Date post: | 25-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 1 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–4794
Atrazine mineralization potential in two wetlands
Kristen L. Andersona, Kevin A. Wheelerb, Jayne B. Robinsonb,Olli H. Tuovinena,*
aDepartment of Microbiology, Ohio State University, 484 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1292, USAbDepartment of Biology, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-2320, USA
Received 1 January 2002; accepted 1 April 2002
Abstract
The fate of atrazine in agricultural soils has been studied extensively but attenuation in wetland systems has received
relatively little attention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mineralization of atrazine in two wetlands in
central Ohio. One was a constructed wetland, which is fed by Olentangy River water from an agricultural catchment
area. The other was a natural fen (Cedar Bog) in proximity to atrazine-treated cornfields. Atrazine mineralization
potential was measured by 14CO2 evolution from [U-ring-14C]-atrazine in biometers. The constructed wetland showed
70–80% mineralization of atrazine within 1 month. Samples of wetland water that were pre-concentrated 200-fold by
centrifugation also mineralized 60–80% of the added atrazine. A high extent of atrazine mineralization (75–81%
mineralized) was also associated with concentrated water samples from the Olentangy River that were collected
upstream and downstream of the wetland. The highest levels of mineralization were localized to the top 5 cm zone of the
wetland sediment, and the activity close to the outflow at the Olentangy wetland was approximately equal to that near
the inflow. PCR amplification of DNA extracted from the wetland sediment samples showed no positive signals for the
atzA gene (atrazine chlorohydrolase), while Southern blots of the amplified DNA showed positive bands in five of the
six Olentangy wetland sediment samples. Amplification with the trzD (cyanuric acid amidohydrolase) primers showed a
positive PCR signal for all Olentangy wetland sediment samples. There was little mineralization of atrazine in any of the
Cedar Bog samples. DNA extracted from Cedar Bog samples did not yield PCR products, and the corresponding
Southern hybridization signals were absent. The data show that sediment microbial communities in the Olentangy
wetland mineralize atrazine. The level of activity may be related to the seasonality of atrazine runoff entering the
wetland. Comparable activity was not observed in the Cedar Bog, perhaps because it does not directly receive
agricultural runoff. Qualitatively, the detection of the genes was associated with measurable mineralization activity
which was consistent with the differences between the two study sites.r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Atrazine; Biodegradation; Herbicide degradation; PCR amplification; Southern hybridization; Wetland system
1. Introduction
Atrazine (2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylami-
no)-s-triazine) is a relatively common contaminant in
groundwater and sometimes exceeds the maximum
contaminant level of 3 mg/l established for drinkingwater. Surface waters with agricultural watersheds have
also been reported to contain detectable levels of
atrazine. The major non-point sources of atrazine in
water are subsurface runoff and field tile drainage in
agricultural sites. Because atrazine is a regulated
compound in drinking water, its attenuation in ground
and surface water is an important aspect of the
environmental fate of this chemical. Elucidation of
abiotic and biological degradative pathways of atrazine
in the environment is also crucial in view of its endocrine
disruptor effects [1]. In soils, the most important
mechanism for the attenuation of atrazine involves
microbial degradation and mineralization. In surface
waters and wetlands, the transformations of atrazine are
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-614-292-3379; fax: +1-
614-292-8120.
E-mail address: [email protected] (O.H. Tuovinen).
0043-1354/02/$ - see front matter r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 4 3 - 1 3 5 4 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 2 0 9 - 9
poorly understood although these systems receive
agrochemicals through surface runoff and drainage.
To date, there is little evidence that native microbial
populations in natural or constructed wetlands can
actively and substantially mineralize atrazine. Ro and
Chung [2] monitored atrazine biotransformation in
spiked wetland sediments. The samples were taken from
a diked wetland constructed to treat sugar mill waste-
water. The initial concentration of atrazine, 10mg/l,
decreased to o10 mg/l within 10 weeks of aerobic
incubation, and subsequent spikes of atrazine were
depleted in 3 weeks. Atrazine concentrations were
measured by HPLC and the extent of mineralization
could not be established from the biodegradation data.
Kao et al. [3] reported atrazine attenuation in the water
column and sediments of a natural wetland system that
received agricultural runoff following a storm event.
