+ All documents
Home > Documents > Dialogue Without Words

Dialogue Without Words

Date post: 02-May-2023
Category:
Upload: yale
View: 5 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
107
Dialogue Without Words Interactions and intersections of cinema and music in films of the French avantgarde Ent’racte, Un chien andalou, and Le sang d’un poète Patrick Campbell Jankowski Candidate for the Master of Musical Arts Degree, 2015 March 27, 2015
Transcript

Dialogue  Without  Words  Interactions  and  intersections  of  cinema  and  music  in  films  of  the  French  avant-­‐garde   Ent’racte,  Un  chien  andalou,  and  Le  sang  d’un  poète   Patrick  Campbell  Jankowski  Candidate  for  the  Master  of  Musical  Arts  Degree,  2015  

March  27,  2015  

 

   

2

Table  of  Contents  

 

 

3  

13  

31  

53  

72  

91  

93  

105  

Prologue:  Setting  the  Scene  

Chapter  1:  The  Role  of  Film  Music  –  Far  more  than  “Occupying  the  ear”  

Chapter  2:  Timbre,  Orchestration,  and  Harmony  

Chapter  3:  Interactions  of  Cinematic  and  Musical  Rhythm,  Tempo,  and  Meter  

Chapter  4:  The  Crucial  Element  of  Form  

Epilogue:  Fade  to  Black  

Appendix  

Bibliography  and  Filmography  

3

Prologue:  Setting  the  Scene    

The   following   is   an   imagined   dialogue   between   filmmaker   René   Clair   and   a   conceptual  

figure  called  “The  Other”:  

 

RC:  The  cinema  is  too  young,  too  imperfect,  to  satisfy  us  if  it  remains  stationary.  

From  the  moment  it  ceases  to  advance,  it  seems  to  move  backwards.  

 

The  Other:  What  do  you  mean  exactly  by   “cinema?”   It   is  a  word   that  may  be  

taken  in  different  ways  in  future  years.  

 

RC:  It  is  time  to  have  done  with  words.  Nothing  is  being  improved  because  we  

are  not  wiping  the  slate  clean.  Real  cinema  cannot  be  put  in  words.  But  just  try  

to  get  that  across  to  people  –  you,  myself,  and  the  rest  –  who  have  been  twisted  

by   thirty-­‐odd   centuries   of   chatter:   poetry,   the   theater,   the   novel…   They  must  

learn  again  to  see  with  the  eyes  of  a  savage,  of  a  child  less  interested  in  the  plot  

of  a  Punch  and   Judy   show   than   in   the  drubbings   the  puppets  give  each  other  

with  their  sticks.  

 

 

The   cinematic   medium   provided   artists   with   a   new   wealth   of   expressive  

possibilities.   However,   many   were   contentious   over   precisely   how   to   influence   the  

evolution  of  this  new  art  form.    Was  it  an  extension  of  the  theater?  Was  it  a  purely  visual  

art?  Was  it  a  mechanical  ballet?  Was  it  narrative,  poetic,  or  both?  One  truth  was  inevitable:  

film  offered  the  greatest  control  of  a  viewer’s  sensory  experience  that  had  yet  been  offered  

in   an   artistic   medium,   and   in   utilizing   the   cinema,   artists   could   tap   into   that   viewer’s  

comprehension  of  an  artwork.  Narrative,  image,  and  eventually,  accompanying  music,  were  

fused  together  into  a  singular  experience,  but  with  an  added  element:  the  control  that  the  

filmmaker  had,  through  cinematography  and  editing,  of  perception.  The  filmmaker  guides  

4

the   viewer’s   eye   and   ear,   and   dictates   how   to   perceive   a   scene.   What’s   more,   they  

manipulate   time,  being  able   to   interrupt   the   linear   flow  of   a   logical  narrative   in  order   to  

form  new  temporal  relationships  in  the  mind  of  the  viewer.  

 

The  newly  born  relationship  between  the  filmmaker  and  the  composer  allowed  the  

pair   to   control   the   interaction  of   consonance   and  dissonance  between   the  moving   image  

and   its   accompanying  music   and   sound.   The   cinema   came   to   be   known   in   France   as   “le  

septième   art,”   a   term   which   remains   in   common   use   (Eatwell   2014).   Film   was  

conceptualized  as  a  brand  new  art  form,  yet  it  simultaneously  fused  together  a  multitude  of  

other  arts:  visual  imagery,  narrative,  choreography  of  movement,  and  architecture,  both  of  

set  designs  as  well  as   in  the  structuring  of   images  in  the  editing  process.   It  embodied  the  

union  of  image  and  sound.  Between  the  musical  streams  of  the  artistic  and  the  commercial,  

intersection   is   frequent.   Such   is   the   case   with   film:   conceived   both   as   spectacle   and  

entertainment   as  well   as   “high   art.”  Many,   including  René  Clair,   recognized   the   potential  

bifurcation  between  the  two  streams  early  on.  Clair  writes  of  French  film’s  shortcomings  in  

its  earliest  days,  noting:  

 

It  was  not  in  the  years  around  1922  that  the  French  film  enjoyed  its  best  

period.   At   that   time,   while   the   American,   German   and   Swedish   film  

industries   were   producing   original   works   in   each   turn   (the   Soviet  

cinema  was   to   take   its   place   in   history   shorty   afterward),   the   French  

cinema  seemed   lack-­‐luster  and  characterless   in  comparison.  Of  course,  

France   had   an   interesting   “avant-­‐garde,”   but   its   purely   visual  

experiments   could   be   appreciated   only   by   a   few   people,   and   the  

disagreements   between   this   “avant-­‐garde”   and   the   “commercial”  

cinema   threatened   to   lead   French   film   production   into   a   blind   alley  

(Clair  1972).  

 

5

In  fact,   it  was  in  the  realm  of  “popular  music,”  that  is,  the  music  of  dancehalls,   jazz  

bands,  and  vaudeville  theater,  to  which  those  figures  essential  to  the  early  development  of  

French   film   scores   would   turn   for   inspiration.   These   figures   included   Erik   Satie   and  

Georges  Auric,  who  found  an  appeal  in  popular  and  folk  entertainments  rather  than  the  art  

music  that  they  considered  to  be  tired,  overused,  and  antiquated.  Often,   it  must  be  noted,  

this   music   was   of   German   origin,   signifying   the   political   divide   that   underpinned   the  

cultural  one.  The  dissonance  between  popular  art  and  high  art  was  motivated  as  much  by  

politics  as  by  anything  else.  Among  the  fundamental  characteristics  of  Dada  are  absurdity  

and  chaos.  This   “anti-­‐art”  movement,  born   in  Zürich  and  which   flourished   in  Paris   in   the  

period  from  1915  through  the  mid-­‐1920’s,  commented  on  the  nonsense  of  war  and  on  the  

contentious  political  climate.  Experimentation,  irony  and  humor  were  its  weapons,  and  the  

establishment  was  its  target  (Dorf  2006).  Dadaist  art  challenged  the  belief  that  everything  

needed  to  have  a  reasonable  explanation.      

 

Just   as   the  perception  of  harmony   relies  upon   the   relationship  of   consonance  and  

dissonance,  and  the  resulting  effects  of  tension  and  relaxation  on  the  listener,  a  consonant  

and  dissonant  relationship  also  operates  between  music  and  moving  image.  It  is  manifested  

perhaps   foremost   in   the   deliberate   alignment   and   misalignment   of   image   with   musical  

rhythm.   Erik   Satie’s   score   to   Rene   Clair’s   Dadaist   1924   film   Entr’acte   –   conceived   and  

premiered  as  part  of   the  ballet  Relâche  –  exemplifies  these  techniques.  Likely   for  the  first  

time   in   the  history   of   the   very  new  medium,   a   deliberate   effort  was  made   to   establish   a  

carefully   controlled   relationship   between   image   and  music.   Drawing   upon   techniques   of  

ballet   music,   Satie   fashioned   a   score   that   was   deliberately   synchronized   with   Clair’s  

realization   of   Francis   Picabia’s   vision.   Satie’s   collaboration   with   scenarist   Jean   Cocteau,  

visual   artist   Pablo   Picasso,   and   choreographer   Léonide   Massine   in   the   groundbreaking  

succès   de   scandale  ballet   Parade   presaged   this   relationship   in   1917.  The   style   of   Satie’s  

music,   with   its   surface   simplicity   and   timbral   leanness,   proved   a   perfect   match   for   the  

experimental,   humorous,   and   often   nonsensical   ballet   of   images   that   together   comprise  

Entr’acte.  However,  significant  instances  of  asynchrony  of  both  pacing  and  of  topic  generate  

6

tension  for  the  viewer.  It  is  in  these  moments  of  deviation  from  total  synchronization  that  

chaos  and  absurdity  –  those  subversive  traits  of  Dadaism  –  are  heightened,  and  strengthen  

the  film’s  impact.  

 

Defying  Logic    

The  function  of  logic  is  an  important  consideration  in  examining  these  films  of  Clair,  

Cocteau,   and   Buñuel,   precisely   because   in   all   cases,   the   filmmakers   and  musicians  make  

deliberate  attempts  to  defy  it.  Entr’acte’s  creators,  per  their  Dadaist  stance,  are  subversive  

and  anti-­‐establishment  in  their  goals.  In  1924,  the  same  year  that  Entr’acte  was  premiered  

as  the  intermediary  of  Relâche,  Andre  Breton  published  his  two  Surrealist  Manifestos.  The  

surrealist  movement,  while   intrinsically   linked   to   Dada,  was   championed   by   artists  who  

sought  to  sever  ties  with  its  predecessor:  Entr’acte  came  just  as  the  last  traces  of  Dada  were  

fading  away.  Breton  wrote:  “Surrealism,  such  as  I  conceive  of  it,  asserts  our  complete  non-­‐

conformism  clearly  enough  so  that  there  can  be  no  question  of  translating  it,  at  the  trial  of  

the   real   world,   as   evidence   for   the   defense”   (Breton   1969).   Surrealism   taps   into   the  

subconscious   experience   in   that   it   does   not   deal   in   logical   relationships.   However,   the  

viewer  may  inevitably  attempt  to  piece  together  the  occasionally  asynchronous  interaction  

of  image  and  sound,  and  in  doing  so  is  met  with  a  challenge  to  his  or  her  expectations.  This  

very  challenge  enhances  an  aesthetic  experience  that   is  often  missing  in  films  that  do  not  

venture  into  the  realm  of  the  unexpected,  ironic,  subversive,  and  nonsensical.    

 

Introducing  Un  chien  andalou  and  Le  sang  d’un  poète  

The  images  and  scenarios  that  would  come  to  comprise  Un  chien  andalou  came  from  

the  dreams  of   two   artists.   This   controversial   surrealist   short   film,  made   in   1928  by   Luis  

Buñuel   and   Salvador   Dalí,   presents   a   logical   story   as   though   it   were   dug   up   from   the  

subconscious,   with   echoes   of   Freudian   sexual   themes.   Un   chien   andalou   was   inherently  

linked   from   its  very   inception  with  pre-­‐existing  music:   rather   than  commissioning  a  new  

7

cinematic   score,   Buñuel   instead   incorporated   musical   portions   of   the   scene   of   Isolde’s  

Death–   popularly   known   as   the  Liebestod  or   “love-­‐death”   from  Richard  Wagner’s  Tristan  

und   Isolde   –   as   well   as   two   Argentinean   tangos,   as   the   accompanying   music.   For   the  

purposes  of  clarity,  Wagner’s  music  will  henceforth  be  referred  to  as  the  Transfiguration:  

the  English   translation  of  Verklärung,  which  was   the  composer’s  own  designation   for   the  

scene  in  an  accompanying  program  note.  By  incorporating  pre-­‐existing  music,  filmmakers  

challenge   the   expectations   of   the   viewer,   who   may   possess   some   preconceptions   about  

these   musical   “found   objects”.   Through   the   juxtaposition   of   these   preconceived   notions  

against  the  experience  of  images  and  scenes,  filmmakers  open  the  door  to  another  realm  of  

expressive  possibilities:  that  of  external  association.  

 

Jean   Cocteau’s   own   Le   sang   d’un   poète   is   likewise   fashioned   as   an   episodic   depiction   of  

dream-­‐like   scenarios,   though   the   director   resisted   the   term   “surrealism”   in   his   own  

description  of  the  film,  calling  it  instead  a  “realistic  portrayal  of  surreal  events”  (Fragineau  

1972).   Cocteau,   rather   than   projecting   images   of   apparently   subconscious   origin,   he  

intended  to  induce  a  dream-­‐like  state  through  which  the  mind  could  wander.    

 

The  Blood  of  a  Poet  draws  nothing  from  either  dreams  or  symbols.  

As  far  as  the  former  are  concerned,  it  initiates  their  mechanism,  and  

by  letting  the  mind  relax,  as  in  sleep,  it  lets  memories  entwine,  move  

and  express  themselves   freely.  As   for  the   latter,   it  rejects  them,  and  

substitutes   acts,   or   allegories   of   these   acts,   that   the   spectator   can  

make   symbols  of   if   he  wishes   (Cocteau,   Preface   to   The   Blood   of   a  

Poet  1946).  

 

 

8

The  Context  of  the  films    

 

The   films   and   scores   under   examination   were   created   in   a   time   and   place   of  

significant   creative   energy   and   drive.   Paris   between   the   First   and   Second   World   Wars  

housed  a  number  of  artistic  circles  with  the  common  goal  on  upending  establishment  and  

the  artistic   status  quo.  One  common   intention  and  sense  of  duty   seems   to  have  emerged  

among   the   followers   of   the   Surrealists,   Dadaists,   Modernists,   Cubists,   and   Les   Six:     the  

establishment  of  a  new  and  distinctly  French  art.  The  concept  of  a  unique  French  art  came  

about   in   music,   literature,   poetry,   dance,   the   visual   arts,   and,   in   the   case   of   Parade,   a  

synthesis   of  multiple   artistic  media.  Not   coincidentally,   the   visionary   behind  Parade  was  

Jean  Cocteau,  an  artistic   impresario  and  patron  who  provided  the  magnetic   force  binding  

the   Groupe   des   Six:   a   half-­‐dozen   distinct   composers   rallying   behind   Erik   Satie.   Cocteau  

projected   his   own   musical   ideals   into   a   manifesto,   written   in   the   form   of   a   series   of  

humorous   musings   that   he   called   “notes   on   music.”   The   pamphlet,   titled   Le   coq   et   le  

harlequín,  was  published  in  1918,  and  provides  a  fascinating  glimpse  into  the  motivations  

of  French  artists  within  his  broad  circle.  Cocteau  proved  to  be  a  central  figure  in  this  time  

and   place.   He   wrote   the   scenario   to   Parade,   brought   together   Les   Six,   and   influenced  

Georges  Auric  –  the  one  member  of  this  group  most  deeply  connected  to  the  director  –  in  

the  evolution  of  his  compositional  style.  Auric  would  come  to  collaborate  with  Cocteau  on  

the  score  to  the  poetic  film  Le  sang  d’un  poète  in  1928  (premiered  in  1930)  and  would  later  

work  with  René  Clair  on  his  A  nous  la  liberté.  Each  of  these  films  uniquely  exemplifies  the  

composer-­‐filmmaker   relationship   as   well   as   the   early   handling   of   sound   in   film,   as   the  

technology  transitioned  from  the  silent  era  to  the  sound  era.    

 

                               The  artistic  goals  of  each  of  these  significant  figures  were  propelled  and  guided  by  

a  “new  spirit,”  or  esprit  nouveau,  a  phrase  first  coined  by  the  poet  Guilliaume  Apollinaire  in  

a  description  of  Parade  that  accompanied  the  program  at  the  premiere  (Doyle  2005).  The  

9

cinema  was   largely   Franco-­‐centric   in   its   earliest   evolution.  While   the   American   Thomas  

Edison  had,   with   his   peephole   kinetoscope,   invented   the   technology   by  which   a  moving  

image  could  be  captured  and  reviewed,  the  cinematic  experience  as  we  know  it  today  –  that  

of   moving   film   strips   created   through   a   series   of   camera   exposures,   assembled   and  

projected  onto  a  screen  for  a  number  of  people  to  view  simultaneously  –  was,  in  fact,  born  

in  France  (Prendergast  1977).  The  very  concept  of   films  as  experiences  that  audiences  to  

share  collectively,  as  in  the  theatre,  was  likewise  of  French  origin.  The  cinema  was  born  of  

the   Auguste   and   Louis   Lumière   in   1895,   and   grew   through   the   early   experiments   of  

Georges  Meliés  in  the  first  decade  of  the  twentieth  century.  Meliés,  for  the  first  time  in  its  

early  conception,  used  the  medium  to  relay  narratives  both  realistic  and  fantastical  purely  

through  the  moving  image  (Prendergast  1977).  The  new  art  form  was  revelatory  to  French  

artists,  and  though  German  and  Swedish  film  studios  were  growing  and  the  American  film  

industry  was  booming,  French  filmmakers  sensed  that  they  could  create  something  all  their  

own.   Even   with   respect   to   the   technique   and   style   of   American   and   German   films,   the  

French  did,  in  fact,  utilize  the  cinematic  medium  in  a  very  unique  manner.    

 

                             The   relationship   between   film   and  music  was   recognized,   even   very   early   in   the  

cultivation  of  the  new  medium,  as  symbiotic.  Filmmakers  often  conceptualized  film,  both  in  

formal   and   rhythmic   terms,   by   using   the   same   techniques   that   composers   utilized   in  

musical  composition.  Conversely,  a  number  of  musicians  would  in  turn  be  influenced  by  the  

techniques  of  cinema,  which,  in  its  free  approach  to  the  chronology  of  time  and  its  ability  to  

abandon   straightforwardness   in   projecting   its   themes,   provided   a   new   collection   of  

techniques   through   which   musicians   could   conceptualize   their   own   art   form.   Musical  

equivalents   to   splicing,   jump   cuts,   zooms   and   pans   began   to   subtly  make   their  way   into  

composition.   The   composer   Claude   Debussy   saw   great   potential   in   the   cinema,   and  

recognized   the   relationship   between   the   medium   and   music   even   in   its   very   earliest  

incarnation,  writing  in  1913:  

 

10

There   remains   but   one  way   of   reviving   the   taste   for   symphonic  music  

among   our   contemporaries:   to   apply   to   pure  music   the   techniques   of  

cinematography.  It  is  the  film  –  the  Ariadne’s  thread  –  that  will  show  us  

the  way  out  of  this  disquieting  labyrinth  (Leydon  1996).  

 

The  pursuit  of  the  “new  spirit,”  in  cinema  is  embodied  in  the  musings  of  René  Clair,  

who   in  1922  wrote:   “How  we  wish   that   there  were  a   typically  French   film  style.  Perhaps  

there   is  one.  But   it   could  only  be  perceived  at   a  distance.  We  are   too   close”  (Clair  1972).  

Now,  nearly  a  century  later,  it  might  at  last  be  possible  to  examine  this  small  but  significant  

body  of  works  conjointly,  and  to   find  a   thread  of  commonality   through  them  all.   In   just  a  

handful   of   bold,   adventurous   films,   the   bold   artists   that   created   them   cultivated   an  

interaction  between  music  and  image  that  would  continue  to  evolve  over  the  next  century,  

and  that  continues  to  evolve  today.  Though  the  conception  of  film  as  an  art  form  has  been  

continuously  altered  –  and  varies  depending  on  the  work’s  country  of  origin,  director,  and  

its  intended  audience  –  wherever  music  and  film  coexist,  the  viewer  is  inevitably  influenced  

by  their  relationship.  

 

Defining  the  indefinite    

One  very  important  consideration  in  understanding  the  function  of  film  music  is  in  

bearing  in  mind  the  type  of  film  being  examined.  There  are  in  essence  two  extremes  in  film  

types:  pure  cinema  (cinema  púr)  and  narrative  cinema.  The  former  involves  no  narrative  at  

all,   but   instead   an   abstract   sequence   of   images.   The   avant-­‐garde   filmmaker   Germaine  

Dulac,   among   the   most   important   figures   in   the   movement   and   a   classically   trained  

musician,  likened  pure  cinema  to  music  itself:  

 

 

 

11

“A  film’s  characters  are  not  the  only  important  things;  the  length  of  the  images,  

their  contrast  and  harmony,  play  a  primary  role  alongside  them.  A  new  drama  

made   up   of   movement,   finally   understood   rationally,   asserts   its   rights,  

magnificently   leading   us   towards   the   symphonic   image   poem,   towards   the  

visual   symphony   beyond   familiar   formulas  where,   like  music,   emotions   burst,  

not  into  deeds  or  actions,  but  into  sensations”  (T.  Williams  2014).  

 

 Narrative   films  are  essentially  akin   to   filmed   theater.  However,   filmmakers  of   the  

silent  era  were  not  yet  afforded  the  aid  of  recorded  dialogue.  At  best  they  relied  upon  an  

interspersion  of  cue  cards  and  pantomime  to  relay  the  plots  of  their  films.  On  the  opposite  

end  of   the   spectrum,   the  notion   that   a   film   could   function  more   like  pure   art   or   a   visual    

equivalent   to   symbolist  poetry   enabled   filmmakers   such  as  Clair,  Buñuel,   and  Cocteau   to  

stray  from  or  abandon  the  pretenses  of  plot,  liberated  from  the  Aristotelian  conception  of  

space  and  time.    

 

Entr’acte,  Un  chien  andalou,   and  Le  sang  d’un  poète  all   lie   somewhere  between   the  

two  extremes.  There  are  elements  of  narrative,  but  little  in  the  way  of  a  logical  story,  per  se.  

As  film  scholar  Martin  Marks  describes,  “during  the  mature  phase  of  the  silent  period  (from  

about   1915   on),  most   films  were   products   of   an   industry   geared   to   supplying   audiences  

with   entertaining   stories;   and   music   was   normally   expected   (as   it   still   is   today)   to  

underline   and   interpret   the   narratives,   with   careful   reflections   of   a   film's   settings,  

characters,   actions,   and   moods”   (M.   M.   Marks   1997).   If   the   goal   of   a   film   is   something  

different,  that  is,  if  it  is  meant  to  serve  a  different  function  besides  simply  relaying  a  story,  

then   perhaps   the   goal   of   that   film’s   music   should   likewise   differ   from   the   goals   of   a  

conventional  score.    

 

These  three  films,  in  that  they  are  by  nature  not  expressly  plot-­‐driven,  rely  on  their  

musical   relationship   more   intensely.   Because   the   viewer   is   not   given,   as   they   are   in   a  

narrative   film,   the   stability   of   a   story   on   which   to   grasp,   in   such   films   they   rely   more  

12

strongly  upon  music  to  guide  their   interpretation  than  they  perhaps  would  in  a  narrative  

film.  Music  in  a  plot-­‐driven  film  is  an  essential  component  in  underlining  the  action  and  in  

manipulating   emotional   response.   However,   when   the   logical   story   is   obscured   or  

nonexistent,  the  filmmaker  and  composer  cannot  rely  conventional  film  scoring  techniques  

as  heavily.  If  they  did,  a  profound  effect  may  inherently  be  lost.    

 

What  was   revolutionary,   then,   about  Satie,  Buñuel,   and  Auric’s   approaches   to   film  

scoring  is  the  way  that  they  addressed  the  problem  of  specifically  non-­‐narrative  film,  that  

is,  cinema  that  was  closer  to  a  “pure”  and  abstract  aesthetic  than  to  the  theatrical.  The  three  

films  under  examination  in  this  analysis  are  extremely  different  in  musical  scoring.  Satie’s  

is   a   mostly   continuous   piece   of   music,   in   which   the   timing   of   each   musical   change   is  

carefully  and  closely  aligned  with  the  timing  of  the  film.  Un  chien  andalou  appropriates  pre-­‐

existing  music  as   its  score,  and  it   is  through  the   juxtaposition  of   image  and  scenario  with  

music   that   a   deeper   level   of   subtextual   significance   is   derived.     Georges   Auric’s   score   to  

Cocteau’s  Le  sang  d’un  poète,  from  1930,  deals  in  musical  topics,  motives,  and  cues,  aligned  

with  the  film  in  such  a  way  as  to  create  either  synchrony  of  meaning  or  ironic  asynchrony.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

Chapter  1:  The  Role  of  Film  Music  –  Far  more  than  “Occupying  the  ear”    

Igor   Stravinsky,   when   asked   “What   is   the   function   of   music   in   moving   pictures?”  

responded,  in  his  typically  dry  tone:    

 

It  has  got  to  bridge  holes;  it  has  got  to  fill  the  emptiness  of  the  screen  

and   supply   the   loudspeakers   with  more   or   less   pleasant   sounds.   The  

film  could  not  get  along  without  it,  just  as  I  myself  could  not  get  along  

without  having  the  empty  spaces  of  my  living  room  walls  covered  with  

wall  paper.  But  you  would  not  ask  me,  would  you,   to   regard  my  wall  

paper   as   I   would   regard   painting,   or   apply   aesthetic   standards   to   it  

(Stravinsky  1946).  

 

Almost   as   soon   as   film   music   came   into   being,   a   heated   debate   began   about   its  

function,  as  well  as  its  value.  There  were  two  conceptions  of  music  early  on  in  its  marriage  

to  film:  either  that  it  was  exclusively  “background  music,”  or  that  it  was  akin  to  incidental  

music.  These   two  conceptions  are   somewhat   similar   in   function,  yet   the   idea  of  music  as  

pure   background   is   more   similar   to   Satie’s   “furnishing   music,”   in   that   it   is   intended   to  

simply  coexist  with  a  film’s  action,  unnoticeably.  It  was,  for  lack  of  a  better  word,  among  the  

earliest   incarnations   of   “Muzak”   or   “ambient   music,”   as   it   is   called   today.   Early   film  

projectors  were   quite   noisy,   and   the   first   film   scores,   usually   performed   by   pianist  with  

music  combining  a  selection  of  familiar  melodies  with  pure  improvisations,  were  as  much  a  

practical  necessity  as  they  were  an  artistic  contribution  to  the  experience.  

 

From  the  small  scale  of  a  solo  piano  grew  the  small  ensembles  that  performed  the  

first   film  scores:  around  the  size  of  a  typical  theatrical  pit  orchestra.  The  title  of  Entr’acte  

even   alludes   to   this   notion   of   theatrical   incidental  music,   and   though   this   title   has   been  

shortened   in   common  practice,   the   full   description,   as  printed  on   the  original   score,  was  

Cinéma:  Entr’acte  symphonique  de  “Relâche.”  The  film  was  never  meant  to  stand  on  its  own,  

14

but   as   an   intermediary   between   the   acts   of   the   ballet/theatre   piece.   It   is   important   to  

contextualize  the  film  in  this  way,  as  there  are  many  connections,  both  visual  and  musical,  

to  the  larger  scale  ballet.  An  investigation  of  the  film’s  relationship  to  the  ballet  is  beyond  

the  scope  of  this  thesis.  For  the  purposes  of  examining  the  interaction  of  music  and  film,  the  

focus  will  be  on  the  cinematic  Entr’acte  itself.  

 

Many  of  the  earliest  French  films,   in  the  first  decade  of   its  existence,   functioned  as  

filmed  theater,  wherein  a  mostly  fixed  camera  simply  reflected  the  scene  from  the  vantage  

of   an   audience  member.   Examples  may   be   found   the   early   films   of  Meliés,   including   his  

famous  Voyage  dans  la  lune.  Though  it  is  a  fantastical  and  imaginative  film,  functionally,  it  is  

little  more  than  a  series  of  set  pieces:  a  stationary  camera  films  the  action  before  it.  Editing  

had  not  yet  been  conceived  as  a  complex  art  capable  of  manipulating  a  viewer’s  temporal  

and  visual  comprehension  of  a  scene.  Arguably  the  first  true  orchestral  film  score  to  come  

about   in   France   –   that   is,   music   written   exclusively   and   expressly   for   the   purpose   of  

accompanying   a   film   –   was   L’assassinat   du   Duc   de   Guise,   a   historical   work   from   1908  

directed  by  Charles  Le  Bargy  and  André  Calmettes.  The  music,  composed  by  Camille  Saint-­‐

Saëns,  was  never  intended  to  align  temporally  with  the  images  on  screen  with  any  degree  

of   exactitude.   The   independence   of   the   score   is   evidenced   by   its   life   as   a   standalone  

orchestral   suite,   divided   into   a   brief   prelude   and   five   scenes,   perfectly   embodying   the  

concept  of  incidental  music  (M.  M.  Marks  1997).  

