of this study, it is therefore necessary to recommend that owners of sea-food processing plants and food processors/hand-lers/sellers should be educated on the adverse effect of lack of proper personal and environmental hygiene and sanitation. Shrimps to be used for consumption purposes should be adequately cooked before use in preparing food for human consumption and NAFDAC should ensure and enforce strict compliance of the recommend-ed seafood standards as regards the production and sales of processed and re-packaged seafood products such as shrimps.

Okonko et al. 545 REFERENCES Ackman RG (1989). Marine biogenic lipids, fats and oils (Ackman, R.,

ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Adebolu TT, Ifesan BO (2001). Bacteriological quality of vegetables

used in salads. Nig. J. Microbiol. 15(1): 81-85. Adesokan IA, Ogunbanwo ST, Odetoyinbo BB (2005). Microbiological

quality of selected brands of beer in Nigeria. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, from 6-10th November. p. 21.

Afolabi OR (2005). Microbial risk of hand measured rebagged powdered miks. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), UNAAB, Abeokuta, from 6-10th November. p. 18.

Afolabi OR, Adams RF, Popoola TOS (2004). Comparative studies and Microbial risk assessment of fruit juices and fruit drinks available in the market. In: the Book of Abstract no. 59 of the 1st International Conference on Science and National Development, organized by COLNAS, UNAAB, from 25-28th October. p. 56.

Bankole MO, Oladimeji DS, Omemu AM (2005). Microorganisms associated with the palms of food-vendors in Abeokuta Metropolis. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, from 6-10th November. p. 17.

Bankole MO, Sangokoya OA, Adeitan AA (2004). The microbiological analysis of spoilt canned foods sold and meant for sale in the markets. In: the Book of Abstract no. 67 of the 1st International Conference on Science and National Development, organized by COLNAS, UNAAB, from 25-28th October. p. 62.

Centre for Disease Control (CDC) (1998). Vibrio parahaemolyticus outbreak in North America. MMWR 47(22)

Centre for Disease Control (CDC) (1999). An outbreak of Food borne infections associated with consumption of oysters and clams harvested from Long Island Sound occurred among residents of Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York. MMWR 48(03).

Centre for Disease Control (CDC). (1996). Incidences of food poisoning in people who had eaten oysters harvested from certain southern U.S. waters. MMWR 45(30).

Dunn RA, Hall WN, Altamirano JV, Dietrich SE, Robinson-Dunn B, Johnson DR (1995). Outbreak of Shiegella flexneri linked to salad prepared at a central commissary in Michigan. Public Health Reports 110 (5): 580-586.

Edema MO, Atayese AO, Idowu AO (2005). Microbiological Quality of mIcrowave-processed foods. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), UNAAB, Abeokuta from 6-10th November. p. 17.

Edema MO, Omemu AM (2004). Microbiology & food hygiene in public food services. In: the Book of Abstract no. 54 of the 1st Intl. Conference on Science and National Development, organized by COLNAS, UNAAB, from 25-28th October. p. 51.

Edema MO, Omemu AM (2004). Microbiology & food hygiene in public food services. In: the Book of Abstract no. 54 of the 1st Intl. Conference on Science and National Development, organized by COLNAS, UNAAB, from 25-28th October. p. 51.

Edema MO, Omemu AM, Bankole MO (2005). Microbiological safety and quality of ready-to-eat foods in Nigeria. In: the Book of Abstract

of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, from 6-10th November. p. 26.

Edema MO, Omemu AM, Fapetu OM (2001). Microbiology and Physicochemical Analysis of different sources of drinking water in Abeokuta. Nigeria. Nig. J. Microbiol. 15(1): 57-61.

Fagade OE, Ogunjobi AA, Oyelade AA (2005). Microflora of non-carbonated orange drink. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society

546 Sci. Res. Essays for Microbiology (NSM), UNAAB, from 6-10th November. p. 16. FAO/WHO (2007). "FAO/WHO guidance to governments on the

application of HACCP in small and/or less-developed food businesses". Retrieved on 14 October.

Fawole MO, Oso BA (2001). Laboratory manual of Microbiology: Revised edition spectrum books Ltd. Ibadan, p. 127.

Flick GF, Martin J (1992). Lipid oxidation in Food, in Advances in seafood biochemistry. Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. USA.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (1997). Annual Report on Food Quality Control. 1: 11-13.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA Draft). (2007b). "Guide to minimize microbial food safety hazards of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables". Retrieved on 14 October.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007a). "Fish and fisheries products hazards and controls guidance, third edition". Retrieved on 14 October.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007c). "Guidance for Industry: Juice HACCP Hazards and Controls Guidance, First Edition". Retrieved on 14 October.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007d). "Managing Food Safety: A HACCP Principles Guide for Operators of Food Establishments at the Retail Level (Draft)". Retrieved on 14 October.

Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). (2007). "FSIS Microbiological Hazard Identification Guide For Meat And Poultry Components Of Products Produced By Very Small Plants". Retrieved on 14 October.

Food Safety Research Information Office (FSRI). (2003). "A Focus on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points". Created June 2003, Updated March.

Frampton EW, Restaino L (1993). Methods for Escherichia coli identification in food, water and clinical samples based on �-glucuronidase detection. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74: 223- 233.

Hughes JM, Koplan JP (2005). Saving Lives through Global Safe Water. Emerging Infect. Dis. J. 11(10): 1636-1637.

Jolt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Stanley JT, Williams ST (1994). Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 9th edn. Williams & Wilkins Co. Baltimore, Maryland, p. 786.

Kosek M, Bern C, Guerrant RL (2003). The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 81: 197-204

Kurtzweil Paula (2008). Critical Steps toward Safer Seafood. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/ seafood1.html

Lennette EH, Ballows A, Hausler WJJr, Shadomy HJ (1985). Manual of Clinical Microbiology American Society for Microbiology Washington DC, USA.

Liston J (1982). Chemistry and biochemistry of marine food products. AVI Publishing Co., Westport, CT.

Okonko IO, Adejoye OD, Ogunnusi TA, Fajobi, EA, Shittu OB (2008a). Microbiological and physicochemical analysis of different water samples used for domestic purposes in Abeokuta and Ojota, Lagos State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7(3): 617-621

Okonko IO, Ogunjobi AA, Adejoye OD, Ogunnusi TA, Olasogba MC (2008b). Comparative studies and Microbial risk assessment of different water samples used for processing frozen sea-foods in Ijora- olopa, Lagos State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7(16): 2902-2907.

Okonko IO, Ogunjobi AA, Fajobi EA, Onoja BA, Babalola ET, Adedeji AO (2008c). Comparative studies and microbial risk assessment of different Ready-to-Eat (RTE) frozen sea-foods processed in Ijora-olopa, Lagos State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7(16): 2898-2901.

Olawale AK, Oluduro AO, Famurewa O (2005). Evaluation of microbiological and sanitary standards of canteens and eateries in Osun State Polytechnic, Iree. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), UNAAB, Abeokuta, from 6-10th November. p.19.

Oluwafemi F, Simisaye MT (2005). Extent of microbial contamination of

sausages sold in two Nigerian cities. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, from 6-10th November. p. 28.

Omemu AM, Bankole MO (2005). Ready-to-eat (RTE) vegetable salad: effect of washing and storage temperature on the microbial quality and shel-life. In: the Book of Abstract of the 29th Annual Conference & General Meeting (Abeokuta 2005) on Microbes As Agents of Sustainable Development, organized by Nigerian Society for Microbiology (NSM), UNAAB, from 6-10th November. p. 28.

Parashar U, Bresee JS, Glass RI (2003). The global burden of diarrhoeal disease in children. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 81: 236.

Peterson EA, Roberts L, Toole MJ, Peterson DE (1998). The effect of soap distribution on diarrhea: Nyamithuthu Refugee Camp. Int. J. Epidemiol. 27: 520-524.

PHPP (1997). Produce Handling and Processing Practices. Emerging Infect. Dis. 3(4).

Scates P, Moran L, Madden RH (2003). Effects of incubation temperature on isolation of Campylobacter jejuni genotypes from food enriched in Preston broth. J. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 4658 -4661.

Spanish Ministry of Industry, Turism and Commerce (SMITC). (2005). In Seafood Porcessing Industry. Short and Long Technological Tendences.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2007). "Guidance for school food authorities: developing a school food safety program based on the process approach to HACCP principles".

World Health Organization (WHO). (2004). Water, sanitation and hygiene links to health: Facts and figures updated November 2004 [accessed May 30, 2008]. Available from http:// www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/facts2004/en/print.html.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2005). The WHO Report 2005-make every mother and child count. Geneva: The Organization.

Wright J, Grundy S, Conroy R (2004). Household drinking water in developing countries: a systematic review of microbiological contamination between source and point-of-use. J. Tropical Med. Int. Health 9: 106- 117.

Younes M, Bartram J (2001). Waterborne health risks and the WHO perspectives. Int. J. Hygiene Environ. Health 204: 255- 263.


Recommended