Parallel mesocosm experiments with wetland sediments
indicated accelerated biodegradation of atrazine only in
the presence of an external carbon source (sucrose).
Mineralization potential was not established [3]. Wet-
land mesocosm studies have demonstrated the biode-
gradation of atrazine in water columns [4], with losses of
about 70% as determined by gas chromatography, but
the extent of mineralization and unavailability due to
sorption to sediments remain unknown.
A study using sediment and groundwater samples
from a freshwater wetland showed that approximately
4.5% of atrazine was mineralized under aerobic condi-
tions and less than 2% under anaerobic conditions after
68 weeks of incubation [5]. DeLaune et al. [6] reported
that atrazine was relatively persistent in anaerobic
sediments of a swamp-forest wetland that received
runoff from adjacent atrazine-treated agricultural fields,
but the biodegradation could be enhanced upon the
introduction of aerobic conditions. Mineralization of
atrazine was not investigated in the study. Runes et al.
[7] used bioaugmentation with an atrazine spill-site soil
to enhance an otherwise slow mineralization of atrazine
in sediment microcosm and rhizosome mesocosm
samples from a constructed wetland receiving irrigation
runoff from a container nursery.
There are several known genes that encode the
proteins in the atrazine degradative pathway. The most
commonly studied is atzA, which encodes the atrazine
chlorohydrolase. A survey of five geographically distinct
atrazine mineralizing isolates showed that each isolate
contained an atzA gene X99% identical to the gene
found in the original host, Pseudomonas ADP [8]. Shapir
et al. [9] tested soil samples from several agricultural
fields that had different histories of atrazine application.
Regardless of previous application history, most sam-
ples contained organisms that could mineralize atrazine
to a certain extent and the atzA gene could be amplified
from these soils [9]. Shapir et al. [10] amplified a PCR
product with atzA primers from DNA extracted from
sand/gravel lysimeters that had been amended with
secondary wastewater effluent or partially composted
sludge. The data suggested that there was a positive
association between the presence of atzA and atrazine
mineralization, even if the extent was only 1% [10].
Another gene of interest in this work is trzD, which
encodes the cyanuric acid amidohydrolase that catalyzes
the ring cleavage of cyanuric acid. This compound is
believed to be the last aromatic intermediate in the
degradative pathway, but to date the gene and the
enzyme have been characterized only in a melamine-
degrading Pseudomonas sp. [11]. Data based on hybri-
dization signals [12] indicated that, in agricultural soil
samples, the gene trzD was not dominant and its
detection did not reflect the potential mineralization of
atrazine. However, molecular ecological approaches
using atzA, trzD, and other genes encoding enzymes of
the atrazine degradative pathways have not previously
been applied to study mineralization of atrazine in
wetland systems.
In view of the lack of knowledge on atrazine
mineralization in wetlands, the purpose of this study
was to evaluate the mineralization of atrazine in water
and sediment samples retrieved from a constructed
wetland. It was hypothesized that genes such as atzA
and trzD from the degradative pathways are associated
with active mineralization of atrazine in native microbial
populations. This relationship may be consistent only in
circumstances that involve the presence of atrazine or
metabolites in the wetland and may be analogous to the
atrazine history effect described for agricultural soils
[13,14].
The wetland, Olentangy River Wetland Research
Park of The Ohio State University (http://kh465a.ag.o-
hio-state.edu/ORW.html), receives water from the
Olentangy River, which has an upstream agricultural
watershed. Detectable levels of atrazine, up to 13mg/l,have been periodically detected in the Olentangy River
and in the wetland water column in the past (http://
www.epa.state.oh.us/ddagw/pestsbw2.pdf). The atzA
and trzD genes from the mineralization pathways were
targeted for PCR amplification and Southern blotting
using DNA extracted from the Olentangy wetland
samples. A natural wetland, Cedar Bog, fed by water
from springs was also selected for this work. This
wetland, a nature preserve in Ohio, receives no surface
runoff from the agricultural fields in the vicinity.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sampling
Sediment and water samples were retrieved from sites
near the inflow and outflow of the experimental wetland
1 at Olentangy River Wetland Research Park, Colum-
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–47944786
bus, OH (Fig. 1). This site is a constructed wetland that
receives Olentangy River water through the inflow and
feeds back to the river via the outflow. The Olentangy
River has an agricultural watershed upstream of the
wetland and receives non-point source runoff from these
fields. The site is located at 831108100W longitude and
401105900N latitude and was constructed in 1993. The
hydraulic retention time was between 4 and 5 d in 1999.