 

The  composer  and  theorist  Frank  Martin  wrote   in  1925  that  “music   in  cinema  has  

no  other  object  than  to  occupy  the  ears  while  the  whole  attention  is  concentrated  on  vision,  

and   to  prevent   their  hearing   the  exasperating   silence  made  by   the  noise  of   the  projector  

and   the  movements   of   the   audience.   It   is   important,   then,   that   it   should   not   distract   the  

attention  by  a  richness  and  novelty  that  would  divert  the  eye  from  the  spectacle”  (Manvell  

1949).   Such   a   strongly   held   opinion   is   not   far   removed   from   Stravinsky’s,   and   although  

these  words  should  be  taken  with  a  grain  of  salt,  they  reflect  one  concern  of  filmmakers  at  

the  time:  that  music,  in  its  interaction  with  the  film,  could  potentially  overpower  the  image.  

15

In  collaboration,  filmmakers  and  composers  often  sought  a  delicate  balance  wherein  music  

would   enhance   the   visual   experience   without   oppressing   it.   Dr.   Paul   Ramain,   a   widely  

disseminated  theorist  in  the  early  days  of  Parisian  avant-­‐garde  film,  and  likely  well  known  

to  both  Satie  and  Clair,  writes:  “if  the  film  is  beautiful,  the  music  will  be  vanquished  by  the  

film,  and  if   the  music   is  sublime,  then  the  film  will  be  vanquished  by  the  music”  (Manvell  

1949).  The  type  of  music   that  does  not  grab  the  attention  too  strongly  would  come  to  be  

known  as  “underscore,”  a  term  borrowed  from  opera  and  ballet.    

 

The  three  films  under  examination  each  demonstrate  the  essentiality  of  film  music  

in   differing   manners,   and   also   exemplify   three   unique   types   of   “filmmaker-­‐composer”  

relationships.   Satie  worked  very  closely  with  Picabia  and  Clair,   and  Entr’acte  was  always  

conceived  as  a  collaborative  musical-­‐cinematographic-­‐artistic  statement.  As  such,  the  score  

of  the  film  is  unique  to  the  style  of  the  film  that  it  accompanies,  and  the  score  is  so  deeply  

aligned   with   the   film   that   the   music   can   hardly   stand   on   its   own.   Luis   Buñuel   never  

commissioned  a  new  score   for  Un  chien  andalou.  The  musical  works   that  he   incorporates  

into   the   film   (Wagner’s  music  and   tango)  had   already   existed   and   the   film   can   therefore  

either  serve  as  a  reaction  to  that  music  or  can  simply  coexist  arbitrarily  with  it.  The  degree  

to   which   Buñuel   built   the   film   around   this   music   is   debatable.   However,   the   music’s  

alignment  to  the  imagery  and  its  effect  on  the  viewer's  comprehension  of  the  film  is  quite  

significant,  particularly  when  one  is  privileged  to  see  the  sound-­‐synchronized  version  that  

Buñuel  produced  in  1960.  

 

Le  sang  d’un  poète      

  Auric’s   score   to   Le   sang   d’un   poète   is   distinct   both   from   Satie's   score   and   from  

Buñuel’s  use  of  pre-­‐existing  music.  The  composer  wrote  a  series  of  cues  that  maintain  their  

own  topical  independence.  They  do  not  share  the  strung-­‐together  unity  of  Satie's  score,  nor  

are  they  meant  to  coincide  in  conjunction  with  one  another.  The  way  in  which  these  cues  

relate   to   one   another   and  with   the   scenarios   occurring   on   screen   establishes   their   own  

16

significance.   Unlike   the   continuous   musical   accompaniment   of   the   other   two   films   –  

continuity  referring  to  the  fact  that  music  is  continuously  playing  and  mostly  unbroken  by  

silence   –   Auric’s   cues   are   more   asynchronous   to,   and   at   times   misappropriated   to   the  

images.   Cocteau   also   frequently   separates   the   cues   with   prolonged   periods   of   silence.  

Unlike  Satie,  Auric  was  in  fact  not  present  during  filming,  and  was  instead  asked  by  Cocteau  

to  produce  cues  of  music  based  on  ideas,  concepts,  and  themes  before  having  seen  the  film.  

The  composer  recalls:  “He  told  me  simply,  evidently:  in  such-­‐and-­‐such  a  passage,  I  imagine  

a  music  with  this  kind  of  character.  It  ended  there.  When  I  played  my  music,  when  he  heard  

my  music,  there  was  no  discussion  of  any  sort  between  us.  He  was  happy  with  what  I  had  

done”  (Auric  1999).  Cocteau  claimed  to  have  “shifted  and  reversed  the  order  of  the  music  

in  every  single  sequence.  Not  only  did   the  contrast  heighten   the  relief  of   the  music,  but   I  

even   found   at   times   that   the   ‘displaced’   music   adhered   too   closely   to   the   gestures,   and  

seemed   to  have  been  written  on  purpose”   (Fragineau  1972).  This   is   an  entirely  different  

manifestation  of  the  composer-­‐filmmaker  relationship  than  in  the  other  two  cases.  Though  

Auric’s  music   is   less   rhythmically   tied   to   the  moving   image   than   is   the   case  with   Satie’s  

score,   it   still   relies   as   much   upon   the   imagery   to   provide   it   with   substance,   just   as   the  

imagery  relies  upon  the  music  to  enhance  its  own  meaning.  The  ambiguity  of  the  complex  

film  is  imbued  with  elements  of  Cocteau’s  own  ambiguous  public  persona.  In  “shifting”  the  

music   throughout   the   film,   one   might   imagine   that   Cocteau   had   an   apathetic   attitude  

towards  music  in  relation  to  film.  As  Cocteau  scholar  Jann  Pasler  describes,  though  Cocteau  

was  initially  quite  opinionated  about  the  direction  of  new  music  –  as  Le  coq  et  le  harlequin  

demonstrates  –  evaluating  it  as  a  vessel  of  confrontation  and  disturbance,  when  it  came  to  

the  role  of  music  in  his  own  films  and  art,  he  surprisingly  enough  seemed  content  to  leave  

well  enough  alone  and  to  allow  the  composers  to  speak  for  themselves  (Pasler  1991).    In  Le  

sang  d’un  poète,   Cocteau   juxtaposes  music   against   image,   and   in   doing   so,   juxtaposes   his  

public  persona  against  his  true,  internal  self.  He  once  told  an  audience  seeing  the  film  that  

“one   must   let   the   film   act   like   Auric’s   noble   accompanying   music,”   adding   that   “Auric’s  

music   gives   nameless   nourishment   to   our   emotions   and  memories.”   (Cocteau,   Preface   to  

17

The  Blood  of  a  Poet  1946).  The  enigma  of  Cocteau  emerges  in  his  enigmatic  use  of  music  in  

Le  sang  d’un  poète.  

 

Entr’acte    

Satie’s  score  to  Entr’acte  is  sometimes  called  a  “model  of  film  music.”  In  reality,  it  is  a  

model   of   a   very   specific   kind   of   film  music:   that  which  might   best   accompany   the  Dada,  

anti-­‐narrative,   stream   of   consciousness   parade   of   images   comprising   Rene   Clair’s  

realization  of  Picabia’s  absurd  vision.  The  film  was  unlike  anything  that  had  come  before,  

and  therefore  warranted  a  score  that  was  unlike  anything  yet  written.  Though  its  run  time  

is   only   around  17-­‐18  minutes1,   it   is   comprised  of   over   three-­‐hundred  different   shots.  To  

call   it   cinematographically   complex   is   almost   an   understatement:   it   is   a  multi-­‐patterned  

work,  and  instantaneity  underscores  its  style.  For  a  film  with  such  frequent  shifts  and  such  

a  mercurial   tone,   a   score   that   followed   in   the   conventional   silent   score   tradition   would  

betray   its   style,   rhythm,   and   form.   Though   the   score   to  Entr’acte  exemplifies   brand   new  

compositional   techniques,   that   is  not   to   say   that   there  were  not   important  precursors   in  

Satie’s  own  compositional  history.  

   

Erik   Satie’s   musique   d’ameublement   exemplifies   the   concept   of   music   as   purely  

“background.”  Satie’s  three  sets  of  pieces  –  titled  “furnishing  music”  though  a  precursor  to  

what  would  come  to  be  called  “ambient  music”  –  are  connected  to  film  music  in  that  they  

serve  the  function  of  “occupying  the  ear.”  However,  this  is  where  the  relationship  between  

the   two   essentially   ends.   Film   music   is   inevitably   more   noticeable,   and   regardless   of  

whether  the  score  was  intended  to  reflect  upon  or  relate  to  the  events  occurring  on  screen,  

the  audience  naturally  seeks  to  correlate  the  two.  The  popularly  held  notion  that  film  music  

is  somehow  an  outgrowth  of  ambient  music  is  not  entirely  accurate.  Satie  intended  for  his  

furnishing  music  to  be  ignored  by  the  audience  to  the  best  of  its  ability.  He  equated  these  

1 The  original  run-­‐time  depends  on  which  account  one  reads,  and  the  most  reliable  version  in  existence  today  is  the  1967  version,  with  a  score  conducted  by  Henri  Sauguet.

18

works  with  “light  and  heat,”  proclaiming  that  it  simply  “creates  a  vibration:  it  has  no  other  

goal,”  and  generates   “comfort   in  all   its   forms”   (Gillmor,  Erik  Satie  and   the  Concept  of   the  

Avant-­‐Garde  1983).  Upon  examination,   this  unobtrusive  music  has  very   little   in   common  

with   the   score   to   Entr’acte.   For   music   intended   to   serve   solely   as   background,  Musique  

d’ameublement   No.   1,   is   rather   disturbing   when   given   significant   attention.   It   is   not   the  

melodic   line,  harmonic  underpinning,  nor  timbral  qualities  themselves  that  admonish  the  

piece  to  the  background  of  the  listener’s  consciousness,  but  rather  the  inherent  repetition  

of   the   same   gestures.   After   numerous   repetitions   of   exactly   the   same   music   with   no  

perceptible  alteration,   the   listener  may  begin   to  assume   that   in   fact   the   composition  will  

remain   static   and   unchanging.   Repetition   breeds   expectation,   and   expectation   breeds  

either  tedium  or  satisfaction,  depending  on  the  perception  of  the  listener.  The  music  ceases  

to   challenge   the   listener’s   negotiation   of   expectation   and   reality,   and   therefore   ceases   to  

hold  his  or  her  active  attention,  becoming  essentially  white  noise:  meditative  and  trance-­‐

inducing.  One  could  argue   that   if   too  much  attention   is  paid   to   such  music   then   it  would  

actually  become  disturbing  rather  than,  as  Satie  described  it,  “comforting.”  In  an  account  of  

the  only  documented  performance  of  Satie’s  Musique  d’ameublement  during  the  composer’s  

lifetime  –  in  the  intermission  of  a  play  by  Max  Jacob  in  1920  –  the  composer  recalled  that  

the   audience   at   first   sat   quietly   and   listened   to   the   music,   not   understanding   Satie’s  

intention.   He   described   this   music   as   that   which   “completes   one’s   property;   it’s   new;   it  

doesn’t  upset  customs;  it  isn’t  tiring;  it’s  French;  it  won’t  wear  out;  it  isn’t  boring”  (Gillmor,  

Erik  Satie  1988,  325).  On  the  invitation  to  the  play’s  performance,  the  composer  and  Darius  

Milhaud  included  a  note  stating  “We  urge  you  to  take  no  notice  of  it  and  to  behave  during  

the   intervals   as   if  it   did   not   exist.   This   music,   specially   composed   for   Max   Jacob’s   play  

claims  to  make  a  contribution  to  life  in  the  same  way  as  a  private  conversation,  a  painting  

in  a  gallery,  or  the  chair  on  which  you  may  or  may  not  be  seated”  (Templier  1932,  42).  

 

René  Clair   recalled   the  premiere  of   the   likewise  experimental  ballet  Relâche,   from  

which  Entr’acte  is  derived.  He  noted  that  the  work  was  received  with  “shivers  and  screams”  

from   the  audience,   satisfying  what  were  Picabia’s   intention   from   the  outset.   “Booing  and  

19

whistles  mixed   together   with   the  melodious   clowning   of   Satie   who,   as   a   connoisseur   of  

noise,   doubtlessly   appreciated   the   background   reinforcement   lent   to   his   music   by   the  

protestors”  (Dale  1986,  23).  In  its  repetition  and  apparent  simplicity,  the  score  to  Entr’acte  

has  much  in  common  with  furnishing  music,  yet  the  experiences  of  each  case  are  markedly  

different.   The   repeated   units   in   Entr'acte   evolve   and   develop   over   the   duration   of   the  

musical  score,  and  are  inherently  tied  to  the  moving  image.  Though  the  music  “furnishes”  

the  film,  it  is  not  meant  to  be  ignored.  

 

Another   experimental   work   of   Satie   that   points   strongly   to   his   compositional  

technique   in  Entr’acte   is  his  Sports  et  divertissements,  dating   from  1923,  around  the  same  

time  that  he  first  began  to  explore  the  collaboration  with  Clair  and  Picabia.  The  composer’s  

preface  describes  the  work,  which  is  made  up  of  a  series  of  short  pieces  for  solo  piano,  each  

accompanied  by  an  image  by  the  artist  Charles  Martin.  

 

This   publication   is  made  up  of   two  artistic   elements:   drawing,  music.  

The  drawing  part  is  represented  by  strokes  –  strokes  of  wit;  the  musical  

part  is  depicted  by  dots  –  black  dots  [i.e.,  blackheads].  These  two  parts  

together  –   in  a   single   volume  –   form  a  whole:   an  album.   I   advise   the  

reader   to   leaf   through   the  pages  of   this  book  with  a  kindly  &   smiling  

finger,   for   it   is   a  work   of   fantasy.  No  more   should   be   read   into   it   (q.  

(Gillmor,   Musico-­‐Poetic   Form   in   Satie's   "Humoristic"   Piano   Suites  

(1913-­‐14)  1987)  .  

 

Figure  1  on  the  facing  page  shows  an  image  of  Satie’s  score  to  the  movement  

“La   comedie   italienne”   from   Sports   et   divertissements.   Charles   Martin’s  

accompanying  illustration  is  shown  as  Figure  2.  

   

20

 

Figure 1 – Erik Satie, Sports et divertissements, La comedie italienne – 1914-1923  

 

 

 

 

   

Figure 2 – Charles Martin, Sports et divertissements – 1914-1923

21

Sports  et  divertissements  was  the  result  of  an  experimental  venture  into  the  realm  of  

image  and  musical  alignment,  yet  clearly  differs  from  film  score  composition.  The  

experience  of  association  for  the  solo  piano  piece  was  intended  for  the  performer  rather  

than  for  the  audience,  as  the  images  were  printed  along  with  the  score.  In  the  act  of  playing  

the  music,  the  performer  associates  the  images  with  their  accompanying  music.  It  is  a  

technique  not  unlike  the  one  experienced  by  the  first  accompanists  to  silent  films,  who  

improvised  music  “in  the  moment”  that  aligned  with  the  moving  images  on  screen.  Satie’s  

venture  into  film  score  composition  is  likewise  presaged  by  his  humorous  1917  

neoclassical  Sonatine  bureaucratique  for  solo  piano  –  a  caricature  of  Clementi’s  Sonatina,  

Op.  31,  No.  1  –  in  which  the  narrative  of  a  bureaucrat’s  typical  day  is  printed  in  the  score  

above  the  notated  music.  Figure  3  on  the  facing  page  shows  an  example  from  the  opening  of  

the  score.  

 

22

Figure 3 – Erik Satie, Sonatine bureaucratíque (1917) – allegro – mm. 1-23  

 

23

Like  the  score  to  a  silent  film  that  exists  only  in  the  mind  of  the  performer,  Satie  establishes  

a  vague  and  humorously  arbitrary  association  of  narrative  and  music,  though  most  of  the  

relationship  is  completely  incidental,  as  can  be  seen  in  the  score.  In  no  way  does  the  

musical  composition  seem  to  correspond  with  the  action  of  the  narrative.  In  some  ways,  

Entr’acte  is  a  synthesis  of  these  two  compositional  methods,  in  that  it  accompanies  both  

images  and,  to  a  certain  extent,  some  semblance  of  a  “narrative.”  The  film  depicts  situations  

–  a  ballet  dancer,  a  chess  game,  a  funeral  procession  –  which  are  narrative  in  their  

descriptive  nature,  but  the  order  of  the  images  in  the  film,  in  a  frenzy  of  juxtaposition,  

defies  narrative  logic.    The  same  technique  would  be  used  in  Un  chien  andalou  and  Le  sang  

d’un  poète:  a  residual  story,  embellished  with  surrealistic  imagery.  

Films  which  generate  their  own  context    

Entr’acte   functioned  as  a  component  of  a   larger  vision  by  Francis  Picabia  and  Erik  

Satie,  the  musical  figure  perhaps  at  the  time  most  closely  aligned  with  the  Dada  movement.  

Even  Satie’s  own  writings  reflect  the  syntactical  games  of  Dadaist  poetry.  The  identities  of  

these   two   figures   are   omnipresent   throughout   both   ballet   and   film.   A   brief   cinematic  

“Projectionette”   to   the   ballet,   shown   before   the   first   and   second   acts,   depicts,   in   slow  

motion,  Picabia  and  Satie  leaping  through  the  air  around  a  cannon,  aimed  at  the  audience,  

shown   at   00:31   in   the   film.   They   fire   the   cannon   at   the   camera,   and,   resultingly,   at   the  

viewer.    This  work,   they  seem  to   imply,   is  meant   to  have   the  explosive   impact  of  a   firing  

shot.   It   will,   in   the   quality   of   its   instantaneity,   strike   the   viewer   like   a   speeding   bullet,  

before  they  have  time  to  react.    

 

Both  Buñuel’s  and  Cocteau’s  films  also  open  with  something  of  a  statement  piece:  a  

representation  of  how  they   intend   for   the  audience   to  approach   the  experience.  Buñuel’s  

film  opens  rather   infamously  with  a  scene   in  which  shots  of  a  moon  being  obscured  by  a  

cloud  are   intercut  with  close-­‐up  shots  of  a  woman’s  eyeball  being  sliced  open  by  a  razor,  

seen  at  1:27.  Buñuel  informs  the  audience  visually  in  this  prelude  –  independent  from  the  

24

rest  of  the  film’s  “plot”  –  that  the  old  ways  of  seeing  are  useless:  one  cannot  rely  on  trusted  

vision   and   expectation   in   comprehending   the   film,   which   inherently   defies   logic.   The  

director  wrote,  regarding  the  film:  “Our  only  rule  was  very  simple:  No  idea  or   image  that  

might  lend  itself  to  a  rational  explanation  of  any  kind  would  be  accepted.  We  had  to  open  

all  doors  to  the  irrational  and  keep  only  those  images  that  surprised  us,  without  trying  to  

explain  why"  (Edwards  2005,  24).  

 

In  a  similarly  cognizant  manner,  Cocteau  opens  Le  sang  d’un  poète  with  a  prologue  

at  1:33,   in  which   the  director   explains   via   cue   cards   the  nature  of   the  poet,   and  his  own  

description  of  how  the  viewer  should  approach  the  film.  It  is  important  to  recall  that  in  the  

film,   Cocteau   casts   himself,   the   filmmaker,   as   the   embodiment   of   the   “poet.”   While   the  

protagonist  of  the  film  is  the  cinematic  embodiment  of  the  poet,  Cocteau  aligns  himself  with  

that   protagonist.   Likewise,   Buñuel   himself   portrays   the   character   who   slices   open   the  

woman’s   eye   at   the   start   of   Un   chien   andalou.   Thus,   in   all   three   films,   the   filmmakers  

themselves  are  present  from  the  outset,  appearing  on  screen  in  some  manner,  whether  in  

person  or  through  their  words,  to  guide  the  viewer’s  experience.    

 

Cocteau’s  title  cards  at  the  opening  of  Le  sang  d’un  poète,  intercut  with  shots  of  a  doorknob  

opening,  which  symbolize  the  opening  of  the  mind,  and  the  opening  of  new  artistic  doors,  

tell  the  viewer:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

Every  poem  is  a  coat  of  arms,    

It  must  be  deciphered.    

 

How   much   blood,   how   many   tears   in   exchange   for   these   muzzles,   these  

unicorns,   these   torches,   these   towers,   these  martlets,   these   seedlings   of   stars  

and  these  fields  of  blue!  

 

Free   to   choose   the   faces,   the   shapes,   the   gestures,   the   acts,   the   places   that  

please  him,   he   composes  with   them  a   realistic   documentary   of   unreal   events.  

The  musician  will  underline  the  noises  and  the  silences.  

 

 The  visual  motif  of  a  pillar  collapsing  –  representing  “smashing  statues,”  or  the  concept  of  

defying   convention   and   abandoning   old   principles   –   both   opens   and   closes   the   film,   and  

functions   as   the   transitional   image   between   episodes,   as   shown   at   2:22.     All   three  

filmmakers  provide  a  contextual  framework  for  their  films.  The  viewer  is  made  aware  from  

the  very  outset  that  they  must  be  prepared  for  a  new  experience.  

 

Cocteau   significantly   heightens   the   role   of   Auric   –  who   gets   second   billing   to   the  

director  in  the  opening  credits  –  by  specifically  calling  the  viewer’s  attention  to  the  music.  

In  the  opening  title  cards,  Cocteau  writes:  “The  musician  (Auric)  will  underline  the  noises  

and   the  silences.”  The  use  of  silence,   revealingly,   is  a  very   important   techique   in   the   film,  

used  to  great  effect  by  the  director.  Cocteau  establishes  a  relationship  between  music  and  

his   film   from  the  outset,   including,   revealingly,   in   the   title  card  of   the   film,   the   first   thing  

shown:  “Le  sang  d’un  poète,  de  Jean  Cocteau,  musique  de  Georges  Auric.”      

 

The  film  is  neoclassical  in  both  its  themes  and  in  its  tone,  and  Cocteau  considered  it  

to   be   a   “poetic   film.”   He   places   significance   on  music   as   a   punctuating   and   commenting  

element  within  the  action  of  the  film:  cinematic  poetry  akin  to  the  music-­‐accompanied  lyric  

poetry  of  Homer.  Le  sang  d’un  poète   is   the   first   in   a   trilogy   that  Cocteau   came   to   call   his  

26

“Orphic   Trilogy,”   and   the   idea   that   a   film   can   function   like   a   poem   with   a   musical  

accompaniment  harkens  back  to  millennia-­‐old  poetic  traditions.    

Entr’acte    

The   very   fact   that   the   cinematic   Entr’acte   occurs   within   the   larger   context   of   a  

musical  work  like  Relâche  naturally  draws  its  music  to  the  fore.  Both  Cocteau  and  Buñuel  

linked  music  and  film  through  recorded  audio,  while  the  music   for  Entr’acte,  by  the  mere  

presence  of  a  live  pit  orchestra  in  the  scene,  takes  on  a  more  prominent  role.  The  film  itself  

was  referred  to  by  its  director  as  a  series  of  “visual  babblings”  (Dale  1986).  The  provocative  

nature  of  Relâche  and  of   its  cinematic  Entr’acte   is  evidenced  by  the  humorous  tone  of  the  

film.  Clair  recalled  Picabia’s  explanation  that  the  film  was  to  be  shown  in  the  middle  of  the  

two  acts  “just  as  they  used  to  do  before  1914  during  the  entr’acte  at  cafe-­‐concerts”  (Clair  

1972).  The  film  has  become  far  more  famous  and  notable  over  time  than  the  ballet  in  which  

is   plays   a   part.   This   ballet,   a   Dadaist   “meeting   of   the   minds”   was   meant   to   shock   and  

astound,  and  Francis  Picabia  –  a  central  figure  in  the  Dada  movement  and  the  creative  mind  

behind  Entr’acte  –  wrote  earnestly  to  Satie  that  “people  will  feel  a  sensation  of  newness  of  

pleasure,   the   sensations   of   forgetting   that   one   has   to   think   and   know   in   order   to   like  

something”   (Dale   1986).   The   title   of   the   theatrical   work   is   itself   a   joke,   as   in   French  

“Relâche”   signifies   the   cancellation   of   a   performance:   in   short,   the   ballet   was   called,   in  

translation,   “No   Show   Tonight.”   Fittingly   enough,   the   first   performance   was   in   fact  

cancelled,  due   to   the   illness  of   Jean  Börlin,   the   choreographer  and   lead  dancer,  who  also  

plays  a  hunter  in  the  film  that  ends  up  murdered  and  in  a  casket.  People  took  the  title,  at  

first,  quite  literally,  thinking  that  the  ballet  itself  was  a  practical  joke,  or  “the  apotheosis  of  

Dada”  (Elder  2013).  

 

  Throughout   the   film,   preposterous   jokes   abound,   and   visual   non-­‐sequiturs  

are   prevalent.   Man   Ray   and   Marcel   Duchamps,   central   artistic   figures   in   the   Dada  

movement,  make  cameos,  playing  a  game  of  chess  at  4:28.  This  is  a  veritable  hodgepodge  of  

27

an  artistic  “who’s  who,”  much  in  the  same  way  that  Parade,  Satie’s  ballet,  was  a  multimedia  

collaboration  of  the  most  significant  figures  in  Parisian  modernism  and  cubism.  

 

The  origins  of  the  film  lie  with  Picabia,  who  casually  jotted  down  its  scenario  on  a  napkin  

that  he  provided  to  René  Clair.  The  scenario  that  he  provided  is  as  follows  (extracted  from  

R.C.  Dale’s  The  Films  of  Rene  Clair,  Volume  I):  

 

 

Francis  Picabia’s  Original  Scenario  to  Entr’acte  

 

Curtain.  

Picabia  and  Satie  load  cannon  in  slow  motion,  shot  should  make  as  much  noise  as  

possible.  Total  time:  1  minute.    

During  the  entr’acte.  

1st.  Boxing  between  white  gloves  on  black  screen:  15  seconds.  

Title  from  explanation:  10  seconds.  

2nd.  Chess  game  between  Duchamp  and  Man  Ray.  Stream  of  water  directed  by  Picabia  

hosing  down  the  game:  30  seconds.  

3rd.  Juggler  and  old  geezer:  time  30  seconds.  

4th.  Hunter  shooting  at  ostrich  egg  on  stream  of  water.  Dove  comes  out  of  egg,  comes  

back  to  perch  on  hunter’s  head,  second  hunter  shooting  at  it,  kills  first  hunter:  

he  falls,  bird  flies  off:  time  1  minute,  title  20  seconds.  

5th.  21  people  on  their  backs  showing  bottoms  of  their  feet.  10  seconds,  manuscript  

title  15  seconds.    

6th.  Ballerina  on  transparent  glass,  cinematographed  from  beneath:  time  1  minute,  

title  5  seconds.    

7th.  Blow  up  balloons  and  rubber  screens,  on  which  faces  and  inscriptions  will  be  

drawn.  Time  35  seconds.    

8th.  A  burial:  hearse  drawn  by  camel,  etc.  Time  6  minutes,  title  1  minute.  

28

 

  René   Clair’s   role   in   the   making   of   the   film,   as   the   man   who   realized   Picabia’s  

scenario  and  vision,  is  no  less  significant.    Clair  does  not  adhere  strictly  to  the  concepts  that  

Picabia   describes,   and   the   film   lacks   Picabia’s   “titles”   that   would   add   an   element   of  

explanation.   Perhaps   the   director   believed   these   titles  might   detract   from   the   ambiguity  

and   instantaneity   of   the   experience   of   the   film.   Though   the   visual  motives   and   the   basic  

structure  of  Entr’acte  are  Picabia’s,  Clair’s  realization  leaves  its  own  significant  mark  on  its  

organization  and  especially  on  its  cinematic  rhythm.  In  assembling  it,  the  director  stated:  

 

I  had  written  out  a  script,  but  I  found  myself  straying  from  it  considerably  as  I  

cut  the  film.  The  film  really  came  together  in  the  cutting  room.  It  was  there  that  

I  was  able   to  get  down   to   the  business   I  was   really   interested   in.   I  wanted   to  

give  it  a  continuity  of  sorts,  but  not  a  continuity  of  story.  I  tried  to  make  things  

grow  from  one  subject  into  another”  (Dale  1986).  

 

This  revealing  statement  demonstrates  that  the  film’s  tone,  pacing,  and  style  have  as  much  

to   do   with   the   art   of   editing   as   with   the   art   of   cinematography.   Likewise,   this  

conceptualization   of   the   film   as   a   continuously   evolving   art  work,  meandering   from   one  

subject  to  another  while  slowly  revealing  some  cross-­‐relationships,  is  significant  and  is  also  

reflected   in  Satie’s  unique   film  music.  Clair   freed   the  camera   from   its  stationary  position,  

and  utilized  the  arts  of  cinematography  and  editing  to  completely  upend  the  viewer’s  visual  

interpretation   of   the   film.   His   unprecedented   and   experimental   use   of   the   camera  

demonstrated   the   multitudinous   possibilities   in   the   new   cinematic   art   form.  

Superimposition,  layering,  jump-­‐cuts,  and  rapid  editing  all  captured  motion  in  a  new  way.  

Just   like   Parade   demonstrated   all   that   could   be   done   in   ballet,   and   Relâche   calls   into  

question  nearly  every  convention  of  the  genre,  Entr’acte  showcases  all  that  could  be  done  

with  the  camera  and  in  the  editing  room.    

 

29

As   the   film   progresses,   the   viewer   is   subjected   to   Clair’s   frequent   shifts   in   the  

rhythm  of  editing.  In  the  latter  part  of  the  film,  non-­‐sequitur  jump  cutting  is  used  far   less  

frequently:   the   rhythm   of   editing   slows   at   the   beginning   of   the   chase   scenario,   but   then  

steadily   accelerates   to   the   end,   becoming   uncontrollably   fast   to   the   point   of   inducing  

disorientation.   Though   the   editing   speed   quickens   to   the   end   and   becomes   disjoint,   the  

actual   relationship   of   the   images   becomes  more   logical.   In   this   sense,   there   is   a   greater  

sense   of   unity   reflected   in   the   rhythmic   and   structural   cohesiveness   that   emerges   in   the  

latter  part  of  Satie’s  score.  Clair  scholar  R.C.  Dale  observes  that  “the  second  half  of  the  film  

abandons   the   collision-­‐cutting   principles   observed   in   the   first   part.   Now   the   visual  

absurdities,  where  they  occur,  appear  within  the  shot  rather  than  by  contiguity,  or  between  

the   shots   (Dale   1986).   Satie’s   music   underlines   this   continuity   by   reserving   the   longest  

continuous  stretches  of  mostly  consistent  musical  ideas  for  the  latter  parts  of  the  film.  

 

One  disruption  of  the  viewer’s  linear  and  logical  understanding  of  time  occurs  in  the  

transition  from  the  episode  of  the  hunter  to  the  funeral  march  scene,  at  9:23.  The  viewer  

glimpses,  in  a  brief  shot,  the  funeral  hearse  before  the  shooting  of  one  hunter  by  the  other,  

seeing   the   result   prior   to   seeing   the   cause.   Such   visual   jokes   abound   in   the   film,  which,  

above  all,  was  meant  to  encourage  laughter.  Picabia  himself  conceptualized  cinema  as  “an  

evocative  invention,  as  rapid  as  the  thought  of  our  brain.”  (M.  Marks  1983).  Thus,  there  is  

instantaneousness  both  in  the  film’s  intent  and  in  the  viewer’s  response  to  it.  Relâche  was,  

in  fact,  billed  as  an  Instantaneist  Ballet:  the  rapid  changes  of  its  imagery  and  scenes  are,  by  

their  very  nature,  unpredictable,  with  Satie’s  film  score  underlining  these  changes.  

 

The  conception  of  music’s  role  in  the  total  experience  the  ballet  Parade  foreshadows  

the   ideas   that  would   come   to   form   the   central   techniques   of   early   film   scoring.   Cocteau  

wrote  on  the  first  page  of  Satie's  handwritten  score  to  that  work:  "The  music  for  Parade  is  

not  presented  as  a  work   in   itself  but   is  designed   to   serve  as  a  background   for  placing   in  

relief  the  primary  subject  of  sounds  and  scenic  noises”  (Doyle  2005).  The  inclusion  of  the  

spoken  word   in  the   form  of  carnival  barkers,  as  well  as   the  added  sounds  of   typewriters,  

30

gunshots,  milk  bottles,  and  foghorns,  in  effect  draw  the  sounds  of  the  outside  world  into  the  

theater.  Rather   than  utilizing   the  ballet   theatre  as  a  means  of  disconnecting   from  reality,  

Cocteau   sought   to   knit   the   production   into   the   audience's   experience   of   reality.   It   is   a  

manifestation   of   diegetic   music,   wherein   the   characters   in   the   production   are,   by  

implication,   often   hearing   the  music   just   as   the   audience   is.   The  mixture   of   diegesis   and  

non-­‐diegetic   music   would   come   to   play   a   significant   role   in   silent   and   early   sound   film  

music,  as  sound  effects  became  intertwined  with  the  scores  themselves.  

 

31

Chapter  2:  Timbre,  Orchestration,  and  Harmony      

Satie’s  Musical  Aesthetic  and  its  Effect  in  Entr’acte    

It  is  fitting  that  Erik  Satie  would  compose  the  score  to  Entr’acte,  a  film  that  fits  his  

own   artistic   personality,   and   the   aesthetic   that   would   come   to   be   heralded   as   the  

signature  style  of  Les  Six.  This  style,  imbued  with  ironic  detachment  and  a  stripped-­‐down  

aesthetic,  lends  itself  well  to  film  score  composition  in  its  very  unobtrusiveness.  Cocteau,  

a   champion   of  Les  Six,  wrote   of   Satie,   in   his   infamous  manifesto   on  music  Le  coq  et   le  

harlequin.  In  the  text,  he  made  the  following  three  consecutive  observations:  

 

• Satie   is   the  opposite   of   an   improviser.  His  works  might  be   said   to  have  been  completed  beforehand,  while  he  meticulously  unpicks  them,  note  by  note.    

• Satie  teaches  what,  in  our  age,  is  the  greatest  audacity,  simplicity.    • Has   he   not   proved   that   he   could   refine   better   than   any   one?   But   he   clears,  simplifies,   and   strips   rhythm   naked   (Cocteau,   Le   coq   et   le   harlequin:   notes  

concerning  music  1921).  

 

    Although  the  orchestral  score  to  Entr’acte,  the  composer’s  final  composition,  is  large  

by  Satie’s  standards  both  in  terms  of  length  as  well  as  in  instrumentation,  the  full  forces  of  

his  ensemble  are  rarely  deployed  all  at  once,  saving  a  full   tutti   for  only  the  very  end.  The  

leanness  of  his  composition,   rendered  as  such  by  detached  articulations  and  a   frequently  

homorhythmic   construction,   gives   a   sense   of   clarity   to   the   music   that   underlines   the  

subtleties   of   instrumental   shifts   that   occur   as   the   film   progresses.   The   score   exists   in  

several  versions.  It  was  conceived  first  for  a  small  pit  orchestra,  consisting  of  a  single  flute,  

oboe,   clarinet,   bassoon,   two   horns,   two   trumpets,   a   single   trombone,   and   a   small  

compendium   of   strings   and   percussion   (M.   Marks   1983).   Darius   Milhaud   produced   a  

reduction  for  four-­‐hand  piano  in  the  same  year,  and  a  two-­‐hand  reduction  came  later,  first  

32

published   in   1926   (Satie   and   Milhaud   1926).   The   cabaret   aesthetic   of   Satie’s  

instrumentation   is   in   line  with  the   jazz-­‐hall  sound  world  to  which  those   in  Satie’s  artistic  

circle  often  looked  for  musical  inspiration.  It  is  far  removed  from  the  lush  “Wagnerian”  film  

scores   often   associated   with   narrative   film,   and   is   distant   even   from   the   large-­‐scale  

orchestral  scores  of  such  early  examples  as  Breil’s  music  for  The  Birth  of  a  Nation  in  1915.    

Satie’s   rhythms   and   starkly   juxtaposed   harmonic   shifts   reflect   the   angularity   and   visual  

juxtaposition  of  the  film.    

 

One   need   only   look   to   2:19   at   the   very   opening   of   the   film,   in   which   images   of  

rooftops  are  distorted  and   turned  about,   seen  at   various  angles,   in  order   to   find  a  visual  

manifestation  of  this  stark  angularity.  Similarly,  the  concept  of  moving  in  and  out  of  focus    –

as  in  the  brief  glimpse  of  traffic  at  night  in  a  square  at  3:27  –  is  another  visual  motif  in  the  

film  reflected  in  Satie’s  shifting  patterns.  The  music  imitates  this  angularity  in  almost  cubist  

fashion.   Parade   from   almost   decade   earlier,   not   coincidentally,   was   billed   as   a   “cubist”  

ballet  (Doyle  2005).  

 

The   timbre   of   the   Entr’acte   score   is   often   lean,   metallic,   and   strident.   René   Clair  

recalled   the  premiere  of   the  ballet,  writing   that   in   the  opening  moments  of   the   “cinema,”  

the  conductor  Roger  Desormiere,  “seemed  both  to  conduct  the  orchestra  and  to  unleash  a  

burlesque  hurricane  from  his   imperious  baton”  (Dale  1986,  31).  The  shrill  opening  of  the  

score,  beginning  at  2:19,   is  underpinned  by  “oompah”  rhythmic  ostinati  between  the  bass  

drum  and  cymbals.  The  effect  is  striking  to  say  the  least,  and  comes  off,  in  this  “burlesque”  

style,   as   even   vulgar.   Satie   effectively   underlines   the   provocative   nature   of   the   film   by  

calling  to  mind  the  burlesque  show  even  in  the  timbre  of  the  orchestra,  and  the  composer  

once   referred   to   the   film   as   “pornographic”   (M.  M.  Marks   1997).   Not   coincidentally,   this  

strident   opening   cue   of   eight   bars   will   become   the   structural   motto   that   comes   to  

punctuate  moments  throughout  the  whole  film,  signifying  important  moments  and  tableau  

changes.    

 

33

 

This  brief  cue  functions  as  the  ritornello  in  Satie’s  cinematic  rondo  form.  The  motto  

is   immediately   attention-­‐grabbing,   and   defies   the   notion   of  music   as   background.   Upper  

winds  screech  against   the  static  bass   line.  Due  to   its   imminent  noticeability  –  made  more  

pronounced  through  Satie’s   incessant  repetition  of   the  motto  –   it   is  an   ideal  way  to  open  

and  close  sections  of  the  film,  and  to  serve  as  a  punctuating  point.  This  music  simply  cannot  

be  ignored  by  the  viewer,  straying  far  from  the  concept  of  film  scores  as  wallpaper.  What’s  

more,   Satie   imparts   a   great   deal   of   tension   from   the   beginning   of   the   score,   in   that   the  

Figure 4 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 1-8 (Unit 1)

34

upper  voice   and  bass  hover   around   the  key  of  A  major,   yet  never   conclusively   state   that  

key.  Quintal  harmony  on  the  downbeat  of  the  first  measure,  in  which  the  tones  B,  F#,  and  

C#  are   stacked  over   an  E   in   the  bass,   seem  have   a   vaguely  dominant   function,   yet  never  

properly   resolve.   Instead,   Satie   prolongs   this   irresolution,   undermining   F#   minor   as   a  

possible  key.  Meanwhile,  the  bass  line  outlines  an  A  major  arpeggio,  through  E  -­‐  C#  -­‐  A,  but  

the  upper  voices  never  follow  suit.  This  technique,  evocative  of  some  of  Stravinsky’s  music  

in  Petrouschka,  sets  the  tone  for  the  entire  film,  embodying  in  one  cue  elements  that  recur  

throughout  the  rest  of  the  score:  an  undulating  melodic  contour;  a  wide-­‐spread  range,  with  

the  majority  of  the  timbral  weight  on  the  upper  end  thereby  amplifying  the  stridency  of  the  

top-­‐heavy   score;   a   transparent   and   lean   bass   orchestration;   and   a   repeated   rhythmic  

ostinato.  Even  in  this  one  musical   fragment,   the  recurring  musical  theme  of  simultaneous  

motion  and  stasis  emerges.  The  descending  bass  line  helps  to  establish  the  overall  A  major  

tonality   of   the  motto.   However,   from   there,   the   bass   is   completely   stuck   on   the   pitch   A,  

stepping  down  through  G-­‐sharp  and  F-­‐sharp,  but  never  again  arriving  on  E:  the  root  of  the  

dominant   harmony   implied   by   the   upper   voices.   There   is   a   sense   of   great   discomfort  

generated   by   this   ambiguous   music.   Satie   substitutes   instability   for   stability,   and   it   is  

appropriately  ironic  that  the  motto  to  which  the  entire  score  will  return  as  a  point  of  stasis  

and  arrival  is  itself  incredibly  unstable.  

 

Incessant  repetition  emerges  early  on  in  the  score.  An  initially  active  bass  line  seems  

to   exhaust   the   ability   to  move   on,   often   drawn   by   some   gravity   back   to  where   it   began.  

Likewise,   the   top   voice   sits   jarringly   on   the   second   scale   degree,   adding   a   great   deal   of  

tension  to  the  cue.  The  scoring,  spacing,  pitch  content  all  teeter  on  the  edge  of  comfort,  and  

if   it  were  not   for  the  accompanying   imagery,   the  score  might  surely   irritate  the  audience.  

This   is   music   that   at   first   screams   for   attention,   and   then,   by   virtue   of   repetition,   slips  

somewhat  into  the  background.  

 

By  way  of   instrumentation,   the  score  to  Relâche  and  to  the  cinéma   is   fairly  sparse,  

calling   for   fewer   forces  even   than  some  preceding  works,   such  as  Parade  (1917),  Socrate  

35

(1920).   The   decision   to   score   the   work   for   such   a   small   ensemble   of   musicians   seems  

deliberate  and  artistically  motivated  in  this  case.  As  Satie  scholar  Robert  Orledge  describes  

it,    

 

The  orchestra  is  even  smaller,  and  the  continually  mixed  ‘cabaret’  scoring  more  

restrained.   The   percussion   accentuation   is   sparing,   with   the   tarolle   and  

cymbals  only  being  employed   for   ten  bars   in   the   final  number.   Indeed,  Satie’s  

judicious   selection   of   instruments   is   such   that   the   whole   band   never   plays  

together   –   there   are   no   timpani,   percussion   or   oboe   in   the   final   bars,   for  

instance.   Favorite   devices,   such   as   doubling   the   first   violins   and   cellos   in  

octaves,   or   blending   the   clarinets   with   the   violas   and   the   bassoons   with   the  

double-­‐basses,  still  persist,  but  there  is  very  little  unison  doubling,  and  no  string  

double  stopping  for  extra  sonority.  The  orchestra  is  used  to  reflect  the  form,  in  

that   the   many   recurring   passages   have   the   same   scoring,   and   the   use   of  

orchestral  contrast  between  phrases  is  more  noticeable  (Orledge  1990).  

 

The  shifts   in   instrumentation  and   timbre   to  which  Orledge  refers  are   just  some  of  

the   many   parameters   in   which   Satie’s   score   embodies   the   principle   of   continuity   and  

discontinuity  at  play.  Though  some  elements,   such  as   rhythmic  units,  may  be  held  equal,  

the  shifting  sonority  creates,   like   the  distortion  of  a   lens,  a  new  way  of  hearing   the  same  

passage  of  music.    One  instance  of  this  occurring  in  the  film  visually  takes  place  at  5:43  in  

the   ballet   scene   (Satie’s   Cue   IV),   when   the   dancer   is   filmed,   to   use   Satie’s   description,  

“pornographically”  from  below.  She  is  then  filmed  in  darkened  silhouette,  as  well  as  from  

the   front.   This  manifests   seeing   the   same   image   from  multiple   angles   and   from  multiple  

vantages.  Likewise,  Clair  films  a  traffic  circle  in  a  street  scene,  at  3:31,  both  during  the  day  

and  at  night.  Satie’s  music  shifts  enhance  these  visual  shifts,  and  the  theme  of  “the  same  yet  

different”  arises.  As  Martin  Marks  notes  in  his  exhaustive  analysis  of  the  film  score  and  its  

original  orchestration,   “Entr’acte   is  scored   for   flute,  oboe,  clarinet   in  A,  and  bassoon;   two  

horns  in  F,  two  trumpets,  and  one  trombone;  strings;  and  a  percussive  battery  that  includes  

36

snare  drum,  cymbals,  wood  block,  bass  drum,  a  gong,  triangle,  and  tambourine.  Only  in  the  

last   twelve  measures   do   all   members   of   the   orchestra   play   together.”   (M.   Marks   1983).  

Satie’s  score  is  akin  to  chamber  music  in  that  pairs  and  groups  are  often  juxtaposed  against  

one   another.   There   is   also   a   practical   purpose   for   this   technique:   in   a   score   of   almost  

continuous  music  for  over  seventeen  minutes,  the  musicians  will  need  to  rest.      

The   “cabaret”   timbre   of   the   score   lends   a   unique   sonority   to   Satie’s   music   that  

provides  it,  even  in  its  heaviest  moments,  with  a  sense  of  levity  and  buoyancy.  The  leanness  

of   the   score   provides   it   with   a   sonorous   transparency   that   allows   for   Satie’s   shifting  

instrumentation   to  project  more   clearly,   as   in   the   transition   from  Unit  Number  9   to  Unit  

Number  10,  beginning  at  3:28  in  the  film.    

 

Figure 5– Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 53-60 (Units 9,10)

 

The  same  pattern  and  intervallic  arch  –  an  ascent  and  descent  of  a  fifth,  followed  by  

the   same  pattern   repeated  up  one  whole   step  –   repeats,   transposed   from  A  major   to   the  

new  key  of  F  major,  with  no  harmonic  preparation.  Satie   first  presents   the  pattern   in  the  

strings,  and  then  repeats  it  in  the  woodwinds.  The  change  in  color  between  the  two  musical  

units   is   achieved  by  Satie’s   clear  delineation  between   instrumental  groups.  There   is  very  

little  of  the  lush,  blended  orchestral  color  of  many  scores,  particularly  the  stereotypical  film  

37

score   sound.   Rather,   the   segregation   of   the   pit   orchestra   into   groups   of   instruments  

provides   the   composer  with   the  means   by  which   to   achieve   contrast   through   otherwise  

very   similar  musical  material.   The   cues   share   a   great  many  musical   attributes:   rhythmic  

similarity,  contour,  and  intervallic  components.  By  shifting  elements  of  timbre  in  and  out  of  

focus,  the  composer  is  able  to  alter  some  while  keeping  others  the  same,  providing  a  thread  

of   commonality   to   the   entire   score,   which   unfolds   like   an   interrelating   patchwork   of  

patterns.  

 

Meanwhile,   Satie’s   use   of   a   pit   orchestra   calls   to   mind,   particularly   for   Satie’s  

audience,   the  familiar  notion  of  a   jazz  hall  orchestra.  Satie  spent  time  as  a  pianist   in  such  

cabarets,  most  famously  in  Le  chat  noir  in  Paris,  in  which  he  played  from  1888  to  1891,  long  

before  the  composition  of  the  cinema     (Doyle  2005).  This  part  of  his  history  possibly  also  

contributed   to   his   interest   in   “background   music.”   In   its   populist   connotations,   the  

instrumentation  of  Entr’acte  signifies  a  sense  of  levity  and  lighthearted  entertainment.    

 

This  notion  of  buoyancy  in  music   is  matched  by  the  constantly  shifting  patterns  in  

the   musical   units,   which   bounce   off   one   another,   often   with   little   “logical”   harmonic  

connective  tissue.  One  instance  of  such  buyancy  is  in  the  Hunter  Scene  (Satie’s  Cue  Number  

V).   If  one  traces  the  harmonic  trajectory  of  the  Units  of  this  section,  Numbers  24  through  

27,  Satie  clearly  emphasizes  A  major,  signified  by  the  opening  and  closing  motto,  at  7:37.  

However,  in  the  interim  between  these  two  “bookends”  of  the  motto,  the  composer’s  cues  

meander   to   C   major,   to   F   major,   and   back   to   A   major,   accompanied   by   a   shifts   in  

orchestration.  When  juxtaposed  against  one  another,  the  motion  between  these  keys  ceases  

to   sound   like   a   tonal   progression   of   any   sort.   Rather,   Satie   merely   juxtaposes   them   for  

contrast.   Particularly   in   the   first   part   of   the   film,  which   is   by   far   the  most   non-­‐linear   in  

construction,  Picabia  and  Clair  reflect  a  state  of  levity  and  suspension  with  a  visual  motif  of  

bouncing  or  floating  objects,  as  in  the  water  balloon  elevated  by  a  jet  of  water,  the  ballerina  

suspended   in   air,   and   the   leaps   of   the   funeral  mourners   in   procession   at   10:45.  A  water  

motif  recurs  throughout  the  film,  often  as  a  non-­‐sequitur,  with  no  logical  function  except  to  

38

remind  the  viewer  of  the  fluid  nature  of  the  film,  and  of  the  fluidity  of  logic  and  the  human  

thought  process.  The  recurring  image  of  a  paper  boat  floating  not  on  water  but  in  the  air,  

superimposed  onto  rooftops,   is  among  the  most  striking  images  in  the  film.  It   is  a  vehicle  

taken  out  of  its  proper  context,  floating  in  the  realm  of  the  unbelievable  and  the  ridiculous.    

 

The  film  itself  is  not  “heavy”  in  tone.  Picabia  famously  wrote,  around  the  time  of  the  

premiere,   that   it   “respects   nothing   but   the   right   to   laugh   hysterically,”   a   sentiment  well  

aligned  with  Dadaist  philosophy  (Dale  1986).  When,  in  the  final  portion  of  the  scene,  Börlin  

is  shot  by  another  hunter  –  played  by  Picabia  himself  –  and  ends  up  in  a  funereal  coffin,  the  

filmmakers  establish  a  symbolic  “deflation,”   foreshadowed  by  deflating  balloons   from  the  

opening  part  of  the  film.  Death  and  burial  in  the  ground  signify  the  ultimate  acceptance  of  

gravity.  However,  the  filmmakers  get  the  last  laugh,  as  rather  than  the  actual  burial  taking  

place,   Picabia,  with   the  wave   of   a  magic  wand,   causes   both   the   corpse   of   Börlin   and   the  

parade  of  mourners  to  evaporate  into  thin  air.  Levity  and  buoyancy  triumph  over  gravity,  

logic,  and  to  some  extent,  reality.    

 

At  Satie’s  Cue   IV   –   the   tableau  of   the  Ballerina,  beginning  at  5:25   in   the   film  –   the  

orchestration  suddenly  and  jarringly  changes  color,  shifting  away  from  the  strident  “wind  

band”  sonority  of  the  previous  material  to  a  far  more  soft  and  delicate  orchestration,  with  

more   textural   density   in   the   string   section   than   in   the   winds.   The   wind   instruments   -­‐  

clarinet,  flute,  English  horn  –  are  used  in  solos,  or  in  small  groups,  rather  than  in  a  unified  

timbre.  Satie  thereby  imparts  grace  to  this  music  that  matches  the  aesthetic  beauty  of  the  

ballet   dancer.   As   the   scene   is   mostly   consistent   in   its   visual   subject,   meaning   that   the  

viewer  is  only  asked  to  focus  on  one  topic  –  the  dancer  –  for  an  extended  period  of  time,  the  

consistency   of   orchestration   in   the   scene   helps   to   isolate   it   as   a   singular   tableau.   This  

relates  to  the  formal  underpinning  of  the  film,  wherein  the  rhythm  of  editing  slows,  and  the  

narrative  becomes  more  cohesive  towards  the  center  of  the  film.  There  is  a  greater  sense  of  

timbral  unity  at  this  point  in  the  film  that  was  hitherto  missing.  

 

39

  Satie  cleverly  employs  the  principle  of  orchestral  reinforcement,  almost  in  the  vein  

of   a   Rossini   crescendo,   towards   the   end   of   the   film,   in   which   the   funeral   hearse,   led  

inexplicably   by   a   camel,   comes   loose   from   the   reigns   of   the   procession   and   rolls   off  

downhill.   It   is  a   chaotic,  uncontrolled  moment   in   the   film,  and   the  growing  orchestration  

carefully  underpins  this.    

 

Undulation    

Among   the  most   significant  and  recognizable  musical  motifs   in  Satie’s   score   is   the  

recurring  use  of  undulation  between  pitches.  Back  and  forth  steps  by  the  interval  of  major  

and  minor   second   can  be   found   in  nearly   any  moment   in   Satie’s   score,   from   the   angular  

chords  of  the  opening  motive  to  the  delicate,  unobtrusive  background  texture  in  the  strings  

in  unit  5.    This  back  and  forth  motion  reflects  to  a  certain  extent  the  mechanical  nature  of  

film   itself.  Especially   in   the  period   from  1924-­‐1930,   film  technology   in   its  most  primitive  

form   was   very   obviously   machine-­‐driven,   relying   on   moving   parts   in   order   to   function.  

Satie’s   undulating   pitch   content   invokes   the   very   idea   mechanism;   repetition   and  

undulation   are   therefore   not   only   justifiable,   but   essential,   to   this   invocation.   One   need  

merely   glance   at   any   page   of  Milhaud’s   four-­‐hand   piano   reduction   of   the  Cinéma   to   see,  

even   in   the   visual   layout   of   the   notes   on   the   page,   the   overwhelming   presence   of  

undulation,  which  the  musicologist  Bruno  Nettl  defines  as  one  of  the  basic  melodic  contour  

archetypes   of   any  musical   idiom   (Nettl   2011).  When   the   endless   back   and   forth   parallel  

motion   of   pitches   becomes   such   a   pervasively   repetitive   idea,   the   listener   is   naturally  

drawn   away   from   linear   harmonic   progression,   and   loses   their   sense   of   melody   as   the  

guiding  force  in  the  experience.  Satie’s  exploitation  of  this  melodic  contour  is  in  many  ways  

defiantly   non-­‐Western.   Robert   Orledge   notes   that   even   in   his   early  Gnossiennes   for   solo  

piano,   the   composer   incorporated   the   “hypnotic   effects   of   repetition   from   the   Javanese  

Gamelan”   (Orledge   1990).   As   in   gamelan,   which   the   composer   encountered   at   the   Paris  

Exhibition  of  1889,  the  score  to  Entr’acte  relies  upon  texture,  repetition,  and  rhythm  as  the  

guiding  forces,  as  opposed  to  melody  and  harmony.  

40

 

Particularly   in   the  2/4  metered  units   in   the   first  part  of   the   film,  and   in   the  duple  

meter  units  of  the  chase  scene  at  the  end  –  a  relationship  which  exhibits  metrical  mirroring  

across   the   large   scale   form   –  undulation   is   essential   in   hypnotizing   the   viewer   as   they  

encounter   the   film’s   rapidly   edited   string   of   images.  Only   film   music   can   speak   in   this  

language  without   sinking   into   tedium,  and   it   relies  on   the   film   itself   to   justify   its  musical  

language.  

 

In  the  chase  scene,  beginning  at  14:55,  undulation,  now  in  the  accompanying  string  

texture,   becomes   an   almost   obsessive   feature   of   the   music,   and   takes   to   the   extreme   a  

source   of   tension   that   is   present   even   at   the   very   beginning   of   the   work.   What   once  

represented  stasis  at  this  point  in  the  film  and  score  is  exploited  to  represent  motion,  like  

the  left  and  right  footsteps  and  hoof  steps  of  the  people  and  horses  in  pursuit  of  the  funeral  

casket.  This  push  and  pull  relationship  of  motion  and  stasis  likewise  emerges  the  harmonic  

rhythm   of   the   score,  which   in   its   alternation   of   key   areas   imitates   on   a   larger   plane   the  

effect   of   simultaneously  moving   and  yet   somehow  going  nowhere.  These  musical   figures  

relate  to  the  images  of  people  running  in  slow  motion,  of  traffic  going  nowhere  in  a  town  

square,  or  of  a  roller  coaster  at  Luna  Park,  which  becomes  a  visual  motif  at  the  end  of  the  

film,  at  16:55.  They  are  visual  manifestations  of  the  absurd,  illogical  notion  of  static  motion.  

Roller  coasters  move  quickly,  ascend  and  descend,  take  many  unexpected  turns,  but  always  

end  up  back  where  they  started.  Satie’s  music  embodies  this  very  concept.  

 

As   a   subtle   narrative   underpinning   of   this   moment,   the   idea   of   increasing  

instrumental  forces  reflects  the  increasing  number  of  people  attempting  to  regain  control  

of  the  runaway  hearse.  In  a  playful  gesture,  the  director  splices  in  shots  of  moving  vehicles  

–  horses,  airplanes,  and  rollercoasters  –  as  if  to  imply  that  a  much  larger  group  of  people  is  

involved   in   this   frenzied   chase.  As   the  ensemble   forces   increases,   so   too  does   the   cast  of  

characters  on  screen.  Satie  matches  this  increasing  intensity  with  the  rhythmic  acceleration  

of  the  music,  simultaneously  temporal  and  harmonic.    