The retention time in the wetland varies with the flow
velocity of the Olentangy River and can be as long as 3
weeks during periods of low flow of the river. The
chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of the
Olentangy wetland have been summarized in several
publications and annual reports (http://kh465a.ag.ohio-
state.edu/ORW.html).
Olentangy wetland sediments and overlying water
were sampled with a 4� 140 cm acrylic column. Sedi-
ment samples were pooled or sectioned to measure the
potential for atrazine mineralization. Three replicate
sediment samples were mixed to form a composite.
Individual sediment cores were removed by plunging
from the column sampler and then sectioned into three
approximately equal parts (about 5 cm each). Composite
and sectioned sediment samples were taken in April and
August 2000. All sediment samples were taken under
water-saturated conditions. Water content varied be-
tween samples, with the inlet composite sample having a
water content of 65% while the outlet composite was
34%. Inlet sections had water contents of 63% (0–5 cm),
47% (5–10 cm), and 51% (10–15 cm). The outlet section
water contents were 50%, 35% and 26% for the same
sections. The variability in the water content reflects
sediment compaction and clay content. Further chemi-
cal or mineralogical analyses were not within the scope
of this study.
Wetland water samples were taken in August 2000
and Olentangy River samples were taken in October
2001. Surface water samples were collected as grab
samples. Initial measurements of atrazine mineralization
showed very low activity (o1%). Subsequently, watersamples were concentrated 200 fold by centrifugation at
10,000g for 20min. The pellets were resuspended in the
Fig. 1. Sampling sites at the Olentangy wetland and Cedar Bog. The boardwalks that provide access to the sites at the Olentangy
wetland are also indicated. The inflow marks the site where water is pumped into the cell from the Olentangy River and the outflow
marks the pipe that allows water to return to the river. Sampling sites are indicated with open squares.
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–4794 4787
mineral salts solution for mineralization experiments.
No effort was made to standardize the concentrated
samples with respect to suspended solids, which varied
with hydraulic flow conditions and rainfall. All sediment
and water samples were stored at 41C before use.
The Cedar Bog site (Fig. 1) is an undisturbed alkaline
fen in Urbana, OH, fed by springs. The alkalinity is due
to Ca, Mg-bicarbonates, causing carbonate precipitation
surrounding and downstream from the springs. The site
is located at 83147.50W longitude and 40130N latitude.
This wetland was sampled at two forested sites. For
Cedar Bog site 1, the samples were collected from a
riparian zone approximately 30m from a cornfield.
Samples for Cedar Bog site 2 were collected along the
banks of a small ditch draining into the bog. The
adjacent upstream cornfield had been treated annually
with atrazine for at least the past 10 years, but there is
no direct access of surface runoff to the Cedar Bog
sampling sites. Five subsamples were taken at each site
for a composite in May and June 2000. The top 15 cm of
soil was sampled each time. Neither sampling site in the
Cedar Bog has received any direct application of
atrazine in the past.
2.2. Mineralization studies
Mineralization of [U-ring-14C]-atrazine under aerobic
conditions was measured in biometers, which consisted
of 60ml serum bottles equipped with suspended 2ml
vials to trap evolved 14CO2 [13]. Each biometer received
5.5 g (wet weight) aliquots of sediment samples or 5ml
of water. Each sample was tested in duplicate biometers.
Two inlet composite sediment samples were autoclaved
at 1211C for 20min and used as a sterile control. Each
biometer received 0.065mmol [U-ring-14C]-atrazine (spe-cific activity 1.54mCi/mmol; Sigma-Aldrich Co., St.