41

 

Orchestration  and  Timbre  in  Auric’s  Score  to  Le  sang  d’un  poète      

The   cabaret   aesthetic   endures   in   the   compositional   technique   and   style   of   one   of  

Satie’s   followers:  George  Auric.  Though   the  component   instruments  of   the  ensemble  may  

be  similar,  Auric’s  use  of  his  pit  orchestra  ensemble  is  far  different.  Whereas  Satie’s  score  is  

a   continuous   orchestral  work,   intended   for   performance   live   alongside   a   showing   of   the  

film,  Auric’s  orchestra  is  unseen  and  deliberately  ambiguous.  Each  cue,  composed  with  its  

own   unique   instrumental   configuration,   has   an   independent   sound,   and   there   is   no  

indication  to  the  film’s  viewers  of  the  constituency  of  the  full  ensemble.    With  Auric’s  score,  

one   senses   the   phantom-­‐like   presence   of   film  music   as   it  would   remain   from   then   on   in  

cinematic  history.  Pre-­‐recorded  sound  separates  the  viewer  from  the  orchestra,  creating  an  

air  of  surrounding  mystery.  

 

The  opening  cue  to  Auric’s  film,  over  the  title  cards,  encapsulates  a  variety  of  styles,  

moods,  and  senses  in  just  a  few  seconds  of  music.  Entr’acte,  in  its  original  inception,  did  not  

include  a  title  card,  and  Un  chien  andalou  begins  with  a  visual  prologue.  However,  Cocteau’s  

film   begins   with   a   series   of   title   cards   and   credits,   and   Auric’s   music   functions   as   an  

overture.  At  00:22,  there  is  nothing  to  see  apart  from  credits,  and  only  music  to  set  the  tone  

for  the  film  that  will  follow.  Auric  juxtaposes  a  triumphant  fanfare  in  the  brass  with  a  jovial  

gigue-­‐like   compound  meter   rhythm   that   adds   an   element   of   the   dance.   Into   this,   he   also  

intersperses   the  nervous  pulsation  of  a   trumpet  melody   that  alternates  between  D  major  

and  minor,  adding  an  degree  of  tension  to  this  otherwise  celebratory  music.  Just  following  

this  first  cue,  at  0:54,  the  music  shifts  to  a  new  cue  with  a  melancholic  and  pastoral  theme  

in  the  winds,  beginning  with  a  soliloquy  in  the  solo  flute.  Two  very  distinct  timbral  worlds  

are   juxtaposed   against   one   another   in   stark   contrast.   This   pastoral   cue   continues   as   the  

first  image  appears  on  screen:  that  of  Cocteau  in  contemporary  attire  on  a  film  set,  masked  

with  an  ancient  Greek   facial  covering  and  a  Hellenic   tunic.  When  the   first   image  appears,  

therefore,  the  viewer  is  already  presented  with  a  major  visual  theme  of  the  film:  a  sense  of  

42

implacable   time,   matched   by   the   neoclassical   elements   of   Auric’s   music.   The   ironic  

juxtaposition  of  the  classically-­‐informed  fanfare  and  gigue  motives  against  the  parameters  

of  modern  cabaret  scoring  and  the  shadings  of  jazz  in  the  “blue-­‐note”  contrast  of  D  minor  

and  major,  are  apropos  to  this  visual  juxtaposition.  What’s  more,  by  the  unique  scoring  of  

each   cue,   Auric   disassociates   each   any   sense   of   attachment   to   reality   and   reason.   As  

exemplified   by   this   juxtaposition   in   the   opening   minute   in   the   film,   there   is   never   an  

indication  of  what  orchestration  might  follow  the  one  heard  in  the  present  moment,  and  so  

one  is  unable  to  guess  at  what  may  come.  As  Cocteau  claims  was  one  of  his  purposes  with  

the  film,  it  induces  a  dream-­‐like  sense  of  detachment  from  reality.  

 

At   times,   Auric’s   choice   of   instrumentation   and   incorporation   of   sound   effects   is  

deliberately  unconventional  and  symbolic  of  the  events  taking  place  on  screen.  Among  the  

most  profound  of  these  moments  is  in  the  fourth  and  final  episode,  in  the  card  game  scene,  

in   which   the   angel   of   death   descends   upon   the   characters   in   the   courtyard   in   order   to  

transport  the  spirit  of  the  poet,  embodied  in  the  dead  corpse  of  the  child  lying  in  the  snow,  

to   the   spiritual  world.   To   underscore   this  moment,   at   39:10,   Auric   uses   no   conventional  

instrument,  but  rather  the  sound  of  a  wine  glass.  The  ethereal,  otherworldly  timbre  seems  

to  come,   like  the  angel,   from  somewhere  far  removed  from  the  physical  world.  Later   film  

composers   would   use   the   Theremin   to   evoke   alien   life   or   the   supernatural.   The  

discomforting  juxtaposition  of  this  sound  with  the  melancholic  cue  that  follows,  scored  at  

first  in  two  trumpets,  and  afterwards  introducing  more  instruments,  effectively  juxtaposes  

the  worlds  of  the  metaphysical  and  the  physical.  This  is  made  more  discomforting  when,  at  

40:39,   the   sound   of   an   engine   overtakes   the  musical   texture.   To   call   this   diegesis   is   not  

accurate.  There  is  physical  mechanism  on  screen  that  generates  this  sound.  It  is  grating  and  

pure   noise.  Meanwhile,   Cocteau’s   camera   cuts   to   shots   of   an   audience   looking   upon   the  

scene  apparently  unaffected.  Cocteau’s  point  is  clear:  the  soul  of  the  artist  is  dead,  and  the  

audience  does  not  notice.  The  use  of  mechanical  noise  enhances  this  discomfort.  When  the  

noise  recedes,  at  41:34,  the  melancholic  cue  returns,  unaffected.  The  angel  takes  the  Ace  of  

Hearts   from   the  hand  of   the  man  playing   in   the   card  game,   a  moment  underscored  once  

43

again,  at  42:30,  by  the  ethereal  sound  of  a  wine  glass  that  plays  as  the  angel  ascends  once  

again  to  the  spiritual  world.  The  juxtaposition  of  these  timbres  is  a  powerful  effect.  Music  

disappears  entirely  at  43:10,  when  the  male  card  player  realizes  that  he  will  lose  the  game  

without   the   Ace   of   Hearts,   and   commits   suicide.   This   moment   is   underscored   by   the  

diegetic  sound  of  his  own  beating  heart:  the  auditory  manifestation  of  life  itself.  When  the  

man  finally  commits  suicide,  his  heart  stops  beating,  but  no  sound  of  a  gunshot  is  audible.  

Cocteau’s  sensitive  employment  of  recorded  sound  creates  a  disassociation  for  the  viewer.  

This  situation  is  clearly  not  realistic,  for  the  logical  sounds  of  the  real  world,  like  the  firing  

of  a  gun,  are  absent.  However,  the  presence  of  the  diegetic  sound  of  the  heartbeat  provides  

some   link   between   this   and   the  physical  world.   The   recorded  heartbeat   used   in   place   of  

music  relates  to  the  use  of  the  recorded  sound  of  breathing  used  elsewhere  in  the  film:  in  

preceding  episode   two,   in  which   the  poet   is   struggling   through   the  hallways  of   the  Hôtel  

des  Folies-­‐dramatiques,  at  26:20.    

 

In   the   closing   scene   whereupon   the   angel   descends   upon   the   scene,   the   careful  

mixture  of  music,   noise,   ethereal   and  diegesis   all   come   together   to  place   the   viewer   in   a  

realm  of  experience  hovering  somewhere  between  dream  and  reality.  The  fact  that  music  

and   sound   do   not   occur   simultaneously,   but   rather   in   juxtaposition,   is   crucial   to   this  

experience,   as   music   becomes,   ironically,   the   viewer’s   emotional   connection   with   the  

characters   on   screen.   The   musical   cues   tend   to   arrive   in   response   to   the   disturbing  

imagery,  likewise  underscoring  the  viewer’s  own  disturbed  response.  The  next  musical  cue  

does   not   arrive   until  minutes   later.   In   the   interim,   the   audience   looking   upon   the   scene  

applauds  and  mutters  to  themselves,  commenting  on  the  “theatrical”  action.  It  is  a  macabre  

scene,  and  the  deafening  absence  of  music  to  underscore  it  demonstrates  Cocteau’s  reliance  

upon   silence   for   effect.   The   filmmaker   wrote   revealingly   in   Le   coq   et   le   harlequin:   “The  

impressionists   feared   bareness,   emptiness,   silence.   Silence   is   not   necessarily   a   hole;   you  

must   use   silence   and   not   a   stop-­‐gap   of   vague   noises.”   Silence   for   Cocteau   is   a   tool:   an  

auditory  blank  gallery  wall  upon  which  he  hangs  Auric’s  musical  paintings.  When  the  next  

of  Auric’s  cues  plays  at  47:40,   following   this  discomfortingly  prolonged  period  of   silence,  

44

the   music   is   ominous:   a   dirge   over   a   forboding,   pulsating   bass   line,   as   the   statue   –   the  

product  of   the  artist’s  creation  –  retreats   from  the  screen  and  is  shown  lying  broken  into  

multiple  pieces.  A  menacing  drone  comes   to   the   fore,  over  which  a   closing   fanfare   in   the  

trumpet  sounds:   far  darker   in  tone  than  the   jovial   fanfare  that  opened  the  film.  A  martial  

snare  drum  announces  the  continuous  march  of  time,  as  Cocteau’s  narration  closes  the  film  

with   the  statement   “The  mortal   tedium  of   immortality.”  Time  and  eternity  are  at  odds   in  

the  film,  which  closes  with  the  destruction  of  a  pillar  that  began  at  the  start.      

 

Sources  and  Effects  of  Harmonic  Irresolution    

One  element  shared  by  the  scores  to  all  three  films,  and  which  enhances  the  sense  of  

continuity   among   them,   is   the   irresolution   of   harmony.   Satie’s   score  meanders   between  

juxtaposed  key  centers  as  a  means  of  avoiding  a  sense  of  trajectory  and  finality.  Points  of  

cadence  seem  to  come  unexpectedly,  often  unprepared  by  expected  harmonic  motion.  This  

effect   is   likewise   enhanced   by   the   composer’s   handling   of   tonal   centers   throughout   the  

work.  At  most  moments  in  the  score,  with  the  exception  of  the  chase  scene,  a  governing  key  

area  is  obvious,  and  is  frequently  a  point  of  return.  However,  Satie  seldom  establishes  that  

key  in  a  means  that  allows  it  to  sit  comfortably  in  the  ear.  Rather,  like  the  buoyant  images  

in  the  film,  and  like  the  inharmonious  quality  of  non-­‐sequitur  images,  particularly  towards  

the  beginning  of  the  film,  Satie’s  handling  of  harmony  keeps  it  afloat,  suspended  above  the  

gravity  of  resolution.  

 

 This  principle  is  exhibited  in  music  underscoring  the  ballet  tableau,  at  Satie’s  cue  IV.  

The  music  of  this  scene,  beginning  at  5:25  in  the  film,  provides  one  of  the  few  truly  melodic  

themes   in   the   entire   score.   This   seems   appropriate,   given   that   the   previous   “visual  

babblings”  provided  little  reality  to  latch  onto,  and  the  lasting  image  of  a  ballerina,  which  is  

for   the   first   time  not   spliced  with   quick   cuts   to   other   non-­‐sequitur   images,   provides   the  

viewer  with  a  moment  of  semi-­‐logical  visual  stability.  At  last,  there  is  something  lasting  for  

the  viewer  digest:  the  image  of  a  ballerina,  appropriate  to  a  cinematic  Entr’acte  to  a  ballet.  

45

Everything  seems  to  make  sense   in  this  scene  visually,  and  to  correspond  with  this,  Satie  

provides   some   semi-­‐logical   musical   stability.   The   tempo   has   slowed   and   the   meter   has  

changed   to   3/4,   isolating   the   music   from   what   came   before.   Eight-­‐bar   units   unfold  

predictably,   and   the   melody   in   the   upper   winds   unfolds   in   a   clear   ascending   and  

descending  arch.  Yet,  something  is  still  unsettled  about  Satie’s  music  in  this  scene.  

 

       

   

46

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 6 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 125-156 (Units 20 - 23)

47

 

The  overall  harmonic  “gravity”  is  clearly  E  major,  yet  the  composer  approaches  and  

hovers   around   this   key   with   a   light   touch,   avoiding   anything   resembling   an   authentic  

cadence  until  the  very  end  of  the  scene.  Rather  than  overtly  stating  the  tonic,  the  first  four  

measures   only   allude   to   it,   opening   and   closing   in   the   Dominant   key   area.  When   in   the  

following  four  measures  Satie  provides  the  Tonic  E  on  each  downbeat,  a  sense  of  tonality  is  

fleetingly  established,  In  each  measure,  the  harmony  ‘escapes’  on  the  weak  beats,  and  the  

addition  of  D-­‐natural  destabilizes  the  tonic.  In  unit  21,  the  tonal  area  shifts  to  the  parallel  

minor,  and  instead  of  returning  to  E  major,  meanders  farther  away  in  unit  22  to  C  major.  

Only  by  virtue  of  a  repeat  is  E  major  at  first  “reasserted.”  Curiously  enough,  the  B-­‐natural  

staccato  eighth  notes,  in  their  C  major  context  in  unit  22,  sound  like  the  leading  tone  to  C.  

Yet,   both   in   the   repeat   back   to   unit   20   (units   20-­‐22   repeat   once   in   the   film),   and   in   its  

continuation   to   Unit   23,   the   B   actually   functions   as   the   fifth   scale   degree,   creating   a   V-­‐I  

motion  back  to  E  major.    

 

Satie  rounds  out  the  tableau  with  a  definitive  closing  in  E  major,  and  one  of  the  few  

punctuating  cadences  in  the  entire  score.  However  the  cadence  it  is  weakened  both  by  its  

arrival  on  the  third  beat,  and  by  the  insertion  of  a  C#  between  the  B  and  E  in  the  bass  line.  

Satie   provides   an   essential   harmonic   closure   to   the   tableau,   marking   an   important  

structural   point   in   the   semi-­‐narrative   structure   of   the   film.   He   follows   this   with   the  

repetition   of   the   opening   unit   that   punctuates   these   moments   of   structural   significance  

throughout  the  score.  However,  the  brevity  of  this  moment  of  closure  prevents  a  sense  of  

stasis.   The   viewer   experiences   a   continuation   of   motion   even   while   acknowledging   a  

structural  close.  Although  the  tableau  exhibits  a  skeletal  E  major  context,   the  meandering  

away   to   non-­‐harmonic   areas   in   this   section   adds   a   degree   of   levity,   as   though   the   pitch  

content   is   somehow   trying   to   escape   the   gravity   of   E  major.  Of   course,   the   “logic”   of   the  

entire   scene   is   revealed   to   be   an   enormous   joke,   for   the   ballerina   is   revealed   to   have   a  

beard.   Though   the   viewer   may   have   felt   that   they   had   settled   into   a   predictable,   semi-­‐

narrative  tableau,  the  filmmakers  reveal  even  this  expectation  to  be  in  vain.  Satie’s  suitably  

48

uncomfortable  music,   logical   to   a   degree   and   yet   simultaneously   incorrect,   foreshadows  

this   joke.   However,   there   is   no   clang   of   percussion   nor   a   shocking   orchestral   forte   to  

underpin   the  punch-­‐line  of   the   joke,   as   one  might   expect   of   silent   film   score   convention.  

Rather,   the   nonchalance   of   the   music   actually   makes   it   more   surprising,   as   though   the  

orchestra  were   unaffected   by   the   joke   itself.   Even   Satie’s   handling   of   that   very  moment  

defies  our  expectation.  Ridiculous  though  the  joke  may  seem,  it  is  simply  absorbed  into  the  

absurd  vision  of  Entr’acte  as  a  whole.  

 

Delayed  Resolution  in  Wagner’s  Transfiguration,  and  Buñuel’s  Un  chien  andalou    

The  music  of  Wagner’s  Transfiguration  embodies  the  idea  of  harmonic  unsettledness.  

The  harmonic  trajectory  of  entire  opera,  in  the  words  of  Richard  Taruskin,  functions  as  the  

pursuit  of   a  harmonic   resolution   that  only  occurs   in   the   final  measures  of   the   last   scene,  

when   the   two   title   lovers   have   both   died:   thus   implying   that   resolution   for   them   can   be  

found  only  in  death,  away  from  the  light  of  day  and  reality.  Buñuel’s  choice  of  this  music  to  

underscore  portions  of  Un  chien  andalou  heightens   the   theme  of  unfulfilled  sexual  desire.  

The   filmmaker  once  noted   that   “for  me,   throughout  my   life,   coitus  and  sin  have  been   the  

same   thing   .   .   .   and   I  also  have   felt   a   secret  but   constant   link  between   the  sexual  act  and  

death.”   For  Buñuel,   the   symbolic  undertones  of   the   idea  of  Liebestod  or   “Love  death”  are  

quite  clear.  It  is  no  surprise  that  he  returned  to  the  Tristan  theme  on  numerous  occasions  

during  his  career  as  a  filmmaker.  

 

 Harmonically,  Wagner’s  music  yearns  for  resolution  that  only  occurs  in  Buñuel’s  film  

when  the  male  protagonist  has  died.  Buñuel’s  handling  of  this  point  in  the  film  is  ironic,  as  

the  man  dies  alone  in  an  implied  suicide,  and  his  lover  runs  off  with  another  man  who  can  

presumably   fulfill   her  own   sexual  desires.  This  new  couple  does   in   fact  die   together,   but  

that  final  scene  is  underscored  by  carnal,  erotic  tango.  The  most  basic  plot  line  of  the  film  is  

actually  quite  similar  to  Wagner’s.  As  Taruskin  summarizes  Tristan  und  Isolde:  “The  story  is  

negligible:  a  man  and  a  woman  are  seized  with  a  forbidden  love  (act  I);  they  attempt  to  act  

49

upon  it  but  are  forcibly  separated,  the  man  being  mortally  wounded  in  the  process  (act  II);  

the   man   dies   and   the   bereft   woman,   overwhelmed   at   the   sight   of   his   corpse,   dies   in  

sympathy  (act  III)”  (Taruskin  2004).  

 

The  transfiguration  scene  from  Tristan  und  Isolde,  the  Humperdinck  concert  version  

of  which  is  used  in  the  film,  unfolds  in  a  series  of  waves.  Buñuel’s  incorporation  of  this  lush  

music  which  by  its  very  construction  unfolds  linearly,  defying  vertical  cadence  points  and  

continuously  evading  resolution,  is  quite  very  self-­‐aware,  and  verging  on  cliché.  This  music  

naturally   contrasts  with   the  extremely  vertical,   percussive,   and  punctuated  nature  of   the  

tango.  The  two  selections  could  not  be  more  diametrically  opposed.  Following  the  Prologue,  

and  a  disorienting  title  card  noting  a  time  “Eight  years  before,”  Wagner’s  music  is  heard  for  

the  first  time,  at  2:04.  Rather  than  being  presented  as  a  heroic  knight,  the  “Tristan”  figure  in  

the   film,   the  male   protagonist,   is   dressed   in   the   feminine   attire   of   Vermeer’s   silk-­‐maker,  

riding   on   a   bicycle   in   the   street.   Among   the   first   significant   building   “waves”   in   the  

Transfiguration  begins  at  a  passage  underscored  by  string   tremoli,  accompanying  4:10   in  

the  film.  Here,  Buñuel  aligns  this  music  with  a  growing  sense  of  desire  in  the  protagonist,  

represented  by  erotic   imagery:  ants   crawl   from  a  hole   in   the  man’s  hand  and  a  woman’s  

underarm  is  interposed  with  images  of  sea  urchins  on  a  beach.  When  the  man  looks  out  the  

window  at  the  androgynous  figure  in  the  street  as  they  move  a  severed  hand  around,  a  look  

of   erotic   excitement   fills   his   face,   and   the   wave   of   Wagner’s   music   continues   to   grow,  

settling   on   a   prolonged   Dominant   pedal   in   the   bass,   matched   with   a   sudden   shift   to  

pianissimo,   aligned   at   6:05   in   the   film.   Here   begins   the   last   of   Wagner’s   waves   in   this  

sequence  of  music.  The  prolongation  of  F-­‐sharp  in  the  bass  against  a  climbing  melodic  line  

in  the  upper  strings  and  winds  creates  a  profound  sense  of  tension.  It  reaches  its  climax  at  

the  precise  moment  that  the  androgynous  figure  is  killed,  run  over  by  a  car  after  being  lost  

in  thought  alone  in  the  middle  of  the  street  at  6:20.  An  important  sub-­‐textual  connection  at  

this   moment   is   hinted   in   Buñuel’s   shooting   script,   in   which,   the   director   notes   (in  

translation)  at  this  moment:  “It  is  as  though  the  echoes  of  distant  religious  music  enthralled  

50

her;   perhaps   music   she   heard   in   her   earliest   childhood.   Their   curiosity   satisfied,   the  

bystanders  begin  to  disperse  in  all  directions.”  

 

This  scene  will  have  been  seen  by  the  characters  that  we  have  left  in  the  room  

on  the  third  floor.  They  are  seen  through  the  windowpanes  of  the  balcony  from  

which  may  be  seen  the  end  of  the  scene  described  above.  When  the  policeman  

hands   the   box   over   to   the   young  woman,   the   two   characters   on   the   balcony  

appear   to   also   be   overcome   to   the  point   of   tears   by   the   same   emotion.  Their  

heads  sway  as  though  following  the  rhythm  of  this  impalpable  music.  The  man  

looks  at  the  young  woman  and  makes  a  gesture  as  though  he  were  saying:  "Did  

you  see?  Hadn't  I  told  you  so?"  (Buñuel  and  Dalí,  Un  chien  andalou  1996).  

 

Like   the   androgynous   figure   in   the   street,   “enthralled   by   the   echoes   of   distant   religious  

music,”   the  viewer   is   likewise  caught  up  and   in   the  grip  of   the  music  playing  at   this  very  

moment.  Buñuel   seems   to  almost   cross   the   threshold  of  diegesis,  putting   the  viewer   into  

the  mind  of  the  characters  on  screen.  Cocteau  would  explore  the  concept  of  diegetic  music  

to  a  far  greater  degree  in  Le  sang  d’un  poète,  yet  it  is  of  crucial  importance  to  this  scene  for  

Buñuel.  This   is  music   that,   in   its  harmonic   tension,  grabs   the  viewer’s  attention,  drawing  

them   into   the   same  hypnosis   as   the   characters  on   screen.   “Background  music”   could  not  

induce  the  same  effect.  

 

The  crest  of  this  dramatic  wave  occurs  simultaneously  with  an  orgasmic  expression  

on   the   man’s   face,   who   seems   not   disturbed   but   fulfilled   by   the   death   of   the   figure.   In  

Wagner’s  opera,  resolution  and  the  realization  of  love  come  only  in  death.  In  Buñuel’s  film,  

sexual  gratification  comes  with  the  same.  However,  at  this  point  in  both  the  Transfiguration  

and  in  Un  chien  andalou,  nothing  is  yet  complete.  Buñuel  quiets  Wagner’s  music,  beginning  

at  6:38,   leaving   it  unresolved.  Rather   than  having  his  desires   fulfilled,  as   it   turns  out,   the  

man  is  only  left  with  his  desire  heightened,  and  he  immediately  turns  to  the  woman  in  the  

room  with  him  and  begins   to  charge  at  her  sexually,  a  moment  which  coincides  with   the  

51

reintroduction  of   the  carnal   “tango”  music,   interrupting   the  completion  and  resolution  of  

the  Transfiguration  for  a  time.    

 

The  true  resolution  in  Wagner’s  music  is  not  presented  in  the  film  until  the  second  

instance  of  the  Transfiguration  in  the  film,  in  the  sequence  beginning  at  10:49.  Here,  Buñuel  

begins  the  music  in  media  res,  “dropping  the  needle”  in  the  midst  of  the  climactic  growing  

wave.  This  scene  is  a  dramatization  of  suicide,  in  that  the  male  protagonist  from  before  in  

the  film,  conflicted  and  weak,  is  murdered  by  a  reflection  of  himself,  in  the  form  of  a  sporty,  

youthful  outgoing  “ladies  man”  figure,  likely  the  protagonist’s  youthful  self  from  earlier  in  

his  life,  as  indicated  in  Buñuel’s  shooting  script.  While  the  protagonist  could  not  realize  his  

own  sexual  desires,  he  is  suppressed  and  literally  killed  by  the  idealized  version  of  himself,  

a  doppelgänger  played  by  the  same  actor.    

 

It   is   no   accident   that   the   climax   of  Wagner’s   passage,   replayed   twice   in   the   film,  

occurs  simultaneously  with  a  moment  of  death.  Here,  Buñuel  aligns  the  moment  of  erotic  

climax  with  a  moment  of  death:  a  figurative  Liebestod,  or  a  play  on  the  French  conception  of  

orgasm   as   Le   petit   mort.   However,   following   the   symbolized   suicide   of   the   male  

protagonist,   Buñuel   allows   the   music   to   play   out   to   its   close,   rather   than   fade   it   out.  

Following   his   death,   at   12:02,   the   scene   immediately   transitions,   in   a   leap   of   space   and  

time,  to  an  open  field  in  a  park.  The  man  falls  dying  through  this  transition,  and  the  figure  

of  a  nude  woman,  likely  the  female  protagonist  from  before  shown  from  behind,  appears  in  

the   field.  He  briefly   touches  her  shoulder,   in  a   final  attempt  at  erotic  satisfaction,  but  she  

disappears,   “transfigured.”   As   the   man’s   body   is   carried   away,   the   Tristan   chord,   that  

unresolved  dissonance  that  permeates  the  entire  opera,  is  heard  at  12:52,  and  Buñuel  this  

time  allows  Wagner’s  harmonic  tension  to  find  resolution,  implying  that  death  has  fulfilled  

the  protagonist’s  desires.    

 

  Even   in   the   highly   contrasting   sections   of   tango   music,   Buñuel   very   carefully  

chooses   to   end   each   cue  with   an  open   cadence,   creating   the   effect   of   an   elision  between  

52

scenes:   a   seamless   transition.   The   “resolution”   of   the   tango’s   dominant   is   Wagner’s  

Transfiguration.  Like  Wagner’s  music,  even  the  accompanying  tangos  reflect  an  inherently  

unresolved  quality.  At  2:02  in  the  film,  the  tango  ends  on  a  dominant  chord  and  therefore  

sounds  inconclusive.  This  moment  aligns  precisely  with  the  beginning  of  the  Wagner  cue,  

and  a  transition  to,  perhaps,  a  different  “time”  in  this  incoherent  narrative,  as  signified  by  

the   nonsensical   cue   card   noting   a   point   in   time   “eight   years   later.”   Following   the   scene  

accompanied  by  the  Transfiguration  music,  another  tango  cue  plays  under  a  scene  of  sexual  

pursuit   of   the   male   protagonist   towards   the   female.   To   align   music   and   action,   Buñuel  

actually   splices   in   material   from   a   different   tango,   beginning   at   8:25   in   the   film.   In   all  

likelihood,  the  inclusion  of  this  second  tango  was  meant  merely  to  fill   in  the  gap  between  

this  cue  and  the  next  emergence  of  the  Wagner  theme,  a  fact  that  again  demonstrates  the  

degree  to  which  Buñuel  intended  for  the  music  to  align  precisely  with  moments  in  his  film.  

However,  in  the  sound  version  from  1960,  Buñuel  splices  in  a  dominant  chord  at  10:47  just  

before   the  music   of  Wagner   emerges   once  more.   Buñuel   very   carefully   and   deliberately  

chose   the   unresolved   dominant   harmony   to   create   a   particularly   irresolute   effect   at   this  

moment  in  the  film.  When  in  the  final  scene  of  the  film,  in  which  the  decrepit  bodies  of  the  

two  new   lovers  are   shown  rotting  on  a  beach,   at  15:40,   the  dominant   chord  of   the   tango  

humorously   serves   as   the   final   punctuation   to   the   entire   film,   under   the   word   “Fin.”   In  

order   to  achieve   this,  Buñuel  splices   the   tango  theme  at  15:43,  so   that   its  conclusion  will  

coincide  perfectly  with   the   concluding   image  of   the   film.  To   end   the   entirety   of  Un  chien  

andalou   with   this   inconclusive,   open-­‐ended   punctuation   is   the   equivalent   of   ending   a  

sentence  with   a   question  mark   rather   than   a   period:   Buñuel   intends   for   the   audience   to  

question  everything  that  they  just  experienced,  and  provides  no  answers  himself.    

 

 

 

 

53

Chapter  3:  Interactions  of  Cinematic  and  Musical  Rhythm,  Tempo,  and  Meter    

 

Perhaps   the  most   critical   difference   between   a   still   image   a   film   is   that   the   latter  

possesses  the  capacity  to  evoke  rhythm  and  motion.  Its  images  are  assembled  in  a  specific  

order,   and   the   length   of   those   shots   likewise   corresponds   to   a   specific   pacing.   As   Clair  

described   film   in  1924,   “it   can   scarcely  be  denied   that   the   cinema  was   created   to   record  

motion.”  He  further  expands:  

 

If  there  is  an  esthetic  of  the  cinema,  it  was  discovered  at  the  same  time  as  the  

movie    camera   and   the   film,   in   France,   by   the   Lumiere   Brothers.   It   can   be  

summed   up   in   one  word:  motion.   Outward  motion   of   objects   perceived   by  

the   eye,   to   which   we   would   add   today   the   inner   motion   of   the   unfolding  

story.  From  the  union  of  these  two  motions  there  can  arise  that  phenomenon  

so  often  spoken  of  and  so  seldom  perceived:  rhythm  (Clair  1972).  

 

 

Clair,   like   many   of   his   contemporaries,   particularly   in   the   Russian   school   of  

filmmaking,  conceptualized  cinematic  devices  in  musical  terms.  Perhaps  it  is  partly  due  to  

the   inherently   musical   nature   of   the   cinema   –   the   shared   formal,   structural,   rhythmic,  

motivic,  and  topical  parameters  –  that  the  two  media  are  so   interrelated.  Both  music  and  

film  occur  linearly  in  time,  and  for  a  viewer  or  audience  member,  the  experience  is  likewise  

linear.   Any   unique   moment   that   occurs   in   the   experience   can   occur   only   once,   and  

establishes,   due   to   what   came   before,   an   expectation   of   what   will   come   after.   The  

experience  is  both  instantaneous  and  reactionary.  In  our  attempt  to  link  the  two,  we  must  

rely  on  both  the  experience  in  the  moment,  and  a  later  evaluation  of  that  moment.  

Clair  wrote  of  his  interaction  with  Satie  in  the  preparation  of  the  score  to  Entr’acte:    

 

54

That  old  master  of   young  music,   he  measured  out   each   sequence  with  meticulous  

care   and   thus   prepared,   in   a   day   when   cinema   was   still   silent,   the   first   musical  

composition   written   image   by   image   for   a   film.   Conscientious   to   an   extreme,   he  

worried  about  not   finishing  his  work  on   time,   so  he  sent  me   friendly  admonitions  

set   down   in   his   inimitable   calligraphy:   “What   about   the   film?  When?  Time  passes  

(and  doesn’t  pass  by  again).  Am  scared  you’ve  forgotten  me.  Yes…  Send  me  news  of  

your  marvelous  work  right  away.  Thanks  a  lot.”  (Dale  1986).  

 

Satie’s  conception  of   the  score  aligned  closely  with   the  rhythm  and  editing  of   the   film,  as  

evidenced   by   his   eagerness   to   see   the   visuals   themselves,   rather   than   simply   going   by  

Picabia’s  loose  scenario.  Unlike  the  method  by  which  Auric  composed  the  score  to  Le  sang  

d’un  poète  –  in  which  the  music  was  composed  before  having  seen  any  visuals  whatsoever  

and  was   inspired   solely  by   synopses  –   Satie’s   score   to  Entr’acte  was   so  precisely   aligned  

with  the  images  that  the  composer  relied  on  seeing  the  produced  film  in  order  to  create  his  

score.  Film  is  inflexible  and  concrete,  unlike  ballet  and  theatre.  The  music  can  be  adjusted  

to  match  with  the  film,  but  the  inverse  is  not  true.  Satie’s  approach  to  scoring  the  film  is  as  

much   practical   as   it   is   artistic.   The   patterns,   because   they   avoid   harmonic   or   melodic  

expectations   of   phrase   structures   to  make   sense,   are   inherently   flexible.   Early   on   in   the  

film,   the  units,   by   their   very  non-­‐sequitur  qualities,   acclimate   the  ear   to  hearing   them  as  

fragmentary.  When,  in  the  ballet  tableau  or  funeral  tableau,  in  which  the  visuals  seem  more  

logically  cohesive,  so  too  does  the  music.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

A  Continuous  Rhythmic  Thread,  Sometimes  Broken    

Though   Satie’s   rhythmic   patterns   often   shift   from   unit   to   unit,   an   underlying  

ostinato   pulse   at   the   eighth   note   still   provides   a   thread   of   continuity   between   them.  

Whether   orchestrated   as   an   “oompah”   figure   –  with   separate   voices   on   the   quarter   note  

beats  and  others  on  eighth  note  offbeats  –  or  as  a  continuous  string  of  running  eighth  notes  

in   one   voice,   Satie   maintains   this   subdivision.   This   technique   effectively   serves   several  

functions.   First,   it   enhances   the   “hypnotic”   quality   of   the   music,   removing   it   from   the  

foreground   of   the   listener’s   attention,   just   as   the   repetitive   rhythmic   quality   of   Satie’s  

musique  d’ameublement  causes  it  to  retreat  to  the  background  of  the  experience.  The  use  of  

a  continuous  rhythmic  thread  also  maintains  a  sense  of  perpetual  motion  to  accompany  the  

energetic  motion  of  the  cinematography.  In  those  few  moments  in  the  score  in  which  Satie  

draws   the   music   to   a   point   of   cadence,   the   effect   is   therefore   all   the   more   jarring:   like  

suddenly   braking   a   rapidly   moving   car.   When   Satie   establishes   a   rhythmic   pattern   or  

precedent,  whether  rhythmically  or  harmonically,  any  break  from  that  precedent  suddenly  

and  momentarily  draws   the  music   to   the   foreground.  The   viewer  might  question  why   at  

these  pivotal  moments  the  composer  chooses  to  break  pattern.    

 

The  first  of  Satie’s  musical  units  to  shift  away  from  the  eighth  note  subdivision  

aligns  with  3:48  in  the  film.  The  units  –  Numbers  12  and  13  –  last  for  four  bars  each,  and  

many  other  parameters  are  held  constant,  including  the  key  of  D  major,  maintained  from  

the  preceding  unit.  In  unit  12,  the  string  voices  undulate  between  the  pitches  E  and  F-­‐

sharp,  and  in  unit  13,  they  settle  on  a  repeated  E  against  a  changing  accompaniment.    

56

Figure 7 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 67-79 (Units 11 - 14)

 

 

 Both   rhythmically   and   in   terms   of   pitch   content,   everything   seems   to   suddenly  

slow.  It   is   likely  no  accident  that  these  cues  align  with  a  point   in  the  score  at  which  Satie  

himself  wrote  a  cue  mark  (Cue  III,  Scenes  from  the  air;  chess  game  and  boats  on  roof).  This  

moment  therefore  signified  for  Satie  some  shift  in  the  visual  pattern  and  theme.  By  slowing  

the   rhythmic   subdivision   slightly,   the   viewer   experiences   a   new   auditory   backdrop.   The  

moment   also   coincides  with   the   absurd   image   of  matches   dancing   on   a  man’s   head.   The  

“dance”  of   the  matches   is   juxtaposed   ironically  with   the  sudden  grace  and  regality  of   the  

music’s  pulse.  For  a  brief  moment,  Satie’s  rhythmical  slowing  adds  an  element  of  nobility  

and  almost  religiosity  to  the  music,  enhanced  by  the  presence  of  the  graceful  strings,  and  

the   warm,   rich   timbre   of   the   trombone.   This   moment   also   precedes   the   subsequent   re-­‐

emergence  of  the  A  ritornello  motto  from  the  opening  of  the  score,  which  punctuates  these  

57

set  changes  and  shifts   in  visual  and  narrative   themes   throughout  Entr’acte.  By  creating  a  

more   subdued   rhythmic   environment   directly   preceding   this   re-­‐emergence   of   the  

ritornello,   Satie   draws   the   ritornello   further   to   the   foreground.   He   likely   intends   for   the  

viewer  to  notice  this  structural  moment.  

 

Built-­‐in  Flexibility    

Satie   designed   the   rhythmic   and   unit-­‐based   structure   of   his   score   such   that  

measures  could  be  repeated  without  jarringly  interrupting  the  listener’s  comprehension  of  

the  music.    His  units,   for  the  most  part,  amount  to  about  eight  bars  of  music   in  the  score,  

which   coincides   almost   exactly   with   the   average   length   of   Clair’s   individual   shots.  

Technology   in  1924  was  primitive  by   today’s   standards,  and   the  playback  of  a   film  score  

relied  literally  on  the  coordination  of  moving  parts,  which  were  not  always  so  reliable.  The  

score,   performed   live   by   the   ballet   orchestra,   needs   to   have   some   flexibility   in   order   to  

maintain  alignment.  If  the  conductor  or  a  pianist  performing  from  the  reduction,  finds  that  

the  score  is  slightly  misaligned  with  the  moving  image,  repetitions  can  be  made  to  realign  

the  patterns  (Dale  1986).  Evidence  that  this  was  Satie’s  solution  to  the  inherent  problems  

of  alignment   can  be   seen   in  what   remains  of  his  original   cue   sheet   (Figure  1   -­‐  Reprinted  

from  Gallez  and  Satie,   “Satie’s   ‘Entr’acte:’  A  Model  of  Film  Music,  Cinema  Journal,  Vol.  16,  

No.  1).  

58  

Figure 8 – Page 1 of Satie’s cue sheet for Entr’acte – Units 1 - 17

59

Though  only  the  first  part  remains  intact  and  available  for  analysis,  the  sheet  clearly  

outlines   the  number  of   reiterations  of  units   –  indicated  by   repeat  numbers  –   that   should  

occur  in  order  to  align  the  image  and  the  film.  What’s  more,  it  indicates,  in  Satie’s  use  of  key  

signatures  rather   than  named  keys,   that   tonality   in   the  score   is  arbitrary  and  ambiguous.  

The  sheet  exemplifies   in  an  early  model   the  process  of  vamping   in  cinema,  and   is  not   far  

removed   from   similar   techniques   in   ballet.   In   order   to   provide   some   flexibility   to  

accommodate   set   changes,   the   introduction   of   new   characters,   and   other   practical   uses,  

composers  of  background  music  or  entr’actes  in  ballet  often  include  built-­‐in  repetitions  for  

adjustment.  In  ballet,  a  symbiotic  relationship  exists  between  music  and  dance  that  music  

and  film  cannot  share.  The  music  must  “go  to  the  film”,  rather  than  the  film  responding  to  

the   music.   The   very   unique   nature   of   Entr’acte   and   its   score   create   very   particular  

limitations   and   problems,   which   are   alleviated   by   the   technological   advancements   of  

recorded  sound  that  would  become  available  to  filmmakers  not  long  after  its  premiere.    

 

 The  importance  of  the  conductor,  and  Satie’s  reliance  on  that  conductor  in  aligning  

music   and   image,   is   made   clear   by   several   indications   in   the   score.   The   lack   of   specific  

tempo  markings  in  the  manuscript  is  telling.  One  would  imagine  that  a  score  meant  to  align,  

down   to   the   second,   with   a   film   would   be   have   far   greater   specifications   in   terms   of  

metronome   markings,   although   one   should   also   recall   that   metronome   markings   were  

often   a   source   of   ironic   humor   for   Satie,   particularly   in   his   solo   piano   music.   The  

technological  realities  film  projection  at  the  time  created  an  element  of  unpredictability  in  

showing  a  film.  Not  nearly  as  reliable  in  lengths  and  speeds,  as  evidenced  by  the  multiple  

conflicting   accounts   of   exact   running   times   for  Entr’acte,   some   room   for   adjustment  was  

needed  (Gallez  1976).  Metronome  markings  were  approximations  and  suggestions  at  best,  

and   there   are   only   four   tempo   indications   in   the   entire   score.   These  marks   occur   at   the  

beginning  of  the  score,  marked  “Pas  trop  vite;”  and  at  the  start  of  the  funeral  march  scene  

(Satie  cue  VI),  marked  “Plus  lent”  and  accompanied  by  a  shift  to  4/4.  They  also  appear  in  

the  scene  following  the  chase  in  which  the  coffin  falls  and  bursts  open,  marked  “Lent,”  and  

accompanied  by  a  shift  to  triple  meter;  and  in  the  final  four  measures  of  the  score,  marked  

60

“Large   et   lourd,   en   retenant.”   Satie   implies   an   inherent   flexibility   in   the   very   absence   of  

tempo  indications.  Why  would  “Lent”  follow  “Plus  lent”  unless  the  tempo  had  shifted  in  the  

time  between  the  two  points  in  the  score?  The  material  between  these  two  markings  is  the  

accelerando   passage   of   the   chase   scene,  without  which   the   coordination   of   cue   to   visual  

would  completely   fall  apart.   In  an  autographed  copy  of   the  unpublished  orchestral  score,  

the   composer   wrote,   in   the   music   accompanying   the   scene   of   the   hunter:   “Make   this  

repetition  until  Picabia  has  killed  Börlin.  Stop  -­‐  then  proceed”  (Gallez  1976).  The  cue  that  

Satie   indicates   should   be   repeated   is,   in   fact,   the  A   ritornello  motto   that   introduces   the  

entire  film,  and  serves  as  punctuation.  It  recurs  at  unit  number  27’  –  the  entire  sequence  of  

Units  25-­‐27  being  repeated  once  –  and  is  aligned  with  the  sequence  beginning  at  9:13  in  the  

film.  That  Satie  intended  to  align  this  cue  to  exactly  correspond  with  the  death  of  Börlin  and  

the   transition   to   the   funeral   hearse   scene   reveals   its   significance   as   a   punctuating   unit.  

Here,   it   humorously   marks   the   “punctuation”   of   Börlin’s   life.   Rather   than   adding   an  

additional  musical  cue  to  fill  this  span,  Satie  meant  for  this  particular  motto  to  underscore  

this  pivotal  moment  in  the  film,  and  so  his  built-­‐in  repetition  allowed  for  that.    

 

The  version  of  the  film  used  in  this  analysis  is  a  synchronized  sound  version  

released  in  1968,  for  which  Henri  Sauguet,  a  Satie  disciple,  conducted  the  score.  The  film  

running  time  conforms  to  the  performance  time  that  the  composer  indicated  in  the  

autographed  score:  seventeen  minutes  and  forty  seconds.  This  is  likely  the  most  reliably  

coordinated  recorded  version  of  the  film  with  music  that  exists  in  terms  of  intended  tempi,  

though  the  history  of  the  film  between  1924  and  today  has  been  complex,  and  to  this  day  

no  definitive  edition  of  the  orchestral  score  exists.  As  Marks  notes,  “There  is  much  that  

could  be  gained  from  having  a  critical  edition  of  the  score,  and  also  a  scholarly  examination  

of  the  film’s  own  history  from  1924  to  the  present.  However,  the  problems  are  perhaps  less  

menacing  than  stimulating.  Silent  film  accompaniments  were,  of  necessity,  inherently  

flexible;  and  some  spontaneity  should  not  be  denied  their  interpreters  –  especially  when  

dealing  with  a  work  of  Picabia  and  Satie”  (M.  Marks  1983).  

 

61

The  composer  used  a  stopwatch  to  measure  the  exact  lengths  of  shots,  and  decided  

upon   tempi   and   repetitions   from   there.   This   again   signifies   the   close-­‐knit   relationship  

between   Satie   and   Clair   in   the   creation   of   the   film.   Satie   was   often   present   during   the  

process  of  the  film’s  creation,  unlike  Auric’s  involvement  with  Le  sang  d’un  poète,  wherein  

the  composer  provided  cues  before  having  seen  the  film.  Satie’s  standard  “shot  length”  unit  

is  usually  about  eight  bars.  The  chart  outlining  the  unit-­‐based  construction  the  film  shows  

58  of  such  units.  When  the  composer  delineates,  abruptly,   from  this  pattern,   it   interrupts  

the   logical   flow   of   the   experience   for   the   viewer.   One   very   palpable   instance   of   such  

interruption   occurs   at   Unit   number   17,   aligned   with   4:35   in   the   film.   The   unit   is  

constructed  as  a  pattern  of  5+2  bars,  followed  by  3+2.  Not  coincidentally,  it  coincides  with  a  

moment  in  the  film  in  which  a  chessboard,  a  symbol  of  planning  and  strategy,  is  destroyed  

by  a  jet  of  water.  The  water  jet  is  the  visual  image  signifying  the  buoyant  nature  of  the  film  

and   its   illogical   construction.   By   destroying   the   logical   implications   of   a   chess   game,   the  

filmmakers  are  commenting  on  the  absurdity  of  such  logic.  Satie’s  own  disruption  of  logical  

symmetry,   with   his   inclusion   of   unit   lengths   of   disproportionate   lengths   of   measures,  

perfectly  encapsulates  in  music  this  moment  in  the  film.  

   

62

 

 

Figure 9 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 97-108 (Units 17,18)

 

 

 

 

 

63

Metrical  Shifts    

Satie,  at  some  points   in   the  score,  blurs   the   lines  of  metrical  shifts  coinciding  with  

significant   tableau   changes,   as   in   the   shift   into   triple   meter   for   the   ballet   scene   or  

quadruple  meter  for  the  funeral  scene.  These  two  instances,  save  the  return  of  triple  meter  

at  the  end  of  the  film,  are  the  only  moments  of  metrical  alteration  in  the  entire  score,  which  

otherwise   rolls   along   in  duple   time.   It   is   no   accident   that   the   longest   stretches   of   logical  

action   on   screen   coincide   with   these   set   pieces,   and   that   Satie   isolates   them   from   their  

surroundings  by  altering  the  meter.  However,  the  composer’s  introductions  of  these  meter  

shifts  are  not  always  cut-­‐and-­‐dry.  Though  an  examination  of  the  score  clarifies  that  these  

conventions  of  make  logical  sense  –  that  a  waltz  topic  should  in  fact  appear  in  triple  meter,  

and  a  funereal  procession  should  appear  in  quadruple  meter  –  the  ear  blurs  these  lines.  For  

instance,  the  presence  of  triplets  at  the  preceding  foreshadows  the  triple  meter  section  of  

the   ballet   scene.   It   is   the   first   instance   of   triplet   subdivision   in   the   entire   score,   and  

therefore   leaps   to   the   foreground   by   virtue   of   contrast.   Satie’s   sudden   manipulation   of  

rhythmic  subdivision  draws  attention  to  this  transitional  moment.  

 

64

Figure 10 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 117-125 (Units 19,20)

 

 

   

 

In  another  moment  in  the  film,  at  Satie’s  Cue  V,  at  9:29,  the  phrase  marks  and  accent  

patterns   at   the  Plus   lent   “Marche   Funèbre”   at   first   resemble   a   hemiolic   pattern   of   three.  

Two  measures  of  friction  between  common  time  meter  and  triple  hypermeter  (3+3+2)  play  

65

out  before  the  Chopinesque  ‘Funeral  March’  dotted  rhythm  begins  outright  at  9:38,  helping  

to  distort  the  sense  of  reality  at  this  moment.    

 

Figure 11 Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 189-190 (Unit 28)

 

 

The  music  exhibits   a  very  deliberate   tension  between  expectation  and   reality   that  

matches   the   absurdity   of   this   funeral   procession:   the   parade   of   mourners   is   led,  

ridiculously,  by  a  camel,  and  the  processors  eat  pieces  of  bread  from  the  wreaths  adorning  

the  hearse.  The  shadings  of  a  mock  Chopin  Funeral  March  from  the  composer’s  B-­‐flat  minor  

piano  sonata,  Op.  35,  is  instantly  recognizable  and  draws  attention  to  the  funereal  theme  of  

the  scene.  However,  in  a  film  whose  purpose  to  some  degree  is  to  upend  tradition,  the  use  

of   this   cliché  gesture   seems  almost   too   fitting.  However,   Satie’s   incorporation  of   this   cue  

into  the  score,  the  only  overtly  discernable  extra-­‐musical  reference  in  Entr’acte,  completely  

undermines  its  cliché  quality  of  predictability.  To  use  an  instantly  recognizable  trope  in  a  

silent   film   score   was   common   practice   in   the   earliest   days   of   the   art   form.   Many  

improvisers  at  the  piano  during  the  1920’s  would  likely  have  incorporated  such  a  gesture.  

66

However,   the   cue   plays   only   until   10:42,   at   which   point   the   funeral   procession   actually  

begins   to  move.  One  would   imagine   that   a   “Funeral  March”  would   accompany   the   actual  

movement  of  mourners.  However,  just  in  time  for  the  viewer  to  become  settled  into  a  sense  

of   predictability,   Satie   once   again   unleashes   the   “burlesque   hurricane”   of   the   screeching  

opening  motto,  now  played  at  a  crawling  speed.  Upon  close  examination  of  the  side  of  the  

hearse,   the   initials   “FP”  and   “ES”  are  discernable.  Francis  Picabia  and  Erik  Satie  are  both  

dead,  here  in  the  exact  middle  of  the  film.  If  the  composer  and  scenarist  are  both  no  longer  

living,  who  could  be  around  to  control  the  rest  of  the  film’s  progress?  The  answer,  in  fact,  is  

no   one.   From   this   point   on,   the   film   will   gradually   spin   out   into   uncontrollable   chaos,  

almost  with  a  mind  of  its  own.  

 

 

Figure 12 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 191-196 (Unit 28)

 

Satie’s   musical   acceleration   does   not   always   align   temporally   with   the   visual  

acceleration.   In   one   of   the   most   effective   sequences   in   the   film,   just   before   the   chase  

sequence,  around  12:40,  Clair  departs   from  slow  motion  playback,   returning   to  a  normal  

pace   of   editing,   yet   Satie’s   music   remains   slow.   If   the   pacing   of   the   music   were   exactly  

mapped  onto  the  pacing  of  the  film’s  motion,  then  Satie’s  music  likewise  would  have  begun  

to  accelerate,  yet  it  remains  unhurried  and  lags  behind.  The  funeral  mourners  are  clearly  in  

67

a   running   stride,   but   Clair’s   slow   motion   editing   at   10:46   establishes   a   visual   conflict  

between  motion  and   stasis.  The   filmmaker,   at   this  moment,   is   in   complete   control  of   the  

viewer’s  experience.  To  see  the  mourners  running  yet  simultaneously  halted  in  their  speed  

is,  by  nature,  an  illogical  image.  Simultaneously,  the  extremely  slow  reproduction  of  Satie’s  

quick  music  reflects  this  tension,  and  further  enhances  the  friction  of  the  scene.  

 

Because   of   the   delayed   gratification   of   the   accelerando,   which   only   begins   at   the  

“Chase”  cue  at  14:56,   that  accelerando   is  made  all   the  more  effective  when   it  does   finally  

arrive.  For  a  sequence  lasting  for  several  minutes,  both  the  filmmakers  and  the  composer  

had   to   carefully   pace   the   increasing   tempo  of  motion,   so   that   it  would   constantly   feel   as  

though   it  were   tumbling   forward,   out   of   control.   As  with   any   crescendo   or   accelerando,  

there  is  a  realistic  and  practical  limit  that  cannot  be  exceeded.  However,  by  generating  this  

rhythmic   and   temporal   friction,   Satie   and  Clair   are   able   to   provide   the   illusion   of   having  

ventured  beyond  the  threshold  of  reality.  At  18:19  in  the  very  end  of  the  chase  sequence,  at  

the  point  at  which  the  accelerando  can  go  no  further,  Satie  at  last  manipulates  the  rhythmic  

content  of  the  cells.  From  14:56  in  the  film  to  18:19,  for  well  over  three  minutes  of  music,  

the   rhythmic   subdivision   has   been   at   the   eighth   note.   Now   the   subdivision   breaks   loose  

into  a  syncopated  rhythm  of  sixteenth+dotted  eighth  followed  by  dotted  eighth+sixteenth.  

 

68

Figure 13 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 362-382 (Units 50’, 51, 52)

 

69

The  sense  of  pulse   is  broken,  as   though   the   figurative  wheels  had  broken   loose   from   the  

vehicle   propelling   the   forward   momentum   of   the   music.   This   transition   appropriately  

coincides  with  the  moment  at  which  the  casket   finally  breaks   free   from  the  hearse   in   the  

film:  both  rhythm  and  image  reach  a  simultaneous  “breaking  point.”  A  moment  of  silence  in  

the  score  before  the  following  “Lent”  allows  the  viewer  to  catch  their  breath.  Like  Cocteau’s  

use  of  silence  between  Auric’s  musical  cues  as  a  means  of  punctuating  particular  moments,  

the  sudden  break  in  rhythmic  acceleration  at  this  moment  in  Entr’acte,  followed  by  a  brief  

moment  of  calm  stasis,  recalibrates  the  viewer’s  experience.    

 

Rhythmic  Friction  and  Mock-­‐Solemnity    

Just  before  the  chase  and  accelerando  begin  outright,  Satie  illuminates  the  palpable  

tension   and   friction   between  motion   and   stasis   by   including   an   asymmetrical,   dirge-­‐like  

motive:   a   solemn  brass   chant   figure,   unharmonized   apart   from  doubling   in   octaves.   This  

theme  is  then  repeated  in  the  higher-­‐voiced  winds,  with  altered  instrumentation,  and  with  

an   underpinning   of   snare   drum   rolls.   The   passage   seems   bizarrely   out   of   place,   and  

seemingly  almost  archaic   in  character.  Satie’s  music  exhibits,   like  the  funeral  mourners,  a  

mock  solemnity.  Beginning  at  Unit  number  41  in  the  score,  aligned  with  13:45  in  the  film,  

the  awkward  hypermetrical  groupings  of  3+2+2  highlight  the  discomforting  misalignment  

between   the   speed   of   the   action   on   screen   and   the   pacing   of   the   music.   The   funeral  

mourners   are   already   in   rapid  motion,   yet   the  music   hovers   somewhere   in   a   far   slower  

context.  The  misalignment  of  speeds  thereby  enhances  this  friction,  and  the  chant  is  made  

all  the  more  unsettling  by  its  vaguely  off-­‐kilter  hypermeter  groupings  in  three.  Though  in  

cut   time,   the  passage  actually  sounds,  due  to  Satie’s  hemiolic  groupings  and  accentuation  

across   bars,   like   a   brief   recurrence   of   triple   meter.   The   seven-­‐bar   abridged   unit   length  

likewise  disrupts  the  established  eight-­‐bar  patterns  of  prior  music.  The  fact  that  the  figure  

is   repeated   twice   more   enhances   its   strangeness   in   this   context:   Satie   prolongs   the  

discomfort.  

   

70

 

 

 

Within   the   context   of   the   motion   of   a   funeral   march,   Satie   is   perhaps   sneakily  

harkening   back   to   elements   the   ballet   music   from   before.   Perhaps   in   an   ironic   musical  

inside   joke,   the   composer   poke   fun   at   the   absurdity   of   the  whole   scene   by   undercutting  

“march  music”  in  triple  meter  with  an  incomplete  bar  at  the  end  of  the  unit,  left  hanging  on  

its  own.  How  can  one  process  properly   in   triple  meter  without  occasionally  being  on   the  

wrong  foot?  Satie’s  music,  at  this  moment,  refuses  to  march  forward.  In  the  midst  of  a  score  

in  which  continuity  of  motion  is  a  distinguishing  feature,  the  halted  quality  of  this  passage  

draws  attention  to  this  misalignment.  It  is  uncomfortably  slow.  