Louis, MO) with a total concentration of 2.55mg
atrazine/kg wet weight sediment and 2.8mg/l for water
samples. Trace mineral salts (per liter of 100� stock
solution): MgSO4 � 7H2O, 50mg; CaSO4, 200mg; FeS-O4 � 7H2O, 1 g; MnSO4 �H2O, 20mg; CuSO4, 20mg;ZnSO4 � 7H2O, 20mg; CoSO4 � 7H2O, 10mg; Na-
MoO4 � 2H2O, 5mg; H3BO3, � 5mg; nitrilotriacetate,3 g) were also added (100ml of 100X) to fulfill any tracemetal requirements. Mineralization of atrazine was
monitored as evolution of 14CO2, which was trapped
in 1ml of 0.5M KOH. The KOH was collected and
replaced at intervals. The alkaline trapping solution
was mixed in 10ml scintillation fluid (Scintiverse BD,
Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) in a vial and counted
in a scintillation counter. The counting efficiency was
determined using an external standard and was deter-
mined to be 97%. Mineralization was monitored for up
to 38 d.
2.3. Data analysis
The data were analyzed by calculating the means and
standards deviations from the replicate biometers.
Cumulative atrazine mineralization was calculated by
adding the sample percentage of carbon dioxide evolved
to the total from the preceding time course. A first-order
rate expression was used to compare the time courses of
atrazine mineralization between different samples. First-
order kinetic parameters are commonly used to assess
environmental biodegradation of pesticides, based on
the premise that degradation or mineralization is limited
by the concentration of the pesticide [15]. Thus, the
kinetic parameters determined in this study can be
compared with those previously reported for various soil
and other agricultural and environmental conditions.
Half-lives and rate constants were determined by fitting
the data to P ¼ Pmaxð1� e�ktÞ; where P is the observed
amount of 14CO2 evolved (%), Pmax the maximum
extent of mineralization, t the time (d), and k the rate
constant (d�1). Half-life (t1=2) values were calculated
using their respective rate constants as t1=2 ¼ ln 2k�1:The first-order fits were evaluated by calculating the
corresponding r2 values (coefficient of determination).
While atrazine mineralization could not be adequately
described with non-linear first-order rate expression in
samples where the evolution of 14CO2 remained
relatively low, additional kinetic analysis to seek the
best-fitting rate expressions was beyond the scope of this
study.
2.4. Mass balances
After the final sampling, the samples were dried for
approximately 24 h at 901C. The dried soil samples were
crushed to a uniform particle size and 0.25 g samples
(dry weight) were used for analysis. The samples were
combusted in an oxidizer (Biological Oxidizer OX-400,
R.J. Harvey Instrument Corporation, Patterson, NJ)
and the evolved 14CO2 was trapped in scintillation fluid
(14C Cocktail, R.J. Harvey Instrument Corporation).
The cocktail was transferred to a vial for liquid
scintillation counting. For mass balance estimates, the
amount of radioactivity remaining in the sample was
added to the cumulative 14CO2 from the mineralization
studies.
2.5. DNA isolation and PCR amplification
DNA was extracted from 0.5 g sectioned sediment
samples using the alternative lysis method in the
UltraClean Soil DNA Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Solana
Beach, CA). DNA was stored in 10mM Tris pH 8 at
�201C. Positive controls were amplified from plasmid
constructs transformed into Escherichia coli DHa strains
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–47944788
(pMD4 for atzA and pJK204 for trzD). The Surzycki
et al. [16] protocol was used for plasmid isolation.
Primers for atzA were based on the 528 bp internal
sequence of atzA [17]. The trzD primers were generated
using a computer software package (GeneRunner,
http://www.generunner.com) and were based on an
internal 500 bp sequence of the gene, which was
sequenced by Karns [11]. The trzD forward primer was
50-TCGTTCAGGTCAAGTGCC-30 and the reverse
primer was 50-ATCGTCCAGCATCGTGTG-30. The
PCR mixture (final volume: 50ml) contained 0.2mgtemplate DNA, 1X PCR buffer (30mM Tricine, 0.1%
gelatin, 1.0% Thesit (polyoxyethylene 9 lauryl ether),
and 5mM b-mercaptoethanol), 1.0mM primers,
0.55mM dNTPs, 0.2mg BSA, 3.0mM MgCl2, and 3–5
U Taq polymerase. The atzA gene was amplified in a
PTC-200 DNA engine thermocycler (MJ Research,
Waltham, MA) using the following cycle: denaturation
at 921C for 5min, 40 cycles of 921C for 1.5min, 551C for
1min, 721C for 2min, and a final extension step at 721C
for 5min. The trzD gene was amplified with similar
cycles with the exception of the extension step which was
performed at 581C. 10 ml samples of all PCR reactionswere separated on a 1.0% agarose gels in TAE buffer.