 

The  function  of  “slowness”  in  Le  sang  d’un  poète    

Cocteau   likewise   relied   upon   “slowness”   in   Le   sang   d’un   poète   to   emphasize   its  

mood.   Unlike   Entr’acte   however,   which   incorporates   periodic   moments   of   slowness   for  

emphasis,   the   overall   pace   of   Cocteau’s   film   is   discomfortingly   and   intensely   lugubrious,  

Figure 14 – Erik Satie, tr. Darius Milhaud – Entr’acte (two pianos) – mm. 293-299 (Unit 41)

71

perhaps  even  hallucinogenic.  The  director  wrote,  in  an  essay  published  with  the  screenplay  

to  the  film:  

 

The   innumerable   faults   of   The   Blood   of   a   Poet   end   up   by   giving   it   a   certain  

appeal.  For  example,  I  am  most  attached  to  the  images.  These  give  it  an  almost  

sickening  slowness.  When  I  complained  of  this  recently  to  Gide,  he  replied  that  I  

was  wrong,  that  this  slowness  was  a  rhythm  of  my  own,  inherent  in  me  at  the  

time   I   made   the   film,   and   that   changing   the   rhythm   would   spoil   the   film.  

(Cocteau,  Preface  to  The  Blood  of  a  Poet  1946).  

 

The   prolongation   of   periods   of   silence   in   the   film   between   musical   cues   enhances   this  

discomforting  slowness,  as  the  viewer  sits  on  the  edge  of  their  seat  in  anticipation  of  what  

is  to  come.  Likewise,  when  viewed  collectively,  the  vast  majority  of  the  film  is  accompanied  

by  what  may  be  considered  “slow  music.”  Those  rare  moments  in  Auric’s  compositions  in  

which  the  pacing  suddenly  quickens  are  usually  moments  intended  to  heighten  a  mood  of  

either  levity  or  turmoil.    

 

 

 

 

     

72

Chapter  4:  The  Crucial  Element  of  Form    

  Most   conventional   narrative   films   unfold   linearly,   like   a   dramatic   work   or   novel,  

with   the   schematic   of   “Exposition,   Conflict,   Resolution.”   The   closest   compositional  

equivalent  to  such  a  form  would  naturally  be  opera.  As  opera  is  both  musical  and  dramatic,  

while  the  scores  to  films  are  by  nature  instrumental  and  textless,  this  comparison  between  

these   two  genres   is  prejudicial.  The   three   films  under  examination,  because   they  are  not  

exclusively   linear   nor   expressly   narrative   in   construction,   are  more   suited   to   a   different  

formal  plan.  By  adhering  to  some  degree  of  identifiable  formal  structures,  the  scores  in  all  

three  cases  help  to  provide  an  element  of  stability  onto  which  the  viewer  can  grasp,  in  an  

otherwise  very  disorienting  experience.    

 

Entr’acte  and  Elements  of  Rondo  Form    

A   rondo   is   defined   formally   by   its   juxtaposition   of   repeated   ritornelli   against  

contrasting   episodes.   All   three   films   are   to   some   degree   episodic   in   form,   yet   contain  

elements   of   repeated   visual   and   narrative   motives   and   themes,   somewhat   akin   to   a  

cinematic  rondo.  Upon  examination  of  the  general  key  areas  of  the  major  sections  in  Satie’s  

score,  a  mock-­‐rondo  harmonic  structure  emerges  that  coincides  with  the  repeated  return  

of   the  opening  motto  as  a  recurring  Ritornello.  Elements  of   this  rondo  structure   lie  at   the  

background   of   a   score   into   which   the   composer   simultaneously   inserted   his   own  

delineating  “cues”  aligned  with  scenes  and  images  in  the  film:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73

Satie’s  Cues:  

I. Chimneys;  deflating  balloons    

II. Boxing  gloves  and  matches    

III.    Scenes  from  the  air;  chess  game  and  boats  on  roof  

IV.    The  female  dancer  and  figures  within  water  

V.    The  hunter  and  the  beginning  of  the  funeral    

VI.  Funeral  March  

VII.  Funeral  procession  in  slow  motion    

VIII.  The  chase  

IX.  The  coffin's  fall  and  the  emergence  of  Berlin    

X.  The  End  (Screen  bursts  and  The  End)    

 

 

The   first   section,   encompassing   Satie’s   cue   marks   I   and   II,   serves   as   a   kind   of  

“prologue”   to   the   film:   the   most   meandering   and   least   narrative   section.   It   is   centered  

predominantly   in  the  key  area  of  A  major,  which  will,  as   it   turns  out,  serve  as  the  overall  

tonic  of  the  entire  score.  The  first  “episode”  of  Satie’s  rondo,  beginning  at  Satie’s  cue  III  –

Scenes   from   the   air;   chess   game   and   boats   on   roof   –   is   centered   predominantly   in   the  

subdominant   D   major.   This   section   closes   with   a   brief   restatement   of   the   punctuated  

ritornello   unit   in   the   A   major   tonic.   The   following   large   section,   at   Satie’s   cue   IV   –   the  

female  dancer  and  figures  within  water   –   is   centered  predominantly   in   the  dominant  of  E  

major.  Cue  V  –  the  hunter  and  the  beginning  of  the  funeral  –  is  centered  in  the  tonic  A  major,  

and   likewise   begins   and   ends   with   the   punctuating   ritornello   unit.   The   Funeral   March  

episode  at  Satie’s  cue  VI  is  centered  in  the  parallel  A  minor,  which  then  makes  its  way  back  

to   the   A   major   tonic   in   cue   VII,   wherein   the   funeral   hearse   begins   to   process   in   slow  

motion.   This  moment   again   coincides  with   the   return   of   the   ritornello  motto,   albeit   in   a  

ploddingly  restrained  tempo.  The  brief  cue  IX,  in  which  the  coffin  falls  from  the  hearse  and  

Börlin   emerges,   humorously   and  unbelievably   still   alive,   begins   in  A  major   yet   ends   in  E  

major,  a  I-­‐V  progression  that  sets  up  V-­‐I  motion  back  to  A  at  the  start  of  Cue  X,   the  “End”  

74

summation   of   the   film.   Despite   the   seemingly  meandering   key   areas   of   the   score,  which  

sound  at  first  arbitrary,  Satie  has  actually  constructed  a  nearly  “by  the  book”  neo-­‐classical  

mock-­‐rondo,   even   in   its   harmonic   structure:   I–IV–I–V–I–i–I–V–I.   The   somewhat  

unconventional  move  to  the  subdominant  in  the  second  episode  exemplifies  Satie’s  flexible  

approach   to   classical   convention.   This   harmonic   scheme   is   matched   by   the   rondo-­‐like  

alternation   of   a   ritornello   theme   with   contrasting   episodes.   It   is   curious   that   the  

conventional   rondo   form   should   underpin   a   score   to   a   film   that,   at   least   at   first   glance,  

seems   formless.   Satie   and   Clair   both   ultimately   deliver   a   joke   within   a   joke:   a   sense   of  

detachment   governs   the   whole   exercise,   not   unlike   Buñuel’s   use   of   the   Wagner  

Transfiguration  music  for  his  surrealistic  film  with  its  bizarre  visuals.    

 

Breaking  the  Pattern  in  the  Chase  Scene  of  Ent’racte    

It  is  no  accident  that  an  elaboration  the  Chase  scene,  Satie’s  Cue  VII,  is  left  out  

of  the  above  outline,  as  it  marks  a  significant  and  deliberate  departure  from  the  harmonic  

“plan”   of   the   rest   of   the   score.   The   chase   scene   begins   in   the   tonic   A  major,   yet   quickly  

meanders  away.  Like   the   runaway  hearse  being  chased  by   the  characters   in   the   film,   the  

tonality  of  A  has  “escaped,”  so  to  speak,  becoming  out  of  reach.   It   is   the  only  point   in   the  

film  in  which  a  sense  of  harmonic  gravity  is  suspended.  In  each  of  the  large  sections,  a  key  

area  serves  as  a  gravitational  tonal  center.  Though  Satie  meanders  away  from  the  tonality  

that  governs  each  section,  he   inevitably  returns   to   it,  usually   in  a  harmonic  ebb-­‐and-­‐flow  

effect,   once   again   reflecting   the   notion   of   simultaneous  motion   and   stasis.   For   the   chase  

scene,  however,  once  the  meter  shifts  to  2/4  and  the  accelerando  begins,  Satie  replaces  the  

“back   and   forth”   harmonic  motion  with   a   progressive   ascent,   underpinned   by   a   steadily  

climbing  pedal  point.  Beginning  in  Unit  44,  B  and  C#  undulate  in  the  strings,  while  the  oboe  

sustains  an  incessant  E-­‐sharp  pedal.  In  the  subsequent  unit,  the  strings  undulate  between  D  

and  E-­‐flat,  while   the  E-­‐sharp  pedal,   spelled   enharmonically   as  F,   endures.   In  unit  46,   the  

strings  undulate  between  E  natural  and  F  natural,  and  the  F  pedal  sustains.  In  unit  47,  the  

strings   continue   to   undulate   between   E   natural   and   F,   but   now   the   pedal   climbs   to   G  

75

natural.  This  is  yet  another  example  of  Satie’s  shifting  one  element  at  a  time,  holding  other  

elements  equal,   thus  creating  an  effect  of  simultaneous  continuity  and  discontinuity.  Unit  

48  is  something  of  an  outlier:  a  brief  moment  that  interrupts  the  progression  and  creates  a  

temporary  moment  of  stasis.  The  undulation  steps  down  to  E  and  D-­‐sharp,  and  the  pedal  is  

briefly  absent.  The  ear  still  retains  the  E  natural   from  the  previous  E–D-­‐sharp  figure,  and  

the  instrumentation  is  altered.  One  might  imagine  that  Satie  inserted  this  disruption  simply  

to  maintain  interest,  and  to  break  his  own  pattern  in  jest.  Unit  49  picks  up  again  where  the  

progression  had  left  off,  and  the  undulation  is  elevated  to  between  E  and  F-­‐sharp,  climbing  

upward  while   the   pedal   rises   to   A-­‐flat.   In   unit   50,   the   undulation   steps   upward   to   G–B-­‐

natural,  and  the  sustain  rises  to  B-­‐flat.    

     

    In  the  chase  scene,  Satie  establishes  a  misaligned  polyphony:  two  ascending  

lines,   that   do   not   always  move   in   tandem:   the   sustained   pedal   tone   and   the   undulating  

tones.  If  one  traces  the  common  pitch  element  between  each  consecutive  cue,  the  line  in  the  

undulating  pitches  ascends   from  C-­‐sharp   to  D-­‐natural   to  D-­‐sharp   to  E-­‐natural,   then   to  F-­‐

sharp  and  finally  to  G.  Meanwhile,  the  sustained  pitch  climbs  from  E-­‐sharp/F-­‐natural  to  G  

to  A  to  B-­‐flat.  Both  lines  ascend  a  fourth,  but  not  entirely  at  the  same  time.  There  is  a  sense  

of   push   and   pull   between   the   two   voices   that   creates   a   palpable   tension   in   the   scene.   If  

every   pitch   simply   transposed   upward   by   a   half-­‐step   or  whole-­‐step   in   each   consecutive  

unit,   the   obviousness   and   predictability   of   the   climb   might   actually   work   against   this  

building   tension.   Instead,   Satie’s   line   ascends   upwards,   but   does   so   meanderingly   and  

subtly.  The  effect   is  almost  unnoticeable   to   the  ear,  but  undeniable   in   feeling.  One  senses  

that   Satie’s   line   is   building   upwards,   but   the   exact  mechanism   by  which   he   does   this   is  

nearly   imperceptible.  When  matched  by   the  steady  accelerando   in   tempo  over   the  whole  

scene,  the  effect  is  quite  powerful.  For  a  moment,  Satie  has  suspended  the  neo-­‐classical  “by-­‐

the-­‐book”   notions   of   harmonic   motion   in   order   to   emulate   the   experience   of   chasing  

something  that  cannot  be  caught,  and  of  tumbling  forward  with  uncontrollable  momentum.  

The   “exceptional”   feeling   of   this   moment   relies   upon   the   standardization   of   its   context.  

76

Because  a  formal  harmonic  framework  is  in  place,  breaking  from  this  framework  stands  out  

in  relief,  as  an  effect  to  enhance  the  experience  of  the  moment  in  the  score.  

 

  The  general  technique  of  Rondo  form  –  repeating  a  “ritornello”  between  contrasting  

episodes  –  reflects  in  a  formal  structure  the  idea  of  motion  and  stasis.  Each  time  the  music  

ventures   to   some   new   area,   whether   rhythmic,   tonal,   stylistic,   or   topical,   it   is   inevitably  

brought  back  to  a  point  of  familiarity.  In  utilizing  the  mock-­‐rondo  form,  Satie  incorporates  

an  element  of  self-­‐aware  neo-­‐classicism,  yet  within  this  context,  the  composer  incorporates  

a  modern-­‐day  Burlesque  aesthetic,  and  mechanical,  repetitive  music  more  akin  to  gamelan  

than  to  melodically-­‐oriented  music.  This  contrast  between  the  modern  and  the  classical  is  

significant,   and  may   serve   as   a   reflection   upon   the   very   new  medium   of   cinema.   Artists  

were  struggling  to  incorporate  this  novel  vehicle  of  artistic  expression  within  the  context  of  

tradition.  That  the  Entr’acte,  a  very  modern  artwork,  premiered  in  the  context  of  a  ballet  –  a  

decidedly  traditional  art  form  –  embodies  this  conflict  between  past  and  present.    

 

  A  Rondo,  particularly  when  heard  for  the  first  time,  is  an  open  form:  it  could  go  on  

for  as  long  as  a  composer  likes.  Sonata  form,  by  contrast,  establishes  an  expectation,  and  a  

sense  of  the  scope  and  scale  of  a  movement  from  early  on.  A  listener  can  generally  gauge  

where   they  will  be   taken,  and   it   is   through  the  composer’s  manipulation  of   that  progress  

towards   the   conclusion   that   they   create   the   excitement   of   the   experience.   In   contrast,  

rondo   forms   can   go   on   endlessly,   and   therefore   induce   relaxation   and   a   sense   of   levity,  

which   is   perhaps  why   they   are   frequently,   in   the   classical   period,   the   standard   form   for  

many   finales   of  multi-­‐movement   instrumental  works.   As   the   listener   does   not   anticipate  

where   he   or   she  will   be   taken,   there   is   little   cause   for   angst  when   the   journey   veers   in  

unexpected  places.  The  visual  babblings  and  semi-­‐narrative  structure  of  Entr’acte  functions  

in  a  similar  manner:  the  audience  is  provided  with  nothing  to  suggest  where  the  film  will  

lead,  as   there   is  simply  no  “plot.”  A  rondo  structure,   then,   is  perfectly  suited   for  a   film  of  

this  type.    

 

77

 

Contrasting  Patterns  in  the  Musical  Accompaniments  to  Un  chien  andalou    

  Buñuel’s  use  of  integrated  musical  recordings  in  Un  chien  andalou  exhibits  not  a  true  

“Rondo”   structure,   but   rather   an   alternating   pattern   in   which   the   director   exploits   the  

extreme  contrast  between  Wagner’s  music  and  Argentinean  tango  by  juxtaposing  the  two  

against  one  another,  creating  a  variable  auditory  backdrop.  Buñuel’s  use  of  music  therefore  

establishes  an  underlying  structure   in   the   film,  enhancing   the  viewer’s  comprehension  of  

its  organization.  The  musical  structure  unfolds  rather  simply  as  Tango  –  Wagner  Part  1  –

 Tango   –  Wagner   Part   2   –   Tango.  Buñuel’s  shooting  script,  printed   in   translation   in   the  

appendix,   outlines   the   alternation   of   Buñuel’s  musical   cues,   coordinating   these  moments  

with  the  pseudo-­‐narrative  of  the  film.  Like  Satie’s  score  –  and  unlike  the  music  of  Le  sang  

d’un   poète,   in   which   periods   of   silence   and   episodic   music   occur   between   instances   of  

recorded  dialogue  –  Buñuel’s  “found  object”  score  is  continuous  throughout  the  film.  Every  

moment  of  the  action  is  underscored  by  music,  and  the  very  contrast  between  the  musical  

selections   draws   the   score   to   the   foreground   of   the   viewer’s   experience.   The   use   of   the  

Wagner  Transfiguration  music  stands  out  all  the  more  because  of  its  juxtaposition  against  

the  tangos.  The  Argentinean  tango  cues  are  highly  rhythmic,  repetitive,  and  structured  with  

conventional  phrase  lengths,  while  Wagner’s  music  is  far  more  horizontal  than  vertical   in  

its   conception.   In   this   sense,   the   tango   is   very   much   the   music   of   sordid   reality.   This  

‘grounded’  music  echoes  populist  undertones,  whereas  Wagner’s  music  symbolizes  high  art  

and  an  element  of  mystical  spiritualism.  The  tango  music  is,  not  coincidentally,  aligned  with  

the   points   in   the   film   in   which   the   viewer   feels   most   “in   the   present.”   When   the   male  

protagonist   is   shaken   into   reality   from   a   dreamlike   state   at   6:38,   the   tone   of   the   film  

suddenly   becomes   far  more   natural.   The   viewer   is   caught   up   in   the   carnal   desire   of   the  

protagonist,   as   he   looks   upon   the   woman   in   the   room   lustfully.   The   death   of   the  

androgynous   figure   in   the   street   is   distant   from   the   protagonist,   as   he   and   the   female  

protagonist   stand   in   the   window   looking   on.   Wagner’s   music   therefore   underpins   this  

sense  of  distance  from  reality.  When  the  man  is  suddenly  stirred  from  his  dream  state  and  

78

lurches  toward  the  woman  in  the  room,  both  the  protagonist  and  the  accompanying  music  

are  jolted  to  reality.    

 

Though   Buñuel   initially   stood   behind   the   screen   with   two   record   players   and  

literally  “dropped  the  needle”  at  corresponding  moments   to  create  an  early  “mix  tape”  of  

Wagner  and   tango,   in  1960   the  director  was  able,  with   the  advent  of  new   technology,   to  

create   a   precisely   timed   and   coordinated   realization   of   his   film,  musically   aligned   as   he  

intended.  For   the  purposes  of  study,   this  1960  sound  edition  of  Un  chien  andalou  may  be  

considered   the   Urtext,   or   definitive   version.   Besides   the   clear   evidence   that   Buñuel  

intended  for  the  moment  of  climax  in  Wagner’s  music  to  coincide  with  moments  of  death  in  

the  film,  and  that  he  spliced  the  second  instance  of  Wagner’s  score  to  directly  coincide  with  

the   death   and   ‘transfiguration’   of   the   male   protagonist,   the   director’s   carefully   planned  

alignment  of  music  and  image  further  enhances  the  viewer’s  experience  of  the  film.  

 

  The  film’s  narrative  structure  unfolds  in  a  non-­‐linear  fashion.  A  Prologue  precedes  a  

title  card,  at  2:02,  that  indicates  the  action  will  take  place  “Eight  years  later.”  It  is  important  

to   note   that   Wagner’s   music,   in   the   two   instances   that   it   emerges   in   the   film,   always  

coincides   with   a   title   card.   The   second   instance   aligns   with   the   title   card,   at   10:53,  

signifying  that  the  action  is  taking  place  “Sixteen  years  before.”  This  indication  is  illogical,  

and   disturbs   the   viewer’s   experience   of   time   in   the   film,   which  may   or   may   not   unfold  

linearly.  That  Wagner’s  music,  with  its  sense  of  unresolved  harmony,  coincides  with  these  

moments  of  atemporality  and  “timelessness,”  is  fitting.  It  is  likewise  important  to  note  that  

the  music   from   the  Transfiguration  scene   in   the  context  of  Tristan  und  Isolde,   like   that  of  

most   Wagner   operas,   does   not   begin   cut   and   dry.   Rather,   it   flows   directly   from   the  

preceding   scene,   in   defiance   of   conventional   Recitative-­‐Aria   structure.   Wagner’s   music  

thereby   begins   in   media   res,   with   no   clear   beginning.   The   haze   of   this   appropriation  

coincides  with  the  indistinct  quality  of  both  the  action  and  the  cinematography  in  the  film.  

In   the   scenario   that   Buñuel   prepared   and   which   served   as   his   shooting   script,   at   the  

moment  at  which  the  second  Wagner  cue  begins,  Buñuel  writes:  

79

 

At   this   point,   the   photography   becomes   hazy.   The   newcomer   moves   in   slow  

motion  and  we  set  that  his  features  are  identical  to  those  of  the  other;  they  are  

one  and  the  same  person,  but  for  the  fact  that  the  newcomer  looks  younger  and  

more  doleful,  as  the  other  must  have  been  years  before.    

 

When   watching   the   film,   there   is   no   visual   break   in   the   scene,   apart   from   the   vague,  

unfocused  quality  of  the  cinematography.  The  action  takes  place  in  the  same  room,  and  in  

with   the   same   actor.   Only   the   change   in  music   helps   to   inform   the   viewer   that   this   is   a  

different  time,  and  that  the  man  is  encountering  the  more  youthful  and  exuberant  version  

of  himself.  Wagner’s  music  completely  transforms  the  emotional  content  of  the  scene.  The  

extreme   contrast   between   the   tango   cue   and   Wagner’s   cue   helps   to   underscore   this  

transition.  Though  perhaps   the  original  purpose  of   film  music  was   to   simply   “occupy   the  

ear,”   at   this   moment   in   Un   chien   andalou,   Buñuel   relies   heavily   on   the   musical  

accompaniment  to  completely  alter  the  viewer’s  perception  of  the  scene.  

 

Film  scholar  Linda  Williams  notes   that  Un  chien  andalou  presents   “a   semblance  of  

narrative   coherence,   much   like   the   feeling   when   wakened   from   a   dream’s   radical  

incoherence   .   .   .   covered  up  by   the   false   appearance  of   intelligibility”   (L.  Williams  1992).  

There   is   something   resembling   an   inherent   narrative   structure   to   the   film,   but   it   is  

undermined   by   the   unreliability   of   memory   and   memory   association.   Buñuel’s   absurd  

juxtaposition   of  Wagner   and   tango   perfectly   encapsulates   this   lack   of   reliability.   As   in   a  

dream,  there  is  no  logical  reason  for  Buñuel’s  use  of  either  musical  source,  save  to  distort  

any  rational  experience  of  the  film.  

 

 

 

 

 

80

Evocations  of  Timelessness  in  Le  sang  d’un  poète  –  Visual  and  Musical  Non-­‐sequiturs      

Elements   of   Cocteau’s   use   of   Auric’s   musical   cues   Le   sang   d’un   poète   likewise  

embody   the   concept   of   timelessness,   or   suspension   in   time;   as   do   a   number   of   visual  

motives  throughout  the  film.  Like  the  work  of  most  of  Les  Six,  Auric’s  music  often  harkened  

back  to  the  classical  period,  though  almost  always  with  a  degree  of  self-­‐aware  détachement.  

Auric’s  mélange   of   elements   –   classical   form,   topic,   and   style   –   intermingling  with   other  

more   modern   elements,   particularly   instrumentation,   create   a   sense   of   the   cues   being  

somehow  suspended  in  time,  which  perfectly  reflects  the  tone  of  the  film.  Like  the  score  –

which,   like  Buñuel’s   juxtaposition  of  Wagner   and   tango   reflects   the   concept   of   “high   and  

low”   coinciding   together   –   Cocteau’s   imagery   eschews   the   clear   evidence   of   any   obvious  

period.  Both  Cocteau  and  Auric  are  deliberately  anachronistic.    

 

 Cocteau’s  handling  of  Auric’s  cues  is  quite  disjunct.  As  Auric  recalled,   for  this  film,  

“Cocteau  told  me  simply:  evidently:  in  such-­‐and  such  a  passage,  I  imagine  a  music  with  this  

kind  of  character.  It  ended  there.  When  I  played  my  music,  when  he  heard  my  music,  there  

was  no  discussion   of   any   sort   between  us.  He  was   happy  with  what   I   had  done”   (Pasler  

1991).  Cocteau  even  claimed  to  have  randomly  aligned  the  music  with  various  scenes,  and  

relied  upon  the  ironic  contrast  between  image  and  musical  tone  to  intensify  the  experience  

of   the   image.   Through   his   isolation   of   Auric’s   musical   cues,   Cocteau   establishes   a  

discontinuity  in  the  film.  Likewise,  the  juxtaposition  of  stylistically  contrasting  musical  cues  

creates  a  sense  of  disorientation:  a  dream-­‐inducing,  surrealistic  mercurial  quality.    

 

 Even  the  intercut  moving  image  of  a  collapsing  pillar  presented  at  the  film’s  outset  

is  fragmented  and  disjunct,  and  a  different  portion  of  this  action  is  presented  between  each  

episode  of  the  film.  Preceding  the  first  episode,  the  pillar  begins  to  fall  at  2:17,  and  only  at  

the   close   of   the   film,   at   50:17,   is   the  moving   image   complete.   Perhaps  Cocteau  means   to  

imply  that  all  of  the  action  in  the  film  occurs,  as  in  a  dream  state,  within  in  the  metaphorical  

81

“blink  of   an  eye.”  The  whole  of   the   film’s   structure  occurs  within   the   context  of   a  period  

that  the  viewer  cannot  properly  equate  with  reality.    

 

Large  Scale  Form  in  Entr’acte  as  it  relates  to  Relâche      

Form   is   far   from   arbitrary   in   Entr’acte,  nor   is   it   arbitrary   in  Relâche.   In   fact,   the  

ballet  is  structured  as  a  palindrome  in  which  the  form  reflects  upon  itself  about  the  middle.  

The  diagram  on  the  facing  page  outlines  this  form.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82

Figure 15 –Robert Orlege – The mirrored structure of Relâche, from Satie the composer

 

When  taken  in  this  way,  the  Entr’acte  serves  as  far  more  than  simply  a  palate  cleanser,  

or   intermediary  between   the   two  parts  of   the  ballet,  but   rather  as   the  very   central   focus  

point   of   the   entire   structure.   Reflective   surfaces   and   images   in   the   film,   including   the  

83

surface  of  water  and  brief  glimpses  of  circular  mirrors  at  3:10,  provide  a  visual  equivalent  

to  this  motif.    

 

Satie’s   score,   in   the   pacing   of   shifts   between   musical   units,   likewise   resembles   a  

mirrored   structure.   It   begins   with   many   unrelated   musical   units   rebounding   from   one  

another  in  line  with  the  imagery;  it  then  becomes  more  cohesive  and  unified  in  topic  in  the  

central   Ballerina   and   Funeral   tableaux;   finally,   it   once   again   spins   out   of   control   as   the  

funeral  hearse  speeds  away.  The  cinematic  rhythm  of  the  film,  that   is,   the  speed  between  

shots,   is  quickest  at   the  beginning  and  ending  sections  of   the   film,  and   it   is   in   the  middle  

that   it   becomes   more   unified   and   deliberately   paced.   The   structure   of   Satie’s   score   to  

Entr’acte   reflects   –   no   pun   intended   –   the   mirror   structure   of   the   entire   ballet.   By   this  

approximation,  perhaps  the  biggest  jokes  in  the  film  form  the  central  point  of  all  of  Relâche.  

The  bearded  Ballet  dancer  is  among  these  jokes,  accompanied  by  Satie’s  own  play  on  meter,  

at   6:45,  wherein   the   ballerina   is   obviously   not   dancing   in   the  waltz  meter   of   the  music.  

Likewise,  in  the  central  Hunter  tableau,  Jean  Börlin  is  shot  and  presumably  killed.  Börlin’s  

cameo   in   the   film   is   not   coincidental:   he   was,   in   fact,   the   lead   dancer   in   Relâche.   The  

filmmakers,   in  other  words,  have  killed  off  the  lead  dancer  of  a  ballet  midway  through  its  

form,   just   as   Hitchcock   does   to   his   heroine,   with   a   far   different   effect,   in   Psycho.   The  

screeching  timbre  of  Satie’s  Ritornello  motto  at   this  moment   intensifies   its  absurdity,  and  

he  follows  this  with  one  of  the  few  moments  of  silence  in  the  entire  score:  a  true  point  of  

rest,   at   9:27.   From   then,   the   music   abruptly   shifts   into   the   mock-­‐Chopin   funeral   march  

episode.   Satie’s   use   of   silence,   like   Cocteau’s,   enhances   the   shock   of   this   moment.   The  

music,   like   the   viewer,   seems   to   gasp.  Harmonically,   even   the   cadence   is   incomplete   and  

unresolved.  Rather,  Satie’s  cue  simply  comes  to  an  unprepared  halt.    

   

Some  semblance  of  logic  seems  to  underpin  the  film’s  construction,  in  that  though  it  

can  generally  be  broken  down  into  tableaux  or  scenes  –  with  the  later  ones  becoming  more  

unified   and   cohesive   in   the   presentation   of   their   ideas   –   the   use   of   non-­‐sequiturs   and  

repeated  visual  motives  blurs  the  lines  of  formal  delineation.  The  most  important  features  

84

that   Satie   incorporates   to   underline   the   formal   construction   of   the   score   are   repeated  

musical   motives,   in   particular   the   recurrence   of   the   opening   Ritornello   motive   at  

structurally  significant  moments.  Likewise,  he  relies  upon  the  use  of  points  of  cadence,  and  

significant   moments   of   musical   change   –   particularly   shifts   in   meter,   and   sudden  

alterations   in  tempo  –   in  order  to  create  structural  divisions.  Satie’s  score  punctuates  the  

film   in   such   a  way   as   to  make   it   resemble   not   a   run-­‐on   sentence,   but   rather   a   series   of  

thoughts   that   bounce   off   one   another,   not   unlike   some   techniques   used   in   Dada   poetry.  

Behind  this  absurd  score  lurks  a  clear  underlying  structure,  a  fact  that  somewhat  betrays  

the  notion  of  “instantaneity”   that  Picabia,  Clair,  and  the  composer  all  claimed  were  at   the  

heart  of  the  film  and  of  Relâche.  Their  greatest  gesture  of  absurdity  is  the  very  fact  that  this  

film  and  its  score  are  actually  planned  very  carefully  and  logically.  

 

The  “Episodic”  Use  of  Music  in  Cocteau’s  Le  sang  d’un  poète    

Cocteau’s  use  of  Auric’s  musical  cues  in  Le  sang  d’un  poète  likewise  appears  to  have  

been  planned  quite  carefully,  despite  the  filmmaker’s  assertion  that  only  “by  grace  of  God”  

did   any   alignment   come   to   be.   The   structure   of   Cocteau’s   film   is   very   different   from  

Entr’acte,   yet   both   are,   in   a   manner,   “episodic.”  While   Entr’acte   resembles   a   continuous  

stream  of  thought  marked  by  distinctive  tableaux,  Le  sang  d’un  poète   is  assembled  in  four  

“episodes,”  each  announced  by  Cocteau’s  narration.  The  first  episode,  “The  wounded  hand,  

or  the  scar  of  a  poet,”  begins  at  2:21.  The  second,  “Do  walls  have  ears?”  begins  at  11:31.  The  

third  episode,  “the  snowball   fight,”  begins  at  28:43,  and  the  fourth  and  final  episode  “The  

profanation  of  the  Host,”  begins  at  33:39.  Each  episode  in  some  way  evolves  into  another,  

and   they   all   often   share   similar   visual   motives.   In   this   sense,   the   structure   of   the   film  

resembles   the   continuous  evolution  of  dream-­‐like   thought,   and   is   far  more   fluid  and   less  

jagged  than  the  frequently  juxtaposed  images  in  Entr’acte.  The  loose  narrative  of  the  four  

episodes   traces   the   death   of   the   poet,   a   figure   representing   Cocteau   himself.   In   the   first  

episode,   the  poet   is   “scarred”  by   the  wounds  of   inspiration;   in   the   second,  he   sleeps  and  

dreams,  exploring   the  resources  of  his  creative  mind;   in   the   third,  he  awakens  as  a  child,  

85

drawing  from  the  memories  of  his  youth  for  inspiration;  and  in  the  fourth,  he  is  dead,  killed  

by  his  own  hand.  Like   the  structure  of  Entr’acte,  Cocteau  blurs   the   lines  delineating  each  

episode.   The   four   distinct   episodes   in   Cocteau’s   film   each   contain   their   own   miniature  

“narrative.”  One  cannot  help  but  attempt  to  draw  parallels  between  them,  however,  and  the  

recurrence  of  specific  musical  cues  in  multiple  episodes  creates  musical  links  across  these  

episodes.    

 

Cocteau   himself   blurs   the   lines   between   the   four   episodes   both   narratively   and  

visually.   The   poet   figure,   in   falling   through   a   mirror,   emerges   in   the   second   episode.  

Likewise,  there  is  no  blank  screen  or  title  card  in  the  transition  from  the  snowball  fight  of  

the  third  episode  to  the  final  episode  scene,  wherein  the  angel  of  death  emerges  to  collect  

the   corpse   of   the   child.   Rather,   Cocteau   creates   a   superimposition   of   one   scene   onto  

another:   a   seamless   transition.   Theatrically,   the   staging   and   scenario   changes   while   the  

setting   itself   remains   the   same,   dead   corpse   and   all.   The   music   helps   to   reinforce   this  

blurring,  in  that  it  elides  each  scene.  Rather  than  ending  each  of  Auric’s  cues,  which  were  all  

pre-­‐recorded,   Cocteau   instead   allows   the  music   to   continue   over   the   scene,   bridging   the  

gaps  between  them.    

 

However,   the   juxtaposition   of   cue   against   cue,   and   Cocteau’s   occasionally   abrupt  

splices  of  the  recorded  music  at  times  carefully  underscore  particular  moments  in  the  film.  

In   the   passage   transitioning   from   the   first   episode   to   the   second   episode,   beginning   at  

10:22,  the  poet,  in  an  effort  to  remove  the  macabre  image  of  the  sinister  whispering  mouth  

from  his   own  hand,   transfers   it   to   a   statue   in   his   studio.   Auric’s  music,  with   a   perpetual  

motion  of  continuous  running  notes,  sinuously  meandering  in  the  winds,  continues  to  play  

over  the  transition  to  the  next  “episode,”  as  announced  by  Cocteau’s  narration,  thus  eliding  

the  scene.  However,  on  occasion,  a  menacing  trill  interrupts  the  music,  conveying  a  sense  of  

anticipation.  Cocteau  splices  Auric’s  music  at  12:03,  just  after  the  statue  shockingly  begins  

to   speak,   and   the  poet   realizes   that  he   is   trapped   in   the   room.  The   ceaselessly   repetitive  

musical   cue   underscoring   this   scene   reflects   the   state   of   the   poets  mind   as   he   begins   to  

86

wonder   if   he  will   ever   escape  his   studio.   There   is   no  door   through  which   to   exit,   just   as  

Auric  provides  no   structural   ‘exit’   his  musical   cue;   instead,   only   incessant   repetition:   the  

poet  cannot   leave,   just  as  Cocteau  refuses   to  allow  Auric’s  music   to  shift   to  a  new  cue  or  

topic.  At  12:50,  the  ominous  trill  sounds  once  more,  perfectly  aligned  with  the  moment  at  

which  the  poet  realizes  what  he  must  do  in  order  to  escape:  plunge  through  the  mirror,  and  

into  his  subconscious.    

 

A  Hierarchy  of  Musical  Cues  in  Le  sang  d’un  poète    

  Among  Auric’s  many  varied,  independent  cues  used  in  the  film  –  of  which  there  are  

over  a  dozen  –  only  two  recur,  implying  that  this  pair  has  a  particular  symbolic  function  of  

greater   import   than   all   other   cues   in   the   film.   If   Cocteau  meant   for   his   film   to   induce   a  

dream-­‐like   state,   by  means   of   free   association,   then   the   director’s   use   of   recurring   cues  

provides  a  means  through  which  to  establish  these  connections.  Like  the  recurring  visual  

motives   of   the   film,   the   viewer   is   led   to   question  why   the   accompanying  music   from   an  

earlier  scene  is  reused.  As  with  the  Wagnerian  leitmotivic  technique  that  would  become  a  

hallmark   of   later   film   scores,   particularly   in   Hollywood   –   notably   including   in   John  

Williams’s   Star   Wars   scores   –   the   viewer’s   association   of   music   to   image   is   a   crucial  

component  to  understanding  the  subtext  of  the  film.  The  music,  rather  than  serving  merely  

as  background,   enhances   and   adds  depth   to   the  understanding  of   the   visuals,   and   tells   a  

story  all  its  own.    

 

The   two   motives   that   recur   in   the   film   are   contrasting   and   thereby   distinctive.  

Auric’s   distinctive   scoring   and   use   of   topic   –  like   Satie’s   distinctive   orchestration   of   the  

Ritornello  unit,  and  the  contrasting  juxtaposition  of  Wagner  with  tango  –  help  to  draw  these  

cues  to  the  foreground.  Set  apart  from  their  musical  surroundings,  often  by  Cocteau’s  use  of  

silence   between   cues,   Auric’s   musical   themes   take   on   an   almost   statuesque   character.  

There   is   no   evolution  nor  development  between   two   cues;   and   even  within   a   single   cue,  

often   multiple   musical   ideas   are   assembled   in   what   James   Deaville   refers   to   as  

87

“carnivalesque”   fashion   (Deaville   and   Simon   2011).   Auric   employs   contrast   within   his  

musical  cues,  as  Cocteau  utilizes  contrast  between  the  musical  cues.  

 

The   first   cue   to   transcend   episodes   is   the   sprightly   G-­‐major  music   from   the   first  

episode,  heard  first  at  3:08:  a  gigue-­‐like  theme  scored  for  high  winds,  accompanied  by  the  

piano  and  plucked  strings,  with  the  noticeable  intrusion  of  a  ratchet,  providing  the  theme  a  

toy-­‐like   quality   signifying   childhood   innocence.   This   music   truly   embodies   the  

carnivalesque   style   that  Deaville  describes,   both   in   its   jovial   quality   and   in   its   capricious    

quality,  asymmetrical  phrase  lengths,  and  neurotic  undertones.  Perhaps  at  this  point  in  the  

film,  in  which  the  poet  is  painting  in  his  studio,  the  theme  is  meant  to  represent  the  creative  

artistic  process.  Heard  first  at  the  sight  of  the  five-­‐pointed  star  that  scars  the  poet’s  back  –  a  

visual   motive   that   recurs   later   in   the   film   and   which   serves   Jean   Cocteau’s   own   visual  

“signature”  –  the  theme  is  associated  both  with  a  distinct  image  and  with  a  thematic  idea:  

that   of   creativity.   The   distinctive   scoring,   particularly   Auric’s   use   of   non-­‐pitched  

percussion,   calls   attention   to   this   cue.   Likewise,   the   theme   underscores   an   absurd,  

dreamlike   image:   that   of   a   mouth   beginning   to   move   on   the   painting   –   signifying   the  

expressive  voice  of  art  itself.  

 

When   the   theme   recurs   in   the   film,   in   the   final   episode  at  34:57,   its   context   is   far  

different:  it  accompanies  a  card  game  being  played  over  the  corpse  of  a  dead  youth  in  the  

snow.  Two  characters  recur,  though  they  are  now  transfigured.  The  man  playing  the  card  

game  is  played  by  the  same  actor  who  played  the  poet  from  episode  one,  while  the  woman  

across  from  him  is  the  figure  first  painted  by  the  poet  in  that  earlier  episode,  now  in  human  

form.  This  character  later  becomes  a  statue,  which  is  the  ultimate  fate  of  the  poet  himself.  

Cocteau’s   use   of   this   very   distinctive   cue   at   this   moment   in   the   film   serves   several  

functions.   First,   its   carnivalesque   character  heightens   the   grotesque  quality   of   the   scene:  

that  a  game  of  cards  can  take  place  in  the  same  context  as  the  harrowing  death  of  a  child.  

Likewise,   it   associates   the   two   characters   on   screen  with   their   former   incarnations.   The  

music   informs   the   viewer,   by   association,   that   these   are   in   fact   the   same   figures,   now  

88

transformed.   Furthermore,   if   the   theme   symbolizes   artistic   creativity,   then   Cocteau   is  

perhaps  commenting  on  creativity  ironically  in  the  scene.  The  man  pulls  the  winning  card  

from  the  child’s  coat.  Symbolically,  this  signifies  that  he  is  cheating  in  the  creative  process  

by   drawing   from  his   own   childhood   for   inspiration.   As  Deaville   points   out,   the   snowball  

fight  of  the  third  episode  was  based  upon  a  memory  from  Cocteau’s  own  childhood,  which  

further  establishes  the  autobiographical  subtext  of  the  film  (Deaville  and  Simon  2011).  The  

use  of   this  cue   in   two  completely  distinct  contexts   first  establishes  a  connection  between  

the  two  episodes  and  then  comments  on  the  disturbing  alteration  of  a  petty  card  game  with  

the  harrowing  significance  of  death.  Cocteau’s  use  of  this  music  in  the  final  scene  is  highly  

ironic,  and  its  cheerful  tone  seems  entirely  out  of  place,  discomfortingly  so.  

 

The  second  cue  to  recur   is   first  presented   in  the  second  episode,   in   the  hallway  of  

the  Hotel  des  Folies-­‐Dramatiques,  after  a  transition  scene  at  13:21  that  incorporates  special  

visual  effects  with  magical   results.  The  poet  has  descended   through  a  mirror   to  arrive   in  

this   bizarre   passageway   of   multiple   doors,   four   of   which   he   opens,   revealing   different  

scenes.  The  mirror,  a  reflective  surface,  symbolizes  the  poet’s  looking  within  himself.  When  

he   falls   through   this   mirror,   Cocteau   implies   that   the   poet   has   descended   into   his   own  

creative  mind   in   search  of   inspiration.   Each   locked  door   represents   a  different   source  of  

creative  stimulus,  whether  a  memory  or  a  new  creation.  The  poet’s  descent  into  his  creative  

mind   is  significantly  accompanied  by  silence.  The  absence  of  sound  and  music   in  Le  sang  

d’un  poète  often  affects  the  experience  of  the  scene  as  much  as  the  presence  of  music  and  

sound.   The   poet   here   floats   through   a   vacuous,   dark   space,   and   the   lack   of  music   seems  

deliberately   intended   to   evoke   this   vacuum.  By   surrounding  Auric’s   cues  with  prolonged  

lengths  of  periodic  silence,  the  cues  themselves  stand  out  more  in  relief,  as  is  the  case  with  

this   cue,   which   emerges   first   at   15:29,   following   several   minutes   of   silence.   The   music  

accompanying   the   scene   is   far   different   from   the   jovial  motive   of   the   first   episode.   This  

theme   is   dirge-­‐like   and   processional,   in   a  minor  mode,   and   subdued   in   both   tempo   and  

timbre.  It  evokes  an  ominous  quality,  as  though  Cocteau  were  using  Auric’s  music  to  imply  

that  when  an  artist   looks  within,  occasionally  disturbing  and  haunting  memories  emerge.  

89

As   the   poet   looks   into   each   room,   peering   through   a   keyhole,   the   music   subsides   and  

silence   enhances   the   experience   of   the   scene.   The   situations   in   each   room   –   the  

assassination   of   a   man   by   firing   squad,   a   bound   child   escaping   the   abusive   whip   of   a  

schoolmaster,   and   a   hermaphrodite   bearing   a   sign   reading   “Danger   of   Death”   –   are   all  

disturbing  and  grotesque   in  nature,  and   the  ominous   tone  of  Auric’s  music  appropriately  

underscores  this.  Cocteau  fragments  Auric’s  cues,  and  incorporates  portions  only  when  the  

poet  is  in  the  hallway.    

 

When  this  cue  re-­‐emerges  later  in  the  film,  it  is  in  the  third  episode:  the  “Snowball  

Fight”  scene.  This  cue  begins  at  33:00,  and  here  is  aligned  with  the  death  of  the  boy  whose  

corpse   remains   lying   under   the   card   table   in   the   final   episode.   The   boy   may   perhaps  

represent  Cocteau’s  own  childhood  self,  and  his  death   is  a  macabre  and  disturbing  scene,  

perfectly  suited  to  the  accompaniment  of   the  menacing,  dirge-­‐like  music  of   the  preceding  

episode.    Here,  it  is  the  viewer  who  is  spying  on  an  unsettling  scene  that  it  cannot  help  or  

control  from  its  voyeuristic  vantage,  separated  by  the  cinematic  fourth  wall.  Like  the  poet  

in  the  preceding  episode,  looking  in  on  disturbing  scenes  that  he  cannot  control,  the  viewer  

is  helpless  and  must  simply  observe.  Auric’s  use  of  dissonant,  flutter-­‐tongue  punctuations  

in   the   winds   helps   to   enhance   the   alarming   tone   at   this   point   in   the   film.   The   dark,  

menacing  quality  of  this  cue  then  acts  as  a  foil  to  the  re-­‐emerging  jovial  G  major  theme  of  

episode  one.  At  34:18,  Cocteau  allows  us   to  hear   the  pained  moans  of   the  boy,   as  he   lies  

dying.  The  absence  of  diegetic   sound  during   the  earlier  musical   cues  makes   this   realistic  

sound  all  the  more  effective,  as  it  stands  out  in  contrast.  Realistic  sounds  are  rare  in  the  film  

and   by   isolating   this   particular   moment   and   temporarily   muting   the   film’s   musical  

backdrop,  Cocteau  draws  the  viewer  into  the  scene.  It  is  starkly  juxtaposed  moment  of  lucid  

reality  in  an  otherwise  dreamlike  film.    

 

The   next  musical   cue   to   play   after   these   darkened  moments   is   the   jovial   G  major  

theme,   at   34:57.   The   extreme   contrast   between   this   theme   and   the   preceding   one   has   a  

disturbing   effect   on   the   viewer.   Cocteau   depicts   the   carefree   scene   of   a   card   game,   and  

90

Auric’s  light-­‐spirited  music  accompanies  it.  However,  the  viewer  still  notices  the  corpse  of  

the  dead  boy   lying   just  beneath   the   table.  The  music   seems,   for  all   intents  and  purposes,  

entirely  inappropriate.  The  viewer  is  left  with  the  tension  inherent  in  negotiating  between  

the   many   conflicting   elements   of   the   scene.   Like   the   card   players,   Auric’s   music   seems  

completely   unaffected   by   the   scene.   This   very   deliberately   calculated   misalignment   on  

Cocteau’s  part  intensifies  the  viewer’s  ironic  comprehension  of  the  depicted  situation.  The  

episode’s  title,  the  “Profanation  of  the  Host,”  signifies  sacrilege.  Cocteau’s  use  of  this  music  

to  underpin  this  particular  scene  is  likewise  sacrilegious,  and  deeply  disturbing.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

91

Epilogue:  Fade  to  Black      

 At   the   time   of   their   creation,   perhaps   no   one   would   have   sought   to   draw  

comparisons  between  Entr’acte,  Un  chien  andalou,  and  Le  sang  d’un  poète.  These  exemplify  

three   entirely   unique   approaches   to   the   cinematic   art   form,   created   by   completely  

independent   creative  artists.  Now,  nearly  a   century   later,   it  might  be  possible   to  observe  

some  larger  collective  goals  amongst  them.  These  films  all  emerged  from  a  similar  time  and  

place   in   history.   Paris   between   the  World  Wars  was   a   dynamic   and   progressive   cultural  

mecca.   Almost   unprecedented   immigration   to   the   City   of   Light   just   following   the   First  

World   War   collected   an   influx   of   new   cultures,   including   the   important   arrival   of   Jazz  

music,   for   instance.   These  anées   folles  gave  way   to   a   period   in  which   artists   exemplified  

significant  boldness  and  daring,  and  the  coincidence  of  the  emergence  of  cinema  as  a  new  

art   form  meant   that   these   artists   could   utilize   this   brand   new  medium   to   channel   their  

expressive  voice.  

 

Unconventional  films  do,  to  some  degree,  require  “unconventional”  film  music.  The  

cliché   tropes   of   silent   film   and   early   sound   film   convention   could   not   recreate   the   same  

effects  that  these  perfectly  suited  musical  scores  have  on  the  films  that  they  accompany.  A  

symbiotic   relationship   between   music   and   the   moving   image   emerges,   and   the   music  

breathes   life   into   the   images,   as   the   visuals   conversely   nourish   the  music.   Entr’acte,  Un  

chien  andalou,  and  Le  sang  d’un  poète  are  each  prized  and  beloved  for  the  creative  energy  of  

their   visual   composition.   Their   filmmakers   manipulate   the   viewer’s   experience   with  

sometimes  surreal,  often  absurd,  and  occasionally  shocking  imagery,  cinematography,  and  

editing.   The  music   of   these   films   has   been   discussed   and   analyzed   in   far   less   detail   in  

scholarship   than   the   visuals,   and   new   film   scores   have   been  written   for   all   three   in   the  

eighty   to  ninety  years  since   they   first  premiered.  While   these  new  scores  can  allow  us   to  

experience  the  films  anew,  they  cannot  substitute  for  the  carefully  crafted  balance  of  music  

and  image  that  the  filmmakers  and  the  original  composers  first  intended.  It  is  my  personal  

hope   that   in   the   future,   film  music  will   take   a   higher   place   in   the   hierarchy   of   scholarly  

92

analysis,   and   that   definitive   orchestral   scores   for   many   of   these   early   films   might   be  

published.    

 

In   the   dark   of   a   theater,   as   Hitchcock   once   famously   noted   in   reference   to   his  

infamous   1963   film   Psycho,   the   audience   is   subjected   to   a   director’s   carefully   crafted  

manipulation  of  their  experience.  He  recalled:  “the  game  with  the  audience  was  fascinating.  

I   was   directing   the   viewers.   You   might   say   I   was   playing   them,   like   an   organ.”   The  

composer   Bernard   Hermann,   whose   film   scores   contribute   so   much   to   Hitchcock’s  

calculated   manipulation   of   the   audience,   tellingly   and   appropriately   quipped:   “he   only  

finishes  a  picture  sixty  percent.  I  have  to  finish  it  for  him”  (Brown  1994).  

 

93

APPENDIX  

APPENDIX  1  

The  Musical  Structure  of  Entr’acte    

Correspo

nding  

Time  in  Film

 

Unit  N

umbe

r  

Satie

’s  Cue

 Num

ber  

Satie

’s  descriptio

n    

Unit  D

esigna

tion  

Num

ber  o

f  Measures  

Repe

titions  in  Film

 

Key  Signature  

Meter  and

 Tem

po  

Measure  #  in  sc

ore  

2:20   1   I   Chimneys;  deflating  balloons  

A   8     A   2/4;  Pas  trop  vite  

1  

2:31   2       B   4     F     9  2:37   3       C   8     C     13  2:46   4       D   8     A     21  2:57     5       E   8     A     29  3:08   6   II   Boxing  Gloves  and  

Matches  A   8     A     37  

3:17   7       F   4     A     45  3:23   8       E’   4     A     49  3:28   9       B’   4     A     53  3:34   10       B’’   4     F     57  3:38   11       D’   8     D     61  3:48   12   III   Scenes  from  the  air;  

chess  game  and  boats  on  roof  

F’   4     D     69  

3:53   13       G   4     D     73  3:58   14       A   8     A     77  4:09   15       H  +  H’   4+4     D     85  4:29   16       I   4     B-­‐flat     93  

4:35   17       J  +  J’   (5+2)+(3+2)     F     97  4:50   18       H  +  H’   4+4   1  repeat  

of  8  bars  D     109  

5:11   19       K   6+2     D     117  5:25   20   IV   The  female  dancer  

and  figures  within  water  

L  +  M   4+4     E   3/4;  No  designated  

tempo  change  

125  

5:41   21       N  +  O   4+4     E  minor     133  5:58   22       P  +  Q   4+4(+4)   1  repeat  

of  last  4  bars  (Q)  

A  minor     141  

6:21     20’       L+M     (Full  repeat  of  Units  

L-­‐Q)  

E     125’    

94

Correspo

nding  

Time  in  Film

 

Unit  N

umbe

r  

Satie

’s  Cue

 Num

ber  

Satie

’s  descriptio

n    

Unit  D

esigna

tion  

Num

ber  o

f  Measures  

Repe

titions  in  Film

 

Key  Signature  

Meter  and

 Tem

po  

Measure  #  in  sc

ore  

6:37   21’       N+O       E  minor     133’  6:54   22’       P+Q       A  minor     141’  7:17   23       R  +  L’  

(rounds  out  the  section)  

4+4     E       149  

7:37   24   V   The  hunter  and  the  Beginning  of  the  

funeral  

A   12  (extension)  

(4+4+4)  

  A   2/4   157  

7:56   25       B’’’   4     1  repeat   C     169  8:08   26       S   8   1  repeat   F     173  8:21   27       A   8   1  repeat   A     181  8:50   25’       B’''   4     C     169’  9:02   26’       S   8     F     173’  9:13   27’       A   8     A     181’  9:30   28   VI   Funeral  March   T   2+(3+3)  

(2  bars  of  intro)  

  A  minor   4/4;  Plus  Lent  

189  

10:01   29       U   8  (3+2+3)     F     197  10:24   30       V  +  W   4+4     A  minor     205  

MISSING  FROM  FILM  

31       X   8     A       213  

10:43   32   VII     Funeral  Procession  in  Slow  Motion  

A   8     A   2/4  (much  slower  tempo)  

221  

10:58   33       D’’   8     D     229  11:11   34       X  +  Y   4+4     E-­‐flat     237  11:27   35       Z   8     E  minor     245  

11:43   36       AA   8     D     253  11:59   37       A   8     A     261  12:16   38       BB   8  (2+6)     F     269  12:35   39       CC   8   1  repeat   C     277  13:13   40   VIII   The  Chase   BB’   (4+4)   1  repeat   D     285  13:45   41       DD   7   1  repeat   A   Cut  time  

(Accents  give  the  music  a  

feeling  of  triple  

meter)  Pulse  

293  

95

Correspo

nding  

Time  in  Film

 

Unit  N

umbe

r  

Satie

’s  Cue

 Num

ber  

Satie

’s  descriptio

n    

Unit  D

esigna

tion  

Num

ber  o

f  Measures  

Repe

titions  in  Film

 

Key  Signature  

Meter  and

 Tem

po  

Measure  #  in  sc

ore  

Remains  Same  

14:09   42       DD’   7   1  repeat   A     300  14:35   43       DD’’   7   1  repeat   A     307  14:56   44       EE   8   1  repeat   D   2/4  (The  

beginning  of  

accelerando  through  Unit  51)  

314  

15:14   45       EE’   8   1  repeat   E-­‐flat     322  15:28   46       EE’’   8   1  repeat   F     330  15:43   47       FF   8   1  repeat   C     338  15:58   48       GG   8   1  repeat   C     346  16:14   49       HH   8   1  repeat   G     354  16:29   50       II   8   1  repeat   A     362  16:44   44’       EE   8   1  repeat   D     314  17:00   45’       EE'   8   1  repeat   E-­‐flat     322  17:15   46’       EE’'   8   1  repeat   F     330  17:28   47’       FF   8   1  repeat   C      17:43   48’       GG       C      17:56   49’       HH       G      18:09   50’       II       A      18:19   51       JJ   8   1  repeat   D     370  18:37   52   IX   The  Coffin’s  fall  and  

the  emergence  of  Börlin  

KK   8     A   3/4;  Lent   378  

18:59   53       LL   8     C     386  19:18   54       MM   8     F   Ritardando   394  19:40   55   X   Final:  The  screen  

bursts  and  the  end  A   8     A   2/4   402  

19:49   56       A’   8     A     410  19:57   57       NN   8     A     418  20:00   58       OO   4     A   6/8   422  

 

 

 

 

   

96

APPENDIX  2    

Un  Chien  Andalou  

Original  Shooting  Script  by  Dalí  and  Buñuel  (translated  by  Haim  Finkelstein)    

Section  Breaks,  Musical  (in  Red)  and  Timing  Cues  Supplied  by  the  Patrick  Campbell  Jankowski     PROLOGUE  

TANGO  

Once  Upon  a  Time  ...  

A  balcony  at  night.  A  man  is  sharpening  a  razor  by  the  balcony.  The  man   looks  at   the  sky  

through  the  window-­‐panes  and  sees  ...  A  light  cloud  moving  toward  the  full  moon.  Then  a  

young  woman's  head,  her  eyes  wide  open.  A  razor  blade  moves  toward  one  of  the  eyes.  The  

light  cloud  passes  now  across  the  moon.  The  razor  blade  cuts  through  the  eye  of  the  young  

woman,  slicing  it.  End  of  Prologue.    

 

EIGHT  YEARS  LATER  

 

WAGNER  1:45  

 

A   deserted   street.   It   is   raining.   A   character   dressed   in   a   dark-­‐gray   suit   appears   riding   a  

bicycle.  His  head,  back  and   loins   are  adorned   in   ruffles  of  white   linen.  A   rectangular  box  

with  black  and  white  diagonal  stripes  is  secured  to  his  chest  by  straps.  The  character  pedals  

mechanically   without   holding   the   handlebars,   with   his   hands   resting   on   his   knees.   The  

character   is   seen   from   the   back   down   to   the   thighs   in   a   medium   shot,   superimposed  

lengthwise   on   the   street   down   which   he   is   cycling   with   his   back   to   the   camera.   The  

97

character  moves  toward  the  camera  until  the  striped  box  is  seen  in  a  close-­‐up.  An  ordinary  

room  on  the  third  floor  on  the  same  street.  A  young  girl  wearing  a  brightly  colored  dress  is  

sitting  in  the  middle  of  the  room  attentively  reading  a  book.  Suddenly  she  comes  out  of  her  

reading  with  a  start,   listens  with  curiosity,  freeing  herself  of  the  book  by  throwing  it  on  a  

nearby  couch.    