The bands were visualized by soaking the gel for 1 h in a
10�4 dilution of SYBR Green 1 DNA stain (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR) in TAE.
The detection limit for atzA and trzD was determined
to be approximately 100 copies per PCR reaction using
plasmid DNA as the template. However, the detection
limits for atzA and trzD when amplified from sediment
DNA samples cannot be defined because of unknown
and perhaps variable efficiency of DNA extraction.
2.6. Southern hybridization analysis
The DNA probes used in Southern blot hybridiza-
tions were prepared by PCR amplification of plasmids
pMD4 and pJK204 containing the cloned atzA and trzD
genes. The amplified fragments were subsequently
purified using a PCR gene clean kit (Qiagen, Valencia,
CA). Approximately 50 ng of the fragment DNA was
boiled for 5min followed by a 5-min incubation on ice to
denature the double stranded templates. DNA probes
were labeled with fluorescein-dUTP using the Gene
Images Random-prime kit (Amersham Pharmacia Bio-
tech, Piscataway, NJ). PCR products were separated by
agarose gel electrophoresis and were transferred to
Hybond-N+ membranes. Hybridization and all washes
were performed at 581C. Hybridization signals were
detected using an anti-fluorescein antibody conjugated
with alkaline phosphatase (CDP-Star detection kit,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
3. Results and discussion
Atrazine mineralization in the Olentangy wetland was
initially evaluated using composite sediment samples. As
shown in Fig. 2, the extent of mineralization after 38 d of
incubation was approximately 43% at the inlet and 47%
at the outlet. Autoclaved sediment samples showed no
Time (Days)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
14C
O2
Evo
lved
(%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Olentangy InletOlentangy OutletSterile ReferenceCedar Bog 1Cedar Bog 2
Fig. 2. Mineralization data from the April, 2000 Olentangy wetland composite samples and Cedar Bog sediment samples. Standard
deviations may be smaller than the points.
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–4794 4789
mineralization activity (14CO2 evolution o1%). Thisinitial screening of 14CO2 evolution from the ring-
labeled atrazine indicated that an atrazine-mineralizing
microbial community was present in both segments of
the Olentangy wetland.
In general, atrazine mineralization in composite
samples appeared to approach a sustained linear phase.
However, the rate constant and half-life for the
composite inlet sample (April, 2000) indicated a reason-
able first-order fit (r2 > 0:988), suggesting that the rate ofmineralization was accelerating into a nonlinear phase.
This linear phase may be analogous to an extended lag
period preceding accelerated mineralization.
The sediment zone closest to the water interface (0–
5 cm) showed consistently higher levels and faster
mineralization than the underlying zones at both
the inlet and outlet (Fig. 3). These data indicated
differences in the distribution of atrazine-minera-
lizing organisms by depth, with the highest activity
located at the sediment–water interface. The surface of
the sediment is the initial sink for atrazine in the inflow
river water. It is noteworthy that the composite inlet
sediment sample yielded a lower extent of mineralization
as compared to the individual sediment fractions within
a similar period of incubation. This difference may
reflect variability such as clay content and cell density
14C
O2
Evo
lved
(%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0-5 cm5-10 cm10-15 cm
Time (Days)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0
20
40
60
80
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
(D)(C)
(A) (B)
Fig. 3. Mineralization data for the Olentangy wetland sediment sections: (A) April, 2000 Inlet, (B) August, 2000 Inlet, (C) April, 2000
Outlet, (D) August, 2000 Outlet. Standard deviations were smaller than the symbols.
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–47944790
and distribution among the core samples retrieved for
the composite.
Figs. 3A and B show the 14CO2 evolution data for the
inlet sections sampled in April and August, respectively,
and Figs. 3C and D show the corresponding data for the
outlet. At the inlet, the extent of atrazine mineralization
in the 0–5 and 5–10 cm zones were approximately 15%
lower in August than April at day 28 (Fig. 3A and B).
However, the rate of mineralization was faster in the
August samples. At the outlet, almost no activity was
present at depths of 5–15 cm in August, unlike the April
samples (39 and 21% compared to 1%).
Table 1 lists kinetic parameters of atrazine miner-
alization derived from the first-order rate expression.
Half-lives were in the order of 5–7 d in the most active
samples. Kinetic parameters were not calculated for
samples where mineralization was low and linear over
the experimental time course.