 

2:30  The  book  stays  open  with  a  reproduction  of  Vermeer's  The  Lacemaker  on  one  of  the  

pages   facing  up.  The  young  woman   is   convinced  now   that   something   is   off:   she,   gets  up,  

and,   half   turning,   walks   in   quick   steps   toward   the   window.   The   character   we   have  

mentioned   before   has   just   at   this   very   moment   stopped,   below   on   the   street.   Without  

offering  the  least  resistance,  out  of  inertia,  he  lets  himself  come  down  with  the  bicycle  into  

the  gutter,   in   the  midst  of  a  mud  heap.  Looking  enraged  and  resentful,   the  young  woman  

hurries  down   the  stairs  and  out   to   the  street.  Close-­‐up  of   the  character   sprawling  on   the  

ground,  expressionless,  his  position   identical   to   that  at   the  moment  of  his   fall.  The  young  

woman  comes  out  of  the  house,  and,  throwing  herself  on  the  cyclist,  she  frantically  kisses  

him  on  the  mouth,  the  eyes  and  the  nose.  The  rain  gets  heavier  to  the  extent  of  blotting  out  

the  preceding  scene.    

 

3:11   Dissolve   to   the   box  whose   diagonal   stripes   are   superimposed   on   those   of   the   rain.  

Hands  equipped  with  a  little  key  open  the  box,  pulling  out  a  tie  wrapped  in  tissue  paper.  It  

must  be   taken   into  account   that   the   rain,   the  box,   the   tissue  paper  and   the   tie   should  all  

exhibit  these  diagonal  stripes,  with  their  sizes  alone  varying.    

 

3:19   The   same   room.   Standing   by   the   bed,   the   young  woman   is   looking   at   the   clothing  

articles  that  had  been  worn  by  the  character  -­‐-­‐  ruffles,  box,  and  the  stiff  collar  with  the  plain  

dark  tie  -­‐-­‐  all   laid  out  as  though  they  were  worn  by  a  person  lying  on  the  bed.  The  young  

woman   finally  decides   to  pick  up   the   collar,   removing   the  plain   tie   in  order   to   replace   it  

with  the  striped  one  which  she  has  just  taken  out  of  the  box.  She  puts  it  back  in  the  same  

place,   and   then  sits  down  by   the  bed   in   the  posture  of   a  person  watching  over   the  dead.  

98

(Note:   The   bed,   that   is   to   say,   the   bedspread   and   the   pillow,   are   slightly   rumpled   and  

depressed  as  if  a  human  body  were  really  lying  there).    

 

3:56  The  woman   is   aware   that   someone   is   standing  behind  her  and   turns  around   to   see  

who  it  is.  Without  the  least  surprise,  she  sees  the  character  who  now  is  without  any  of  his  

former  accessory  articles,  looking  very  attentively  at  something  in  his  right  hand.  His  great  

absorption  betrays  quite  a  great  deal  of  anxiety.  The  woman  approaches  and  looks  in  turn  

at  what  he  has  in  his  hand.    

 

4:15   Close-­‐up   of   the   hand,   the  middle   of  which   is   teeming  with   ants   swarming   out   of   a  

black  hole.  None  of  these  falls  off.  Dissolve  to  the  armpit  hair  of  a  young  woman  sprawled  

on  the  sand  of  a  sunny  beach.  Dissolve  to  a  sea  urchin  whose  spines  ripple  slightly.    

 

4:38  Dissolve  to  the  head  of  another  young  woman  in  a  powerful  overhead  shot  framed  by  

an  iris.  The  iris  opens  to  reveal  the  young  woman  surrounded  by  a  throng  of  people  who  

are  trying  to  break  through  a  police  barrier.  At  the  center  of  this  circle,  the  young  woman,  

holding  a  stick,  attempts  to  pick  up  a  severed  hand  with  painted  fingernails  that  is  lying  on  

the  ground.  A  policeman  comes  up  to  her,  sharply  reprimanding  her;  he  bends  down  and  

picks  up  the  hand  which  he  carefully  wraps  up  and  puts  in  the  box  that  was  carried  by  the  

cyclist.   He   hands   it   all   to   the   young  woman,   saluting   her   in   a  military   fashion  while   she  

thanks  him.  As  the  policeman  hands  her  the  box,  she  must  appear  to  be  carried  away  by  an  

extraordinary  emotion  that  isolates  her  completely  from  everything  around  her.    

 

5:23   (Build   to   Climax   of   Wagner)   It   is   as   though   she   were   enthralled   by   the   echoes   of  

distant   religious  music;   perhaps  music   she   heard   in   her   earliest   childhood.   Their   curiosity  

satisfied,  the  bystanders  begin  to  disperse  in  all  directions.    

 

This   scene  will  have  been   seen  by   the   characters  whom  we  have   left   in   the   room  on   the  

third   floor.  They   are   seen   through   the  window  panes  of   the  balcony   from  which  may  be  

99

seen  the  end  of  the  scene  described  above.  When  the  policeman  hands  the  box  over  to  the  

young  woman,  the  two  characters  on  the  balcony  appear  to  also  be  overcome  to  the  point  

of   tears   by   the   same   emotion.   Their   heads   sway   as   though   following   the   rhythm   of   this  

impalpable  music.  The  man   looks  at   the  young  woman  and  makes  a  gesture  as   though  he  

were  saying:  "Did  you  see?  Hadn't  I  told  you  so?"    

 

5:57  She  looks  down  again  at  the  young  woman  on  the  street  who  is  now  all  alone  and,  as  if  

pinned   down   to   the   spot,   in   a   state   of   utter   restraint.   Cars   pass   all   around   her   at  

breathtaking  speeds.    

 

6:15   (Climax  of  Wagner’s  Music)   Suddenly   she   is   run  over  by  one  of   the   cars   and   is   left  

there  horribly  mutilated.    

 

TANGO    

 

6:40  It  is  then  that,  with  the  decisiveness  of  a  man  fully  knowing  his  rights,  the  man  goes  

over  to  his  companion,  and,  having  gazed  lasciviously  straight   into  her  eyes,  he  grabs  her  

breasts  through  her  dress.  Closeup  of  the  lustful  hands  over  the  breasts.  These  are  bared  as  

the   dress   disappears.   A   terrible   expression   of   almost   mortal   anguish   spreads   over   the  

man's   face,   and   a   blood-­‐streaked   dribble   runs   out   of   his   mouth   dripping   on   the   young  

woman's  bare  breasts.  The  breasts  disappear  to  be  transformed  into  thighs  which  the  man  

continues  to  palpate.  His  expression  has  changed.  His  eyes  sparkle  with  malice  and  lust.  His  

wide  open  mouth  now  closes  down  as   if   tightened  up  by  a   sphincter.  The  young  woman  

moves  back  toward  the  middle  of   the  room,   followed  by  the  man  who  is  still   in  the  same  

posture.  Suddenly,   she  makes  a   forceful  motion,  breaking  his  hold  on  her,   freeing  herself  

from   his   amorous   advances.   The   man's   mouth   tightens   with   anger.   She   realizes   that   a  

disagreeable  or  violent  scene  is  about  to  take  place.  She  moves  back,  step  by  step,  until  she  

reaches   the   corner   of   the   room,   where   she   takes   up   a   position   behind   a   small   table.  

Assuming   the  gestures  of   the  melodrama  villain,   the  man   looks   around   for   something  or  

100

other.  He  sees  at  his  feet  the  end  of  a  rope  and  picks  it  up  with  his  right  hand.  His  left  hand  

gropes  about   too  and  gets  hold  of   an   identical   rope.  Glued   to   the  wall   the  young  woman  

watches  with  horror  her  attacker's  stratagem.    

 

8:00   The   latter   advances   toward   her   dragging   with   great   effort   that   which   is   attached  

behind  to  the  ropes.    

 

8:15  We  see  passing  before  our  eyes  on   the  screen:   first,   a   cork,   then  a  melon,   then   two  

Brothers   of   Christian   Schools,   and   finally   two  magnificent   grand   pianos.   The   pianos   are  

loaded   with   the   rotting   carcasses   of   two   donkeys,   their   feet,   tails,   hindquarters   and  

excrement  spilling  out  of  the  piano-­‐cases.    

 

SECOND  TANGO    

8:25  As  one  of  the  pianos  passes  in  front  of  the  camera  lens,  a  large  donkey's  head  is  seen  

pressing   the   keyboard.   Pulling   with   great   difficulty   this   burden,   the   man   desperately  

strains  toward  the  young  woman,  knocking  over  chairs,   tables,  a   floor   lamp,  etc.,  etc.  The  

donkey's  hind-­‐quarters  get  caught  in  everything.  A  lamp  hanging  from  the  ceiling  is  jostled  

by  a  stripped  bone,  and  continues  rocking  until  the  end  of  the  scene.  When  the  man  is  about  

to  reach  the  young  woman,  she  dodges  him  with  a  leap  and  escapes.  Her  attacker  lets  go  of  

the  ropes  and  begins  pursuing  her.    

 

8:49  The  young  woman  opens  a  communicating  door  and  vanishes  into  the  next  room,  but  

not  quickly  enough  to  be  able  to  lock  the  door  behind  her.  The  man's  hand  having  made  it  

past  the  joint,  is  held  captive,  caught  at  the  wrist.    

 

8:56  Inside  the  other  room,  pressing  the  door  harder  and  harder,  the  young  woman  looks  

at  the  hand  which  wrenches  in  pain  in  slow  motion  as  the  ants  reappear  and  swarm  over  

the  door.    

 

101

9:08  Right  away,  she  turns  her  head  toward  the  middle  of  the  new  room,  which  is  identical  

to  the  previous  one,  but  on  which  the   lighting  confers  a  different   look;   the  young  woman  

sees   ...  A  man  sprawled  on   the  bed  who   is   the  one  and  the  same  man  whose  hand   is  still  

caught  in  the  door.  Wearing  the  ruffles  with  the  box  resting  on  his  chest  he  does  not  make  

the  least  movement  but  lies  there,  his  eyes  wide  open,  his  superstitious  expression  seeming  

to  say:  "Something  really  extraordinary  is  now  about  to  happen!"    

 

9:25  ABOUT  THREE  O'CLOCK  IN  THE  MORNING  

9:42   A   new   character   is   seen   from   the   back   on   the   landing;   he   has   just   stopped   by   the  

entrance  door   to   the  apartment.  He  rings   the  bell  of   the  apartment  where   the  events  are  

taking   place.  We   don't   see   the   bell   nor   the   electric   hammer,   but   in   their   place,   over   the  

door,   there  are  two  holes  through  which  pass  two  hands  shaking  a  silver  cocktail  shaker.  

Their  action  is  instantaneous,  as  in  ordinary  films  when  a  doorbell  button  is  being  pressed.  

The  man   lying  on   the  bed  gives  a  start.  The  young  woman  goes  and  opens   the  door.  The  

newcomer   goes   directly   to   the   bed   and   imperiously   orders   the  man   to   get   up.   The  man  

complies  so  grudgingly  that  the  other  is  obliged  to  grab  him  by  the  ruffles  and  force  him  to  

his  feet.    

 

10:17   Having   torn   off   the   ruffles   one   by   one,   the   newcomer   throws   them   out   of   the  

window.  The  box  follows  the  same  route  and  so  do  the  straps  which  the  man  tries  in  vain  to  

save  from  the  catastrophe.  And  this  leads  the  newcomer  to  punish  the  man  by  making  him  

go  and  stand  with  his  face  to  one  of  the  walls.  The  newcomer  will  have  done  all  this  with  his  

back  completely  turned  to  the  camera.    

 

10:53  He  turns  around  now  for  the  first  time  in  order  to  go  and  look  for  something  on  the  

other  side  of  the  room.  The  sub-­‐title  says:    

 

102

SIXTEEN  YEARS  BEFORE  

 

WAGNER  (Cue  beginning  later  in  the  score,  closer  to  climax)  

 

10:55  At  this  point  the  photography  becomes  hazy.  The  newcomer  moves  in  slow  motion  

and  we  set  that  his  features  are  identical  to  those  of  the  other;  they  are  one  and  the  same  

person,  but   for   the   fact   that   the  newcomer   looks  younger  and  more  doleful,   as   the  other  

must  have  been  years  before.  The  newcomer  goes   toward   the  back  of   the   room  with   the  

camera  tracking  back  and  keeping  him  in  medium  close-­‐up.  The  school  desk  toward  which  

our  individual  is  heading  enters  the  frame.  There  are  two  books  on  the  school  desk,  as  well  

as   various   school   objects,   whose   position   and   moral   meaning   are   to   be   carefully  

determined.  The  newcomer  picks  up  the  two  books  and  turns  to  go  and  join  the  other  man.  

At   this   point   everything   goes   back   to   normal,   the   fuzziness   and   slow   motion   having  

disappeared.  Having  come  up  to  the  man,  the  newcomer  directs  him  to  hold  out  his  arms  in  

a   cruciform   position,   places   a   book   in   each   hand,   and   orders   him   to   remain   so   as   a  

punishment.  The  punished  character's  expression  has  now  become  keen  and  treacherous.  

He  turns  to  face  the  newcomer.    

 

11:46  The  books  he  has  been  holding  turn  into  revolvers.  The  newcomer  looks  at  him  with  

tenderness,  an  expression  that  becomes  more  pronounced  with  each  passing  moment.  The  

other,  threatening  the  newcomer  with  his  guns  and  forcing  him  to  put  his  hands  up,  does  

not  heed  the  latter's  compliance  and  fires  both  revolvers  at  him.    

 

12:06   (Wagner’s   Music   begins   to   face)   Medium   close-­‐up   of   the   newcomer   falling   down  

fatally  wounded,  his  features  contorted  in  agony  (the  photography's  fuzziness  is  resumed  

and   the   newcomer's   fall   is   in   slow   motion,   in   a   way   that   is   more   pronounced   than  

previously).  We  see  in  the  distance  the  wounded  man  falling;    

 

103

12:12  This,  however,  happens  no  longer  inside  the  room  but  in  a  park.  Seated  next  to  him  

is   a   motionless   woman   with   bare   shoulders,   who   is   seen   from   behind   leaning   slightly  

forward.  As  he  falls  the  wounded  man  attempts  to  seize  and  stroke  her  shoulders;  one  of  

his  hands  is  turned  shaking  toward  himself;  the  other  brushes  against  the  skin  of  the  naked  

shoulders.  Finally  he  falls  to  the  ground.  

 

12:22  View  from  afar.  A  few  passers-­‐by  and  several  park-­‐keepers  rush  over  to  help.  They  

pick  him  up  in  their  arms  and  bear  him  away  through  the  woods.  Let  the  passionate  lame  

man  play  a  role  here.    

 

WAGNER  MUSIC  CONLUDES  

 

TANGO  BEGINS  at  13:33  

 

13:33   And  we   are   back   at   the   same   room.   A   door,   the   one   in  which   the   hand   had   been  

caught,  now  opens  slowly.    

 

The   young  woman  we   already  know  appears.   She   closes   the  door  behind  her   and   stares  

very  attentively  at   the  wall   against  which   the  murderer  had  stood.  The  man   is  no   longer  

there.   The  wall   is   bare,  without   any   furniture   or   decoration.   The   young  woman  makes   a  

gesture  of   vexation   and   impatience.  The  wall   is   seen   again;   in   the  middle   of   it   there   is   a  

small  black  spot.  Seen  much  closer,  this  small  spot  appears  to  be  a  death's-­‐head  moth.    

 

13:52  Close-­‐up  of  the  moth.  The  death's  head  on  the  moth's  wings  fills  the  whole  screen.  

The  man  who  was  wearing  ruffles  comes  suddenly  into  view  in  a  medium  shot  bringing  his  

hand  swiftly  to  his  mouth  as  though  he  were   losing  his   teeth.  The  young  woman  looks  at  

him   disdainfully.   When   the   man   takes   away   his   hand,   we   see   that   his   mouth   has  

disappeared.  The  young  woman  seems  to  be  saying  to  him:  "Well,  and  what  next?"  and  then  

she  touches  up  her  lips  with  a  lipstick.  We  see  again  the  man's  head.    

104

 

14:11   Hair   begins   to   sprout  where   his  mouth   had   been.  Having   caught   sight   of   this,   the  

young  woman  stifles  a  cry  and  swiftly  examines  her  armpit  which  is  completely  depilated.  

She   scornfully   sticks   out   her   tongue   at   him,   throws   a   shawl   over   her   shoulders,   and,  

opening  the  door  near  her,  goes  into  the  adjacent  room  which  is  a  wide  beach.    

 

13:27  (Splice  of  one  added  bar)  A  third  character  is  waiting  for  her  near  the  water's  edge.  

They  greet  each  other  very  amiably,  and  meander  together  down  the  waterline.  (Are  their  

steps  matched  with   the  musical   rhythm?)  A   shot  of   their   legs  and   the  waves  breaking  at  

their  feet.  The  camera  follows  them  in  a  dolly  shot.  The  waves  gently  wash  ashore  at  their  

feet,   first,   the   straps,   then   the   striped  box   followed  by   the   ruffles,   and   finally   the  bicycle.  

This   shot   continues   a  moment   longer  without   anything   else   being  washed   ashore.   They  

continue  their  walk  on  the  beach,   little  by  little  fading  from  view,  while  in  the  sky  appear  

the  words:  IN  THE  SPRING  

 

15:56  (Splice  of  one  added  bar)    

Everything  has  changed.  We  see  now  a  desert  without  end.  We  see  the  man  and  the  young  

woman   in   the   center,   sunk   in   sand   up   to   their   chests,   blinded,   their   clothes   in   tatters,  

devoured  by  the  sun  and  by  swarms  of  insects.    

16:24  -­‐  End  of  Film  -­‐  Tango  ends,  intriguingly,  on  an  unresolved  dominant  chord  

 

(Original  Shooting  Script  by  Luis  Buñuel  and  Salvador  Dalí  Translated  by  Haim  Finkelstein)  

 

 

 

 

105

Bibliography  and  Filmography  

Auric,  Georges.  Correspndences  of  Georges  Auric  and  Jean  Cocteau  .  Translated  by  Pierre  Caizergues.  Montpellier:  Université  Paul-­‐Valéry,  1999.  

Breton,  André.  Manifestoes  of  Surrealism.  Translated  by  Richard  Seaver.  Ann  Arbor:  University  of  Michigan  Press,  1969.  

Brown,  Royal  S.  "Bernard  Hermann."  In  Overtones  and  Undertones:  Reading  Film  Music.  University  of  California  Press,  1994.  

Buñuel,  Luis,  and  Salvador  Dalí.  "Un  chien  andalou."  Dada  and  Surrealist  Film.  Edited  by  Rudolf  E.  Kuenzli.  Translated  by  Haim  Finkelstein.  Cambridge,  MA:  MIT  Press,  1996.  

Buñuel,  Luis,  and  Salvdor  Dalí.  Un  chien  andalou.  DVD  Reissue.  Directed  by  Luis  Buñuel.  Produced  by  Les  Grandes  Filmes  Classiques.  Transflux  Films,  1928.  

Calkins,  Susan.  "Modernism  in  Music  and  Erik  Satie's  Parade."  International  Review  of  the  Aesthetics  and  Sociology  of  Music  (Croatian  Musicological  Society)  41,  no.  1  (June  2010):  3-­‐19.  

Clair,  René.  Cinema  Yesterday  and  Today.  Edited  by  R.C.  Dale.  Translated  by  Stanley  Appelbaum.  Paris:  Dover  Publications,  1972.  

Cocteau,  Jean.  Le  coq  et  le  harlequin:  notes  concerning  music.  First  English  Edition.  Translated  by  Rollo  H.  Myers.  London:  The  Egoist  Press,  1921.  

Cocteau,  Jean.  Le  Sang  d'un  Poète.  DVD  Reissue.  Directed  by  Jean  Cocteau.  Produced  by  Studio  Canal.  Performed  by  Enrique  Rivero  Lee  Miller.  The  Criterion  Collection,  1930.  

Cocteau,  Jean.  "Preface  to  The  Blood  of  a  Poet."  The  Criterion  Current  (The  Criterion  Collection),  1946.  

Cohen,  Annabel  J.  "Music  as  Source  of  Emotion  in  Film."  In  Music  and  Emotion:  Theory  and  Research  (Series  in  Affective  Science),  by  Patrik  Juslin  and  John  A.  Sloboda.  Oxfordshire:  Oxford  University  Press,  2011.  

Dale,  R.C.  The  Films  of  René  Clair:  Volume  I:  Exposition  and  Analysis.  Vol.  I.  3  vols.  Metuchen,  NJ:  The  Scarecrow  Press,  Inc.,  1986.  

Darrell  Pinto,  B.A.  Music,  Eros,  and  Thanatos  in  the  Films  of  Buñuel,  Dalí,  Visconti,  and  Kubrick.  Masters  Thesis,  Graduate  School  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  Georgetown  University,  Washington,  D.C.:  Georgetown  University,  2011.  

Deaville,  James,  and  Wood  Simon  .  "Synchronization  by  the  Grace  of  God?  The  Film/Music  Collaboration  of  Jean  Cocteau  and  Georges  Auric."  Canadian  University  Music  Review  22,  no.  1  (2011).  

Dorf,  Samuel  N.  "Film  as  Multimedia  and  Performance:  Analyzing  Dada  Film  Music  and  Erik  Satie’s  Cinéma  ."  Edited  by  Catherine  Anne  Cooper.  Resonance:  An  Interdisciplinary  Musical  Journal  Spring  (2006).  

106

Doyle,  Tracy  A.  "Erik  Satie's  Ballet  'Parade'."  DMA  Thesis,  School  of  Music,  Louisiana  State  University,  2005.  

Eatwell,  Piu  Marie.  "Myths  About  French  Culture."  In  They  Eat  Horses,  Don't  They?:  The  Truth  About  the  French,  200-­‐250.  London:  Thomas  Dunne  Books,  2014.  

Edwards,  Gwynne.  A  Companion  to  Luis  Buñuel.  Tamesis  Books,  2005.  

Elder,  R.  Bruce.  "An  Anti-­‐Art  Film."  In  DADA,  Surrealism,  and  the  Cinematic  Effect,  by  R.  Bruce  Elder.  Wilfrid  Laurier  University  Press,  2013.  

Fotiade,  Ramona.  "Un  chien  andalou."  In  The  Cinema  of  France,  by  Phil  Powrie,  21-­‐32.  New  York,  NY:  Wallflower  Press,  2006.  

Fragineau,  André.  Cocteau  on  the  Film:  Conversations  with  Jean  Cocteau.  London:  Dover,  1972.  

Gallagher,  Paul.  "Jean  Cocteau's  'The  Blood  of  a  Poet,'  1930."  Dangerous  Minds.  February  19,  2011.  http://dangerousminds.net/comments/jean_cocteau_blood_of_a_poet  (accessed  December  1,  2014).  

Gallez,  Douglas  W.  "Satie's  Entr'acte:  A  Model  of  Film  Music."  Cinema  Journal,  Autumn  1976:  36-­‐50.  

Gillmor,  Alan  M.  Erik  Satie.  Twayne  Publishing,  1988.  

Gillmor,  Alan  M.  "Erik  Satie  and  the  Concept  of  the  Avant-­‐Garde."  The  Musical  Quarterly  (Oxford  University  Press)  69,  no.  1  (Winter  1983):  104-­‐119.  

Gillmor,  Alan  M.  "Musico-­‐Poetic  Form  in  Satie's  "Humoristic"  Piano  Suites  (1913-­‐14)  ."  Canadian  University  Music  Review  8  (1987).  

Kelly,  Barbara  L.  Music  and  Ultra-­‐modernism  in  France:  A  Fragile  Consensus,  1913-­‐1939.  Paris:  Boydell  and  Brewer  Ltd,  2013.  

Leydon,  Rebecca  Victoria.  "Narrative  Strategies  and  Debussy's  Late  Style."  PhD  Thesis,  Faculty  of  Music,  McGill  University,  Montreal,  1996.  

Manvell,  Roger.  "Experimental  Film  in  France."  In  Experiment  in  the  Film,  by  Roger  Manvell,  60-­‐101.  Detroit:  Arno  Press,  1949.  

Marks,  Martin  Miller.  Music  and  the  Silent  Film:  Contexts  and  Case  Studies,  1895-­‐1924.  Oxfordshire:  Oxford  University  Press,  1997.  

Marks,  Martin.  "The  Well-­‐Furnished  Film  Score:  Satie's  Score  for  Entr'acte."  Canadian  University  Music  Review  4  (1983):  245-­‐277.  

Motte-­‐Haber,  Helga  de  la.  "Ent'racte."  See  This  Sound.  December  1,  2011.  http://www.see-­‐this-­‐sound.at/works/1  (accessed  October  2,  2014).  

Nettl,  Bruno.  Excursions  in  World  Music.  Sixth  Edition.  Pearson,  2011.  

Orledge,  Robert.  Satie  the  Composer.  Cambridge:  Cambridge  University  Press,  1990.  

Pasler,  Jann.  "  New  Music  as  Confrontation:  The  Musical  Sources  of  Jean  Cocteau's  Identity."  The  Musical  Quarterly  (Oxford  University  Press)  75,  no.  3  (Autumn  1991):  255-­‐278.  

107

Picabia,  Francis.  Ent'racte.  DVD  reissue.  Directed  by  René  Clair.  Produced  by  Pathé.  Performed  by  Francis  Picabia,  Erik  Satie,  et.  al.  Jean  Börlin.  The  Criterion  Collection,  1924.  

Prendergast,  Roy  M.  Film  Music:  A  Neglected  Art.  Second  Edition.  New  York,  NY:  W.W.  Norton  and  Company,  1977.  

Rorem,  Ned.  "Cocteau  and  Music."  In  Setting  the  Tone:  Essays  and  a  Diary,  by  Ned  Rorem.  New  York,  NY:  Open  Road  Media,  2013.  

Rorem,  Ned.  "Cocteau  and  Music."  In  Jean  Cocteau  and  the  French  Scene,  edited  by  Robin  James,  153-­‐183.  1984.  

Roust,  Colin.  "'Say  it  with  Georges  Auric':  Film  Music  and  the  esprit  nouveau."  Twentieth-­‐Century  Music  6  (2009):  133-­‐153.  

Sangild,  Torben.  "Wagner's  Tristan  in  Luis  Buñuel's  early  films:  Un  Chien  Andalou  and  L'Âge  d'Or."  JMM:  The  Journal  of  Music  and  Meaning  13  (2014/2015).  

Satie,  Erik,  and  Darius  Milhaud.  "Cinéma."  Cinéma:  Entr'acte  symphonique  de  "Relâche".  Paris:  Editions  Salabert,  1926.  

Schweitzer,  Vivien.  "Through  Erik  Satie's  Music,  a  Trip  Bac  in  Time  to  the  Soundless  and  the  Surreal."  The  New  York  Times,  June  7,  2007.  

Stravinsky,  Igor.  "Stravinsky  on  Film  Music."  In  The  Hollywood  FIlm  Music  Reader,  by  editor  Mervyn  Cooke.  1946.  

Taruskin,  Richard.  "Chapter  Ten:  Deeds  of  Music  Made  Visible  (Class  of  1813,  I)."  In  Music  in  the  Nineteenth  Century,  by  Richard  Taruskin.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  University  Press,  2004.  

Templier,  Pierre-­‐Daniel.  Erik  Satie.  1971  Reissue.  Cambridge,  MA:  The  MIT  Press,  1932.  Townsend,  Chris.  "The  Last  Hope  of  Intuition:  Francis  Picabia,  Erik  Satie  and  René  Clair's  

Intermedial  Project  Relâche."  Nottingham  French  Studies  50,  no.  3  (Autumn  2011):  41-­‐64.  

Williams,  Linda.  Figures  of  Desire:  A  Theory  and  Analysis  of  Surrealist  Film.  University  of  California  Press,  1992.  

Williams,  Tami.  Germaine  Dulac:  A  Cinema  of  Sensations.  Chicago,  IL:  University  of  Illinois  Press,  2014.  

 


Recommended