There are complex reasons underlying these differ-
ences in the kinetics and extent of mineralization in
April and August. During this period, changes took
place, for example, in ambient temperature, hydraulic
flow rate, suspended solids, plant and microbial com-
munity diversity, and sediment organic carbon content.
The role of such complex factors in influencing atrazine
mineralization has yet to be determined.
Mass balance estimates accounted for 85–105% of the14C initially added in these experiments. These mass
balances revealed no major experimental errors or
unaccounted losses of 14CO2 that would have skewed
the calculation of the relative 14CO2 evolution.
Because the activity was so high in the sediment
sections, the atrazine mineralization potential of wetland
water samples was also studied. Atrazine, a pre-
emergent herbicide, is normally applied to agricultural
soils in Ohio at the end of April or beginning of May.
Atrazine would largely be washed from the fields during
rain events in the summer. In river water, atrazine is
mostly associated with suspended solids which include
soil particles from runoff and microorganisms. Biometer
experiments with August samples of wetland water
column showed no mineralization activity. However,
when water samples were first concentrated (200 fold)
before 14CO2 evolution measurements in biometers,
atrazine mineralization was readily detected in the
suspended solids in the inlet water (Fig. 4A).
The Olentangy River was grab sampled about 10m
upstream and 50m downstream of the wetland inlet and
outlet, respectively. The biometer data showed active
mineralization in concentrated water samples, and there
were no differences in the mineralization activity
between the two sites of sampling of river water
(Fig. 4B). In comparison, the rates of mineralization
differ within the wetland, being faster at the inlet
segment. This difference suggests that the capacity for
mineralization in the wetland decreases with distance
from the inlet. Unlike the river, the Olentangy wetland
has low flow conditions (for the 200m distance between
the inlet and the outlet), and sometimes virtual stagna-
tion, which plays a part in the sedimentation of atrazine-
mineralizing microorganisms entering the wetland with
influent river water.
The atzA gene was not detected in DNA from the
Olentangy wetland samples using PCR with atzA
specific primers. However, positive signals were detected
when PCR products were resolved by agarose gel
electrophoresis and subsequently analyzed by Southern
hybridization with the 523 bp PCR product of atzA
(data not shown). These data suggested that atzA was
amplified from DNA but the product was present at
such low levels that it could not be visualized on the gel.
Further attempts were not made to enhance amplifica-
tion of atzA by varying PCR conditions or by nested
PCR. In contrast, the trzD PCR product (500 bp) was
detected in all sections by PCR amplification as well as
by Southern hybridization (Fig. 5).
The mineralization of atrazine was low in samples
from Cedar Bog (Fig. 2). When fitted into the first-order
rate expression, the time course curves of atrazine
mineralization yielded kinetic parameters, but the
corresponding r2 values indicated that these kinetic data
were not of a first order (Table 1). No further kinetic
analysis was undertaken due to a low extent of
mineralization (p13%). No PCR products were ob-
tained with DNA from the Cedar Bog samples using
primers designed for atzA and trzD. Southern hybridi-
zation of the PCR gels failed to detect any signals when
Table 1
Kinetic parameters of atrazine mineralization in the wetland
samples
Sample Date k (d�1) t1=2 (d) r2
Inlet, 0–5 cm April 0.0640 10.8 0.8773
Inlet, 5–10 cm April 0.0644 10.8 0.8970
Inlet, 10–15 cm April 0.0208 33.4 0.9320
Outlet, 0–5 cm April 0.0166 41.9 0.8938
Outlet, 5–10 cm April 0.0142 48.8 0.9556
Outlet, 10–15 cm April 0.0083 83.7 0.8777
Inlet-composite April 0.0166 41.7 0.9883
Outlet-composite April 0.0137 50.6 0.8973
Inlet, 0–5 cm August 0.1458 4.6 0.8554
Inlet, 5–10 cm August 0.1044 6.3 0.8614
Inlet, 10–15 cm August 0.0673 10.3 0.8771
Outlet, 0–5 cm August 0.0233 29.7 0.8703
Outlet, 5–10 cm August 0.0005 1303 0.9832
Outlet, 10–15 cm August 0.0004 1734 0.9286
Inlet-water August 0.0389 17.8 0.5888
Outlet-water August 0.0002 3084 0.0990
Cedar Bog 1 May 0.0053 131 0
Cedar Bog 2 May 0.0045 154 0
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–4794 4791
hybridized with PCR products of authentic atzA and
trzD. Thus, the Cedar Bog samples showed a low
potential for atrazine mineralization. Since the assay
system used in this study was based on 14CO2 evolution
rather than a decrease in the concentration of atrazine, it
is possible that atrazine degradation exceeded miner-
alization in Cedar Bog samples. The lack of PCR
products and Southern hybridization signals does not,
however, support this possibility.
Detection of the atzA gene in the Olentangy wetland
sediment samples was ambiguous because its presence
could only be confirmed by Southern hybridization.
While the data suggest that Southern hybridization was
more sensitive in detecting PCR products than SYBR
Green 1, the actual detection level of Southern
hybridization is unknown. For trzD, there was good
agreement with the detection of the PCR product and its
Southern hybridization signal. Both genes may index
atrazine mineralization. The atzA gene encodes a
chlorohydrolase at the beginning of the upper pathway.
The trzD gene is involved in the lower pathway and
encodes the cyanuric acid amidohydrolase that catalyzes
the ring cleavage of the heterocyclic s-atrazine. The PCR
product of trzD was detected in DNA in all Olentangy
wetland sediment samples examined (Fig. 5B). Because
trzD was more prevalent than atzA, it is plausible that
14C
O2
Evo
lved
(%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
InletOutlet
Time (Days)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0
20
40
60
80
UpstreamDownstream
(A)
(B)
Fig. 4. (A) Atrazine mineralization from concentrated wetland water samples taken in August 2000. Both duplicates of the inlet water
reached a similar Pmax value, but one had a 2 d longer lag period before the onset of mineralization. (B) Atrazine mineralization for
concentrated Olentangy River water. Samples were taken in October 2001. Standard deviations, if not shown, were smaller than the
symbols.
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–47944792
trzD and atzA represent genes from different pathways
of atrazine metabolism in native bacterial communities.
These results indicate that atzA, as originally character-
ized in Pseudomonas ADP, may not be the dominant
chlorohydrolase gene in this wetland system. The
recently identified trzN, a triazine hydrolase gene from
a Nocardioides soil isolate, is supportive of this conclu-
sion [18]. The corresponding amino acid sequence
showed insignificant homology to AtzA and the trzN
gene could not be amplified using atzA-specific primers
[18,19].
In conclusion, the Olentangy River receives agricul-
tural runoff and contains low mg/l levels of atrazine. Inthis work, the river water was shown to contain atrazine-
mineralizing microorganisms, believed to originate from
agricultural watershed runoff. The water from the river
feeds the Olentangy wetland cell, where the mineraliza-
tion activity was found to be more pronounced near the
inlet rather than the outlet. Thus, the mineralization of
atrazine in the wetland can be attributed to the actions
of microorganisms introduced from the river inflow as
well as by microbial populations already established in
the sediment zones. To our knowledge, this is the first
report of active mineralization of atrazine in a con-
structed wetland system without deliberate inoculation
with atrazine-mineralizing organisms.
Acknowledgements
We thank M. de Souza for the E. coli construct
containing atzA and J.S. Karns for the E. coli construct
containing trzD. Partial funding for this work was
received from the US Department of Agriculture, Grant
No. 98-35107-6388. Olentangy Wetland Research Park
publication No. 02-004.
References
[1] Hayes TB, Collins A, Lee M, Mendoza M, Noriega N,
Stuart AA, Vonk A. Hermaphroditic, demasculinized
frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low
ecologically relevant doses. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA
2002;99:5476–80.
[2] Ro KS, Chung KH. Atrazine biotransformation in
wetland sediment under different nutrient conditions-II:
aerobic. J Environ Sci Health 1995;A30:121–31.
[3] Kao CM, Wang JY, Wu MJ. Evaluation of atrazine
removal processes in a wetland. Wat Sci Technol
2001;44(11–12):539–44.
[4] Moore MT, Rodgers Jr JH, Cooper CM, Smith Jr S.
Constructed wetlands for mitigation of atrazine-associated
agricultural runoff. Environ Pollut 2000;110:393–9.
[5] Larsen L, J�rgensen C, Aamand J. Potential mineraliza-tion of four herbicides in a ground water-fed wetland area.
J Environ Qual 2001;30:24–30.
[6] DeLaune RD, Devai I, Mulbach C, Crozier C, Lindau
CW. The influence of soil redox conditions on atrazine
degradation in wetlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ
1997;66:41–6.
[7] Runes HB, Jenkins JJ, Bottomley PJ. Atrazine degradation
by bioaugmented sediment from constructed wetlands.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001;57:427–32.
[8] de Souza ML, Seffernick J, Martinez B, Sadowsky MJ,
Wackett LP. The atrazine catabolism genes atzABC are
widespread and highly conserved. J Bacteriol
1998;180:1951–4.
[9] Shapir N, Goux S, Mandelbaum RT, Pussemier L. The
potential of soil microorganisms to mineralize atrazine as
predicted by MCH-PCR followed by nested PCR. Can J
Microbiol 2000;46:425–32.
Fig. 5. (A) PCR products of DNA isolated from wetland
samples, amplified with the trzD primers. (B) Southern
hybridization of the PCR products with a trzD probe. All
DNA samples from Olentangy wetland sediments are from the
sampling in April, 2000. The Cedar Bog samples were taken in
May and June 2000. (Lane 1) 100 bp ladder; (lane 2) pJK204
(positive control); (lane 3) Inlet 10–15 cm; (lane 4) Inlet 5–
10 cm; (lane 5), Inlet 0–5 cm; (lane 6) Outlet 10–15 cm; (lane 7)
Outlet 5–10 cm; (lane 8) Outlet 0–5 cm; (lane 9) Cedar Bog site 1
sampled in May; (lane 10) Cedar Bog site 1 sampled in June;
(lane 11) Cedar Bog site 2 sampled in May; (lane 12) Cedar Bog
site 2 sampled in June; (lane 13) no DNA (negative control);
(lane 14) pJK204 (positive control).
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–4794 4793
[10] Shapir N, Mandelbaum RT, Fine P. Atrazine mineraliza-
tion by indigenous and introduced Pseudomonas sp. Strain
ADP in sand irrigated with municipal wastewater and
amended with composted sludge. Soil Biol Biochem
2000;32:887–97.
[11] Karns JS. Gene sequence and properties of an s-triazine
ring-cleavage enzyme from Pseudomonas sp. Strain
NRRLB-12227. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:3512–7.
[12] Ostrofsky EB, Robinson JB, Traina SJ, Tuovinen OH.
Effect of cyanuric acid amendment on atrazine miner-
alization in surface soils and detection of the s-triazine
ring-cleavage gene trzD. Soil Biol Biochem 2001;33:
1539–45.
[13] Ostrofsky EB, Traina SJ, Tuovinen OH. Variation in
atrazine mineralization rates in relation to agricultural
management practice. J Environ Qual 1997;26:647–57.
[14] Yassir A, Lagacherie B, Houot S, Soulas G. Microbial
aspects of atrazine biodegradation in relation to history of
soil treatment. Pestic Sci 1999;55:799–809.
[15] Soulas G, Lagacherie B. Modelling of microbial degrada-
tion of pesticides in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 2001;33:551–7.
[16] Surzycki SJ, Surzycki JA, Wagner R. Techniques in
molecular biology workshop: DNA sequencing, PCR,
and RFLP analysis. Laboratory Manual, University of
Indiana, Bloomington, IN, 1997.
[17] de Souza ML, Wackett LP, Boundy-Mills KL, Mandel-
baum RT, Sadowsky MJ. Cloning, characterization and
expression of a gene region from Pseudomonas sp. strain
ADP involved in the dechlorination of atrazine. Appl
Environ Microbiol 1995;61:3373–8.
[18] Mulbry WW, Zhu H, Nour SM, Topp E. The triazine
hydrolase gene trzN from Nocardioides sp. strain C190:
cloning and construction of gene-specific primers. FEMS
Microbiol Lett 2002;206:75–9.
[19] Topp E, Mulbry WM, Zhu H, Nour SM, Cuppels D.
Characterization of s-triazine herbicide metabolism by a
Nocardioides sp. isolated from agricultural soils. Appl
Environ Microbiol 2000;66:3134–41.
K.L. Anderson et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 4785–47944794